Monday, October 12, 2015

Exclusive: U.S. probes allegations AB InBev seeking to curb craft beer distribution - Yahoo Finance

 

By Diane Bartz

Related Stories

  1. AB InBev says talking to DOJ, California AG about two planned distributor deals Reuters
  2. Justice Department investigating A-B InBev for trying to block craft beer: Report American City Business Journals
  3. Big Beer versus Craft Beer: If You Can’t Beat ‘em, Join ‘em Market Realist
  4. Anheuser-Busch InBev to Buy Los Angeles Craft Brewer Golden Road The Wall Street Journal
  5. Anheuser-Busch scoops up another craft brewer CNBC
  6. 100 Rare Historical Photos...You'll Be Speechless Dunzo.net Sponsored

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department is probing allegations that Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI.BR) is seeking to curb competition in the beer market by buying distributors, making it harder for fast-growing craft brewers to get their products on store shelves, according to three people familiar with the matter.

In the past few months, the world's largest brewer has rattled the craft beer world by striking deals for five distributors in three states. Many states require brewers to use distributors to sell their product, and once AB InBev buys a distributor, craft companies say they find that they can't distribute their beer as easily and sales growth stalls.

Antitrust regulators are also reviewing craft brewers' claims that AB InBev pushes some independent distributors to only carry the company's products and end their ties with the craft industry, two of the sources said, noting that the investigation was in its early stages. AB InBev's purchase of several craft beer makers in recent years means that it is in a position to offer a greater variety of products itself.

State regulators in California, where AB InBev announced wholesaler purchases in Oakland and San Jose in September, are also looking into the matter, the people familiar with the matter said.

The beer giant confirmed that it was talking to regulators. "Anheuser-Busch has been in communication with the Department of Justice and California attorney general’s office about the transactions. We are working cooperatively to address any questions they have," an Anheuser-Busch spokesperson said in an email.

Craft brewers, who produce everything from well-crafted classics to odd flavors such as pumpkin or raspberry beer, have been a bright spot in an otherwise dull U.S. beer market. While beer sales rose 0.5 percent in 2014, craft beer sales rose by 17.6 percent to capture 11 percent of the U.S. market.

The Justice Department review comes at an awkward time for AB InBev as it is seeking to buy No.2 SABMiller Plc (SAB.L) for more than $100 billion in what would be the biggest-ever merger of brewers. AB InBev is widely expected to sell SABMiller's stake in U.S.-based MillerCoors if the merger goes through, leaving its U.S. market share unchanged at 46.4 percent.

Small craft brewers have already been rattled by AB InBev's purchases of craft beer makers, including Golden Road in September, Blue Point Brewing in 2014 and Goose Island Beer Co in 2011.

As AB InBev also snaps up distributors, craft brewers have expressed concern that the company would push distributors to only carry its products.

To retain the craft title, a brewery must make less than 6 million barrels annually. That means those that get taken over by a big brewer like AB InBev lose that identity even if they still make small batches with distinctive flavors.

It was not clear if other state regulators were looking at the recent purchases of two distributors in Colorado and one in New York as well.

The Justice Department declined comment. The attorney generals' offices for California, New York and Colorado did not respond to requests for comment.

QUICKLY STALLED

Nikos Ridge, CEO of Ninkasi Brewing Co in Oregon, said that when two of his distributors were bought by AB InBev in 2011 and 2012, he saw what had been healthy sales growth quickly stall until it found alternative distributors.

"Our feeling was that we weren't getting the same level of representation," said Ridge. "We saw our trends drop and we have seen improvements since we've switched."

An executive at a second craft brewer, who asked not to be named, said that AB InBev had recently bought one of its distributors. "It (the distributor) is slowly but surely divesting itself of everything that is not ABI. And we're one of the last ones," said the executive, who noted that its other options for distribution were limited. "We're at the mercy of a lot of big players."

Their experience is not unique. Conversations with at least four other craft brewers told the same story.

There were some 4,000 craft beer companies as of September, brewing everything from artfully made classics like Dale's Pale Ale, Brooklyn Lager and Gordon Biersch Hefeweizen, as well as quirky brews like Breckenridge Vanilla Porter, and the super hoppy Palate Wrecker from Green Flash Brewing Co.

A handful of antitrust experts say that craft brewers have a case, albeit not an easy one.

The authorities could step in if AB InBev bought so many distributors that craft brewers lost significant access to a local market, said Jonathan Lewis, an antitrust expert at the law firm Baker Hostetler LLP. He estimated that the breaking point could be when AB InBev owned some 50 percent of distributors in a given area.

Andy Gavil, a former head of the Federal Trade Commission's Office of Policy Planning who now teaches antitrust law at Howard University Law School, said he believes the problem could be resolved by scrapping a requirement for alcoholic beverages to go through liquor distributors in most U.S. states. That would allow the craft brewers to go directly to the supermarkets, liquor stores and bars.

"There are some older justifications that it's about preventing underage sales but since the ultimate sale is done by a retailer, that's a bogus argument," Gavil said.

(Editing by Soyoung Kim and Martin Howell)

Exclusive: U.S. probes allegations AB InBev seeking to curb craft beer distribution - Yahoo Finance

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Ex-Benghazi investigator: ‘This has become a partisan investigation’ hyper-focused on Hillary Clinton

 

    A former investigator with the congressional Select Committee on Benghazi says the probe into the Sept. 11, 2012, terror attacks that killed four Americans — including Ambassador Chris Stevens — morphed into a politically motivated mission targeting Hillary Clinton after the revelation that she used a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.

“This has become a partisan investigation,” Maj. Bradley Podliska, an intelligence officer in the Air Force Reserve, told CNN. “I do not know the reason for the hyper-focus on Hillary Clinton.”

Podliska, who spent 10 months as an investigator for the Republican-led panel, says he was fired in June for resisting pressure to focus his efforts on Clinton.

“I was fired for trying to conduct an objective, nonpartisan, thorough investigation,” Podliska said in an interview with Jake Tapper that aired on “State of the Union” Sunday.

Podliska said he is planning to file a lawsuit against the committee over the firing next month.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the committee refuted Podliska’s claims.

“We are confident that the facts and evidence give no support to the wild imagination fueling these and any future allegations, and the committee will vigorously defend itself against such allegations,” the statement reads. “The committee will not be blackmailed into a monetary settlement for a false allegation made by a properly terminated former employee.”

Clinton speaks at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s annual awards gala in Washington, D.C., Oct. 8, 2015. (Photo: Yuri Gripas/Reuters)

Podliska’s comments come amid mounting calls from Clinton and other Democrats to shut down the committee.

“This committee was set up, as they have admitted, for the purpose of making a partisan political issue out of the deaths of four Americans,” an angry Clinton said on the “Today” show last week. “I would never have done that, and if I were president and there were Republicans or Democrats thinking about that, I would have done everything to shut it down.”

Clinton is scheduled to testify before the committee on Oct. 22.

Last month, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested that the committee was summoned to derail the former secretary of state’s 2016 presidential bid.

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” McCarthy said on Fox News. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers Friday? What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought.”

But Podliska insists his motivation to come forward has nothing to do with Clinton’s candidacy.

“I do not support Hillary Clinton for president,” Podliska, who describes himself as a libertarian-leaning Republican, said. “I am going to vote for the Republican nominee in 2016.”

He said he decided to speak out because the families of the Benghazi victims deserve it.

“I knew that we needed to get the truth to the victims’ families. And the victims’ families, they deserve the truth — whether or not Hillary Clinton was involved, whether or not other individuals were involved,” he said. “The victims’ families are not going to get the truth, and that’s the most unfortunate thing about this.”

Ex-Benghazi investigator: ‘This has become a partisan investigation’ hyper-focused on Hillary Clinton

YWCA of Rockford acquires La Voz Latina - News - Rockford Register Star - Rockford, IL

 

By Lindsey Holden
Staff writer

Posted Oct. 8, 2015 at 11:00 AM
Updated Oct 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM

ROCKFORD — Two nonprofits are joining forces to better provide services to northern Illinois children and families.
Today, the YWCA of Northwest Illinois, formerly the YWCA of Rockford, acquired La Voz Latina, which is dedicated to helping the area's Hispanic children and families. La Voz will cease operations Friday, and move from 730 N. Church St. into YWCA's east-side facilities at 4990 E. State St. It also will maintain a west-side presence in Easter Seals Child Development Center, 815 N. Church St.
La Voz will function under YWCA's programming umbrella, and Executive Director Luz Ramirez will stay on as vice president. Nine La Voz workers will keep their jobs; three positions were eliminated. La Voz, which will retain its name, will expand into Stephenson and Jo Daviess counties. YWCA has changed its name to reflect its expanded programming across northwest Illinois.
Ramirez and YWCA CEO Kris Kieper said the acquisition will benefit both organizations, especially because they share similar missions. The acquisition made sense because both were spending money on such expenses as payroll, human resources and marketing, and .the YWCA is better equipped to direct and manage state funds.
"They mesh really well," Kieper said. "We work with so many families and so much of our work is directed at parents and children, and we share clients, so it just made sense."
La Voz, which serves about 7,600 families, struggled to remain open this summer amid the state budget impasse. Revenue from the state accounts for more than half of the $880,000 budget, so La Voz was tapping lines of credit to survive. The organization had been preparing to end services Oct. 16, Ramirez said.
"We're just waiting for miracles to come in," he said. "We knew that until the situation at the state gets resolved, we were going to be closing our doors."
Ramirez and Kieper were forced to cut some of La Voz's struggling programs but will maintain core initiatives: family advocacy, teen parenting support, parenting education classes and partner abuse intervention.
La Voz, like many nonprofits in Illinois, was forced either to find a way to continue programming or risk losing out on state money once an official budget is passed.
"We were told 'Either you choose to continue providing services or that contract may not be renewed'," Ramirez said. "In one way or another they did say it."
Kieper said nonprofit acquisitions and mergers are the wave of the future, especially for nonprofits with operating budgets of $1 million or less because the state has become such an inconsistent funding source.

YWCA of Rockford acquires La Voz Latina - News - Rockford Register Star - Rockford, IL

Corporate Welfare for the Kochs - The New York Times

 

FRIDAY, Feb. 1, 2013, was a red-letter day for a proposed Arkansas steel mill called Big River Steel. With a cost estimated at around $1.3 billion, the project, if it got off the ground, was expected to be the largest industrial development in Arkansas history, easily exceeding the cost of two Nucor steel plants situated just 30 miles from the planned site of the new mill.

As is typical of such things, the people who dreamed up Big River Steel wanted government aid that would help make the project successful — the kind of aid that groups like Heritage Action and Americans for Prosperity, both generously supported by the right-wing billionaires Charles and David Koch, derisively describe as “corporate welfare.”

For instance, the Arkansas Legislature was considering a $125 million bond issue to help pay for the mill’s construction, as well as over $200 million in tax credits for buying and installing recycling equipment. The recycling credits would go to the investors, though, not the mill itself.

The deal also depended on an $800 million 10-year loan from a German bank, KfW IPEX-Bank. That loan, in turn, was contingent on credit insurance provided by Euler Hermes, a credit agency like the Export-Import Bank of the United States. In America, of course, Koch-funded groups have led the battle to defund the Ex-Im Bank, which Congress declined to reauthorize this summer, in part because of pressure applied by those groups. (On Friday, Ex-Im backers in the House said they had enough support to force a reauthorization vote.) Opponents argue, among other things, that giant corporations like Boeing and General Electric that make use of the Ex-Im bank shouldn’t put taxpayers’ money at risk to finance their exports.

The Germans have no such ideological hang-ups. Because Big River Steel would be buying its steelmaking equipment from a German company, SMS Siemag AG, and because the deal would lead to German exports “while also safeguarding many qualified jobs for the exporter in Germany,” as a news release later put it, the German government was only too happy to insure the loans, through Euler Hermes.

So what happened on Feb. 1, 2013? On that day, the Arkansas Legislature was informed that Big River Steel had a new investor: none other than Koch Minerals, which is part of Koch Industries, the Koch brothers’ privately held industrial conglomerate. The Kochs, you see, had decided to take a 40 percent equity stake, making them the project’s biggest investor. In doing so, of course, the Kochs were taking advantage of the same “corporate welfare” they had long condemned — while relying on the kind of government credit agency they are trying to dismantle in America.

When I asked a Koch Industries spokesman about the company’s willingness to take advantage of tax incentives and other government goodies, he gave me the standard response to such queries. “Koch Industries has consistently opposed and actively lobbied against all forms of corporate welfare, including those we currently benefit from,” read an emailed statement. “With that said, we will not put ourselves and our employees at a competitive disadvantage in the current marketplace.” In other words, the Kochs believe there is nothing hypocritical about employing government subsidies they oppose.

But I’m not so sure. The Arkansas incentive package ultimately passed, the German government-insured loan was completed and the plant should be up and running next year. And thanks to the recycling tax credits, the Kochs will recoup a significant portion of their investment even if the mill never makes a penny in profit. Indeed, the Kochs’ involvement helped give Arkansas legislators the comfort they needed to approve the incentive package. It gave “validity to the project,” one state legislator told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

“We don’t have the budget to hire people to do due diligence,” says Grant Tennille, who was then running the Arkansas Economic Development Commission. “If people like the Kochs walk in the door, with a reputation and money, that’s a big deal.” In other words, the Kochs didn’t just take advantage of corporate welfare; their involvement was the impetus for the corporate welfare Big River Steel got.

Perhaps more important, the Big River Steel project offers a clear illustration of why those who want to put the Export-Import Bank out of business are dead wrong.

Usually, big new plants are built by existing companies, but that’s not the case with Big River Steel. It is the brainchild of the late John Correnti, a steel executive who rounded up bank financing and investors. (Correnti died in August; the new chief executive is the project’s investment banker.) A group of investors, even one led by a seasoned executive like Correnti, was never going to be able to get the $1 billion-plus needed to build Big River Steel without government help.

“Because of the size of the loan and the 10-year repayment period, private insurers would not have wanted to pick it up,” says Jonathan Bell, the editor in chief of Trade and Export Finance. “And banks wouldn’t have touched it with a 10-foot pole.” There is also usually a grace period during construction that would make banks wary, Bell adds. “This is exactly what export credit agencies are good at,” he says: stepping in to complete deals that make business sense but need the backing of a sovereign to complete.

This would seem to offer a rather resounding rejoinder to the right-wing refrain that giant companies like G.E. ought to be able to finance their own exports. Sometimes that’s simply impossible. SMS Siemag is a reasonably big company, yet there was no way that Big River Steel could borrow the money to buy its steelmaking equipment without the involvement of the German government. Understanding that, Germany facilitated the deal — because it would benefit German exports and German workers.

As for American workers, Big River Steel likes to brag that the mill will provide 525 well-paying jobs. But with the steel industry in a terrible slump, it will surely result in layoffs for other American steelworkers. Those nearby Nucor plants are operating at less than 75 percent capacity; other American steel mills are faring no better. Nucor, in fact, has tried to block Big River Steel, largely because it fears the effect the new mill will have on the steel industry over all. Thus are the Koch brothers helping German workers while hurting Americans.

Bell, the editor who covers export credit agencies, sounded appalled at the fight over the Export-Import Bank. “A lot of U.S. companies are going to lose business,” he said. Then he added, “Those Tea Party idiots have no idea how business is done in the real world.”

But the Koch brothers sure do.

Corporate Welfare for the Kochs - The New York Times

Governor’s Staff ceases travel reimbursements since July 1

image

Read the article at:  http://thesouthern.com/news/opinion/editorial/erickson/erickson-no-money-for-gas-either/article_99026a97-8428-56ac-904d-a2596911a986.html

Rauner focuses criticism on public sector unions - Blogs On Politics - Crain's Chicago Business

 

October 09, 2015

Rauner finally stumbles on a winning message. Is it too late?

Rauner-focuses-criticism-on-public-sector-unions.jpg

Photo by Charles Rex Arbogast Gov. Bruce Rauner

 

After nine months of all-out warfare with Speaker Mike Madigan and other Springfield Democrats, and nearly four months without a state budget, Gov. Bruce Rauner finally seems to have come up with a reform message that could resonate in this Democratic blue state.

The message is clear and direct and has more than a little truth to it: Government unions are getting rich off of you and your kids and need to be reined in before your property taxes go through the roof.

Unfortunately for Rauner, the new talk comes late, very late. Positions have hardened and a recalibrated message may not resonate the way it would have in, say, March. Plus, Team Rauner keeps adding in distracting stuff that it can achieve other ways and which will only provoke lawmakers. Stuff like term limits and remap reform.

Sigh! Better late than never, I suppose.

If you'll recall, Rauner entered office promising to reform or revamp just about everything that moved. His February State of the State speech, his first opportunity to fully present his plan and priorities as governor, included a stunning list of changes in how Illinois operates, from junking the way the state selects judges to passing an eye-ball spinning six constitutional amendments.

He declared war on organized labor as a whole, asking for right-to-work zones, cuts in unemployment insurance and workers compensation and a bunch of other stuff. In proposing too much and failing to focus on what must be any governor's top priority--enacting a balanced budget--Rauner gave Madigan the room he needed to avoid making any changes at all.

This week, a more restrained Rauner has focused on what he should have emphasized from the beginning: Public-sector unions really do have extraordinary control over who's elected to the Legislature and who lawmakers in an impossible conflict-of-interest situation.

Rauner essentially is right that, if you're going to freeze property taxes, you either have to come up with replacement revenue or cut personnel costs. He's right that, when it's been in their interest, Chicago Democrats have signed off on limiting union prerogatives, for instance clearing the way for a longer Chicago school day over intense union opposition.

Now, I don't endorse all of what Rauner wants to do, which comes pretty close to abolishing collective bargaining in the public sector. But labor groups that demand the right to retire with full benefits as early as their late 50s, who insist on 3 percent annual, compounded pension hikes in an era of 1 percent or 2 percent inflation are expecting to live better than taxpayers who pay the bills. As a matter of practical politics, Rauner has more potential to make a salable argument to taxpayers--the unions are asking you to pay too much--if he sticks to government unions and lets the private sector work on its problems itself.

Rauner says he's taken some stuff off the table, and he has, most notably local right-to-work zones. But even this week, he was still talking about how he needs legislative term limits and reapportionment changes.

Governor, you're not going to get that through the Legislature. Ain't gonna happen. You'd be smarter to take those issues right to the people in the form of petition campaigns to change the Illinois Constitution. Ultimately, such changes are going to have to be ratified by voters anyhow.

With Springfield at war, I'm not sure any of it will work now. But Rauner must have figured out by now that Madigan is not going to meekly fold his cards.

This now is about public opinion, a building state budget crisis and upcoming elections. Rauner finally is beginning to focus on what counts. It's a correct, if tardy, move.

Rauner focuses criticism on public sector unions - Blogs On Politics - Crain's Chicago Business

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Ben Carson–as described by Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

image

Early life

Carson was born in Detroit, Michigan, the son of Sonya (née Copeland) and Robert Solomon Carson, a Seventh-day Adventist minister.[4] Both his parents came from rural Georgia.[4] The results of a DNA test on the television series African American Lives estimated his ancestry as 20% European and 80% African, including ancestors within the Makua people.[5] His parents divorced when he was eight, and he and his ten-year-old brother Curtis were raised by their mother.[6]

In his book Gifted Hands, Carson relates that in his youth, he had a violent temper. Once, while in the ninth grade, he nearly stabbed a friend during a fight over a radio station.[7] After this incident, he began reading the Book of Proverbs, applying verses on anger and thereafter "never had another problem with temper".[8][9][10]

Carson attended Southwestern High School in Southwest Detroit where he excelled in JROTC, a program sponsored by the United States Armed Forces. He quickly rose in rank and was offered an appointment to West Point,[11] but never went on to serve in the military.[12]

Carson graduated from Yale University, where he majored in psychology.[13] He received his M.D. from the University of Michigan Medical School,[14][15] and completed his residency in neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore.[16]

Medical career

Carson was a professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and pediatrics, and he was the director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital.[17] At 33, he became the youngest major division director in the hospital's history as director of pediatric neurosurgery. He was also a co-director of the Johns Hopkins Craniofacial Center.

Carson specialized in traumatic brain injuries, brain and spinal cord tumors, achondroplasia, neurological and congenital disorders, craniosynostosis, epilepsy, and trigeminal neuralgia.[17]

Carson believes his hand–eye coordination and three-dimensional reasoning made him a gifted surgeon.[18] After medical school, he became a neurosurgery resident at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He began his career as a neurosurgeon, but also developed an interest in pediatrics.[18]

In 1987, Carson successfully separated conjoined twins, the Binder twins, who had been joined at the back of the head (craniopagus twins). The 70-member surgical team, led by Carson, worked for 22 hours. Both twins survived.[19][20][21]

Carson figured in the revival of the hemispherectomy, a drastic surgical procedure in which part or all of one hemisphere of the brain is removed to control severe pediatric epilepsy. He refined the procedure in the 1980s, encouraged by John M. Freeman,[22] and performed it many times.[23][24]

Carson has served on the boards of the Kellogg Company, Costco, and the Academy of Achievement.[25] He is an emeritus fellow of the Yale Corporation.[25][26][27]

In March 2013, Carson announced he would retire as a surgeon, stating "I'd much rather quit when I'm at the top of my game".[28] His retirement became official on July 1, 2013.[29]

Awards and honors

Carson is a member of the American Academy of Achievement,[30] Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society,[31] and the Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans.[32] Carson has been awarded 38 honorary doctorate degrees and dozens of national merit citations.[33] Detroit Public Schools opened the Dr. Benjamin Carson High School of Science and Medicine[34] for students interested in pursuing healthcare careers. The school is partnering with Detroit Receiving Hospital and Michigan State University.[35]

Writing

Carson is the author of many articles in peer-reviewed journals. He has also written six bestselling[48] books published by Zondervan, an international Christian media and publishing company. The first book is an autobiography, and two are about his personal philosophies of success (hard work, faith).

On July 8, 2013, Carson joined The Washington Times as a weekly opinion columnist. He also writes for American CurrentSee, an online publication for conservative African-Americans.[49]

Political affiliation and views

Carson said in 2013 that he was not a member of any political party.[50] However, he joined the Republican Party on November 4, 2014, the day the 2014 midterms took place, as "truly a pragmatic move" because he was considering running for president in 2016.[51] In his book America the Beautiful, he explained his decision to enter politics: "I believe it is a very good idea for physicians, scientists, engineers, and others trained to make decisions based on facts and empirical data to get involved in the political arena".[52][53]

Abortion and human fetal tissue

Carson has stated that he is pro-life.[54] After news about Planned Parenthood and undercover videos[55] revealed executives in the organization discussing the extraction and distribution of tissue from aborted fetuses, he condemned the videos and stated to Fox News, "there's nothing that can’t be done without fetal tissue."[56] Soon after, it was revealed[57] he had previously done research where the doctors applied, "human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation."[58] He was interviewed, after the research was identified, in order to resolve the apparent conflict by stating to the Washington Post, "If you’re killing babies and taking the tissue, that’s a very different thing than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it".[59]

Cannabis legalization

Carson is against the legalization of recreational cannabis. He believes it to be a gateway drug that leads to more serious drug use.[60][61][62]

Economy and taxes

Carson has suggested that the U.S. abandon its current tax system in favor of a flat tax, arguing that a flat tax would eliminate loopholes and cheating. During a debate on September 15, 2015, Carson called progressive taxation, "socialism."[63] Carson has also advocated for a national luxury tax on "very expensive items".[64][65] Carson believes in raising the minimum age to receive Social Security benefits, "because people are living longer, straining the solvency of the program".[66]

Gun control

Carson stated in a 2013 interview with Glenn Beck that semi-automatic firearms should be better regulated in large cities and high-crime areas.[67] This statement has caused some with conservative views on gun control to question if his views were at odds with most conservatives. Later, clarifying that "This isn’t any evolution of my views, just that I’ve learned how to express myself," he stated that he is strongly in favor of the Second Amendment and that while guns being used on innocent people "is horrible," it "is not nearly as horrible as having a population that is defenseless against a group of tyrants who have arms. And that is what we have to bear in mind."[68] He also said that if in a position of national authority, he would allow citizens to own any weapons, including automatic and semi-automatic guns, that they could buy[69] and that he would not support any efforts to restrict the Second Amendment.[70]

Healthcare
Affordable Care Act

On October 11, 2013, Carson spoke at the conservative Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C., where he called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) "the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery," further adding that it is a form of slavery because it "[makes] all of us subservient to the government." He claimed that the ideology behind the ACA originated with Vladimir Lenin, and quoted Lenin as saying that "socialized medicine is the keystone to the establishment of a socialist state".[71] There is no evidence that Lenin actually said this, but the purported quote appears on a number of conservative websites.[72][73] After an onslaught of criticism, Carson denied that he was "equating Obamacare with slavery" in an October 15 Washington Times column and denounced the "PC police" for attempting "to discredit and... silence" him.[74] During the National Prayer Breakfast, Carson said about the ACA: "Here's my solution. When a person is born, give him a birth certificate, an electronic medical record and a health savings account [HSA]".[75]

Criticism of health insurance companies

In a 2009 interview, Carson said that he found the "concept of for-profits for the insurance companies" absurd. He continued, "The first thing we need to do is get rid of for-profit insurance companies. We have a lack of policies and we need to make the government responsible for catastrophic health care. We have to make the insurance companies responsible only for routine health care."[76][77]

In 2014, Carson wrote in support of expanded use of health savings accounts, plus a system "similar to Medicare and Medicaid" to address "complex pre-existing or acquired maladies".[78] More generally, his position is that, "we need to remove health care from the political arena and recognize that any government proposals affecting the health of all citizens should be free market-based and should be so appealing that it would not be necessary to force citizens into the program."[79]

End-of-life care

In 1992, Carson wrote that aging and technological advancement will eventually lead to many people surviving their 100th birthdays.[80] He questioned the merits of prolonging life, citing the fact that "up to half of the medical expenses incurred in the average American's life are incurred during the last six months of life". He discussed the "dignity of dying in comfort, at home, with an attendant if necessary". Carson also stated: "Decisions on who should be treated and who should not be treated would clearly require some national guidelines... If a patient insisted on having everything done, consideration of more aggressive treatment should be given."[77][80][81] In January 2015, Carson stated that his views have evolved since 1992.[82][83]

Immigration

In the Washington Times, Carson wrote: "Once illegals have legal status, it will be difficult to deny them any of the multitudinous entitlements that are freely distributed throughout our society." Nevertheless, Carson believes that illegal immigrants should be able to register as guest workers and have a pathway to apply for permanent resident status.[66]

Religion

See also: Seventh-day Adventist theology

Evolution and creationism

Ben Carson endorses Seventh-day Adventist theology, which includes belief in a literal reading of the first chapters of Genesis.[84]

Carson's views on evolution and creationism have been controversial.[85] In a 2006 debate with Richard Dawkins, Francis Collins, and Daniel Dennett, Carson stated: "I don't believe in evolution... I simply don't have enough faith to believe that something as complex as our ability to rationalize, think, and plan, and have a moral sense of what's right and wrong, just appeared."[86] In 2012, nearly 500 professors, students, and alumni of Emory University wrote a letter expressing concern about his views in advance of his commencement speech. They cited a quote in an interview with the Adventist Review: "By believing we are the product of random acts, we eliminate morality and the basis of ethical behavior."[87] Carson clarified:

Those of us who believe in God and derive our sense of right and wrong and ethics from God's word really have no difficulty whatsoever defining where our ethics come from. People who believe in survival of the fittest might have more difficulty deriving where their ethics come from. A lot of evolutionists are very ethical people.[85]

In a 2012 address to a Seventh-day Adventist audience, Carson discussed creationism and the Big Bang theory. He applied a junkyard tornado argument to the theory, and said it contradicts the second law of thermodynamics.[88] He argued that retrograde orbits in the solar system are inconsistent with conservation of angular momentum, which he said invalidates the Big Bang theory. Lawrence Krauss argues that, as Carson argues that Muslim candidates should be subjected to scrutiny about their religious beliefs, he too deserves scrutiny for how his worldview is inconsistent with the consensus of scientific information.[84]

Separation of church and state and Islam

In a 2014 op-ed article, Carson argued that separation of church and state in the First Amendment Establishment Clause has been "reinterpreted" by progressives away from its original intent, and that "our Judeo-Christian values have taken a big hit in recent years, we have not yet reached the point of a totally godless government".[89][90][91]

During a 2015 Meet the Press interview Chuck Todd asked Carson "Should a President's faith matter [to voters]?".[92] Carson stated, "I guess it depends on what that faith is. If it's inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter. But if it fits within the realm of America and consistent with the Constitution, no problem." When asked by Todd whether he believes Islam is consistent with the Constitution, Carson said: "No, I don't – I do not." He further stated, "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that." He considers a Muslim running for Congress to be "a different story," however, saying that it would depend on who the Muslim is as well as their policies, just like it would be with any other person.[93]

Marriage and homosexuality

In March 2013, Carson described his views about same-sex marriage on Hannity, saying: "Marriage is between a man and a woman. No group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn't matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition."[94] Carson's comments drew criticism for using "gays" in the same sentence as pedophiles and practitioners of bestiality. A group of Hopkins students petitioned that he be replaced as the university's commencement speaker.[94][95]

Several days later, Carson withdrew as Hopkins's commencement speaker and apologized, saying that "the examples were not the best choice of words", adding that the Bible "says we have an obligation to love our fellow man as ourselves, and I love everybody the same—all homosexuals".[95][96] He said on CNN that he loved all people, whether gay or straight.[94] Carson added, "I was trying to say that as far as marriage was concerned, it has traditionally been between a man and a woman and no one should be able to change that."[97]

In October 2014, Carson was added to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)'s extremist watch list because of his association with groups considered by SPLC to be extremist in nature, "linking gays with pedophiles", and his comparison of health care and liberal government to slavery and totalitarianism.[98][99] In February 2015, the SPLC removed his name and apologized to Carson,[100][101][102][103][104][105] stating:

"In October 2014, we posted an 'Extremist File' of Dr. Ben Carson. This week, as we've come under intense criticism for doing so, we've reviewed our profile and have concluded that it did not meet our standards, so we have taken it down and apologize to Dr. Carson for having posted it. We've also come to the conclusion that the question of whether a better-researched profile of Dr. Carson should or should not be included in our 'Extremist Files' is taking attention from the fact that Dr. Carson has, in fact, made a number of statements that express views that we believe most people would conclude are extreme."[106]

In a March 2015 interview with Chris Cuomo, Carson stated that homosexuality was "absolutely" a choice, claiming that "a lot of people go into prison straight, and when they come out, they're gay".[107] In a Facebook post, Carson apologized, saying that he "[does] not pretend to know how every individual came to their sexual orientation."[108][109] In a Facebook post, Carson said that he supports civil unions for gay couples and that he has "for many years".[110]

National Prayer Breakfast speech on social and fiscal issues

Carson was the keynote speaker at the February 7, 2013 National Prayer Breakfast.[111] In his speech, he commented on political correctness ("dangerous", because it goes against freedom of expression), education, health care, and taxation. Regarding education, he spoke favorably about graduation rates in 1831, when Alexis de Tocqueville visited the United States, and when "anybody finishing the second grade was completely literate". He espoused the idea of a tax-exempt health savings account created at birth, that can be bequeathed at death, along with an electronic medical record and birth certificate. He supports a flat tax, which he calls the "proportional tax" in reference to the biblical tithe.[112]

At the White House in 2008 for an award.

The speech garnered Carson considerable attention because the event is normally apolitical in nature, and the speech was critical of the philosophy and policies of President Barack Obama, who was sitting 10 feet away.[113] Conservative commentators from Rush Limbaugh to Sean Hannity and Neil Cavuto of Fox News praised the speech as an example of speaking "truth to power". The Wall Street Journal titled one of its op-eds "Ben Carson for President".[114] Columnist Star Parker wrote that he "owes no apology for honest talk".[115] Fox contributor Cal Thomas and commentator Bob Beckel, however, found his comments inappropriate.[116][117]

In an interview with Neil Cavuto, Carson defended himself, "Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies".[118] On February 8, he appeared on Hannity, and said that he would run for president "If the Lord grabbed me by the collar and made me do it".[119]

After the speech, Carson said: "I don't think it was particularly political...You know, I'm a physician".[120] Regarding the policies of President Obama, he said: "There are a number of policies that I don't believe lead to the growth of our nation and don't lead to the elevation of our nation. I don't want to sit here and say all of his policies are bad. What I would like to see more often in this nation is an open and intelligent conversation".[120]

In the National Review, Jonah Goldberg compared Carson to Booker T. Washington,[121] while David Graham compared him to Herman Cain without the "personal skeletons" in The Atlantic.[122]

Carson's sudden popularity among conservatives led to him being invited as a featured speaker at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). He tied for seventh place in the Washington Times/CPAC 2013 Straw Poll with 4% of the 3,000 ballots cast.[123][124] In the 2014 CPAC straw poll, he came in third place with 9% of the vote, behind senators Ted Cruz of Texas (with 11%) and Rand Paul of Kentucky (31%).[125]

Carson had a strong showing in the polls at the 2013 and 2014 Values Voter Summits: in 2013, he tied with former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum for second place with 13%, behind Ted Cruz's 42%. In 2014, he took 20% of the Values Voter Summit vote to Cruz's 25% and came in first place for the vice presidential poll.[126][127]

2016 presidential campaign

Main article: Ben Carson presidential campaign, 2016

In January 2015, The Weekly Standard reported that the Draft Carson Committee had raised $13 million by the end of 2014, shortly after Carson performed well in a CNN/ORC poll of potential candidates in December 2014, coming in second in two different versions. He came in second with 10% behind Mitt Romney's 20%, but in the same poll with Romney removed from the list, Carson closed the gap with 11% to Jeb Bush's 14%.[128][129] The Wall Street Journal mentioned that the Draft Carson Committee had chairmen in all of Iowa's 99 counties, and that Carson had recently come in first place in two separate Public Policy polls for the state of Pennsylvania.[130][131]

On May 3, 2015, Carson confirmed his candidacy for President in an interview with a local television station in Cincinnati, Ohio. The next day, on May 4, 2015, he officially announced he was running for the Republican nomination in the 2016 Presidential election at a rally in Detroit, his hometown.[3]

Carson Scholars Fund

In 1994, Carson and his wife started the Carson Scholars Fund, which gave scholarships to students in grades 4–11 for "academic excellence and humanitarian qualities".[132] They founded it after reading that U.S. students ranked second to last in terms of math and science testing among 22 countries. They also noticed that schools awarded athletes with trophies whereas honor students only received "a pin or certificate".

Recipients of the Carson Scholars Fund get a $1,000 scholarship towards their college education. It has awarded 6,700 scholarships.[132][133] In recognition for his work with the Carson Scholars Fund and other charitable giving throughout his lifetime, Carson was awarded the William E. Simon Prize for Philanthropic Leadership in 2005.[134]

Personal life

Carson and his wife, Lacena "Candy" Rustin, met in 1971 as students at Yale University. They married in 1975 and have three sons: Murray, Benjamin Jr., and Rhoeyce. They live in West Friendship, Maryland, and are members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.[135][136]

Carson was baptized at Burns Seventh-day Adventist Church on Detroit's eastside. A few years later he told the pastor at a church in Inkster, Michigan he was attending that he had not fully understood his first baptism and wanted to be baptized again, so he was. He has served as a local elder and Sabbath School teacher in the Seventh-day Adventist Church.[137] His mother is a devout Seventh-day Adventist.[138]

Ben Carson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia