Wednesday, April 15, 2020

What is the truth regarding the check signature?



Trump denied he wanted his name on stimulus checks. Here’s how it happened.

Toluse Olorunnipa, Lisa Rein

3 hrs ago



Trump denies wanting to sign stimulus checks

When President Trump publicly denied on April 3 that he wanted his signature on stimulus checks that would be sent to millions of Americans struggling amid a pandemic, officials in the Treasury Department were already secretly working on a plan to get the president’s name on the payments.

Trump, who was reportedly musing about placing his signature on the checks as early as late March, defended the unprecedented move Wednesday.

“I don’t know too much about it. But I understand my name is there,” Trump said. “I don’t know where they’re going, how they’re going. I do understand it’s not delaying anything, and I’m satisfied with that. I don’t imagine it’s a big deal. I’m sure people will be very happy to get a big, fat, beautiful check and my name is on it.”

The effort to put Trump’s name on millions of “Economic Impact Payment” checks began shortly after the president on March 27 signed the bipartisan $2 trillion legislation aimed at stemming the financial fallout from a global pandemic that has halted much of the economy. It will be the first time a president’s name appears on an Internal Revenue Service disbursement.



While Trump has spent recent weeks talking with friends and supporters about his coronavirus response and his reelection campaign, the effort to place his name on the checks was largely kept secret until this week, with top White House officials in the dark until the plan became public. The White House press office did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

Some senior officials at the IRS did not find out about the plan until Tuesday morning, underscoring the unorthodox process that has turned Trump’s desire into reality.

After privately suggesting to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin that he be allowed to formally sign the checks, Trump settled for having his name printed in the memo section, according to administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

The placement of Trump’s name on the stimulus checks was taken out of the hands of the IRS early in the process, according to two government officials. The plan has been closely held within the IRS, and Commissioner Charles Rettig has not discussed it on his daily calls with his top executives, senior agency officials said.

When the decision came down from the Treasury Department late Monday that the first batch of paper checks would include “Donald J. Trump” on the memo line, it was announced to just five senior IRS officials.

The IRS, already tasked with quickly disbursing hundreds of billions of dollars in payments to Americans, is now rushing to prepare checks that bear Trump’s name. The signature line will continue to feature the name of a civil servant, keeping with long-standing practice, but the IRS must change the computer code to add Trump’s name before the Bureau of the Fiscal Service can print the checks, officials said.

On Wednesday, working remotely on laptops in their homes across the country, the computer code developers and testers on the IRS’s technology teams raced to program the agency’s mainframe computers to add the president’s name to the template for millions of paper stimulus checks.

They’re the first batch to be issued to Americans whose banking information the IRS does not have. With many Americans struggling to pay their bills, making the change and testing the new system must be done under a time crunch. The process is supposed to start on Thursday. The IRS and the Treasury Department said the last-minute change would not delay the payments.

Democratic leaders seized on a report in The Washington Post that the decision to put Trump’s name on the relief checks could delay the delivery of some of the payments.

“Delaying direct payments to vulnerable families just to print his name on the check is another shameful example of President Trump’s catastrophic failure to treat this crisis with the urgency it demands,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement Wednesday.

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.), said the potential delay reflected the “height of insecurity” by Trump. “In the midst of this crisis, President Trump is doing what he always tends to do: make it all about Trump,” he said.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) took to Twitter to voice her displeasure, calling the move “a cruel political stunt from a petulant man who’s failing our families.”

Some Republicans defended Trump.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said previous presidents took steps to show the public their role in stimulus efforts. Grassley issued a statement defending the decision as nothing out of the ordinary and carrying a “negligible expense.”

“Presidents regularly associate their name with economic stimulus programs,” the statement said.

The Treasury Department and the IRS pushed back against claims that Trump’s decision to add his name to the stimulus checks could delay their delivery.

“Thanks to hard work and long hours by dedicated #IRS employees, Economic Impact Payments are going out on schedule, as planned, without delay, to the nation,” the IRS said Wednesday on Twitter. “The IRS employees are delivering these payments in record time.”

Millions of Americans began receiving payments of up to $1,200 on Wednesday via direct deposit. Those electronic payments, which were part of a $2 trillion bipartisan coronavirus rescue package, did not include Trump’s name.

But for Americans who receive paper checks by mail — about 70᠆million of the 150 million who qualify — Trump’s name will feature prominently in the memo section.


On April 3, the president was asked about a Wall Street Journal report that said he had spoken to friends about wanting to sign the checks. He denied it.

“No. Me sign? No. There’s millions of checks,” Trump said. “I’m going to sign them? No. It’s a Trump administration initiative. But do I want to sign them? No.”

But the president often personalizes the pandemic response. In his daily news briefings, he spends considerable time describing what his administration has done to combat the pandemic.

On March 27, Trump lashed out against state governors who had criticized his response, saying any criticism of him amounts to criticism of the broader federal effort.

“I think they should be appreciative because you know what? When they’re not appreciative to me, they’re not appreciative to the Army Corps,” he said. “They’re not appreciative to FEMA.”

Trump has also indicated a desire to have the federal government provide unemployment checks to millions of out-of-work individuals, seeking to take over the role traditionally played by states. It’s not clear if the president also wanted to sign such federally provided unemployment checks.

Millions of Americans have already opened their mailboxes to find Trump’s name. In March, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent out postcards with the headline “PRESIDENT TRUMP’S CORONAVIRUS GUIDELINES FOR AMERICA.” The card included several recommendations for slowing the spread of the virus, including washing hands and avoiding recreational travel.

According to a person familiar with the conversations, Pelosi pushed Mnuchin during negotiations on the economic rescue package to ensure that as many checks as possible were deposited though direct deposit; she told House Democrats that she had told Mnuchin that to the extent there had to be paper checks, she didn’t want to see them held up for Trump’s signature or anything similar.

While several senior Trump administration officials said they did not know where Trump got the idea for putting his name on the stimulus checks, many said they were not surprised by the move. Trump has long exhibited a desire for featuring his signature prominently on objects, including newspaper clippings, stock market charts and even Bibles.

Hours after the House of Representatives impeached him in December, Trump signed copies of the two impeachment articles for a supporter, the Detroit Free Press reported.

While visiting Houston in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in 2017, Trump signed the wall of an events center that was being used to house storm victims and the homeless.

toluse.olorunnipa@washpost.com

lisa.rein@washpost.com

Josh Dawsey and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

Above is from:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-denied-he-wanted-his-name-on-stimulus-checks-heres-how-it-happened/ar-BB12GWKw

New Workmen’s Comp rules for COVID-19


Employers Say Emergency Rule Will Burden Industries

By MIKE SMITH APR 13, 2020

ShareTweetEmail

  • Screenshot of J.B. Pritzker via Blue Room Stream

    Screenshot of J.B. Pritzker via Blue Room Stream

    BLUE ROOM STREAM / BLUE ROOM STREAM

A group of Illinois employers say they are not happy with recent changes to the state’s workers compensation rules.

Under an emergency rule adopted by the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, essential workers who fall ill with COVID-19 are automatically assumed to have contracted it at their workplace, even if they work from home. That means they may qualify for workers compensation.

Governor Pritzker said these rules would give essential workers a safety net by, “ensuring that their workers’ insurance covers them if they contract COVID-19 while they’re on the job.”

Groups representing Illinois employers, like the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, said the rule change will require employers to pay for medical expenses and salary benefits without proof that the illness was contracted at the workplace.

In a statement, those groups said the emergency rule will burden industries already waiting on federal and state help with extra costs.

“At a time when the state is discussing how to provide relief for employers trying to maintain jobs, this move runs contrary in every way,” the statement read.

They also said the Workers' Compensation Commission may have violated Illinois’s Open Meeting Act in approving the move, which requires public bodies to give public notice of meetings at least 48 hours in advance. Business advocates claimed the rule was added with less than 24 hours notice.

Governor Pritzker defended the emergency rule during a daily press briefing Monday.

“Look, my intention is to protect the workers of Illinois, the people who are most affected by this COVID-19,” the governor said.

“We are in a pandemic, in an emergency. This is what we need to do right now to protect people.”

Above is from:  https://www.nprillinois.org/post/employers-say-emergency-rule-will-burden-industries#stream/0

Wage Garnishments can be suspended



Illinois announces new protections for residents receiving federal stimulus checks

April 14, 20203:11 pm

Andrew CarriganCORONAVIRUS,ILLINOIS NEWS,TOP STORIES


CHICAGO (WREX) — Illinois Governor JB Pritzker announced new measures to help ensure residents receiving a stimulus check will be able to use it on essential needs.
The governor announced the state is suspending laws that permit the service of a garnishment summons, wage deduction summons, or a citation to discover assets as part of consumer debt collection proceedings.
These protections are being put in place to help ensure the checks are being used on food, shelter and transportation, according to the state.
The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation also issued Best Practices to Illinois licensed lenders encouraging them to work with struggling borrowers during the pandemic to extend the time for payment, waive late charges, and defer collection measures.

“These measures are intended to assist those impacted by this emergency and in need of temporary financial assistance,” said Deborah Hagan, Secretary of the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.

The state says residents can also take temporary measures to protect their household income for family essentials by considering stopping automatic loan payments and rescinding wage assignments.

Above is from:  https://wrex.com/2020/04/14/illinois-announces-new-protections-for-residents-receiving-federal-stimulus-checks/

***************************************************************************************************************************

Debt Collectors Can Seize Your $1,200 Coronavirus Relief Check

Luke Darby

,

GQApril 14, 2020

By Wednesday, some 80 million Americans should receive a one-time $1,200 check from the federal government. It's part of the CARES Act, Congress's emergency coronavirus package meant to keep the country going through lockdowns and social distancing measures that states are implementing to slow the spread of the virus. Last week, a group of Democratic senators—Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Ron Wyden of Oregon, and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts—wrote to treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin to fix a glaring hole in the legislation. Missouri Republican senator Josh Hawley also joined Brown to reiterate the request. As written, none of the $1,200 can be garnished for any debt held by state or federal agencies. But the CARES Act specifically leaves out privately held debt, meaning that debt collectors can grab the relief payment before it even gets to the people who need it.

Despite 25 Democrat and Republican state attorneys general joining the senators, Mnuchin made no moves to protect people from debt collectors. In fact, according to the magazine Prospect, the Treasury Department informed banks that they were free to seize the money straight from people's checking accounts:

The Treasury Department effectively blessed this activity on a webinar with banking officials last week. In audio obtained by the Prospect, Ronda Kent, chief disbursing officer with Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service, can be heard explaining that banks had posed questions to her about "whether these payments could be subject to collection from the bank to which the money is deposited, if the payee owes an outstanding loan or other payments to the bank." She responded—twice—that "there’s nothing in the law that precludes that action," while counseling that the banks’ compliance officers should consult with their legal offices about what policies their banks will implement. "You will want to know for your bank what your bank has decided to do," Kent said.

Before joining the Trump administration, Mnuchin, a former Goldman Sachs executive, made his fortune by acquiring California’s IndyMac bank during the 2008 financial crisis and aggressively foreclosing on more than 36,000 properties, kicking elderly people and active-duty veterans out of their homes. Worth an estimated $400 million according to Forbes, Mnuchin is a tireless promoter of tax cuts for the rich, claiming as recently as February that "the trillion and a half dollars of tax cuts we have made will pay for themselves."

Mnuchin's belief that tax cuts for the wealthy are a panacea for any economic problem is widely held among GOP officials. According to a new report from the Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan congressional group, more than 80 percent of the tax breaks Senate Republicans included in the coronavirus relief package go to people making more than $1 million per year. This extra support for the already-rich—who currently pay 79 percent less in taxes than they did 40 years ago—is expected to cost $90 billion for 2020 alone.

Meanwhile, millions of Americans couldn't afford an emergency $1,000 expense—that was before the coronavirus outbreak caused more than 16 million people to file for unemployment in less than a month. And the unprecedented 16 million jobless claims is likely an undercount, since many states' unemployment websites crashed due to heavy traffic. So far most of the people who have gotten their relief payments have spent it on food, according to the Washington Post. The relief money, after all, is supposed to help working people survive and put some money back into the economy—not go straight into the accounts of debt collectors and bank executives. Daniel Ruffner, a cook in upstate New York who works at a restaurant that's not closed, received his check last Friday and told the Post, "I’ve just been stocking up on food and paying all of the bills. It’s nice to finally be able to see my bills go to zero." He reportedly spent the entire $1,200 check on groceries, Internet, heating, and rent.

Above is from:  https://finance.yahoo.com/news/debt-collectors-seize-1-200-202613979.html

April 15: 24,593 COVID-19 cases in Illinois



In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Gov. JB Pritzker has ordered Illinois residents to stay at home. Executive Order No. 10 requires all residents to stay home, with exceptions for essential needs or business activities. Gatherings of 10 people or more are prohibited. The order extends through April 30, 2020.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Illinois Test Results
Positive Cases
(24,593  4-15-2020)  (23,247 4-14-2020)  (22,025 4-13-2020)  (20,852 4-12-2020) (19,180 4-11-2020 ) (17,887 4-10-2020) (16,422 4-9-2020) (15,078 4-8-2020) (13,549 4-7-2020) (12,262 4-6-2020) (11,256 4-5-2020) (10,357 4/4/2020) (8,904-- 4/3/2020) (7,695-- 4/2/2020)   (6,980-- 4/1/2020) (5,994-- 3/31/2020)  (5,05--7 3/30/2020) (4,596-- 3/29/2020)
Daily increase in positive cases: 

Deaths
(948  4-15-2020)  (866 4-14-2020) (794 4-13-2020)  (720 4-12-2020) (677 4-11-2020)(596 4-10-2020) (528 4-9-2020) (462 4-8-2020) (380 4-7-2020)(307 4-6-2020) (274 4-5-2020) (243—4-4-2020) (210-- 4-3-2020) (157 4-2-2020)(141 4/1/2020) (99 3/31/2020) (73 3/30/2020)  (65 3/29/2020)
Total Persons Tested*
(116,929  4-15-2020) (110,616 4-14-2020)  (105,768 4-13-2020) (100,735 4-12-2020) (92,779 4-11-2020) (87,527 4-10-2020) (86,857 4-9-2020) (75,066 4-8-2020) (68,732 4-7-2020) (62,942 4-6-2020) (58,983 4-5-2020) (53,581—4-4-2020)  (48,048-- 4-3-2020) (43,653-- 4/2/2020) (40,384-- 4/1/2020) (35,225-- 3-31-2020) (30,446-- 3/30/2020)  (27,762-- 3/29/2020)

*Total number of people reported electronically for testing of COVID-19 at IDPH, commercial or hospital laboratories. Deaths are included in the number of positive cases
All numbers displayed are provisional and subject to change.

Information to be updated daily.

Above is from:  http://www.dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/diseases-and-conditions/diseases-a-z-list/coronavirus

*****************************************************************************************************************************

Home


PROJECTIONS from:  http://www.healthdata.org/research-article/forecasting-covid-19-impact-hospital-bed-days-icu-days-ventilator-days-and-deaths Now being updated three times per week.

Total COVID-19 deaths projected through August 4, 2020 in Illinois  (1248 4-13-2020)

(777 4-10-2020)  (1,584  4-8-2020) (3,629 4-5-2020)(3,386 4-2-2020) (2,789 4-1-2020)  (2,326  3-31-2020)  (2,369 as of 3/30/2020)  (2,454 AS OF 3-26-2020)

COVID-19 deaths   Peak deaths  (91 deaths on 4-12-2020)               Previously (208 on 4-12-2020) (109 on 4-20-2020)

For a lengthier discussion of the projection model go to:  http://boonecountywatchdog.blogspot.com/2020/03/forecasting-covid-19-impact-on-hospital.html

***********************************************************************************************************************************


***********************************************************************************************************************************************



*****************************************************************************************************************

This page summarizes the latest data for COVID-19 in McHenry County. This data is provisional and subject to change.

McHenry County

This page summarizes the latest data for COVID-19 in McHenry County. This data is provisional and subject to change.

McHenry County Confirmed


266

Source: McHenry County Department of Health

McHenry County Deaths


9

Above is from:  https://mchenry-county-coronavirus-response-mchenrycountygis.hub.arcgis.com/

*************************************************************************************

5 new cases of coronavirus in Winnebago County, total up to 124

April 15, 20205:19 pmAndrew CarriganCORONAVIRUS,TOP STORIES


WINNEBAGO COUNTY (WREX) — The Winnebago County Health Department is reporting five new cases of the coronavirus in the county.
The new cases brings the total number of cases in the county up to 124, which leads the Northern Illinois region. DeKalb County has the next closest amount of cases at 42.
The county also announced an employee at the Rockford Rescue Mission has tested positive for the virus. The Mission says they're working closely with the Winnebago County Health Department to take critical measures to prevent the spread of the virus to other staff and guests.

Here's a breakdown of the 124 cases by ages, according to the county:

  • 0-9: 0
  • 10-19: 5
  • 20-29: 18
  • 30-39: 16
  • 40-49: 26
  • 50-59: 24
  • 60-69: 19
  • 70-79: 10
  • 80+: 6

The county has reported 7 deaths related to the virus thus far.
As of Wednesday, the county has issued 1,803 tests for the virus, of which 124 have come back positive, 1,003 tests have come back negative and 676 tests are still pending.

**********************************************************************************************************************************************

Cases in U.S.

Updated  April 14, 2020

This page will be updated daily. Numbers close out at 4 p.m. the day before reporting.

***On Saturday and Sunday, the numbers in COVID-19: U.S. at a Glance and the figure describing the cumulative total number of COVID-19 cases in the United States will be updated. These numbers are preliminary and have not been confirmed by state and territorial health departments. CDC will update weekend numbers the following Monday to reflect health department updates.***

CDC is responding to an outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel (new) coronavirus. The outbreak first started in Wuhan, China, but cases have been identified in a growing number of other locations internationally, including the United States. In addition to CDC, many public health laboratories are now testing for the virus that causes COVID-19.

COVID-19: U.S. at a Glance*†

  • Total cases (605,390  4-15-2020) (579,005 4-14-2020)  (554,849 4-13-2020) (525,704 4-12-2020)  (492,416 4-11-2020)(459,165 4-10-2020) (427,460 4-9-2020) (395,011 4-8-2020)(374,329 4-7-2020) (330,891 4-6-2020) (304,826 4-5-2020) (277,205 4-4-2020) (239,279 4-3-2020) (213,144 4/2/2020)(186,101 4/1/2020) (163,539 3/31/2020) (140,904 3/30/2020)   (122,653  3-29-2020)
  • Total deaths: (24,582  4-15-2020) (22,252 4-14-2020) (21,942 4-13-2020)  (20,486 4-12-2020)  (18,559 4-11-2020) (16,570 4-10-2020) (14,696 4-9-2020) (12,754 4-8-2020) (12,064 4-7-2020) (8,910 4-6-2020)(7,616 4-5-2020)  (6, 593 4-4-2020) (5,443 4-3-2020) (4,513 4-2-2020) (3,603 4-1-2020) (2,860 3/31/2020) (2,405 3/30/2020)   (2,112  3-29-2020)
  • Jurisdictions reporting cases: 55 (50 states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Marianas, and US Virgin Islands)

* Data include both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19 reported to CDC or tested at CDC since January 21, 2020, with the exception of testing results for persons repatriated to the United States from Wuhan, China and Japan. State and local public health departments are now testing and publicly reporting their cases. In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.

† Numbers updated Saturday and Sunday are not confirmed by state and territorial health departments. These numbers will be modified when numbers are updated on Monday.(

Cases of COVID-19 Reported in the US, by Source of Exposure*†

* Data include both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19 reported to CDC or tested at CDC since January 21, 2020, with the exception of testing results for persons repatriated to the United States from Wuhan, China and Japan. State and local public health departments are now testing and publicly reporting their cases. In the event of a discrepancy between CDC cases and cases reported by state and local public health officials, data reported by states should be considered the most up to date.

† CDC is no longer reporting the number of persons under investigation (PUIs) that have been tested, as well as PUIs that have tested negative. Now that states are testing and reporting their own results, CDC’s numbers are not representative of all testing being done nationwide.

Above is from:  https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

Now being updated three times per week.

PROJECTIONS:   US COVID-19 Deaths thru 8-4-2020)  (68,841 4-13-2020)  (61,543 4-10-2020) (60,415 4-8-2020) (81,766 4-5-2020) (93,531 4/3/2020) (93,765 4/1/2020)   (83.967 3/31/2020)    ( 82,141 3/30/2020);  Peak Daily    (2150 4-13-2020)

Older Peak Daily Deaths (2,212 on 4-12-2010)  (1,983 on 4-11-2020)  (2,644 on 4-16-2020)(3,130 on 4-16-2020) ( 2214 on 3/31/2020) (2,214 on 3/31/2 020) (2,271 3/30/2020)

FROM:  http://www.healthdata.org/research-article/forecasting-covid-19-impact-hospital-bed-days-icu-days-ventilator-days-and-deaths Now being updated three times per week

*********************************************************************************************************************************************

COVID-19 Tracker   Great site to find specific county, state, country numbers is at:  https://bing.com/covid?form=msntrk  Site supplies case numbers, recovered cases and deaths.

Worldwide Total confirmed cases

Updated 4 min ago  World population:  7.8 billion    

2,071,710

Active cases

1,427,351

+56,358

Recovered cases

507,330

+36,583

Fatal cases

137,029

+11,833