Friday, March 15, 2019

Nuclear power industry pushing for fewer inspections at plants




Nuclear power industry pushing for fewer inspections at plants

Commission staffers weighing requests as part of a review

  • FILE - In this March 16, 2011, file photo, steam escapes from Exelon Corp.’s nuclear plant in Byron,

    FILE - In this March 16, 2011, file photo, steam escapes from Exelon Corp.’s nuclear plant in Byron, Ill. The nuclear power industry is pushing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to cut back on inspections at nuclear power plants and throttle back what it tells the public about plant problems. (AP Photo/Robert Ray, File)

By ELLEN KNICKMEYER, Associated Press

Published: March 14, 2019, 9:32 PM

WASHINGTON — The nuclear power industry is pushing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to cut back on inspections at nuclear power plants and throttle back what it tells the public about plant problems. The agency, whose board is dominated by Trump appointees, is listening.

Commission staffers are weighing some of the industry’s requests as part of a sweeping review of how the agency enforces regulations governing the country’s 98 commercially operating nuclear plants. Recommendations are due to the five-member NRC board in June.

Annie Caputo, a former nuclear-energy lobbyist now serving as one of four board members appointed or reappointed by President Donald Trump, told an industry meeting this week that she was “open to self-assessments” by nuclear plant operators, who are proposing that self-reporting by operators take the place of some NRC inspections.

The Trump NRC appointees and industry representatives say changes in oversight are warranted to reflect the industry’s overall improved safety records and its financial difficulties, as the operating costs of the country’s aging nuclear plants increase and affordable natural gas and solar and wind power gain in the energy market.

But the prospect of the Trump administration’s regulation-cutting mission reaching the NRC alarms some independent industry watchdogs, who say the words “nuclear safety” and “deregulation” don’t go together.

For example, “the deregulatory agenda at SEC is a significant concern as well, but it’s not a nuclear power plant,” said Geoffrey Fettus, a senior attorney for nuclear issues at the Natural Resources Defense Council, referring to the federal government’s Securities Exchange Commission.

For an industry that is increasingly under financial decline … to take regulatory authority away from the NRC puts us on a collision course,” said Paul Gunter, of the anti-nuclear group Beyond Nuclear. With what? “With a nuclear accident,” Gunter said.

The industry made its requests for change in a letter delivered by the Nuclear Energy Institute group. A “high-priority” ask is to eliminate press releases about lower-level safety issues at plants — meaning the kind of problems that could trigger more inspections and oversight at a plant but not constitute an emergency.

Above is fromhttps://www.columbian.com/news/2019/mar/14/nuclear-power-industry-pushing-for-fewer-inspections-at-plants/

Boone County Young Republicans Club owes $26,875 in fines



  • Boone County Young Republicans Club owes $26,875 in fines

by Local Labs News Service | Mar 15, 2019

The campaign committee Boone County Young Republicans Club owes a $5,000 fine imposed on Aug. 20, 2015, according to Illinois State Board of Elections (ISBE).

A detailed look reveals the committee owes additional outstanding fines totaling $21,875 with Anthony J. Dini listed as the responsible officer.

ISBE Records dating back to 2003 show 29 area campaign committees owe a combined total of $235,529 in pending fines.

Above is from:  https://peoriastandard.com/stories/512290028-boone-county-young-republicans-club-owes-26-875-in-fines

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Fake athletics gain entrance to elite colleges

Felicity Huffman, Lori Loughlin Charged In College Admission Scheme With More Than 40 Others


Some of the purported student athletes didn’t even play the sports they were recruited to play.


  • Actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin are among dozens of people charged by the FBI in an elite college admission scheme, documents unsealed Tuesday in Boston revealed.

    The Hollywood stars allegedly joined CEOs of private and public companies, real estate professionals and a fashion designer in paying up to $6 million in bribes to ensure that their children were accepted to schools such as Yale and Georgetown. Most of the parents paid $250,000 to $400,000 per student.

    The alleged scheme, which the FBI called a “nationwide conspiracy,” allowed parents to pay for their children to cheat on exams and apply to elite schools as student athletes, regardless of their actual skills. Top college coaches at the schools are also among those charged, but authorities said they are not investigating the schools themselves.

    Federal prosecutors said 33 parents bribed entrance exam administrators along with varsity coaches and administrators.

    The bribery ring allegedly got its start several years ago by William Rick Singer, who founded a for-profit college admissions company in Newport Beach, California, that masqueraded as a not-for-profit group, according to authorities. Singer’s “sham charity” allowed him to conceal the nature of the payments made by parents, who could then “take the tax write-off at the end of the year,” U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling said at a press conference Tuesday morning.

    More than 200 law enforcement officials were involved in “Operation Varsity Blues” over the course of a year, arresting over 50 people in six states on both coasts, authorities said at the press conference. Most defendants had been taken into custody as of noon Tuesday Eastern time.

    According to court documents, some parents allegedly paid for someone to pose as their child to take entrance exams ― and even in classes, with those grades submitted as part of the college application. Other cases involved exam administrators allegedly providing students with answers during the tests or correcting wrong answers afterward.

    Lelling alleged that some parents also falsely claimed that their children had learning disabilities, requiring extra time on the exams, and that those claims were bolstered by notes from therapists.

    Some of the purported student athletes didn’t even play the sports they were recruited to play, according to the charging papers. Lelling said Singer helped the parents stage photos to make it appear that their children played those sports.

    ABC News reported that “most” of the students did not know their admission stemmed from bribe money.

    Federal officials said they have recorded phone calls in which Huffman, who is best known for starring in the ABC hit show “Desperate Housewives,” and Loughlin, who is known for her role on ABC’s classic “Full House,” discuss the scheme.

    The plot allegedly affected applications to Yale, Stanford, the University of Texas, the University of Southern California, the University of California at Los Angeles, the University of San Diego and Wake Forest University.

    headshot

    Sara Boboltz

    Above is from:  https://www.huffpost.com/entry/felicity-huffman-lori-loughlin-charged-college-admission-scheme_n_5c87c516e4b08d5b7865d04d

    ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************


    Actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin among those charged in $25 million nationwide college admissions cheating scam

    AARON KATERSKY, BILL HUTCHINSON and MIKE LEVINE

    ,

    Good Morning AmericaMarch 12, 2019


    Actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin among those charged in $25 million nationwide college admissions cheating scam (ABC News)

    More

    Actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin among those charged in $25 million nationwide college admissions cheating scam originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

    Hollywood actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin and a slew of chief executives are among 50 wealthy people charged in the largest college cheating scam ever prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice, federal officials said Tuesday.

    Those indicted in the investigation, dubbed "Varsity Blues," allegedly paid bribes of up to $6 million to get their children into elite colleges, including Yale, Stanford, Georgetown and the University of Southern California, federal prosecutors said.

    "This case is about the widening corruption of elite college admissions through the steady application of wealth combined with fraud," Andrew Lelling, the U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said at a news conference.

    PHOTO: Felicity Huffman in Beverly Hills on Feb 19, 2019 in Los Angeles. | Lori Loughlin,in Beverly Hills, Calif., Feb. 28, 2019. (Getty Images|REX via Shutterstock)

    PHOTO: Felicity Huffman in Beverly Hills on Feb 19, 2019 in Los Angeles. | Lori Loughlin,in Beverly Hills, Calif., Feb. 28, 2019. (Getty Images|REX via Shutterstock)

    More

    "There can be no separate college admissions system for the wealthy and, I'll add, there will not be a separate criminal justice system either," Lelling said.

    Ringleader to plead guilty

    According to Lelling, the ringleader of the scam is William Singer, owner of a college counseling service called Key Worldwide Foundation, who accepted bribes totaling $25 million from parents between 2011 and 2018 "to guarantee their children's admission to elite schools."

    Singer is expected to plead guilty in a Boston federal court on Tuesday on charges of racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of justice, Lelling said.

    PHOTO: Harkness Tower sits on the campus of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., Sept. 9, 2016. (Beth J. Harpaz/AP, FILE)

    PHOTO: Harkness Tower sits on the campus of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., Sept. 9, 2016. (Beth J. Harpaz/AP, FILE)

    More

    Those charged in the probe include nine coaches at elite schools, two SAT and ACT exam administrators, one exam proctor, a college administrator and 33 parents, including Huffman and Loughlin.

    "The parents are a catalog of wealth and privilege," Lelling said. "They include, for example, the CEOs of private and public companies, successful securities and real estate investors, two well-known actresses, a famous fashion designer and the co-chairman of a global law firm."

    Also named as defendants in the indictment are Robert Zangrillo, founder and CEO of the private investment firm Dragon Global; Bill Glashan, a businessman and international private equity investor; and Gordon Caplan, a New York attorney.

    Fake athletic credentials

    He said in many of the cases, Singer allegedly bribed the coaches, who "agreed to pretend that certain applicants were recruited competitive athletes when, in fact, the applicants were not."

    Lelling said the coaches allegedly "knew the students' athletic credentials had been fabricated."

    He said Singer allegedly worked with the parents to "fabricate profiles for their kids, including fake athletic credential and honors, or fake participation in elite club teams."

    Singer allegedly even had parents stage photos or Photoshopped pictures of their children participating in sports.

    PHOTO:Andrew Lelling, U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts, speaks at a press conference on March 12, 2019. (ABC News)

    PHOTO:Andrew Lelling, U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts, speaks at a press conference on March 12, 2019. (ABC News)

    More

    Singer also arranged for a student to take the SAT and ACT exams individually with a proctor in Texas or California he had bribed, Lelling said.

    In one case highlighted by federal prosecutors, the head women’s soccer coach at Yale University was paid $400,000 to accept a student even though the applicant did not play soccer. The parents of that student had paid Singer $1.2 million.

    Other elite schools named in the scam were the University of Texas, UCLA and Wake Forest.

    Joe Bonavolonta, special agent in charge of the FBI Boston Field Office, said 300 special agents fanned out across the country early Tuesday and arrested 38 people. He said seven other suspects were working to surrender to authorities and one is being actively pursued.

    Huffman was arrested at her home in Los Angeles, while Loughlin, who is in Canada, had yet to be taken into custody, sources told ABC News.

    School officials react

    USC President Wanda M. Austin addressed the scandal in a letter to the university community.

    "The federal government has alleged that USC is a victim in a scheme perpetrated against the university by a long-time Athletics Department employee, one current coach and three former coaching staff, who were allegedly involved in a college admissions scheme and have been charged by the government on multiple charges," Austin wrote.

    Austin vowed to take "appropriate employment action" against school employees involved in the scam and will review admissions decisions.

    "It is immensely disappointing that individuals would abuse their position at the university in this way," Austin's letter reads. "We will continue to cooperate fully with all law enforcement regulatory investigations."

    Wake Forest officials also released a statement saying the North Carolina school's head volleyball coach was one of the defendants indicted.

    "The university has retained outside legal counsel to look into this matter," the Wake Forest statement said. "Wake Forest has placed Ferguson on administrative leave."

    The nationwide scheme was prosecuted in Boston partly because it was uncovered by FBI agents working on an unrelated case, officials said. Fake test scores were submitted to Boston College, Boston University and Northeastern University, officials said, but none of those schools were named in the indictment.

    In most cases the students did not know their admission was contingent on a bribe, officials said.

    According to the charging papers, Huffman "made a purported charitable contribution of $15,000 ... to participate in the college entrance exam cheating scheme on behalf of her eldest daughter."

    Bribes disguised as charitable contributions

    "Huffman later made arrangements to pursue the scheme a second time, for her younger daughter, before deciding not to do so," the documents allege.

    Federal agents secretly recorded telephone calls with Huffman and a cooperating witness, according to the court papers.

    (MORE: Student claims she was accused of cheating on SAT after her exam was held for review)

    The documents say Loughlin -- best known for her role as Aunt Becky on the ABC sitcom "Full House" -- and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, "agreed to pay bribes totaling $500,000 in exchange for having their two daughters designated as recruits to the USC crew team -- despite the fact that they did not participate in crew -- thereby facilitating their admission to USC."

    PHOTO: Joseph R. Bonavolonta, special agent in charge of the Boston Field Office speaks at a press conference on March 12, 2019. (ABC News)

    PHOTO: Joseph R. Bonavolonta, special agent in charge of the Boston Field Office speaks at a press conference on March 12, 2019. (ABC News)

    More

    Federal agents obtained emails from Loughlin implicating her in the scam, according to the documents.

    (MORE: Harvard Students Accused of Cheating on Final Exam Reflects 'Culture of Cheating,' Grad Says)

    Federal authorities ultimately had three cooperating witnesses to help them build their case.

    "Today's arrests should be a warning to others: You can't pay to play, you can't cheat to get ahead because you will get caught," Bonavolonta said.

    Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/gma/actresses-ceos-arrested-nationwide-college-admissions-cheating-scam-142252158--abc-news-topstories.html

    Monday, March 11, 2019

    New York Attorney General Opens Investigation of Trump Projects

    New York Attorney General Opens Investigation of Trump Projects

    WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM and DANNY HAKIM

    a group of people standing in front of a building: The office of Attorney General Letitia James of New York issued a subpoena to Deutsche Bank on Monday, opening a new front in the scrutiny of its relationship with President Trump.© Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg The office of Attorney General Letitia James of New York issued a subpoena to Deutsche Bank on Monday, opening a new front in the scrutiny of its relationship with President Trump.

    The New York attorney general’s office late on Monday issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank for records relating to the financing of four major Trump Organization projects and a failed effort to buy the Buffalo Bills of the National Football League in 2014, according to a person briefed on the subpoenas.

    The inquiry opens a new front in the scrutiny of Deutsche Bank, one of the few lenders willing to do business with Donald J. Trump in recent years. The bank is already the subject of two congressional investigations and was examined last year by New York banking regulators, who took no action.

    The new inquiry, by the office of the attorney general, Letitia James, was prompted by the congressional testimony last month of Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, the person briefed on the subpoenas said. Mr. Cohen testified under oath that Mr. Trump had inflated his assets in financial statements, and Mr. Cohen provided copies of statements he said had been submitted to Deutsche Bank.

    The inquiry by Ms. James’s office is a civil investigation, not a criminal one, although its focus and scope were unclear. The attorney general has broad authority under state law to investigate fraud and can fine — or in extreme cases, go to court to try to dissolve — a business that is found to have engaged in repeated illegality.

    The request to Deutsche Bank sought loan applications, mortgages, lines of credit and other financing transactions in connection with the Trump International Hotel in Washington; the Trump National Doral outside Miami; and the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago, the person said.

    Investigators also requested records connected to an unsuccessful effort to buy the Bills, the person said. Mr. Trump gave Deutsche Bank bare-bones personal financial statements in 2014 when he planned to make a bid for the team, The New York Times has reported. The deal fell through when the team was sold to a rival bidder for $1.4 billion.

    Mr. Trump worked with a small United States-based unit of Deutsche Bank that serves ultra-wealthy people. The unit lent Mr. Trump more than $100 million in 2012 to pay for the Doral golf resort and $170 million in 2015 to transform the Old Post Office Building in Washington into a luxury hotel.

    New Jersey-based Investors Bank was subpoenaed for records relating to Trump Park Avenue, a project it had backed.

    Deutsche Bank and Investors Bank declined to comment. The Trump Organization did not respond to requests for comment.

    The subpoenas are a culmination of months of threats from Ms. James that she would aggressively investigate Mr. Trump. In August, referring to the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into Russian interference in the 2016 election, she said “the president of the United States has to worry about three things: Mueller, Cohen, and Tish James.”

    In her victory speech on the night she was elected in November, she said, “I will be shining a bright light into every dark corner of his real estate dealings, and every dealing, demanding truthfulness at every turn.” The next month, before taking office, she told NBC that “we will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family.”

    Mr. Trump has a rich recent history of grievances against the New York attorney general’s office. Before former Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman resigned amid allegations of assault and abuse against women, he pursued cases against the Trump Foundation and Trump University. Mr. Trump has referred to him as “sleazebag AG Eric Schneiderman” and “Shady Eric.” He also assailed Mr. Schneiderman’s temporary successor, Barbara D. Underwood, and has referred to Ms. James as “yet another AG” who “openly campaigned on a GET TRUMP agenda.”

    “Will never be treated fairly by these people — a total double standard of ‘justice,’” he added on Twitter.

    In Congress, the House Intelligence Committee has been exploring real estate transactions related to Russia and other foreign interests, including Deutsche Bank loans to the Trump Organization.

    Follow William Rashbaum on Twitter at @WRashbaum; follow Danny Hakim on Twitter at @dannyhakim.Jesse Drucker contributed reporting.

    Above is from:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-york-attorney-general-opens-investigation-of-trump-projects/ar-BBUEGZw?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE13DHP

    Sunday, March 10, 2019

    Opinion: Should Elected Officials Be Allowed to Serve in the Military? It's Complicated


    1. Should Elected Officials Be Allowed to Serve in the Military? It's Complicated

    Maj. Adam Kinzinger stands as The Meritorious Service Medal award package is read during a ceremony at Truax Field, Madison, Wis., March 5, 2016. Kinzinger received the award for various mission accomplishments (U.S. Air National Guard/Staff Sgt. Andrea F. Rhode)

    FILE PHOTO-- Maj. Adam Kinzinger stands as The Meritorious Service Medal award package is read during a ceremony at Truax Field, Madison, Wis., March 5, 2016. Kinzinger received the award for various mission accomplishments (U.S. Air National Guard/Staff Sgt. Andrea F. Rhode)

    8 Mar 2019

    Military.com | By Dr. Jessica D. Blankshain

    Jessica D. Blankshain is an assistant professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval War College. All views expressed are the author's own and do not represent the views of the United States government, Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or U.S. Naval War College.

    One of the things most people agree on regarding U.S. civil-military relations is that the military should stay out of politics. But how do we keep the military out of politics when politicians are in the military?

    Get Up to $50,000 in Signing BonusesContact a recruiter for insider information on joining the military including signing bonuses, career training + more. Click here!

    Adam Kinzinger, representative for Illinois' 16th Congressional District and a lieutenant colonel in the Wisconsin Air National Guard, is facing scrutiny for tweets and media appearances in which he criticized Wisconsin's governor, Tony Evers, for deciding to withdraw Wisconsin National Guard troops from the southern border.

    Ultimately the Wisconsin Guard determined Kinzinger’s remarks were not a problem, announcing March 7 that a review had found he was speaking in his capacity as a Congressman, not a military officer.

    But this dustup also highlights broader issues raised by members of the National Guard (and service reserves) serving concurrently in political office.

    Members of the National Guard and reserve serving in Congress has been relatively uncontroversial for nearly 200 years. In the early 1800s, the House took action against a member who joined the militia between congressional sessions, arguing that it violated the Incompatibility Clause (Article 1 Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution), which prohibits individuals from serving in the executive and legislative branches simultaneously.

    The law defining "employees" has since been reworded to avoid this issue but, in recent years, the question of legislators serving in the Guard and reserve has begun to draw attention from those who study American civil-military relations. This interest may be driven in part by the effects of the "Abrams Doctrine," which moved many critical capabilities into the Guard and reserve after Vietnam. [There are, of course, significant differences between the National Guard and service reserves, both in terms of force structure and relationship to state and federal government, but for present purposes I consider them together.]

    Beginning roughly near the end of the Cold War and accelerating after 9/11, the United States has shifted from having a largely strategic reserve component -- "weekend warriors" who did not expect to deploy unless there was a crisis -- to having an operational reserve in which members of the Guard and reserve expect to deploy regularly in support of ongoing operations overseas, from the peacekeeping missions of the 1990s to combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 2000s and beyond.

    As a result, members of the Guard and reserve may now be perceived less as civilians who take up arms in time of need and more as part-time professional soldiers who have more in common with their active-duty counterparts than with average Americans.

    Given the professional military's strong apolitical ethic, whether and when we view members of the Guard and reserve as members of the military profession has important implications for how we evaluate their political activity (similar to discussions of political participation by retired officers).

    There can, of course, be benefits to having members of the Guard and reserve serving in Congress or other political offices. Their military experience may inform their lawmaking and oversight. And as we were somberly reminded by the death of Brent Taylor, a Utah National Guard major and mayor of North Ogden, in Afghanistan last year, they may also serve as a link between civilian communities and the military fighting on their behalf.

    But there are challenges, too, as Rep. Kinzinger's case makes clear. When an officer who is also a politician publicly criticizes orders from his commander in chief, who belongs to a different political party, it raises concerns about good order and discipline within the military and, perhaps most significantly, it makes it harder to keep clear separation in the public mind between the military and politics. As the reserve component's role in the military has shifted, so too has the balance of these pros and cons.

    Kinzinger's personal criticism of the governor highlights that concerns about good order and discipline are linked with concerns about politicization. On Twitter, Kinzinger questioned whether Evers visited to the border himself to understand the deployment or instead made a "political" decision. In a Fox News interview, he said that he was breaking the news of the withdrawal because he believed the governor didn't have the courage to do so. While these comments would not be particularly remarkable coming from a member of the opposing political party, they look very different coming from an officer in that state's National Guard. Kinzinger, of course, is both. How will his fellow Wisconsin Guard members, whom he will continue to serve alongside, perceive these comments?

    Kinzinger's remarks also raise concerns about public perceptions of the politicization of the military. One of the main reasons Kinzinger's comments held weight was that he had just returned from a deployment to the border and drew on his experience there to support his criticism of the withdrawal. In the Fox appearance in particular, the hosts and Kinzinger all position him as a neutral expert drawing on his two-week deployment to the border to make a policy judgment, in contrast to partisan politicians who oppose the president's declaration of national emergency for political reasons.

    Kinzinger is explicitly critical of Democrats, both in Congress and in state government. He might be perceived as trying to have it both ways -- using his apolitical military credibility to go after political opponents -- which could have implications for the public's view of the military as an institution. This last point is perhaps of most concern, given the high level of confidence the American public has in the military compared to elected officials, as well as indications that this confidence is increasingly taking on partisan dimensions.

    Kinzinger's situation is by no means unique. There were at least 16 members concurrently serving in the Guard or reserve and the 115th Congress, and the intention of this piece is not to single him out for scrutiny. The shift from a strategic to an operational reserve component has changed the relationship between the reserve component and society, and we should be cognizant of those changes when thinking about how members of the Guard and reserve balance their military service with their political service.

    Such a reassessment wouldn't require a ban on concurrent service, but might mean developing either explicit regulations or implicit norms around which issues such members should recuse themselves on, what boundaries they draw on their partisan political speech, or to what degree they invoke their service while campaigning and governing.

    -- The opinions expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Military.com. If you would like to submit your own commentary, please send your article to opinions@military.com for consideration.

    Above is from:  https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/03/08/should-elected-officials-be-allowed-serve-military-its-complicated.html

    President Trump and the Florida spa owner

    Florida spa founder watched Super Bowl with Trump at Mar-a-Lago,attended Republican events

    Jen Hayden

    Daily Kos Staff

    Friday March 08, 2019 · 10:24 AM CST


    US President Donald Trump, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (2nd-L), his wife Akie Abe (R), US First Lady Melania Trump (L) and Robert Kraft (2nd-L),owner of the New England Patriots, sit down for dinner at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort on February 10, 2017. / AFP / NICHOLAS KAMM        (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

    Donald Trump with Robert Kraft and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

    In late February, billionaire Robert Kraft, owner of the New England Patriots, was arrested in a prostitution sting centered around a day spa in Jupiter, Florida. Kraft faces two counts of soliciting sex, and prosectors say evidence includes video surveillance taken at the spa. The investigation uncovered a series of crimes taking place there, resulting in charges that include human trafficking, racketeering and money laundering.

    Turns out, spa founder Cindy Yang is quite the fan of Donald Trump and Republicans, and has appeared at a number of Republican events. She was also a guest at Mar-a-Lago for a Super Bowl watch party with Donald Trump himself. Jump below for details from the Miami Herald.

    View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

    SFDB@sfdb

    The @MiamiHerald is reporting this AM that the owner of the spa where Robert Kraft was busted likes to hang with Donald Trump. Pictures of Li Yang at a Super Bowl watch party with Trump and attending a fundraiser for him are included in the report. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article227186429.html …

    Yang sold the spa where Kraft and others were surveilled soliciting sex. She started and flipped several spas, placing classified ads written in Chinese, but she and her family still own other Florida spas where prostitution is suspected of taking place.

    “If you’re just wanting to get a ‘rub and tug,’ this might be one of the best places in West Palm Beach,” one Internet commenter wrote about a Tokyo Day Spas’ parlor. A massage therapist at a different location informed police in late 2016 that some employees at the parlor were selling sex and said management encouraged the behavior.

    In recent years, Yang has increased her political activity and has had several encounters with the Trump family.

    Before the 2016 general election, Yang offered no evidence of political engagement. She hadn’t voted in 10 years, records showed. But she has now become a fixture at Republican political events up and down the East Coast. Her Facebook is covered in photos of herself standing with President Trump, his two sons, Eric and Donald Jr., Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Sen. Rick Scott, Sarah Palin, the president’s campaign manager and an assortment of other high-level Republican operators she has met at charity events, political fundraisers and galas, many of which require hefty donations to attend. She sometimes carries a rhinestone encrusted MAGA clutch purse.

    Yang has shown considerable political largesse. Since 2017, she and her close relatives have contributed more than $42,000 to Trump Victory, a political action committee, and more than $16,000 to the president’s campaign.

    Yang also attended Republican events in D.C., including Trump’s inauguration in 2017.

    The Miami Herald notes it is unclear what kind of a background check Yang underwent before gaining access to Trump at Mar-a-Lago. At the end of the day, you are the company you keep. Donald Trump and his staff need to be more cautious about whom they are meeting with, something that is probably difficult to do when they are also focused on promoting and selling access to Donald Trump, lining their own pocketbooks from appearances at Trump-owned clubs. If nothing else, it shows just how easy it is to buy access, and that should be troubling to us all.

    And yes, we hate this game, but can you imagine the uproar, furor, and endless media coverage this story would be getting if it were President Barack Obama in the same situation?

    Above is from:  https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/8/1840494/-Florida-spa-founder-watched-Super-Bowl-with-Trump-at-Mar-A-Lago-attended-Republican-events

    Monday, March 4, 2019

    Trump's sons and scores of others receive document requests from House committee


    David Knowles

    Editor

    ,

    Yahoo NewsMarch 4, 2019

    House panel issues 81 document requests in Trump obstruction investigation

    Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee investigating President Trump over allegations of obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power issued document requests Monday to his two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as well as to his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

    The document requests sent to Trump’s kin are among 81 subpoenas issued by the House panel. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, announced the request for documents Monday and gave the recipients two weeks to comply with the request.


    “Over the last several years, President Trump has evaded accountability for his near-daily attacks on our basic legal, ethical and constitutional rules and norms,” Nadler said in a statement. “Investigating these threats to the rule of law is an obligation of Congress and a a core function of the House Judiciary Committee.”

    Donald Trump, Jr., Eric Trump and Jared Kushner. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: AP)

    Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Jared Kushner. (Yahoo News photo illustration; photos: AP)

    More

    Some of the other recipients are well-known names, including American Media Inc., the owner of the National Enquirer, and its CEO, David Pecker; former White House counsel Don McGahn; Trump’s 2020 campaign chief Brad Parscale; former Attorney General Jeff Sessions; and Trump advisers and former associates including Hope Hicks, Corey Lewandowski and Sam Nunberg. Julian Assange of Wikileaks is on the list, as well as Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, convicted former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and the recently indicted Roger Stone.

    Others are relatively unknown to the public. Here is the full list of who received a document request on Monday:

    1. 1. Alan Garten – general counsel for the Trump Organization

      2. Alexander Nix — former chief of Cambridge Analytica

      3. Allen Weisselberg — chief financial officer for the Trump Organization

      4. American Media Inc

      5. Anatoli Samochornov — translator who attended June 2016 Trump Tower meeting

      6. Andrew Intrater — head of investment company Columbus Nova

      7. Annie Donaldson — former deputy White House counsel

      8. Brad Parscale

      9. Brittany Kaiser — former Cambridge Analytica executive

      10. Cambridge Analytica

      11. Carter Page

      12. Columbus Nova

      13. Concord Management and Consulting

      14. Corey Lewandowski

      15. David Pecker

      16. Department of Justice

      17. Don McGahn

      18. Donald J Trump Revocable Trust

      19. Donald Trump Jr.

      20. Dylan Howard — vice president American Media Inc.

      21. Eric Trump

      22. Erik Prince

      23. Federal Bureau of Investigation

      24. Felix Sater

      25. Flynn Intel Group

      26. General Services Administration

      27. George Nader — Lebanese-American businessman

      28. George Papadopoulos

      29. Hope Hicks

      30. Irakly Kaveladze — Attended 2016 Trump Tower meeting

      31. Jared Kushner

      32. Jason Maloni — former Paul Manafort spokesman

      33. Jay Sekulow

      34. Jeff Sessions

      35. Jerome Corsi

      36. John Szobocsan — associate of Peter Smith

      37. Julian Assange

      38. Julian David Wheatland — CEO, Cambridge Analytica

      39. Keith Davidson — former lawyer for Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal

      40. KT McFarland

      41. Mark Corallo — former spokesman for Trump legal team

      42. Matt Tait

      43. Matthew Calamari — longtime bodyguard to Trump

      44. Michael Caputo

      45. Michael Cohen

      46. Michael Flynn

      47. Michael Flynn Jr

      48. Paul Erickson — Republican operative and boyfriend to Maria Butina

      49. Paul Manafort

      50. Peter Smith (Estate)

      51. Randy Credico

      52. Reince Priebus

      53. Rhona Graff — Executive assistant to Trump

      54. Rinat Akhmetshin — Russian-American lobbyist who attended June 2016 Trump Tower meeting

      55. Rob Goldstone

      56. Roger Stone

      57. Ronald Lieberman

      58. Sam Nunberg

      59. SCL Group Limited — parent company of Cambridge Analytica

      60. Sean Spicer

      61. Sheri Dillon — tax attorney for Trump

      62. Stefan Passantino — former White House deputy counsel

      63. Steve Bannon

      64. Ted Malloch — London-based academic with ties to Nigel Farage

      65. The White House

      66. Trump Campaign

      67. Trump Foundation

      68. Trump Organization

      69. Trump Transition

      70. Viktor Vekselberg — Russian businessman

      71. Wikileaks

      72. 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee

      73. Christopher Bancroft Burnham — businessman with ties to Russia

      74. Frontier Services Group — Africa-focused security company run by Erik Prince

      75. J.D. Gordon — National security adviser to Trump

      76. Kushner Companies

      77. NRA

      78. Rick Gates

      79. Tom Barrack

      80. Tom Bossert — former Homeland Security adviser

      81.Tony Fabrizio — Republican pollster

    Asked Monday whether he would cooperate with the Judiciary Committee document requests to the White House, his presidential campaign and businesses, the president replied: “I cooperate all the time with everybody.”

    Having retaken control of the House of Representatives following the 2018 midterm elections, Democrats have shown little hesitation about exercising their oversight role. Last week, the new chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., marked the opening of testimony by Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen with a rebuke for the Republicans who once controlled it.

    “Ladies and gentlemen, the days of this committee protecting the president at all costs are over,” Cummings said.

    With Democrats now able to subpoena records and testimony from Trump’s family members and business associates, the president has done his best to portray the investigations as partisan overreach.

    Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/news/investigating-trump-democrats-issue-subpoenas-to-the-presidents-sons-and-78-others-183200167.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index