Saturday, December 24, 2016

Groups Continue to Protest Proposed Great Lakes Basin Railroad Alternative Route

 

image

December 23, 2016

By Jean Seegers, REPORTER

JEAN SEEGERS, PHOTO – The Herald. Kathi Jurkowski holds a map of the proposed Great Lakes Basin Rail Project route. Jurowski and her husband own a farm on Yale Bridge Road. According to Jurkowski, if the route is approved it would impact not only their farm, but that of dozens of other farms and businesses, and potentially do harm to the environment and wildlife in the area.

The controversy surrounding the proposed 260 mile, multi-billion-dollar Great Lakes Basin Railroad (GLBT) alternative route continues to rage. Last September, the privately owned GLBT submitted a proposal to the Surface Transportation Board (STB) that laid out a route that would run along the west side of Rockford into Rock, Winnebago, Ogle and Lee counties instead of Boone County as was originally proposed last spring. According to the GLBT, the reason for building the railroad is to relieve congestion in and around Chicago, improve capacity, safety and the environment, and increase revenue. The route will begin in Northern Indiana wind its way north through Illinois, cross I-90 and end in Milton, Wis.

In a Natural Land Institute newsletter article addressing the issue, Executive Director Kerry Leigh said NLI is concerned about the siting and scope of the project. According to Leigh, the project would have a direct impact on the regions streams, surface and groundwater quality. Meridian Road is in the proposed route. The largest aquifer in Winnebago County is located in the area. “The (rail) route could create a loss of habitat and increased fragmentation and impact on endangered and threatened species as well as the extensive taking of production farmland,” Leigh said.

Groups of concerned citizens like farm owners Jerry and Kathi Jurkowski, who own a farm on Yale Bridge Road, have come together to protest the proposed railroad route. Jurkowski is worried that the freight trains could be carrying hazardous materials. “We are in limbo right now. Nobody knows what is going to happen.” Eminent Domain laws allow the government to take private property and convert it for public use. The government must provide just compensation.

“They would be taking 200 feet of our land. They pay for the strip, not the house or farmland,” Jurkowski said. “Our farm is very close to where they want to route the trains,” said another Rockton resident, Jerri Noller who lives on Shirland Road. “At a recent forum in Beloit, we were told that Eminent Domain laws are decided state by state. We also learned that the rail outline that has been drafted was done over 100 years ago and has not been updated since. During the last 100 years, many small villages and farms have been established.” Noller said her group has petitioned the STB relaying their concerns. Rockton Village President Dale Adams said the Village isn’t addressing the issue at this point. “More public hearings are scheduled in Boone and surrounding counties as well as in this area. “It (the railroad) probably won’t happen in our life time.” Adams said Rockton Township and the Village of Rockton have drafted a decision to oppose the railroad.

Winnebago County Board member Jim Webster is against the proposal. Many of Webster’s constituents live in the proposed area. He has put forth a resolution opposing the railroad development. The resolution was unanimously approved by the Board. Now it seems to be a matter of wait and see. Before the GRBT can proceed, the planned route must be approved by the Surface Transportation Board. The STB can reject the route and require the GRBT to come up with another route. Those opposed say they will continue to protest. The resolution of the railroad route lies in the hands of the ST

Above is from:  http://indreg.com/?p=2861

Friday, December 23, 2016

Boone County Board Votes for April Referendum

 

County Board Votes for April Referendum

HomeCounty Board Votes for April Referendum

Boone County Board votes unanimously to ask the voters on April 4, 2017 to increase the existing Public Safety Sales Tax by 1/2 cent to 1 cent. Please click here for more information.

image

image

 

image

Sales tax increase headed for Boone County ballots in April

Friday
Posted Dec 23, 2016 at 12:35 PM Updated Dec 24, 2016 at 12:14 AM
By Susan Vela
Staff writer

BELVIDERE - Boone County voters will decide in April whether to pay more sales taxes to preserve Sheriff Dave Ernest's public safety services.

Almost a month after the board decided to use $1.4 million in public safety tax money - the highest amount ever - to balance its budget, members are looking to increase the sales tax to bolster the sheriff's staff and fix aging facilities.

Board members voted unanimously Wednesday to place a tax question on the April 4 ballot.

It will ask voters to increase its public safety sales tax to 1 percent from 0.5 percent. Groceries, medicine and titled property like cars and farm equipment would be exempt. If approved, Belvidere's sales tax rate would be 8.25 percent, the same as Rockford's.

The tax will generate double the amount of revenue, from $1.4 million a year to $2.8 million - for day-to-day public safety operations in the county courts, jail, street patrolling operations, dispatch center and Public Safety Building. The tax increase would mean shoppers will pay an additional 50 cents for every $100 spent.

Sheriff Dave Ernest said the increase is needed. The department needs the revenue to retain - if not increase - staffing levels and make building repairs.

The county had to pay about $300,000 each of the past two years for overtime costs at the jail, Ernest said. Simultaneously, he has lost seven patrol deputies since 2008 through attrition. He hasn't been able to replace them because of budget concerns. Ernest and his deputies also have moved buckets around the courthouse because of leaky roofs.

"Our buildings are falling apart," he said. "We have ceilings falling down. That's an embarrassment. Clearly, it comes down to finances. I would love to say we don't need this, but I don't think we have any options."

Since 2000, voters have been paying the 0.5 percent sales tax to pay off construction bonds for a $9.3 million jail expansion. Three payments of $585,000 remain due. The last will be paid in December 2018.

If the renewal is approved, the increase could kick into effect within three months. The Illinois Department of Revenue approves the new rate. County officials are hoping the increased revenues will help them address some building repairs and staffing concerns.

"(But) this is going to be a tough sell," Board Chairman Karl Johnson said. "It's going to be a lot of hard work."

County Administrator Ken Terrinoni said board members had few options when finding more money for public safety costs. Along with some board members, he said that a sales tax was a fair way to proceed.

"Everybody pays it whether they live here, work here or (are) just passing through," he said.

Susan Vela: 815-987-1392; svela@rrstar.com; @susanvela

Above is from:  http://www.rrstar.com/news/20161223/sales-tax-increase-headed-for-boone-county-ballots-in-april

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Rauner contributes $50M to his re-election campaign fund

 

 

  • Tina Sfondeles

Gov. Bruce Rauner

Gov. Bruce Rauner | Sun-Times file photo

Although he’s been coy publicly about his re-election campaign, Gov. Bruce Rauner made a big-money statement about his desire to serve a second term, contributing $50 million to his campaign fund this week.

It’s a surefire sign the 2018 gubernatorial campaign may become the most expensive on record. And a Rauner operative called the massive contribution “a first installment.”

Rauner contributed $50 million on Tuesday to Citizens for Rauner, Inc, his campaign committee, according to filings with the state’s Board of Elections.

The contribution is the largest individual contribution in Illinois history. The second largest is also from Rauner, when he donated $10 million to his campaign in 2014, according to Sarah Brune, executive director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform.

Brune also noted the timing and amount is also unprecedented in Illinois elections.

The Illinois Republican Party is already launching attacks on potential gubernatorial challengers, including Democrats Chris Kennedy and J.B. Pritzker. A top Rauner operative said having a good chunk of early money allows them to determine when to begin the race and gives them “tactical flexibility.”

Hanah Jubeh, a Kennedy consultant, countered that the contribution is not a surprise.

“It’s no surprise that the governor is attempting to buy his re-election, because he sure hasn’t earned it,” Jubeh said. “If he believes his Christmas gift to himself intimidates anyone, he’s sorely mistaken.”

Steve Brown, spokesman for Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, on Thursday said the contributions show Rauner can’t run on his accomplishments alone.

“Looks like he’s running scared to me,” Brown said. “If you had the accomplishments, why would you have to spend that kind of money?”

A money war was also at play during the November election when Rauner spent record amounts to add Republican seats to the Illinois House and Senate.

Rauner spent a record $65 million during his 2014 campaign against former Gov. Pat Quinn. He contributed almost $28 million of his own money during that run.

The campaign jumpstart comes as a budget stalemate between Rauner and legislative leaders rages on, with a stopgap budget set to expire on Jan. 1.

Above is from:  http://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/rauner-contributes-50m-to-his-re-election-campaign-fund/amp/

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

FOIA Opens subpoena warrant of Wiener/Clinton emails

Lawyer: 'Appalled' by FBI warrant that shook Clinton

 

 

WASHINGTON — The FBI warrant that shook Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign in its final two weeks has been unsealed, and the lawyer who requested it says it offers "nothing at all" to merit the agency's actions leading up to the Nov. 8 election.

The warrant was released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Los Angeles lawyer Randy Schoenberg, who wants to determine what probable cause the agency provided to suspect material on disgraced congressman Anthony Weiner’s computer might be incriminating to Clinton. Weiner is the estranged husband of Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin. Under the Fourth Amendment, search and seizure can only be granted when proof of probable cause of criminal findings has been documented.

The letter confirms news reports in late October that the FBI had detected “non-content header information” suggesting correspondence with accounts involved in its already-completed investigation of Clinton's private email server. The FBI request concludes there is “probable cause to believe” that the laptop contained “evidence, contraband, fruits and/or items illegally possessed,” without providing specifics.

"I see nothing at all in the search warrant application that would give rise to probable cause, nothing that would make anyone suspect that there was anything on the laptop beyond what the FBI had already searched and determined not to be evidence of a crime, nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between" Clinton and Abedin, Schoenberg said in an email to USA TODAY. It remains unknown "why they thought they might find evidence of a crime, why they felt it necessary to inform Congress, and why they even sought this search warrant," he said. "I am appalled." The FBI's Manhattan office did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

In this Sept. 28, 2016, file photo, FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill.© Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP In this Sept. 28, 2016, file photo, FBI Director James Comey testifies on Capitol Hill.

Clinton campaign officials echoed Schoenberg's complaints Tuesday. Campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said on Twitter that the "unsealed filings regarding Huma's emails reveals Comey's intrusion on the election was as utterly unjustified as we suspected at time." 

The FBI concluded in July that there was no “clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws” and that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” Then, two weeks before the election, Comey sent a three-paragraph letter to Congress that said in the course of an unrelated investigation investigators found emails that “appear to be pertinent” to Clinton’s private email server. Comey also wrote that he could not assess whether the material was “significant.”

The letter was so vague that Clinton’s opponents seized on it to shift the narrative from a damaging drumbeat of news stories about Donald Trump, including his past treatment of women. Trump called it “bigger than Watergate” and predicted that the FBI would "right the ship" after previously deciding against criminal charges.

Comey’s investigation was the primary cudgel for Trump and his supporters, who claimed — falsely — that Clinton was guilty of “criminal” activity. His large rallies regularly chanted “Lock her up!” and Clinton’s motorcade was greeted in city after city with angry crowds waving signs.

Abedin’s lawyers have also been requesting permission to review the warrant, which they say their client never saw and hadn’t or even been alerted to, preventing them from responding publicly in the final days of the campaign. Two days before the election, Comey confirmed there was no new information.

At the same time, Comey was in possession of evidence showing Russia was hacking into the Democratic Party apparatus, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused him of holding back “explosive” information about Russian interference. The retiring senator said Comey may have violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits “activity directed towards the success or failure” of a candidate.

On Monday, former president Bill Clinton said his wife “fought through everything, and she prevailed against it all.” But she couldn’t endure the combination of the FBI’s interference and Russian meddling. At the end, “we had the Russians and the FBI deal. But she couldn’t prevail against that,” Clinton told reporters in Albany.

Republicans have mocked the Clintons’ contention and said it’s an excuse for some of the strategic mistakes the campaign made.

Yet the election was decided by the smallest of margins in a handful of Rust Belt states. Nate Silver, a leading elections statistician and editor-in-chief of FiveThirtyEight, says “Comey had a large, measurable impact on the race" and that she “would almost certainly be president-elect if the election had been held” the day before the letter. He cited late-deciding voters breaking strongly against her enough to cost her Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Schoenberg said more information needs to be made public before the matter is put to rest. "The FBI agent’s name has not been disclosed, but I think that it may be appropriate to find out his/her name and determine what the motivations were, since it must have been obvious to the FBI that there was no real probable cause to believe they would find evidence of a crime," he said in a follow-up email.  "It was very wrong for Director Comey to give that impression."

Schoenberg is a lawyer who gained notoriety by reclaiming Jewish-owned art seized by the Nazis and former president of the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust.

Above is from:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lawyer-appalled-by-fbi-warrant-that-shook-clinton/ar-BBxnnQ8?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Friday, December 16, 2016

WNIJ Series on Great Lake Basis RR

 

 

If you wish to actually listen to the story click on the reference given at the end of each story and and click on the”sound” symbol.

 

Lack of Information Leaves Rockford Area Ambivalent About GLBR Economic Benefits

By Chase Cavanaugh 4 hours ago

TweetShareGoogle+Email

One of the main arguments Great Lakes Basin Transportation Inc. has made in favor of its rail project is that it would act as an economic driver for the region.  Company lawyer Mike Blaszak says construction would create a significant number of jobs.

"Those of course, would be temporary," he said, "but the construction period would last at least two years."

Once the railroad is in operation, he envisions a smaller set of permanent positions operating trains, maintaining track, and other daily functions. 

"I’m not trying to set a bar here for what we ought to pay somebody, but railroad people typically make in the upper five figures," he said.  "We think that’s going to be an attractive option for people in the community who might be looking for employment."

As for the route's customers, Blaszak claims various companies have reached out, with a "substantial amount of interest" expressed in confidential meetings. 

A Planning Agency's Tentative Support

One of the groups which first examined the project was the Rockford Metropolitan Agency for Planning, or RMAP.  Per federal law, it plans and coordinates decisions regarding the region's current and future transportation networks.  In keeping with its name, RMAP works with Loves Park, Machesney Park, Belvidere, and Winnebago and Boone Counties as well as Rockford.

Executive Director Michael Dunn says their involvement with GLBR began early.

Michael Dunn is the Executive Director of the Rockford Metropolitan Agency For Planning.

Credit RMAP

“My predecessor, Steve Ernst, was the one who was mostly involved in the Great Lakes Basin Railroad project.  He had been working with the leaders of that project for the last three or four years.”

After examining the initial concept, Dunn says RMAP envisioned two potential benefits that GLBR could bring to Rockford-area freight transport.   

“There’s a linkage that is defunct between the Rockford airport and Rochelle that would be supplemented by the Great Lakes Basin Railroad and allow more throughput between the two communities.  Another benefit, if this happens, would be that traffic would be able to bypass the city of Rockford and not have to come through the central city.”

Dunn believes diverting these shipments could allow the area to modernize the Canadian National rail yards and put them closer to Chicago Rockford International Airport.

These advantages intrigued the RMAP board, which is made up of elected officials from the representative cities and counties.  In their June meeting,  six members voted in favor of a letter endorsing the project, and sent it to the federal Surface Transportation Board. 

RMAP believes the railroad could benefit freight transit through closer linkage to the airport.

Credit Chase Cavanaugh/WNIJ

However, one member of the body abstained, and Dunn says the letter doesn’t represent complete support. 

“That board did want to support this concept," he said, "but they withheld support for any specific route because we want to make sure that the routes are in conformance with the county comprehensive plan, RMAP’s plan, and all that.”

RMAP has a detailed greenways plan that maps environmentally sensitive areas throughout Winnebago and Boone Counties.   In their letter, the board noted they "do not have enough information from GLBRR to fully understand how the current route will affect the existing transportation, agricultural land use, and environmental asset-mapping plans for the region."

Local Business Groups Say It's Too Early

Despite GLBR's claims of "significant interest," other business groups have their own reservations.  Mike Nicholas of the Rockford Area Economic Development Council said he is trying to get GLBR founder and managing partner Frank Patton to speak with them so they can have a "better understanding of his plans." The Rockford Chamber of Commerce said they didn't have a position on the railroad. 

A UPS airliner being de-iced at Chicago Rockford International Airport. UPS has its second largest shipping hub here.

Credit Chicago Rockford International Airport

Shipping company UPS has its second-largest hub at Rockford’s airport and could potentially benefit from the increased freight traffic.  However, spokesman Dan McMackin said the line is not something they've studied.  He says one of their transportation managers would meet with GLBR next year, but it was too early to disclose anything. 

What Comes Next

Ultimately, the final path of the railroad will be determined by the Surface Transportation Board's environmental impact statement.   Dunn says before this happens, everyone needs more information. 

“Until there’s public participation on the routes, until routes are narrowed down, nobody’s going to spend the money to bring in-the-field research on whatever the final route might be," he says.  "Even then, the research might show that there’s some issues, and they’re gonna have to go back and refine again.  It’s a very long process.”

Great Lakes Basin founder Frank Patton recently filed a request to put the environmental impact review on hold.  Blaszak says that will allow them to provide more comprehensive information on the railroad’s business and operating impact.  Their request was granted December 13, but the Surface Transportation Board expects a progress report by Feburary 28. 

Great Lakes Basin can’t begin any construction until the STB makes a final ruling -- and that could still take years, even after the review process resumes.

Above is from:  http://northernpublicradio.org/post/lack-information-leaves-rockford-area-ambivalent-about-glbr-economic-benefits

 

Farmers Along The Latest GLBR Route Fear The Effect On Their Livelihood

By Susan Stephens Dec 15, 2016

TweetShareGoogle+Email

  • The Double-B Farm Country Store and Cafe in Beloit, Wis., is very near the latest proposed path of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad

    The Double-B Farm Country Store and Cafe in Beloit, Wis., is very near the latest proposed path of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad

    Susan Stephens / WNIJ

 

Meet some of the people whose lives could change because of the GLBR

Over the past year, through three iterations of route proposals, many landowners were outraged when they learned their homes and farms were in the path of a railroad that would divert freight traffic around the Chicago area. They took that anger to a series of sometimes raucous public hearings.

But it’s easy to lose sight of the individuals in a crowd. This isn’t just a gang of rabble-rousers; these are real people. So we met with opponents of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad on their own turf: turf that the rail company would like to sink its tracks into.

Kathi Jurkowski calls her herd to dinner. And it really is a herd -- of chunky, shaggy, skittish two-toned cattle. She raises these Scottish purebreds on her farm and home, Klover Korners in Rockton. They’re Belted Galloways, also known as “Oreo Cookie Cows” because of the white band around their middles.

Kathi Jurkowski lures her Belted Galloway herd with a bucket of bovine snacks.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

As she delivers an afternoon snack of a bucket of grain, Jurkowski points across the pasture. “So, see where that tree line is? That’s where my grandkids live," she says. "And that’s where the tracks will be. So I won’t be able to see them. We’ll just be able to wave at each other between the train cars.”

Her son bought the neighboring farm so his children could be close to their grandparents -- and the hunting was good.

Kathi and Jerry Jurkowski built their brick house 30 years ago in rural northern Winnebago County, not far from the Wisconsin border. They have 200 acres, with plenty of room for their Belted Galloways, goats, and chickens, as well as the corn and soybeans they grow to help pay the bills. It’s where they plan to spend the rest of their lives. Then, in September, they learned the Great Lakes Basin Railroad had changed its route. Trains would pass closer than 200 feet from their bedroom. Jerry Jurkowski says it goes beyond just the loss of part of their land. What happens to the remaining land is one of the reasons a number of county farm bureaus, such as Winnebago-Boone, oppose the rail line.

A Belted Galloway stands its ground in the pasture at Klover Korners in Rockton.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

“It makes many odd-shaped fields that are very, very difficult to work,” he says. “A triangle is probably one of the worst things to farm. And it’s making many, many triangles across the state.”

Within a few months of learning about the rail line, the Jurkowskis found themselves becoming experts in all things rail. Neighbors started meeting in their home to plan their opposition strategy. They’ve been outspoken opponents at public hearings. They’re active on anti-Great Lakes Basin Railroad social media sites. They’ve become a clearinghouse for yard signs. 

Jerry and Kathi Jurkowski in their Rockton-area home with Bunny the Dog

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

And Kathi has put together a presentation to take to area clubs and organizations. She says people throughout the region are learning they have something in common. “When you start over in LaPorte, Indiana, this is thousands and thousands of acres of pristine farmland," she says. "And they talk about creating jobs? What about the jobs they are taking away? Farmers hire people. Farming is a job.”

Then Jurkowski jokes this has been a heck of a way to make new friends.

A satellite map from the GLBT website shows how close the proposed rail line would come to the Double-B Farm, which can be seen on the left side of the map, near Beloit, Wis.

Credit GLBT / greatlakesbasin.net

About ten miles north of the Jurkowski farm, across the Wisconsin state line, is one of the area’s busiest best-kept secrets: Double-B Farm, Country Store, and CafĂ©.

Jim Lyga calls it “the most unique place I’ve ever found.” He’s a retired photographer who has parked himself in a busy part of the restaurant regulars call “The Room of Knowledge.” He says he shows up every day for coffee. Thursdays are special because his crew gets together to solve the world’s problems. They call themselves the ROTC: The Retired Old-Timers Club. Club members tend to have strong opinions on everything. They’re unanimous in their stance against the Great Lakes Basin Railroad.

Some of the regulars at Double-B Cafe in Beloit share conversation as they wait for refills.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

Joe Weum says, “It’s kind of like Standing Rock. They think they have less opposition so they can just bulldoze over us.” He lives about three miles from the proposed path but doesn’t want to deal with construction tie-ups and the fear of cars loaded with hazardous waste derailing. Retired Rock County Sheriff Howard Erickson says he doesn’t know anyone in Beloit Township who supports the plan.

Retired Old-Timers Club members treat the Double-B like home -- or better. They take turns refilling coffee cups for all of the customers. They even pooled their money to fix the driveway when it needed repair. They’ve looked at the maps and know the current proposed path of the train line is a threat to their gathering spot. The two-room restaurant is located in the front part of a barn built in 1850. Baby farm animals live in the back part of the barn, ‘til they’re old enough to move outside.

Barb Beeler does all of the cooking at her Double-B restaurant.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

This is Barb Beeler’s farm. Once she’s finished feeding her restaurant customers, it’s time to take care of the hungry crowd outside.

These are the cattle, sheep, pigs, and chickens that end up on her customers’ plates. She says the current path of the rail cuts off her house, barn, and restaurant from her pasture – the food source for many of her animals.

“So everything we have on the 43 acres is on the other side of the train,” Beeler says as she feeds the pen full of goats – and one sheep. “So when you pull into this lot, you see tracks. If it went up to the top and went straight by the power poles, wouldn’t affect us as much. But this is cutting us out of pasture land.”

The population at Double-B farm near Beloit is more than just people and "Oreo Cookie Cows."

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

Beeler isn’t sure if she and her husband can afford to keep their livestock if a rail runs between them and their grazing land. And it’s the farm-raised meat that keeps their restaurant viable. She also isn’t sure the limestone foundation of her sesquicentennial barn can handle the vibration of a train running less than a football field away. Like many other farmers along the route, she feels disrespected by the whole process. Great Lakes Basin Transportation maintains the path was drawn to have the “least impact” on people.

Beeler takes issue with that: “We are still people. We are not packed together, but we are still people. We count," she says. "Don’t call us a wasteland. You can’t make more ag land. Once you take it away, that’s it. It’s done.”

Like others who have protested in meetings and comments submitted to the federal agency in charge of approving rail projects, Beeler says she is living in limbo. “Do I have to sit for two years and wonder, ‘Am I gonna have a train in my yard?’”

The wait probably will be that long. Building a railroad from scratch is a long process. Frank Patton, the founder and chairman of Great Lakes Basin Transportation, says America has forgotten how to build railroads. And, at this point, it’s in the hands of the Surface Transportation Board.

“It’s a new day, it’s a new process,” Patton said after a public meeting in Grundy County, “We will obey the law and follow the permitting processes. We want everyone to stay informed as we move forward. We want to talk to every property owner eventually, but it’s too early now. But within a year or two. There are some terrific ideas coming in through our website, and it just shows there’s no monopoly on wisdom.”

So, while the wheels of bureaucracy turn slowly along the tracks in Washington, opponents of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad are encouraging each other to continue their fight. That means telling their story to whomever will listen and keeping the comments flowing to the Surface Transportation Board.

Above is from:  http://northernpublicradio.org/post/farmers-along-latest-glbr-route-fear-effect-their-livelihood

 

 

The GLBR From Start To Nowhere Near Finish

By Susan Stephens Dec 15, 2016

TweetShareGoogle+Email

  • Proposed path of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad

    Proposed path of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad

    Great Lakes Basin Transportation / greatlakesbasin.net

 

What’s the Great Lakes Basin Railroad and why should I care?

The GLBR is a proposed railway that, if you live in northern Illinois, southern Wisconsin, or northwest Indiana, you’ve either never heard of or have spent a lot of time learning about over the last year.

Under the current route proposal, the Great Lakes Basin Railroad would enter Kankakee County, Illinois, just below the Will County line, traveling west-southwest to enter Grundy County a couple of miles above its southern boundary.

The route then angles northwest and enters LaSalle County at roughly the southern border of Kendall County, heading northwest into Lee County about two miles west of the DeKalb County line. It goes north to parallel Interstate 39 to just north of Rochelle in Ogle County, where it jogs west and heads up into Winnebago County just west of the Chicago Rockford International Airport.

The route then meanders through western Winnebago County into Rock County, Wisconsin, less than 10 miles west of Beloit. It crosses Interstate 90/39 a few miles north of Beloit and then heads north to a point east of Milton where it would join the Wisconsin and Southern Railroad, which provides connections to Milwaukee.

Examining maps of the proposed railroad in Morris, IL, May, 2016

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

Simply put, it’s a big ring around the Chicago area, way outside Chicago. There would be a 15-thousand acre rail port near Manteno, not far from the proposed “Third Chicago Airport” in Peotone. The reason this rail runs so far out beyond the Chicago suburbs is to avoid the traffic. That’s the point. The Great Lakes Basin Railroad would route traffic around Chicago-area congestion while creating connections for other railroads that want to move faster within the region. This is not about commuter rail.

Who’s behind it?

It’s the brainchild -- and dream -- of Frank Patton. He lives in Will County, is a former computer programmer, and founded a software company serving the financial industry. The Great Lakes Basin railroad started as an idea to run a toll railway along the proposed Illiana Expressway, which was supposed to relieve highway congestion. The Illiana was eventually tabled, and Patton started looking at other ways to relieve rail back-ups in Chicago. He founded Great Lakes Basin Transportation five years ago and partnered with Jim Wilson, who has experience in operations for Santa Fe Railroad. What they’ve come up with is a 260 mile, $8 billion project. They want to reduce freight rail travel time in the Chicago area from 30 hours to 8. Frank Patton says “This is a plan that according to people who understand the process, and what could end up after it’s built, could have a huge impact on the economy of region, on successive generations.”

Frank Patton speaks to a raucous crowd at Morris High School.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

$8 billion? Who’s going to pay for this project?

Patton says it’s privately funded. He won’t say who the investors are because he says he has non-disclosure agreements with them. The company insists taxpayers won’t get stuck paying for anything.

This is the third iteration of this route. How was it chosen and why the changes?

Patton says there are three criteria for the route: It can’t cross through heavily populated areas; there has to be a connection with the tracks belonging to all six of the major rail companies going in and out of Chicago; and they need to stay away from wetlands. The problem is that there are a lot of potential obstacles along the way: wetlands, cemeteries, four major rivers, and a lot of angry residents -- especially farmers. They made their voices heard, quite loudly and clearly, at public meetings earlier this year.

Opposition from town governments and homeowners along a route that would have entered Wisconsin east of Rockford, from Boone County, helped push the GLBR onto a new path in September. The current route, any route, would need a lot of fine-tuning before this thing gets built.

There’s a lot of opposition?

Anti-GLBR groups are unified.

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

Oh, yes. Rock Against the Rail, Block GLB, RAILED, Citizens Against the GLB Railroad … Thousands of well-organized people have planted signs in their yards, called their Congressmen, shared endless amounts of information on social media and, most importantly, filed their comments objecting to the project with the Surface Transportation Board.

What’s that?

The STB is part of U.S. Department of Transportation. It’s in the process of preparing a review of the environmental impact of this project. It takes about two years. They’ve held public meetings and have gathered thousands of comments on their website from residents, businesses, organizations, and governments. The communications with the STB are available for everyone to see on their website.

What’s in it for the landowners?

They get $20,000 an acre, according to Patton. But you have to realize that their land would be purchased in strips 200 feet wide. So they’ll have to do some serious math to figure out how much they’d get for selling their land. (A strip that wide and not quite 220 feet long is an acre.) If they refuse to sell, there’s a chance they’d get a lot less for it after the legal process. In this region, land outside heavily populated areas is very often farmland, and farmers don’t appreciate being told their livelihoods are less important than others. That’s one reason that state Farm Bureaus object. Some farms would be bisected. Barb Beeler owns a farm near Beloit, Wisconsin, and has a little restaurant where she serves her farm-raised meats. The rail line is on track to cut through her farm, near the restaurant, cutting off access to pasture for some of her animals. She says she won’t be able to afford to feed them if that happens. Beeler says it’s frustrating not knowing for two years if she will have a train in her backyard.

Barb Beeler and friend, at the Double B Cafe in Beloit

Credit Susan Stephens / WNIJ

As for landowners, Frank Patton has also promised free electricity to homeowners along the route and the potential for personal rail access, which might be appealing to businesses or very large farms.

Wait. Free electricity? How?

The company isn’t saying how or why, just that it will supply free electricity to the landowners and their immediate heirs, to one home on land connected to the right-of-way. As you can imagine, opponents are skeptical. And it also spurs speculation that the company wants these 200-foot-wide right-of-ways for more than a train: Opponents want to know if the land they sell will be used for other purposes, such as power lines or oil and gas pipelines.

Why not use existing rail lines? There are tracks everywhere around the region.

The company says using existing 19th century railroad beds would route their railroad through population centers, which defeats their purpose. There’s an alternative that opponents of this project point to: an organization called CREATE. It’s a coalition started in 2003 involving the U.S. and Illinois Departments of Transportation, the City of Chicago, regional passenger rail lines, and national freight rail companies. They are spending billions improving existing rail corridors and crossings to speed up freight and passenger rail. Supporters of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad say it will enhance CREATE’s efforts.

What’s next?

The public comment period ended in June, but the most recent route changes were announced in September: people can still send their comments to the Surface Transportation Board. The Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis is reviewing the project. Meanwhile, Great Lakes Basin Transportation wants to suspend the environmental review so it can focus on its entire application. They plan to file their application to build the railroad sometime next year and Patton has stated he wants to start building in 2018. Meanwhile, opponents are asking the government to hold more public meetings because of the route change.

Above is from:  http://northernpublicradio.org/post/glbr-start-nowhere-near-finish

 

Railroad Will Need Eminent Domain Powers To Acquire Land

By Chase Cavanaugh Dec 14, 2016

TweetShareGoogle+Email

  • Susan Stephens/WNIJ

 

Before a company like Great Lakes Basin can build a railroad, it needs land.  And since much of that land is privately owned, the firm needs a way to buy it. 

How can a company like Great Lakes Basin Transportation convince people to sell their land when it's needed for their project?  

Large transportation projects like railroads and interstate railways engender resistance from people whose land lies on its route.  However, if they all refused to sell parts of their land, none of this infrastructure could get built.  That's why governments and private companies make use of a legal procedure called eminent domain.

What is eminent domain?

The company in charge of the project (in this case, Great Lakes Basin Transportation Inc.) plans their route.  Once the company has a definitive path, they'll have an idea of what land they need.  This process would allow them to purchase the land they need outright. 

What is the legal basis for this power, and how does a company obtain the privilege in  Illinois? 

The concept comes from the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  The final clause says private property can't be seized by the government unless "just compensation" is given to the owner.  Traditionally, this is interpreted as the fair-market value of the land.  

States have their own rules on who can make use of eminent domain.  In Illinois, a list of these groups is maintained by the state government.  Certain parties, such as the Department of Transportation, always have eminent domain authority, since it's essential for major road projects.  However, entities that aren't on the list, such as GLBT, need to petition for the privilege on a case-by-case basis.   If approved, the company has eminent domain authority for their specific project. 

To whom does a private company need to petition for eminent domain rights?

Most parties need to send a proposal to the General Assembly.  However, public utilities instead make their case to the Illinois Commerce Commission.  There's an exception in the law for railroads, like the GLBR.  These projects are pitched to the Surface Transportation Board, a regulatory body under the federal Department of Transportation.  

What conditions must these projects meet to receive approval? 

Charles Davidson is an MAI-designated real estate appraiser based in Rockford.

Charles Davidson is a Rockford-based real estate appraiser.  He says projects need to meet three general conditions. 

"The first one is they have to have the authority to actually condemn property," he says.  "The second is they have to have a project for the public good, and the third is it has to be a necessary project."  

What qualifies as "necessary?"

Davidson says the definition can vary. 

"Some projects, especially road projects, have very obvious safety reasons.  If they're going to reduce a hill or a blind spot that causes a lot of accidents, they might have to acquire land so they can lower the hill and spread it out." 

However, more economically-oriented projects may have trouble meeting this condition.  The Rock Island Clean Line is a project that would build transmission lines from Iowa through Whiteside, Henry, LaSalle, Bureau, and Grundy Counties. The project was approved by the Illinois Commerce Commission.  However, an appellate court later ruled it didn't meet two conditions to qualify as a public utility.  That case is being appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court.  But even before the appellate ruling, the Commerce Commission had not granted eminent domain rights. 

If the Great Lakes Basin Railroad is approved, how does the eminent domain process proceed?

The company would first send an appraiser like Davidson to examine the land.  Similar to how real estate agents value open houses, he would compare neighbors' land to establish the local market price.  His price would normally be close to that figure, but Illinois law specifically incorporates damage from a large project into the final property value. 

“If you had a nice rectangular field, that’s very efficient to farm," Davidson says.  "If you do a cut and put angles in that or make an irregular line, that makes it less efficient to farm and that creates a damage to the remainder.  You can offset that with a special benefit to that property, but that’s all.  They (the owners) always get paid for what’s taken.”

In a few cases, Davidson says it's even possible to improve the value of the property.  

"If you’re going to buy some farmland right next to where a highway passes another highway and you’re going to put in an interchange, all of a sudden you can boost the value of that land significantly.  In that case, obviously, the minimum you’re going to pay is zero, and you’re not going to hand a bill to the property owner."

Is the owner limited to the price they're quoted? 

No. Davidson says once the property is appraised, they send out a negotiator, who has some wiggle room.  

"The negotiator is not necessarily bound to that exact amount on the appraisal.  He has some leeway, usually at least 10% without any problem," he explains.  "And if the property owner can show that the appraiser has failed to recognize some element of compensation or value, then they may actually change it considerably or send the appraiser back to take a second look." 

Can companies pay more than the appraised value? 

Yes, and it's often to their advantage in terms of landowners' willingness to make the sale. 

GLBR lawyer Mike Blaszak says the company intends to pay $20,000 per acre of farmland.  He says that price "substantially exceeds the current fair market value if it were to be sold as farmland." 

What does a company do if the owner won't make a sale?

They can initiate a legal process called "quick-take."  Both the condemning authority (the legal term for the company with eminent domain rights) and the owner meet in court. 

The company demonstrates they've gone through the appraisal process and that they can't reach an agreement.  The property is deeded to the state, and money is put into an escrow account that the owner has access to.  The amount is based on the property's appraised value.

At this point, however, Davidson says there is no decision on record. 

"The condemning authority has title of the property," he explains.  "They can continue with their project, but they continue to negotiate with the property owner, and if they really can't reach an agreement at some point, then it will actually go to trial."   

Davidson says trials are uncommon (he says he was involved in 5 total out of more than a thousand quick-take cases).  This is due to their expense, time commitment, and negative effect on both parties' relationship.  The vast majority of quick-take cases end in a settlement.  

Is eminent domain the same across state lines?

The overall process is the same (map out project, value property, make an offer, and use quick-take if necessary).  However, the conditions companies need to meet when presenting their project differ.  There may also be a distinction between public and private projects.  

Mark Spreitzer represents the 45th District of the Wisconsin State Assembly.

Credit legis.wisconsin.gov

A couple of Beloit-area lawmakers are trying to put forward a proposal to remove Wisconsin eminent domain authority from private companies. State Rep. Mark Spreitzer says his constituents are concerned about businesses having this power, and he's trying to send that message to other lawmakers. 

"And my message to them would certainly be that something like this could happen in their district and these laws were written way before anything like this was anticipated, way before people live in the kind of density that they do now." 

Finally, when could the Great Lakes Basin Railroad start making use of eminent domain?

The Surface Transportation Board needs to finish reviewing the railroad's proposed route.  Specifically it must draft an environmental impact statement.  This details the various ways in which the railroad could impact the land through which it passes.  Until the STB releases this statement and approves the proposed route or an alternative, GLBT cannot invoke eminent domain.

Above is from:  http://northernpublicradio.org/post/railroad-will-need-eminent-domain-powers-acquire-land

 

Great Lakes Basin Railroad Factors In Geography, But Environmental Questions Remain

By Jenna Dooley Dec 12, 2016

TweetShareGoogle+Email

  • A pond behind Kathi and Jerry Jurkowski's home in Rockton is for more than aesthetics: It helps drainage in an area with a high water table. Opponents of the GLBR say the area in northern Illinois is too swampy to support the necessary infrastructure.

    A pond behind Kathi and Jerry Jurkowski's home in Rockton is for more than aesthetics: It helps drainage in an area with a high water table. Opponents of the GLBR say the area in northern Illinois is too swampy to support the necessary infrastructure.

    Susan Stephens

Listen

Listening...

0:00

/

6:47

WNIJ's Jenna Dooley highlights some of the environmental questions surrounding the Great Lakes Basin Railroad project.

AMC's Hell on Wheels is a fictionalized version of the construction of the First Transcontinental Railroad across the Wild West in the 1860s.

The show draws much of its drama from a greedy tycoon who encourages workers to weave and wind tracks every which way to maximize profit—with little regard for the land.

Upon seeing a blueprint, self-proclaimed "villain" Thomas Durant laments, "Why have you made my road so straight?"

That is not so easy to get away with these days. 

What type of geography is along the proposed route?

Mike Blaszak is a lawyer representing Great Lakes Basin Transportation, Inc. He says the plan is to avoid "hairpin" turns because a straight path allows the trains to reach higher speeds. Blaszak says great care has been taken to get the lay of the land.

This is a map of the current route proposal for the Great Lakes Basin Railroad.

Credit Great Lakes Basin Transportation, Inc.

"If somebody brought up that there was a feature that exists in the land that we weren't familiar with ... for example, I can think of one that was an old cemetery," Blaszak said. "It was an old cemetery that didn't do any marketing, but we found that there was one close to the route. We were able to adjust the route for that. We looked at river crossings. We are going to cross four major rivers. There will be four major bridges on the route. We are trying to select the river crossings that are the shortest and have the least environmental impact and make the most sense with respect to building the railroad."   

How does the federal government come into this conversation?

The level of environmental scrutiny slows the process down considerably. Blaszak explains that there has to be an Environmental Impact Statement in order for the federal government to take any action on a requested permit.

Great Lakes Basin Transportation, Inc. is requesting a pause in that process, but Blaszak says he doesn't expect that will delay the overall timeline.

He says federal Surface Transportation Board members also have to approve construction in a separate process based on the law in which the potential transportation and financial impact are presented. 

And when the Environmental Impact Statement is finalized, the board can act on the application and "approve" or "approve with conditions," or "reject" it. Blaszak says that could take another two years, but it is up to the Surface Transportation Board to create the precise timeline.  

"When the STB acts, if it approves the railroad, then we would begin land acquisition and construction," Blaszak said.

What is the current impact of trains on the environment?

Mike Phillips, a geologist with Illinois Valley Community College in Oglesby,  says a railroad of this scale can be a trade-off for the region.

"We already have a lot of trains going through the area. They go into Chicago, they get stalled in Chicago for traffic reasons," Phillips says. "While all the trains are sitting there, they are dripping on the railroad tracks a little bit, but more significantly, they're putting emissions into the air. That is unnecessary if they are just sitting there. One of the positives of this rail line is to keep the trains moving around Chicago, [which] means you are getting more distance per unit of pollution that you are putting out." 

Geologically speaking, would the concern for the proposed route be for worst-case scenario instead of day-to-day issues?

Phillips says, "Just like if you are next to a highway, things drip off vehicles and things are going to drip off train engines. It is relatively small amounts. Things might fall out of railcars if they don't have perfect containment. Things drip out. Over time, that can be a concern. The other thing we look at is if there is a train accident. If a railcar -- or a set of railcars -- carrying oil, for example, have an accident, this certainly happens occasionally, what are their plans to deal with that?" 

What other questions come to your mind?

"One of the kind of interesting things that I noticed when I looked at the pathway is, if you are familiar with northern Illinois history, there were a lot more railroad tracks in the past than we have today.

"In some places, you can see the pathway of this railroad coming close to where there used to be railroad tracks.  In some ways, we are kind of building out what we tore down in the past. One notable exception to that is, if you look at where those old railroads went, they typically went through towns.

"They did that because they were part of our transportation system and also because the towns grew up around the railroads. This railroad tends to go around the towns, so they are trying to avoid major population centers. That feeds into what they want to do with the tracks. 

"One of the questions that I have is, as they are going through here, what kind of care are they taking to avoid sensitive areas, environmentally speaking? One example would be wetlands. If you look at the maps, they are mapping out all the local wetlands. They are either going to have to avoid those or they will have to mitigate, which usually means creating a new wetland elsewhere to take the place of the one you damaged.

"The other thing that I am not aware of, but they are probably doing and should look at, is where are the wells for local towns? Are they making an effort to kind of avoid the area that collects water for those wells? We would call that the recharge area. You could determine a sensitive area around a public water supply well and then say, 'We really probably shouldn't have the railroad track going through that sensitive area.'" 

How can stakeholders have a better idea of what's along the path?

One group keeping an eye on the land and water is the Rockford Metropolitan Agency for Planning.

That organization created maps which show an interconnected system of trails, parks and preserves, rivers, streams and lakes for Winnebago and Boone counties.

Credit RMAP

Executive Director Mike Dunn says people who live in communities along the proposed route can cross-check the proposed route with what they have identified along the line.

"Whether it is forest preserve, whether it's private farmland, whether it's watersheds, whether it's how this thing might pass a creek or a river, whether it's impact on homes — noise contours, sound contours, vibrations, how it is going to impact who might not have a home set on a farm but just along a county highway-- all those parties need to be considered." 

Which means there are expected to be a lot more people at the table than when the Wild West was built.

Above is from:  http://northernpublicradio.org/post/great-lakes-basin-railroad-factors-geography-environmental-questions-remain

Thursday, December 15, 2016

Who is the mysterious auto startup that wants to bring jobs back to a shuttered Mitsubishi plant in Normal?

Auto plant in Normal

The Mitsubishi automobile plant in Normal, Ill., is seen in 2006. The plant, which closed in mid-2016, could be purchasd by Rivian Automotive as part of the startup's plans to become a car manufacturer. (John Smierciak / Chicago Tribune)

Robert ReedRobert ReedContact ReporterChicago Tribune

The town of Normal, Ill., which desperately wants to reopen its massive and shuttered Mitsubishi auto plant and create needed jobs, is hitching a ride with a mysterious carmaker that, right now, is raising more questions than it's answering.

Nonetheless, Normal's Town Council took a leap of faith this week by conditionally awarding Rivian Automotive a five-year property tax incentive pact and a $1 million grant that will help the Michigan-based firm acquire the car factory and hopefully start hiring within a few years.

While Normal's taxpayers will bear most of the risk, we could all have a stake in this deal should Rivian succeed in winning state tax credits or incentives. Rivian and state officials will be discussing the matter, according to the state's commerce department, so expect some sweeteners.

Rivian

Rivian Automotive's CEO is R.J. Scaringe, inset, who founded the company in Florida. In 2011, it teased an affordable coupe.

(Rivian Automotive / Handout)

It would be exciting to cheer the debut of a dynamic new automaker, especially in central Illinois, which is reeling from Mitsubishi's midyear exit and the loss of over 1,000 good-paying jobs. But let's hold the applause until Rivian emerges from behind its curtain and becomes more forthright with the taxpayers who are now its partners.

Presently, this company is a master of disguise.

For starters, Rivian has virtually no internet presence, having shut down its previous web page a while back. Now it only floats a bare bones "place holder" with no information or data. In this communications era, who does that? Especially when going to a community to ask for tax abatements and 1 million bucks.

Moreover, Rivian has not disclosed important governance and financial information to the public. This includes: Who is on its board of directors; names of major investors; the amount of money raised to finance operations; and its access to capital, which is essential to building a car manufacturer.

Then there are some nagging operational alarms, even for an upstart. For instance, its "leave a message" phone response at the Michigan headquarters sounds like it was recorded in an echo chamber or someone's basement. And no one returned my calls.

What do we know about Rivian?

Not very much, but here's some basic background assembled from various company, trade and government reports.

Rivian is a small automotive engineering and technology concern that started in 2009 as Mainstream Motors. The firm became Rivian in 2011 and relocated from Florida, where in its early days it talked of expanding operations, to Livonia, Mich., just west of Detroit.

Robert Joseph Scaringe, founder and CEO of Rivian, has a doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, according to biographical information listed by Bloomberg News. A few years ago, Scaringe was heralded by the White House as one of its "Champions of Change," a designation which recognizes emerging community and business leaders.

To date, Rivian has worked on prototypes but has never produced a single car.

In comments this week before the Normal Town Council, Scaringe conceded that Rivian is going through an ultraquiet period after suffering some startup snafus.

It went dark after Rivian had made predictions about the timing of when it might enter parts production. The prediction didn't pan out, he said, and the company decided it would be better to say nothing than to keep backtracking.

Moreover, the company, which now has about 100 employees, was relocating its headquarters from Florida to more autocentric Michigan, he added.

Rivian is refining its technologically advanced prototype car that's geared toward serving the emerging ride-sharing and driverless car markets, Scaringe said.

The CEO also said he'll be talking more openly about Rivian's business in the days ahead.

"Over the next 12 months, you'll see a lot of information coming out," he assured Normal's council members.

Normal's staff and the Bloomington-Normal Economic Development Council, which recommended the tax abatement deal, are apparently already comfortable with what Scaringe has told them in private.

After doing some independent due diligence, they concluded Rivian has the financing prowess to get production rolling, make capital improvements and bring back some good-paying jobs to the old Mitsubishi plant within a couple of years.

Speaking of finances, Securities and Exchange Commission documents show the company raised only $1.2 million over the past few years. That reported amount does not reflect the company's deeper financial resources, Scaringe told the council.

In its heyday the Mitsubishi site, which opened in 1988 as a joint venture with Chrysler, employed nearly 3,000 people. It's also no stranger to government-backed inducements, having received state and local incentives totaling nearly $250 million over its life span.

Still, it doesn't look like Normal, or the other area taxing bodies involved in the Rivian transaction, are giving away the keys to the city.

This is a qualified deal calling for the auto company to acquire the Mitsubishi site, with over 2 million square feet, from the current owner, a business liquidation firm.

Rivian also must meet an agreed-upon timetable over a couple of years, to make significant capital improvements and achieve certain hiring levels before the tax abatement kicks in or the $1 million grant check is cut.

The town's agreement also requires Rivian to invest $40.5 million in the project's first five years.

"I do believe they are a credible organization," said Normal Mayor Chris Koos.

That's encouraging to hear.

Now it's up to Rivian to prove to the rest of us that it's the real deal.

roreed@chicagotribune.com

Above is from:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/ct-rivian-mitsubishi-robert-reed-1214-biz-20161214-column.html

 

image

 

Rivian Automotive plans for driverless future

121316-blm-loc-3rivian

 

  • DAVID PROEBER, THE PANTAGRAPH

RJ Scaringe, Rivian Automotive CEO, talks to State Rep. Dan Brady, R-Bloomington, before addressing the Normal Town Council Monday evening.

 

NORMAL — Rivian Automotive isn't just ready for the auto market to change. It's counting on it.

"Our second set of vehicles ... is designed for pure mobility-as-a-service. You press a button on your phone, and a vehicle shows up. Of course, the vehicle is driving itself, and of course you don't own the vehicle. You're paying for that service on a variable basis," CEO RJ Scaringe said on Tuesday.

"That's something we see happening in the post-2020 environment. ... We've designed our organization to facilitate a lot of that transformation."

The Normal City Council approved a $1 million grant Monday and became the first taxing body to approve a five-year property tax abatement — both based on performance — for the automaker that plans to buy the vacant Mitsubishi Motors North America plant, which ended production a year ago, and make electric cars there, employing 1,000 workers and investing $175 million in the site through 2024.

Driver-operated passenger vehicles would be just the beginning.

Rivian, Scaringe said, wants to make cars that can succeed both in the current market and in a future dominated by a ride-hailing model such as that promoted by Uber and Lyft.

"If I didn't tell you that asset was a vehicle, you would ... say, 'Why do I want to purchase this thing that I never use that loses 65 percent of its value (within five years) and takes a ton of money to keep operational?" Scaringe said. "Our purpose and our vision is to design a company that helps us transition from the world of very low utilization to a world of increasing levels."

The company has research locations in the Detroit and San Francisco areas with about 100 employees. It was founded in Florida in 2009, but left that state to get closer to its suppliers after satisfying the terms of a $2 million state grant, he said.

Scaringe previously acknowledged that the company has operated in secret in the past, but will be much more transparent going forward.

The first step, Scaringe said, is a line of electric cars "that fit between five and seven passengers" and "have a very high level of utility combined with a very high level of performance," as well as "a very high level of efficiency."

Normal City Manager Mark Peterson, who has driven the prototype, said, "It made me feel better that that's a real car and it's very impressive."

The company plans to unveil its first mass-produced vehicle in the next 12 to 15 months, Scaringe told The Pantagraph.

"Those are designed to exist in a world where there's still an ownership-centric customer experience," he said. "But the vehicles are also designed to enable people to share ... either through fractionalized ownership or subscription."

Scaringe referred to the car as "sports-car quick, but a vehicle your whole family can fit into."

Rivian must now tailor the former Normal auto plant to those needs, Scaringe said. Despite the car's technological advancements, he affirmed there will be opportunities for former Mitsubishi employees to work at the plant.

"The body shop is going to be changing quite significantly. The stamping operation will continue to run as it did. ... The general assembly line will be used as is with modifications," he said. "It sounds like a long time, 'three years before we see significant hiring ramp-up,' but it's really not."

Scaringe thinks the vehicle can be successful in Bloomington-Normal and beyond — starting with Rivian employees.

"We hope people who build these vehicles are also able to purchase these vehicles," he said. "We hope to see many of these vehicles on the road here."

Above is from:  http://www.pantagraph.com/business/local/rivian-automotive-plans-for-driverless-future/article_aafff025-802e-59da-87d6-bbb5ddef308f.html

Feds grant GLB RR’s request for time out

Feds grant railroad's request for time out

The federal agency overseeing the environmental review for Great Lakes Basin Transportation's proposed freight railroad looping around Chicago has granted a request to suspend work while GLBT continues its own planning.

In a letter dated Tuesday, the director of the Surface Transportation Board's Office of Environmental Assessment told GLBT that the office would suspend its work, which is required by the National Environmental Policy Act, despite the fact "that stopping and starting the NEPA review process often adds time and expense to the process and increases the burden on all stakeholders."

GLBT had requested the suspension earlier this month, asking the Office of Environmental Assessment to allow it to complete the required application to build and run the railroad before continuing the work that will ultimately produce an environmental impact statement.

"The application likely will provide information that will help the accuracy of OEA's NEPA review," office Director Victoria Rutson wrote. She asked GLBT to submit a status update on Feb. 28.

GLBT's chief legal and administrative officer, Mike Blaszak, said he "wouldn't rule out" the possibility of having the application complete by the end of February.

"Once GLBT files its application with the (Surface Transportation Board), OEA will resume work on determining a range of reasonable and feasible alternatives to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement," Rutson wrote.

Get breaking news sent instantly to your inbox

The alternatives will be published and opened to public comment, with the potential for public scoping meetings, Rutson wrote. Then, the Office of Environmental Assessment will begin preparing a draft environmental impact statement.

GLBT's request for a suspension in the environmental work came after it had submitted a response to a third information request from the Office of Environmental Assessment regarding its plan to build a 260-mile railroad from the LaPorte area through Illinois to Milton, Wisconsin. 

Above is from:  http://www.nwitimes.com/business/transportation/feds-grant-railroad-s-request-for-time-out/article_d697f553-473b-5926-8490-88cd4f990819.html

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Rauner's GOP launches 2018 governor's race with robocalls attacking Democrat Pritzker

Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner fired the first shots of the 2018 governor's race with robocalls attacking Democratic foe J.B. Pritzker.

image

 

(Phil Velasquez, Kristen Norman / Chicago Tribune)

Rick PearsonChicago Tribune

Gov. Bruce Rauner fired the first shots of the 2018 governor's race on Tuesday with an Illinois Republican Party automated telephone call attempting to tie potential Democratic foe J.B. Pritzker to imprisoned former Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

The attack was unprecedented for two reasons: The next election is nearly two years away. And Pritzker, who is largely unknown outside Chicago business and political circles, is only considering a run for governor and isn't a candidate at this point.

The robocall stands as an early signal from Rauner as to what awaits those who might challenge his re-election bid. But it's also an acknowledgment that Rauner's team at this stage views Pritkzer, a wealthy entrepreneur and investor, as a top threat. Pritkzer, listed at No. 190 on Forbes' annual list of the 400 wealthiest Americans with a net worth of $3.4 billion, is one of the few in Illinois who could self-fund a campaign and outspend Rauner.

Giving new meaning to the term "season's greetings," the Rauner-funded state GOP launched the slickly produced automated phone call that lasts just over a minute on Tuesday. The call seeks to link Pritzker to Blagojevich as well as to Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan. Rauner has continued to target the longtime Southwest Side politician, even in the weeks after the governor spent millions of dollars to defeat Democratic legislative candidates by associating them with the speaker.

.

"J.B. Pritzker wants to run for governor. But how well do we really know Pritzker? We know that political boss Mike Madigan likes Pritzker and his billion-dollar fortune as much as disgraced and imprisoned Governor Rod Blagojevich did," a narrator says in the call.

"Pritzker told Blagojevich he wanted to be appointed to the U.S. Senate, and in exchange Blagojevich wanted J.B. to personally raise tens of millions of dollars for him," the narrator says.

The call features portions of an FBI recording of Blagojevich speaking to then-confidant Doug Scofield on Nov. 11, 2008. At the time, Blagojevich was looking for ways to leverage his appointment to fill President Barack Obama's U.S. Senate seat for personal gain — among the issues that led to Blagojevich's federal corruption conviction.

 

"I betcha J.B. can raise me money like that," Blagojevich says in the recording. "If I can get J.B. to do somethin' like that is it worth, ah, givin' him the Senate seat? Incidentally, he, he asked me for it. Don't repeat that."

The call goes on to play a portion of Blagojevich discussing his desire for "10 million dollars, 15 million dollars" for the creation of a social advocacy group so he can leave the governor's office. Then the call plays Blagojevich saying, "J.B. can do it, couldn't he?" before splicing in the then-governor's earlier comment, "Don't repeat that."

In between Blagojevich's statements, the narrator calls Pritzker "just another crooked insider who seeks to screw over Illinois taxpayers."

Not mentioned in the robocall was another section of the FBI-recorded conversation in which Blagojevich asks Scofield about Pritzker: "Who knows him, that we know that's close to him?" Scofield responds, "Mmm, that I don't know" and later tells Blagojevich, "I'll find out who's close to J.B."

A Pritzker spokesman criticized Rauner over the state budget impasse as well as the robocall tactic.

"You would think a governor who has failed to pass a budget for two years and has allowed human services to be gutted would have better things to do with his time than to dredge up the crazy rantings of Rod Blagojevich," Pritzker spokesman David Lundy said in a statement.

After Lundy's statement came out, the state Republican Party doubled down. In a news release, the state GOP contended Pritzker was close politically to Blagojevich and Blagojevich's estranged father-in-law, former Ald. Richard Mell, and had donated more than $100,000 to Blagojevich's campaign fund.

"We will continue to highlight Pritzker's ties to both Rod Blagojevich and Mike Madigan until he makes a final decision concerning a run for the Democratic nomination for governor," said Aaron DeGroot, a state GOP spokesman. He said the robocall was being made to "Democratic donors, Democratic elected officials and Democratic Party activists."

Christopher Mooney, director of the Institute of Government and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois, said the state GOP's effort — and the depth to its early opposition research — may represent a pre-emptive strike to Pritzker and other Democrats considering a challenge to Rauner.

"This could be an attempt at a chilling effect for people to read between the lines and see how much money they have and how willing they are to go negative so early," Mooney said.

The timing of the robocall during the holiday season, as well as coming after often bitter state legislative campaigns and a controversy-filled national election, may give it limited impact, Mooney said.

"Normal rules would say it's a big waste of money, coming during the holidays, with fatigue from the last election, with it coming so far in advance of the next election," Mooney said. "But it's only a waste of money if money matters to you. Even if they get a little bit of benefit out it, maybe it's worth it because they don't care about the money."

Pritzker has been among several names mentioned as possible Democratic contenders to challenge Rauner, a wealthy former private equity investor. Also among those pondering a run are businessman Christopher Kennedy and U.S. Rep. Cheri Bustos, of East Moline.

rap30@aol.com

Above is from:   http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-bruce-rauner-jb-pritzker-met-1215-20161213-story.html

Great Lakes Basis receives a temporary suspension of SLB’s Environmental Review

 

 

image