Thursday, April 28, 2022

April 28, 2022: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report

COVID-19 Situation Report

Editor: Alyson Browett, MPH

Contributors: Clint Haines, MS; Natasha Kaushal, MSPH; Amanda Kobokovich, MPH; Christina Potter, MSPH; Matthew Shearer, MPH; Marc Trotochaud, MSPH; and, Rachel A. Vahey, MHS.

UPCOMING WEBINAR Please join us for a COVID-19 Testing Toolkit webinar, Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Testing Strategy, on Tuesday, May 3 at 2:00pm ET. The 3 panelists, leaders serving across the university, will discuss how JHU developed and implemented its COVID-19 testing strategies for faculty, staff, and students; how JHU adapted its strategy over time; and how JHU is preparing for commencement. Register online here.

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 509 million cumulative cases and 6.2 million deaths worldwide as of April 27. As expected, the number of cumulative cases surpassed 500 million on April 14. The global weekly incidence decreased for the fifth consecutive week—down 19% from the previous week—to the lowest weekly total since mid-December 2021. Most regions continued to report decreasing trends in weekly incidence. Africa’s weekly total increased 32% over the previous week, which appears to be largely driven by the surge in South Africa. Weekly incidence also increased in the Americas, up 8.7% over the previous week. The trend in reported global weekly mortality decreased for a third consecutive week, down 19% from the previous week.

Global Vaccination

As of April 18, WHO reported 11.4 billion cumulative vaccine doses administered globally, with 3.82 billion individuals receiving at least 1 dose, and 3.35 billion fully vaccinated*. Analysis from Our World in Data indicates that the overall trend in global daily vaccinations continues to decline overall—down from nearly 40 million doses per day in late December 2021—although the global average increased from 10.7 million doses per day last week to 11.7 million on April 27**. The trend continues to closely follow that in Asia. Our World in Data estimates that there are 5.13 billion vaccinated individuals worldwide (1+ dose; 65.2% of the global population) and 4.64 billion who are fully vaccinated (59.0% of the global population). A total of 1.84 billion booster doses have been administered globally.

*The WHO data for cumulative global vaccinated individuals decreased substantially from the previous week—down from 5.1 billion with 1+ dose and 4.58 billion fully vaccinated. It is not immediately clear why the current numbers are lower.

**The average daily doses administered may exhibit a sharp decrease for the most recent data, particularly over the weekend, which indicates effects of reporting delays. In an effort to reflect the longer-term trends, the numbers reported here may not correspond to the most recent data.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC is reporting 80.9 million cumulative cases of COVID-19 and 989,408 deaths. The average daily incidence has nearly doubled from the recent low of 24,982 new cases per day on April 4 to 48,692 on April 26. The daily mortality continues to decline, down to 299 deaths per day—the first day below 300 since July 23, 2021.* Notably, new COVID-19 hospital admissions continue to trend upwards, with an increase of 17.6% over the past week.

*Changes in state-level reporting may affect the accuracy of recently reported data, particularly over weekends. In an effort to reflect the longer-term trends, the numbers reported here may not correspond to the most recent dates.

US Vaccination

The US has administered 574 million cumulative doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. After a slight increase starting in late March, following US FDA authorization of a second booster dose, daily vaccinations are once again declining, down from 485,000 doses per day on April 12 to 394,000 on April 21 (-18.6%). A total of 257 million individuals have received at least 1 vaccine dose, which corresponds to 77.5% of the entire US population. Among adults, 89.0% have received at least 1 dose, as well as 27.7 million children under the age of 18. A total of 219 million individuals are fully vaccinated**, which corresponds to 66.1% of the total population. Approximately 76.0% of adults are fully vaccinated, as well as 23.1 million children under the age of 18. A total of 100.3 million individuals have received an additional or booster dose. This corresponds to 45.7% of fully vaccinated individuals, including 68.5% of fully vaccinated adults aged 65 years or older. Only 49.5% of individuals eligible for a first booster dose have received one.

*Due to delays in reporting, estimates for the average daily doses administered are less accurate for the most recent several days.

**Full original course of the vaccine, not including additional or booster doses.

VACCINES FOR YOUNGEST CHILDREN Moderna this morning submitted a request with the US FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of its SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children ages 6 months to under age 6. The submission is based on data from the Phase 2/3 KidCOVE study, which tested a 2-dose primary series in young children using a low-dose 25 μg version of the vaccine. According to Moderna, the lower dosage led to a similar immune response in young children as the higher 100 μg 2-dose primary series in adults, with a favorable safety profile. In a revised analysis based on data first released in March, the data showed the vaccine was 51% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in the youngest children, ages 6 months to under 2 years, and 37% effective at preventing symptomatic disease in children ages 2 through 5. These results were collected during the Omicron surge and showed similar declines in protection as adults due to the variant’s ability to partially evade vaccine-induced immunity. Moderna also is expected to soon seek authorization of its vaccine for children ages 6-11, as well as file an update to its EUA for adolescents aged 12-17. The FDA has not ruled on the company’s EUA request for adolescents, submitted in June 2021, citing concerns over the rare side effect of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in teen boys. Currently, only the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is authorized for children aged 5-11.

A top FDA official this week suggested the agency has not yet reviewed data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for the youngest children because the manufacturers have not completed their EUA applications. The agency is expected to release a timeline for expert review this week. Despite growing pressure, a decision on whether to authorize a vaccine for the nation’s 18 million youngest children likely will not happen until June. Moderna is expected to complete its EUA submission for the youngest children next week, and Pfizer and BioNTech plan to complete their application for a 3-dose vaccine regimen for children younger than 5 years in late May or early June. A White House official suggested the FDA might prefer to review both applications simultaneously in order to compare the vaccines side-by-side and simplify communication about the vaccines if and when one or both are authorized for young children.

BOOSTERS FOR CHILDREN AGES 5-11 Pfizer and BioNTech on April 26 submitted a request to the US FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of a booster dose of the companies’ SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11 years. The booster would be a third shot of the same 10 µg dosage used in the 2-dose primary series, administered about 6 months after the second dose. Currently, third doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are authorized for children aged 5 to 11 who are moderately to severely immunocompromised, and booster doses are authorized for all individuals aged 12 years and older, who receive a higher dose (30 µg). Experts are divided over whether a booster dose is necessary in healthy children. Some say data show vaccine effectiveness wanes over time and support the use of boosters in children to maintain a higher level of protection. Others remain skeptical, contending that 2 doses continue to protect recipients against serious illness from the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants and because children have an overall lower risk of severe disease and hospitalization from COVID-19. Only 28% of children aged 5 to 11 years are fully vaccinated, signaling that demand for a booster dose among this age group likely would be low. Pfizer and BioNTech also plan to submit data for booster authorization to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and other regulatory agencies worldwide in the coming weeks.

ANNUAL BOOSTERS The US FDA has authorized second booster, or fourth, doses for parts of the US population, raising questions over how frequently boosters will be required moving forward. Several companies, including Novavax and Moderna, have begun initiatives to develop joint influenza and COVID-19 shots, creating what would be a new annual vaccine administered each fall. But several US scientists and researchers recently urged more involved dialogue regarding future plans for the use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, pushing back on the idea of annual boosters and calling for more data on the value of annual SARS-CoV-2 booster doses. While there is no evidence suggesting any harm from additional booster doses, the experts have shared several concerns that could stem from a policy requiring annual vaccinations. First, they worry that an emphasis on boosters diminishes the long-lasting protection that current vaccine doses provide against severe COVID-19 disease. Second, experts worry that a lack of evidence in regulatory decision making could set a dangerous precedent moving forward. The group specifically urged the FDA to measure T-cell responses, in addition to antibody responses, when conducting SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. Lastly, they noted the lack of response for both first and second booster doses signals fatigue from the US public. More than 100 million US residents have received the first COVID-19 booster, roughly 50% of eligible people. Some worry that “booster fatigue” will be a problem, adding to calls for a more prudent, data-driven approach to annual boosters.

US SEROPREVALENCE A study published April 26 in the US CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) estimates that 58% of the US population, including 75% of children, have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Many of those infections occurred during the winter’s Omicron surge. The study reports on data from national commercial laboratories across all 50 states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. Between September 2021 and February 2022, labs conducted convenience samples on blood specimens that were submitted for clinical testing in their labs, excluding samples that were testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies upon initial receipt. The median sample size for the group of labs was 73,869 each month, with a drop in the number of tests to 45,810 in February 2022, likely caused by disruptions from the surge in domestic infections fueled by the Omicron variant. The research team weighted samples by demographic data to produce estimates of seroprevalence.

The team saw a slight, but steady, increase in seroprevalence between September and December 2021, increasing between 0.9-1.9% every 4 weeks. At the end of this collection period, the seroprevalence across the US sample was estimated to be 33.5%. Between December 2021 and February 2022, at the height of the Omicron surge, the team observed a spike in national seroprevalence, rising from 33.5% to 57.7%. Notably, during this period, children aged 0-11 saw an increase from 44.2% to 75.2% and those aged 12-17 saw a similar increase from 45.6% to 74.2%. Adult populations saw spikes in seroprevalence from 36.5% to 63.7% for individuals aged 18-49, 28.8% to 49.8% for those 50-64, and 19.1% to 33.2% among those aged 65 and older. The researchers noted several limitations in their study design, including restrictions of applicability tied to convenience sampling; limited race and ethnicity data; the potential for sampling bias due to the setting of sample collection; and the possibility that infection following vaccination resulted in reduced antibody titers. 

SARS-CoV-2 testing is only able to catch a fraction of cases occurring in the country, so serosurveys present an opportunity to better understand the scale of infections. Still, the study may not represent a full picture of COVID-19 in the country, nor does it indicate whether or not individuals with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies have persistent immunity to new infections. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky noted the study’s results and vaccine uptake show an increased level of community protection from SARS-CoV-2. She added that vaccination remains key in creating a more resilient population, urging those who remain unvaccinated, including those previously infected, to get vaccinated.

PANDEMIC TRANSITIONING COVID-19 remains a pandemic, constituting a serious health threat in many parts of the world. Even as COVID-19-related deaths reach their lowest point since the pandemic began, several Asian nations are experiencing their largest surges to date and countries in Africa—which currently is experiencing an increase in cases—continue efforts to ramp up vaccination programs. But other countries, particularly in North America and Europe, are taking steps to move beyond an emergency phase, relaxing public health mitigation guidelines and reducing or eliminating COVID-19 funding from budgets. Global health experts note the pandemic is at a critical juncture, as wealthy nations—criticized for not doing enough to help low- and middle-income countries throughout the pandemic—cut back even more.

The EU this week declared an end to the COVID-19 emergency, saying the disease should be treated similarly to influenza. Denmark announced an end to its widespread vaccination program, saying “the epidemic has reversed.” However, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority said additional vaccinations against COVID-19 likely will be needed in the future as new variants emerge. In the US, debate over additional funding for the pandemic response is at a standstill in the US Congress, and the administration of US President Joe Biden has warned that without new funds, the nation’s domestic and international response efforts will falter. White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said this week that the US is “out of the pandemic phase,” but later clarified those remarks, noting the pandemic is ongoing but that the US is in “a transitional phase,” moving out of an acute emergency state and into a more controlled phase. Mexico’s government declared the nation has moved into an endemic stage, and authorities will treat COVID-19 as a seasonal disease. Still, as long as COVID-19 outbreaks continue, the virus will continue to evolve and potentially develop the ability to further evade vaccine-induced or natural immunity, creating high levels of uncertainty around the future of the pandemic. 

GLOBAL DECLINE IN TESTING As the pandemic continues, the WHO is receiving less testing data, which is compounding challenges in monitoring epidemiological trends and emerging variants. Earlier this week, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called on governments to maintain sufficient SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, in part to ensure that the WHO has the data necessary to track the pandemic and provide guidance. Global testing has reportedly declined by 70-90% over the past 4 months, although the exact cause remains uncertain. Over that period, the global daily incidence fell from a record high of 3.4 million new cases per day in late January to fewer than 700,000, a decline of 80%. It is difficult to get a reliable global estimate for test positivity, because it is not reported consistently by many countries; however, the trends vary considerably among countries with the highest cumulative incidence. Test positivity in some countries—including Argentina, India, Russia, Turkey, and the United States*—has declined substantially from peaks in January-February, while it remains elevated or has increased sharply in others—such as Brazil, France, Germany, Netherlands, South Korea, and Vietnam. Without additional data, the extent to which the decline in testing is a function of slowing transmission, changes in national policies or capacities, or other factors is unclear. One potential factor is the expanded availability of at-home rapid tests in many countries. Many of these test results (positive and negative) go unreported to public health authorities, and therefore, to the WHO. As the pandemic continues, epidemiological and genomic surveillance are needed to provide critical data for health and elected officials at all levels of government.

*Although the US estimate has more than doubled since its recent low in mid-March.

TWITTER & MISINFORMATION The WHO has worked with social media platforms prior to and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to mitigate the spread of online misinformation and disinformation. With the news that billionaire Elon Musk has reached a US$44 billion deal to purchase Twitter—a previously publicly owned influential platform with 217 million daily active users worldwide—WHO officials are warning of the dangers of health and vaccine misinformation on social media. During a briefing this week, several WHO officials said Musk—who has said he plans to hold up free-speech standards similar to those of the US government—has a “huge responsibility” to combat health-related falsehoods, which can lead to mistrust, confusion, or risk-taking and potentially prolong or intensify disease outbreaks.

According to the WHO, false information is 70% more likely to get shared than accurate news on social media. In a paper published April 26 in Nature Scientific Reports, researchers from Indiana University and the Polytechnic University of Milan suggest that online misinformation posted during the pandemic is associated with early COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal. The researchers underscored the importance of combating online misinformation, writing that although people in the US have a constitutional right to free speech, providing access to trustworthy information is vital to maintaining public health. Another study from Germany, published April 27 in BMC Public Health, reinforces these findings, concluding that online misinformation is an important reason for vaccination refusal and providing access to quality information sensitive to the needs of the target audience is vital. It is unclear how or if Musk will continue Twitter’s work with the WHO or other health agencies, and many fear that his insistence on free speech could create a fertile platform for the dissemination of even more health misinformation, myths, and conspiracy theories.

MEASLES Over the past 2 years, the COVID-19 pandemic interrupted routine childhood vaccinations globally, resulting in a backslide of immunization efforts in many regions. As a potential signal of future vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks, the number of reported measles cases increased 79% during the first 2 months of 2022, compared to the same period in 2021, according to UNICEF and the WHO. In 2020, 23 million children missed out on routine childhood immunizations, the highest number since 2009. The agencies urged nations to rapidly get vaccination programs back on track to help mitigate the impacts of missed shots, the effects of which will be felt for decades. 

VIRAL SPILLOVERS At least 10,000 virus species have the ability to infect humans, but most of those are currently silently circulating in mammalian species other than humans. But as the planet warms and humans are forced to move into new habitats, the risk that these diseases will pass from their animal hosts to humans increases enormously over the next 50 years, according to research published today in Nature. Using a computational model, the researchers estimate that more than 4,000 spillover events could occur among 3,139 species as the climate changes and their habitats overlap. This situation is already happening, and some experts say the world is moving from the Anthropocene era—when humans dominated influence over the Earth’s environment—into a Pandemicene, an era characterized by diseases’ influence on humanity. Several SARS-CoV-2 spillover events have been documented, including one involving mink in the US and another involving white-tailed deer in Canada. Hence, global health experts are promoting a One Health approach to tracking COVID-19 and other viruses and warning that more pandemics will occur as the Earth warms, making pandemic preparedness one of the most urgent issues of our time.

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

April 26, 2022: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report

COVID-19 Situation Report

Editor: Alyson Browett, MPH

Contributors: Clint Haines, MS; Natasha Kaushal, MSPH; Amanda Kobokovich, MPH; Christina Potter, MSPH; Matthew Shearer, MPH; Marc Trotochaud, MSPH; and, Rachel A. Vahey, MHS.

PAXLOVID The administration of US President Joe Biden this week announced plans to increase awareness and availability of the antiviral treatment Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir), which can reduce the risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death by nearly 90% if taken within the first 5 days of symptom onset. The administration has purchased 20 million doses of the treatment from Pfizer, creating a sufficient stockpile, and will work with the manufacturer to speed delivery of the drug to pharmacies nationwide. Additionally, the White House plans to educate providers and the public about the drug’s availability and effectiveness, part of its effort to expand the federal Test-to-Treat initiative. Currently, about 2,200 pharmacies, long-term care facilities, and community health centers are operating as test-to-treat sites.

Demand for Paxlovid has increased in recent weeks, but many patients have reported difficulty obtaining the pills and physicians have been hesitant to prescribe it for fear of depleting once limited supplies and a lack of clarity on who can and cannot receive the treatment. The US CDC on April 25 issued a health advisory updating healthcare providers about the availability and use of COVID-19 therapies, as well as advising against unproven treatments, including antibiotics. Paxlovid, along with Merck’s molnupiravir, currently are available in about 20,000 locations nationwide, and the Biden administration hopes to double that number in the coming weeks, as well as allow some pharmacies to order oral antiviral treatments directly from the federal government at no cost. Some experts expressed concern that individuals who are more vulnerable to COVID-19 because they lack access to quality health care, have underlying health conditions, or live in rural areas, including many people of color, do not know Paxlovid is a treatment option or cannot travel to obtain the drug, worsening inequities. However, raising awareness, ensuring access, and securing more and better treatments requires additional funding from the US Congress, the White House noted in a fact sheet.

The Biden administration’s announcement comes days after the WHO announced it strongly recommends Paxlovid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in individuals at the highest risk of hospital admission. The WHO’s living guidelines for COVID-19 treatment were updated on April 22, calling Paxlovid “the best therapeutic choice for high-risk patients to date.” Notably, the WHO outlined several challenges to accessibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The agency said questions about availability, lack of price transparency in bilateral sales made by Pfizer, and the need for quick and accurate testing before administering the drug will limit its use in LMICs. Under a deal between Pfizer and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), several generic manufacturers are licensed to produce Paxlovid to supply about 95 countries, but few companies have begun making the treatment and some need time to comply with international standards to be able to export the pills. Pfizer currently is facing criticism for resisting efforts by the Dominican Republic to issue a compulsory license for Paxlovid, with advocates saying the company claimed its intellectual property is a human right that would be violated if a compulsory license were issued. In a press release announcing the updated treatment guidelines, the WHO expressed concern that poorer nations will once again be “pushed to the end of the queue,” as happened with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

REMDESIVIR FOR UNDER-12 CHILDREN The US FDA on April 25 expanded the approval of the COVID-19 antiviral treatment remdesivir to include children as young as 28 days and older who weigh at least 6.6 pounds and who are hospitalized with COVID-19 or not hospitalized but at high risk of progression to severe disease. The treatment, which is made by Gilead Sciences and sold under the brand name Veklury, was already available for this pediatric population under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), but the approval makes remdesivir the first approved COVID-19 treatment for children under age 12. The drug is administered as an injection and is already approved to treat pediatric and adult patients aged 12 and older who weigh at least 88 pounds. Early treatment with remdesivir, during the first 5 days of acute infection, is highly effective in preventing disease progression in older adults, according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The FDA’s approval for pediatric patients was based on a small study including only 53 participants that showed similar safety and pharmacokinetic results to those in adults.

Although COVID-19 generally causes less severe disease in children, severe illness does still occur in this population. Children aged 5-11 became eligible for vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in November 2021, but those under age 5 are not yet eligible for vaccination. In its approval, the FDA noted that remdesivir is not a substitute for vaccination in those who qualify but is an effective treatment option for pediatric patients. Data published last week in the US CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) show that during the winter Omicron surge, COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates were approximately twice as high among unvaccinated children aged 5-11 as among vaccinated children of the same age. The FDA’s approval of remdesivir for the youngest COVID-19 patients could help lower their risk of disease progression and keep some children out of the hospital. 

VACCINE FOR UNDER-5 CHILDREN The approximately 19.5 million children younger than age 5 in the US remain ineligible for vaccination against COVID-19, and the US FDA likely will postpone any action to authorize a vaccine for the youngest children until June, according to several sources. Moderna is expected to submit a request for Emergency Use Authorization for its SARS-CoV-2 vaccine by the end of this month, and Pfizer-BioNTech earlier this year postponed its rolling application for their vaccine to wait for data on a 3-dose primary series. Those familiar with FDA discussions said the regulator might wait until early summer to simultaneously authorize both vaccines rather than push one through before the other, thereby simplifying communication about the vaccines to the public. However, those plans could change, particularly if the current uptick in COVID-19 cases accelerates. The administration of US President Joe Biden is under increasing pressure to move on authorizing a vaccine for the youngest children, from members of his own political party and parents who are eager to vaccinate their children. Notably, less than 30% of children aged 5-11—who became eligible for vaccination in November 2021—have received their primary 2-dose vaccine series, and some polls show parents of young children might be hesitant to vaccinate their younger children. The FDA has called on its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to set a tentative meeting for June, although the topic of that meeting is not yet known.

CHINA After weeks of lockdowns in China’s largest city, Shanghai, due to surging numbers of new COVID-19 cases driven by the Omicron variant of concern, the nation’s capital of Beijing this week rolled out a 5-day mass testing drive and locked down several residential areas. Cultural holidays, mass gatherings, and holiday travel have all been suspended. The swift response prompted panic buying, as residents crowded grocery stores and swamped food delivery services with requests. Since the outbreak was detected 5 days ago, authorities have identified 92 cases in Beijing, a small number compared with the more than 500,000 cases confirmed in Shanghai, where the number of new cases is beginning to fall. However, the number of new deaths in Shanghai tripled in a 24-hour period between April 22 and April 23. This is expected, as increases in deaths typically follow increases in the number of new cases by 3-4 weeks. China’s lockdowns are not only disrupting life for residents but also are significantly impacting domestic and global economies, crippling supply chains, increasing unemployment, and affecting stock markets.

SOUTH AFRICA The number of new COVID-19 cases is once more rising in South Africa, signaling a potential fifth wave of infections. The country has reported its highest rate in 3 months. South Africa’s National Health Department reported 4,406 new COVID-19 cases in a 24-hour period ending April 21, just over 1.5 times more cases than were reported the day before. The nation’s positivity rate rose from 16% over the weekend to 19.3% on April 25, with an additional 1,954 new cases. The increase is being driven by Omicron sublineages, with a rising proportion of cases attributable to BA.4 and BA.5. No new variant has been reported. Notably, the pandemic may have given a boost to South Africa’s efforts to reform its health system through a national insurance scheme by highlighting the need to improve health equity.

CORONAVAC BOOSTERS New data from Chile estimates vaccine effectiveness with the use of homologous and heterologous booster administration in individuals aged 16 years and older. Published in The Lancet Global Health on April 23, the study evaluates a national-level prospective cohort of more than 4 million individuals who completed a primary immunization schedule (2 doses) of CoronaVac and subsequently received a booster. Of the cohort, 46.5% received a booster of Oxford-AstraZeneca, 48.9% Pfizer-BioNTech, and 4.5% CoronaVac. Both homologous and heterologous booster administration with a primary vaccination schedule of CoronaVac showed a high level of protection against symptomatic COVID-19, including severe disease and death. Notably, vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 was higher among the heterologous booster cohorts compared to homologous booster administration. The Pfizer-BioNTech booster adjusted VE for preventing symptomatic COVID-19 was 96.5% (96.2–96.7), 93.2% (92.9–93.6) for Oxford-AstraZeneca, and 78.8% (76.8–80.6) for CoronaVac. Adjusted VEs against hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death followed a similar trend. The study enforces the need for boosters for the Chinese-made CoronaVac vaccine to improve effectiveness, and could help inform policymaking in China, which is experiencing a surge in COVID-19 cases.

LONG COVID No one knows what causes post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), commonly known as long COVID, but researchers worldwide are working to uncover clues about what causes the condition, its prevalence in COVID-19 survivors, and potential therapies. A study published April 23 in The Lancet Respiratory Health describing results from the Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) suggests that fewer than 1 in 3 people (28.9%) who were hospitalized for COVID-19 felt fully recovered 1 year after being discharged. Factors associated with being less likely to report full recovery were female sex, obesity, and invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. The most common ongoing symptoms were fatigue, muscle pain, physically slowing down, poor sleep, and breathlessness, all of which were reported by more than 51% of the patients 1 year after discharge. Another study—which was presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Lisbon, Portugal, by researchers from the Luxembourg Institute of Health—found that 6 in 10 people continue to have at least 1 symptom a year after their initial infection. The study, Predi-COVID, suggests that severity of initial disease is associated with the likelihood of persistent symptoms and their intensity, reinforcing the need for vaccination to prevent severe disease.

Based on previous research, some scientists believe long COVID could be the result of an overactive immune response, but the results of a small study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases suggest the persistent symptoms could be the result of a suppressed immune system. The researchers, from the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, suggest that certain antibody treatments could help some patients improve. Notably, the study was funded by the manufacturer of the antibody treatment used in the research. Another preprint paper, conducted by researchers at Stanford Medical School and not yet peer-reviewed, raises the question of whether viral reservoirs, possibly in the gastrointestinal system, could contribute to long COVID symptoms. After 4 months from initial infection, researchers were unable to detect SARS-CoV-2 in nasal or oral swab samples from any of the 113 participants who had mild or moderate COVID-19, but nearly 13% had detectable viral RNA in fecal samples. Nearly 4% continued to shed viral RNA in their stool 7 months after initial diagnosis. Ongoing research shows long COVID can impact people far after initial infection. While there currently are no proven effective pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for patients with long COVID, some research suggests that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can reduce but not eliminate the risk of longer-term symptoms, reinforcing public health recommendations to remain up to date on vaccination.

US DEATHS As the US edges closer to marking 1 million deaths from COVID-19, many are grappling with how to explain this reality. In an attempt to describe the seemingly unfathomable death toll, Eric Boodman of STAT equates it to about “5,500 commercial airplanes crashing in a little more than 2 years,” but says trying to account for human loss through analogy is meaningless and does not make those who have lost loved ones feel less alone. In the US, the pandemic’s death toll has been concentrated among elderly populations, including those at long-term care facilities, and mortality rates are highest among Black and Hispanic populations. For a second year, COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in the US in 2021, although racial and ethnic disparities narrowed compared with 2020, most likely showing the impacts of public health interventions such as contact tracing, mask mandates, and, most importantly, vaccination. According to recent analysis from the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, about 234,000 COVID-19-related deaths in the US could have been prevented since June 2021 with a primary vaccination series. Additionally, many could have been spared immense amounts of grief with more widespread and quick vaccine uptake. According to a study published April 25 in JAMA Internal Medicine, most families who had loved ones in intensive care units (ICUs) due to COVID-19 have experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Ed Yong of The Atlantic notes that for every person lost to COVID-19, an average of 9 close relatives are left bereaved, meaning no fewer than 9 million US residents are learning to cope with grief and adjust to their new realities, processes often intensified by the continuing politicization of the pandemic.

Friday, April 22, 2022

WIFR coverage of denial of special use

Denial of special use permit in Boone County raises eyebrows

The debate heats up at a Boone County Board meeting over a special use permit. Some say the denial of it was an act of racism.

Community members say the pledge at the meeting

Community members say the pledge at the meeting(Stephanie Quirk)

By Stephanie Quirk

Published: Apr. 21, 2022 at 10:34 PM CDT

<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" />

ROCKFORD, Ill. (WIFR) - What started as an application for a special use permit turns into a debate among community members. Many believe the man who was denied, is being discriminated against.

Thursday night at the Boone County Board Meeting, groups of people arguing on both sides gathered to share their public comments.

According to Boone County Board Member Cherie Bartlet, two out of the four special use permits applied for since 2019 were approved. Both holders, are white men.

The two denied are Hispanic, one being the man who was voted down today. Many community members at the board meeting Thursday night say this decision is plainly based in racism.

Above is fromhttps://www.wifr.com/2022/04/22/denial-special-use-permit-boone-county-raising-some-eyebrows/


A description of the proposal is available from Boone County Board at:  https://go.boarddocs.com/il/boone/Board.nsf/files/CDLK3H4F2EC0/$file/AdvisoryReport_Nevarez_Special%20Use_ZBA.pdf

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

District 100 Salary Schedule

Employee, Teacher and Administrative salaries and benefits are available at the District’s website at:  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fbyPMzjWiTZzMfeetEDUACHksE4vGg5J/view

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GH3RAWZFkFhuVIzt8oDsFVFyqQK7UdQ/view

Monday, April 18, 2022

Does Congressman Kinzinger still consider himself a Republican?


Adam Kinzinger Is 'Slow Ghosting' Congress. Now He May Want To Beat Donald Trump In A Primary.

Liz Skalka - 18h ago


Adam Kinzinger Is 'Slow Ghosting' Congress. Now He May Want To Beat Donald Trump In A Primary.

© Provided by HuffPostAdam Kinzinger Is 'Slow Ghosting' Congress. Now He May Want To Beat Donald Trump In A Primary.

"I'll make a decision when we get there," Rep. Adam Kinzinger told HuffPost about his presidential ambitions. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

CHICAGO — It was a dreary Friday morning and Adam Kinzinger was hanging out in a conference room with huge windows overlooking a college campus. And he was tired. Not just because it was the end of the week and it was raining. He was tired in his bones.

“It’s like you’re taking on the world all the time,” he said. “I wouldn’t mind having a break.”

EV's Have Gone Mainstream - 3 Stocks That Could Soar

Ad

Ad

manward-financial.com

Kinzinger offered this in response to the very introspective question “How’s it going?” — which most people answer with “great” or “fine” or maybe even “meh” on an especially bad day. That Kinzinger responded this way, barely a minute into our conversation at the University of Chicago in early April, was revealing about the current predicament of Adam Kinzinger, no longer just a rank-and-file GOP moderate from the nation’s second-largest corn-producing state.

This shift happened last year during the second impeachment of President Donald Trump. Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, along with 10 Republicans, voted to advance articles of impeachment against Trump for spurring the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Kinzinger was one of them.

The move uncorked the white-hot fury of the Trump base and instantly turned Kinzinger’s career upside down. Kinzinger and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) compounded the injury by voting to create, and then joining, the Democratic-majority select committee investigating the attack. In February, the Republican National Committee passed a resolution censuring Kinzinger and Cheney for serving on the Jan. 6 panel, whose mission it bizarrely characterized as the “persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.”

As this all unfolded over the past year, many have looked at Kinzinger, a star member of the House’s 2010 freshman class and one of the most visible of the pro-impeachment Republicans, and wondered: Is he totally screwed? Or was this vote a deliberate way of teeing up the next chapter of his political career as a Trump antagonist? Can this GOP tolerate a Trump-basher anywhere in its midst?

Most importantly, what does Kinzinger actually want?

I wasn’t the only one trying to figure this out. The bro-y and charismatic Air Force pilot has been intensely sought after in the media. Case in point: the documentary crew that was also following Kinzinger’s every move that morning at the university, where he was speaking on a panel at a conference dissecting the toxic rise of disinformation on the right.

Kinzinger was followed by a documentary crew at the University of Chicago this month. The lawmaker said he found the experience to be weird. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

© Provided by HuffPostKinzinger was followed by a documentary crew at the University of Chicago this month. The lawmaker said he found the experience to be weird. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

Kinzinger was followed by a documentary crew at the University of Chicago this month. The lawmaker said he found the experience to be weird. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

Kinzinger may be on the inside of the snow globe looking out, banging on the glass, but he’s found an escape hatch. Rather than compete for a seventh term under a new congressional map that pits him against another incumbent Republican, he’s more than happy to give up this fight. He also knows that he’s been shut out of running for governor or U.S. senator in a state where he’s been censured by his own party. What’s left?

Well, he might run for president.

“So, I look at it this way,” he began after I asked him about this. What followed was the boilerplate response from someone who’s mulling things behind the scenes: “I’ll make a decision when we get there, if there’s a need and a desire. It’s truly not anything I’m planning right now, but I’m not going to rule it out,” he said, his voice rising in such a way at the end that suggested this was supposed to be the main takeaway. “Look, if we’re in a position, if it’s just terrible candidates and the country’s in a worse place? Maybe. But there’s no grand plan right now.”

I asked Kinzinger whether he wants to run against Trump, who is expected to mount a third campaign for president. “I would love it. I really would,” he said, his eyes instantly widening. “Even if he crushed me, like in a primary, to be able to stand up and call out the garbage is just a necessary thing, regardless of who it is. ... I think it’d be fun.”

The only thing Kinzinger seems to know for sure about his future plans is that Congress is the absolute last place he wants to be after this year. “I’m exhausted of the same arguments, the same kind of performative politics,” he said, a declaration that rings like a campaign pitch. The cold and drizzly weather outside the conference room windows was adding to the feeling of over-it-ness that Kinzinger was describing.

“I don’t know. Maybe I would have run for governor. Maybe I would have run for Senate. Who knows? But yeah, my time in the House is, mercifully, coming to an end,” he said.

I’ll make a decision when we get there, if there’s a need and a desire. It’s truly not anything I’m planning right now, but I’m not going to rule it out.Rep. Adam Kinzinger, on potentially running for president in 2024

The news articles about Kinzinger’s impending exit from Congress describe the move as a “retirement,” which is an odd way to think about the career pivot of a 44-year-old with a newborn at home. Kinzinger is still boyish-looking with an impish smile. He says “like” a lot. He’s shorter than you might expect in person given the large amount of space he occupies in Trump’s head.

Kinzinger and Trump have become each other’s best foils. Since the second impeachment, Trump has done everything in his power to brand Kinzinger and Cheney as the ultimate RINOs, slang for a phony Republican. When Kinzinger announced in October he wasn’t running for reelection to the House, Trump’s PAC released a statement cheering the “2 down, 8 to go,” a nod to the 10 Republicans who voted to impeach him and his crusade to end their careers. Two more have since called it quits, but Cheney, who’s trying to stick it out in Wyoming, isn’t one of them.

The obsession goes both ways. Kinzinger’s political posture has become entirely about calling out his party and not holding back on Trump. He enrages Republicans and shouts the things Democrats like to imagine most Republicans think but can’t say. He’s called out the “cancer” in the GOP “of lies, of conspiracy, of dishonesty,” blaming it squarely on Trump. He freely tosses out the word “con man” to describe his party’s de facto leader. Kinzinger said his biggest regret in office has been not voting to impeach Trump the first time, when Trump was accused of asking the Ukrainian president to meddle on his behalf in the 2020 election. In 2021, Kinzinger formed a super PAC to collect and spend money on other Republicans willing to defy Trump.

The nation has lived many lives between the 2020 election and now, but Kinzinger is still annoyed that he voted for Trump the second time he ran. In 2016, Kinzinger wrote in former CIA operations officer Evan McMullin. He called his 2020 vote a dumb move and chalked it up to feeling despondent about the party, with which he was already on the outs.

“Everybody was just like, ‘You didn’t vote for Trump, you’re a piece of shit.’ And I dealt with that for four years,” he said. “And in 2020 I was like, he’s not going to win Illinois so I’ll just vote for him. But that’s a big regret. That and the first impeachment. I’m the only guy in history that didn’t vote for Trump in ’16 and did vote for him in ’20.”

Kinzinger (left) spoke at a conference on disinformation put on by the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics on April 8. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

© Provided by HuffPostKinzinger (left) spoke at a conference on disinformation put on by the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics on April 8. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

Kinzinger (left) spoke at a conference on disinformation put on by the University of Chicago's Institute of Politics on April 8. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

It sounds like the windup to a terrible punchline you might hear on Fox News: RINO congressman walks into woke university, meets Barack Obama’s political adviser, bashes Trump to Democrats.

Depending on your political lens, a version of these events happened on April 8. That’s when Kinzinger was in Chicago for the conference put on by the woke Atlantic magazine, the very woke Institute of Politics and woke-by-association Obama strategist David Axelrod. The topic was “disinformation and the erosion of democracy,” something Kinzinger, as a Jan. 6 select committee member, has some insight into. But Kinzinger isn’t able to say much about his work on the committee, which has subpoenaed Trump’s family members and a number of his associates, until public hearings begin this summer.

Kinzinger and Axelrod chatted briefly in the greenroom at the David Rubenstein Forum before the event. The exchange was filmed by the documentary crew, which spent the morning hovering over Kinzinger with a sometimes comically obtrusive boom mic. (The film’s director didn’t want to go on the record yet about this project. After we finally managed to ditch the crew in an elevator, Kinzinger said his office fields lots of similar requests that he’s had to turn down. Maybe not surprisingly, Kinzinger, a young Gen Xer, went with the filmmaker who happened to co-write one of this generation’s classic coming-of-age movies. Kinzinger said he and his wife, Sofia, felt it would be a good way to document “this crazy time” in their lives.)

Axelrod, who steered Obama’s presidential campaigns, told HuffPost he admires the way Kinzinger has stood up to his party.

“There are two ways to do that,” he said. “One is to be Marjorie Taylor Greene and light yourself on fire, and light everyone else on fire. Or you can try to cast some light. I think he’s chosen the right route. He’s a valuable guy, he’ll do fine. Plus, he’s got a newborn at home. What could be better?”

A lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Air Force who served two tours in Iraq, Kinzinger was first elected to Congress in the 2010 tea party wave, beating an incumbent Democrat. (Kinzinger was also endorsed in that race by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who has recently returned from political exile.) Two years later, he was competing in a new congressional district with Don Manzullo, a GOP old-timer who branded Kinzinger the lesser conservative and tea partyer. But with the backing of then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Kinzinger managed to squeeze out Manzullo, securing a seat to watch Republicans implode under Trump.

As a lawmaker, Kinzinger hasn’t been especially outspoken on many issues that excite the GOP base, outside of maybe foreign policy. As the party lurched further right, Kinzinger seemed to remain planted in the center. Even so, his votes aligned with Trump’s positions 90% of the time. The Democrats who admire Kinzinger might also be disappointed to learn he generally carries a concealed weapon in lieu of a security detail.

He’s basically representing the Lincoln Project wing of the party, which doesn’t exist. They’re just Democrats, right?Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project

“Kinzinger was moving in the opposite direction of the party to stay alive,” Terry Schilling, president of the conservative American Principles Project, told HuffPost. Schilling’s father, the late Rep. Bobby Schilling, was elected in the same freshman class as Kinzinger and was also from Illinois.

Democrats might see Kinzinger as brave, but Schilling said there’s no demand in the GOP for what Kinzinger is selling.

“He’s on the wrong side,” he said. “It’s a movement that has been destroyed, a party that has been destroyed. The Republican Party that Adam Kinzinger grew up in doesn’t exist anymore, and so he has no constituency. He’s basically representing the Lincoln Project wing of the party, which doesn’t exist. They’re just Democrats, right?”

That raises the central question dogging Kinzinger since he went fully anti-Trump: Who claims him? Is he even still a Republican? His answer to this was surprising, even given everything he’s said about the party.

“I think mentally I feel more like an independent than a Republican. If there were more Democrats like [House Majority Leader] Steny Hoyer, I could probably identify in that area, some kind of a moderate Democrat. In essence, I guess I’m still comfortable holding the Republican label for now. Because as much as people love it or hate it, the Republican Party is going to be around for a while, and it deserves to have a battle for who it is,” he said.

But few Republicans want Kinzinger to take on that battle. Kinzinger described the uncomfortable split screen that is getting shunned by colleagues at work while also being recognized and praised out in public. He tries to steer clear of the “bad people” in Congress who just want to be famous, like extremists Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.), both of whom Kinzinger is often in the media bashing. He insisted that he rarely runs into them, and if he did, he would skip the formality of elevator greetings that he sometimes exchanges with someone like Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). “I don’t know anything about them,” he said of the two right-wing lawmakers. “They’re freshmen. I don’t care.”

There’s a “coldness,” Kinzinger said, when he’s voting on the House floor. Many of the young lawmakers he came up with in 2010 are gone, and his remaining friendships are strained. “It’s like how you stop dating somebody without breaking up with them. You do a week between dates and then three weeks. It’s like a slow ghosting. It’s the same in Congress. I just sort of ghost having friendships.”

Kinzinger is alone on this island, and it’s a weird place to be.

“I think mentally I feel more like an independent than a Republican,

© Provided by HuffPost“I think mentally I feel more like an independent than a Republican,

“I think mentally I feel more like an independent than a Republican," said Kinzinger, who's pictured outside the University of Chicago's David Rubenstein Forum. (Photo: Kristen Norman for HuffPost)

The Republicans from Homer Township, Illinois, meet every Saturday morning at their party headquarters in a modest strip mall, chatting over coffee, doughnuts and the occasional indoor cigarette. The group members seem to be exclusively white and exclusively of a certain age, and they do not like Kinzinger.

“I see him on TV and I just want to barf,” one of the Republicans told me.

It so happens this slice of Will County is adjacent to, but not actually in, Kinzinger’s congressional district. A byproduct of gerrymandering, Will County, a Chicago exurb, is currently split between six House members. Kinzinger represents an L-shaped chunk of the county. The Homer Township Republicans are fairly certain that Democrat Marie Newman is their representative, and the main thing they know about her is that she’s been endorsed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the East Coast democratic socialist.

“Around here we’re pro-Trump and pro-gun,” said Steve Balich, a township trustee supervisor, gesturing to a Trump 2024 sign on the wall. Balich is the guy who said Kinzinger makes him want to vomit. “I just don’t get why he’s so against Trump.”

“I think it’s pretty transparent the angle he was playing,” another Republican said of Kinzinger.

In February 2021, an overwhelming majority of the Will County GOP voted to censure Kinzinger for supporting Trump’s second impeachment. Other county Republican groups have followed suit, erasing any doubts about how Kinzinger is perceived now in the state. Asked to answer some questions about Kinzinger and the party’s midterm messaging, a spokesman for the Illinois GOP told HuffPost: “We will pass, thank you.”

I think it’s pretty transparent the angle he was playing.a Will County Republican

This is the grassroots GOP, and it’s what Kinzinger would be up against if he does decide to run for president.

Joe Walsh has been on the losing end of that battle. A former Illinois congressman who is also outspoken against Trump, Walsh, in a certain sense, was Adam Kinzinger before Adam Kinzinger. In the span of about a decade, Walsh went from tea partyer to “never Trumper” to ex-Republican. He ran for president in the 2020 GOP primary against Trump, really thinking he might beat him. He dropped out after the Iowa caucuses, the first nominating contest. Walsh is Kinzinger’s Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come.

“I think he’s going through what I went through four years ago when I realized I had no place in this Republican Party,” Walsh, who’s friends with Kinzinger, told HuffPost. “He’s trying to figure out if he can even stay in the party.”

Walsh is still conservative but “hanging on in the political wilderness” since what he calls his “mission impossible” primary.

As for Kinzinger, even if Trump doesn’t run in 2024, the eventual nominee “is going to be the Trumpiest person you can be,” Walsh said. “And if you’re a Joe Walsh or an Adam Kinzinger and you’re an outspoken opponent of Trump, you can’t run for anything. If you’re an opponent of Trump, you have no viability in a Republican primary.”

I asked Kinzinger if there’s a policy or position in the GOP that still resonates for him, anything to grasp on to now. He struggled to find the answer. “I don’t really know, because I don’t really know what the party stands for anymore,” he said. “I used to say things like foreign policy, but Putin sympathy isn’t my thing. I guess spending? I’m a moderate on spending. I see a role for the government but we shouldn’t overspend.”

For the first time in our interview, Kinzinger was truly feeling the chill of Walsh’s political wilderness.

“I don’t know. I don’t know what I identify with anymore,” he said. “I’m just not a Democrat.”

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Above is from:  Adam Kinzinger Is 'Slow Ghosting' Congress. Now He May Want To Beat Donald Trump In A Primary. (msn.com)