Showing posts with label Governor Walker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Governor Walker. Show all posts

Saturday, November 5, 2016

How tax cuts changed Wisconsin

 

image

How tax cuts changed Wisconsin

Wisconsin has become a testing ground for GOP economic policy enshrined since Reagan. The results have been average.

By Simon Montlake, Staff Writer November 3, 2016

 

  • close

    Dennis McBride (left) and Mary Young stand on the steps of Wauwatosa East High School in Wauwatosa, Wis., on Oct. 18.

    Michael Thomas McLoone/Special to The Christian Science Monitor

     

Wauwatosa, Wis. — It’s just one block from Dennis McBride’s modest Arts and Crafts house to Jefferson Elementary School, where two of the recently retired federal attorney’s three children once attended. Joyous screams from the candy-colored apparatus of the school playground echo across Mr. McBride’s yard. 

It’s also just a short walk to the white three-bedroom Colonial on North 68th Street where Republican Gov. Scott Walker used to live. McBride says he’s known “Scott” for 20 years – both as parents whose paths crossed at the local grocery store and at public events back when Governor Walker was a member of the state Assembly. 

But now, the two men are on opposite sides of a battle over Wisconsin’s future. 

As governor, Walker has made Wisconsin a prime testing ground for Republican economic principles: He has cut the top rates of income and corporate taxes in hopes of unleashing strong economic growth. 

As a resident of Wauwatosa, McBride has stepped up to say that vision has failed in a crucial way: The tax cuts are straining Jefferson and other schools across the state. What began in Wauwatosa as a small parents’ advocacy group resisting school cutbacks in this middle-class suburb of Milwaukee has reverberated in other districts. 

The scuffle is over money for public schools. But at its core, it is an ideological tussle over the low-tax, anti-union brand of economics that Walker has pushed here since the 2010 election gave the Republicans, infused with tea party vim, unbridled control of Wisconsin’s government for the first time since 1938. 

For most in the national Republican establishment, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan, Walker’s supply-side economics are suffused with the golden glow of the Reagan era. And the party’s donor class has a direct interest in lower taxation. 

But with a deadlocked Congress barely able to pass a budget, let alone rewrite the tax code, Republican-led states such as Wisconsin, Kansas, and North Carolina have taken the lead – all sharply reducing taxes on individuals and businesses in pursuit of growth and jobs. 

The results have ranged from poor to middling, suggesting that the most oft-cited success story – Texas – is more the result of the state’s energy economy than its fiscal policy. 

Kansas, for example, was forced to raise its sales tax in 2014 after income tax cuts and lackluster growth led to a costly debt downgrade.

In Wisconsin, the report card is more mixed. In fact, Wisconsin looks a lot like the rest of the country: The economy is starting to hum and unemployment is low. But Wisconsin has not outperformed in growth and jobs, as Walker promised it would. And other states in the same economic tier didn’t cut taxes and reduce social spending to get their economies going again. 

The question: Was it worth it?

How parents see it

SOS (Support Our Schools) Wauwatosa began with anxious parents talking on school playgrounds. It was February 2015 and Walker, who had been reelected in November, had proposed a two-year budget that would strip $127 million from K-12 schools. The superintendent had written to parents to explain that this would cut $900,000 from his budget. 

Among the anxious parents was Mary Young. She wrote back to the superintendent to thank him and ask what this meant for her two children who were in kindergarten and second grade. Soon she was coordinating with other parents, and former Jefferson school parents like McBride, to put up SOS yard signs and bombard lawmakers with thousands of signed postcards opposing cuts. They showed up at town hall meetings – a first for Ms. Young, an educator at a Roman Catholic university – to press lawmakers, mostly Republicans, about where they stood on the budget. 

“There were many other parents who felt like I did. We chose to buy our homes here, to live here. And a lot of it is about the neighborhood schools,” she says. 

For many in the education community, the 2015 budget was just the latest blow. First in that line was Act 10, the controversial 2011 law that ended collective bargaining for teachers and other public employees. 

In an interview with the Monitor, Walker defends Act 10 as a powerful tool for improving the state’s finances. At a time of public disquiet over recession-hit state finances, including pension liabilities, Act 10 saved taxpayers more than $5 billion by shifting costs onto teachers, Walker says. 

In addition to allowing districts to pay less for health care and pensions, it also revoked union seniority and tenure rules. 

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker delivers keynote remarks at the DuPage County GOP Summer Reception in Downers Grove, Ill., in this 2015 file photo. Anthony Souffle/Chicago Tribune/AP/File

Act 10 is “one of the most significant education reforms in our history,” he says. “Schools can hire and fire based on performance. They can pay based on performance as well.... We’ve seen school districts have tremendous success.” 

But others argue that along with Act 10, Walker has defunded school districts and universities and demoralized educators. 

McBride has nothing against Walker personally, but he argues that the governor’s sweeping reforms have undermined a long tradition of bipartisan support for public schools and teachers – and abiding pride in the results – without a signpost to a better destination. “It’s a wild experiment without controls,” he says. 

McBride, an elected alderman, takes pride in Wauwatosa’s history – how it has evolved from a reliably Republican streetcar suburb of Milwaukee into a semi-urban college town of more vibrancy and political diversity. That vibrancy gives the town a certain centrist political ethic. As an independent, McBride says he has respect for Republican governors who supported public education, ticking off a list that includes Warren Knowles and Tommy Thompson. 

“We voted for moderate people who cared about the things that we cared about,” he says. 

Last July, SOS’s work paid off when lawmakers restored the $127 million in K-12 cuts. But some of the money went to an expanded voucher program for low-income students. And lawmakers cut $250 million from the University of Wisconsin system, an 11 percent drop, to an all-time low. 

Walker says the university’s overall pool of money – including federal grants – is bigger than ever, and a move to cap fees has made higher education more accessible. “Students and families that support them do not want higher tuition. It’s one of their biggest burdens,” he says. 

Property taxes, which are tied to state aid to school districts, have also been capped by Walker, a point of pride. 

For her part, Young says she could have done without the extra $13. “Having a good public school for my kids to attend is worth more than $13 a year.”

How businesses see it

On a warm September night, the setting sun bronzes the private planes parked on the tarmac at Appleton International Airport, an aspirational name for a regional gateway. Inside a gym-sized hangar where two business jets are conspicuously positioned behind a buffet table of nachos, baked chicken, and chocolate fondue, an event planner is giving a pep talk to 20 or so men and women.

The bus, they are told, is on its way. On the bus is the reason they came tonight – 89 engineering and IT students from 23 universities. 

Here in the valley of the Fox River, a confluence of highways and industries that serves as a bellwether for manufacturing in Wisconsin, the mantra is talent, not taxes. 

Wisconsin’s population is aging, and the state will need to bring in roughly 300,000 workers in the next 20 years just to maintain its existing labor force. Not only that, it needs to convince multinationals that this workforce will stick around.

So it’s all the event planner can do to keep the attendees from salivating. 

“The students will come in here. Now let’s not stare at them,” says the manager, eyeing the company reps, who smile awkwardly and shuffle their feet on the concrete. “We want to intermingle with them.” He advises them to join the students in the buffet line, just not all at once. “You’ll get some good line-talking with them,” he promises. 

Among the attendees are businesses that have benefited from the governor’s new economic regime and applaud it. 

In May, Werner Electric, which supplies electrical materials to factories and builders, moved into a new $20 million 200,000-square-foot distribution center in Appleton. It got a $2 million, five-year tax credit for the facility. And it indirectly benefits from a production credit introduced by Walker that virtually eliminates state taxes on manufacturers and agribusiness.

The tax credits help Werner invest in equipment that underpins its long-term expansion, including new hires at its new facility, says Craig Wiedemeier, Werner’s vice president of operations. 

“I see more manufacturers willing to take a risk.... The support we get helps us to invest and that flows out as well,” he says. 

This is the core supply-side proposition: Lighten the tax burden on entrepreneurs and their investments will seed a larger economy, benefiting those who don’t get the tax breaks. 

And there is some evidence that it’s working. State unemployment was at 4.2 percent in August. Last year Wisconsin ranked fourth in growth in average household income, and some data show a stronger rebound than after the 2001 recession, when Wisconsin grew more slowly than the national average. 

But the Appleton event also points to what tax breaks can’t deliver: a pipeline of educated workers. 

While fiscal policy can encourage investment, quality of life and good schools are a greater draw, says Dale Knapp, research director at the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance. 

“You can have all of these policies to attract businesses, but you have to attract the workers to help the economy grow and that’s going to be a challenge.”

So far, Walker’s tax credits have mostly been a boon for existing manufacturers but aren’t bringing in many new investors. The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation ranks Wisconsin last for start-up activity, citing a lack of entrepreneurs and new businesses. 

John Torinus, whose midsize company builds car console panels in Mexico and Wisconsin, disputes this ranking. He praises Walker, comparing him to a “turnaround CEO” who takes over in a crisis. 

But Mr. Torinus acknowledges that he doesn’t see any new thinking on the economy and worries that cuts to higher education will handicap future start-ups. 

Tax cuts vs. education

Democratic state Sen. Kathleen Vinehout has actually put a number on the cost of all income and property tax cuts, manufacturing credits, and other tax breaks: $1.7 billion. To her, these are giveaways that may not even sway the decisions companies make about where to invest. That investment would do much more for the state’s long-term economic health if it went to public schools, she argues. 

“We may be recovering but our recovery is slow. The governor has been taking credit for the sun coming up,” says Senator Vinehout, an organic dairy farmer and former college professor. 

A 2015 study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center came to the same general conclusion, finding no strong evidence, positive or negative, that tax cuts affected states’ economic growth. 

“There’s no evidence that what [Walker has] done has been good for growth. And there’s potential for what he’s done to be bad for growth,” says Kim Rueben, coauthor of the study.

One prominent counterexample is next door. In 2013, Minnesota raised the top rate of income tax over protests that it would hurt the economy and lead to lower tax revenues. Now lawmakers are debating what to do with a budget surplus. 

Back in Wauwatosa, SOS has begun a new campaign, calling for an increase in state aid to public schools and a freeze on voucher programs. Wauwatosa has dipped into its reserves to make sure that it doesn’t cut programs or lose in-demand teachers. At some point, though, it will have to ask local taxpayers to pay more. 

“We’re not politicians,” says Young. SOS’s strength lies in the bonds that form between parents, she adds. “We have the power of the playground.” 

Walking past the elementary school, McBride strikes a hopeful note. Some Republican legislators support a hike in the gas tax to plug the budget gap, and that could free up money for education. 

He stops to take in the joyful mayhem of lunchtime recess. An empty nester, he no longer gets to chew the fat with other parents. “I miss being on the playground.”

Above is from:  http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/1103/How-tax-cuts-changed-Wisconsin?cmpid=ema:nws:Weekly%2520Newsletter%2520%2811-05-2016%29&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20161105_Newsletter:%20Weekender&utm_term=Weekend_Best_of_Web

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Scott Walker Backers Defend Lead and Wisconsin’s Poisoned Politics

 

image

CONTRIBUTOR

Scott Walker Backers Defend Lead and Wisconsin’s Poisoned Politics

10/16/2016 11:05 am ET | Updated 1 hour ago

 

Mary Bottari

Center for Media and Democracy/ALEC Exposed

This post is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

In Scott Walker’s Wisconsin, lead chips have replaced cheese curds as the tasty snack of choice.

At least that’s what one might think reviewing right-wing reaction to news revelations in the Guardian that Scott Walker may have secretly solicited $750,000 from Texas billionaire Harold Simmons. Simmons was the owner of numerous businesses including a lead pigment firm called NL Industries (formerly National Lead), which sold toxic paint and other products containing lead for decades.

The contributions, deposited into the coffers of dark money group Wisconsin Club for Growth, were followed by a sneaky (and unconstitutional) change to the law that attempted to retroactively nullify lawsuits brought by 173 poisoned children against NL Industries and other lead pigment manufacturers. The four word change was slipped into a 600 page budget bill with a “Motion 999” in the dead of night with no public notice. The fingerprints couldn’t be clearer; the language was handed to legislators by NL’s high-dollar lobbyist in a memo.

But you wouldn’t hear any of this listening to Walker’s defenders. “Who gives a damn about lead?” shouts right-wing talk radio host Vicky McKenna into the mic shortly after the story broke. “The lead case is over. Lead paint has not been manufactured since 1978.”

McKenna fails to note that even today, thousands of kids a year are poisoned by lead paint in Wisconsin. And the problem disproportionately impacts poor and vulnerable kids living in run-down housing.

When confronted with allegations of potential pay to play Walker’s spokesman demurred and the Governor Walker leaned in:

“Maybe in the world of politics it is shocking that politicians actually do the things they say they’re going to do when they campaign, but I’ve talked about this for years. If I did something different than what I said I was gonna do, then voters would have a right to question. But I fulfilled the things I said I would do on this and many other cases.”

Ah yes. Remember those campaign commercials when Walker explained he was going to unconstitutionally rip away away the legal rights of Wisconsin kids in order to help some out-of-state billionaire? Those went over well.

But the spin doesn’t stop there.

The Guardian reporting indicates that Walker and top aides used the “independent” electioneering group, Wisconsin Club for Growth as a pot of secret money for the 15 recall elections sparked by Walker’s bill to eviscerate public sector unions in 2011. Wisconsin Club for Growth board member Eric O’Keefe is proud of his group’s $20 million dollar operation during the 2011-2012 recall period, which was under investigation by state prosecutors, and proud of the Texas billionaire ladling on the cash.

“The smearing of the late patriot, philanthropist businessman Harold Simmons is one of the more disgraceful aspects of the new ‘leaks,’” O’Keefe told Wisconsin Watchdog, a media site he helped create and whose own staff was involved in running dark money during the recall period.

And Watchdog has its own theory: “The left’s hatred for the late Dallas billionaire Harold Simmons is perhaps surpassed only by its animus for Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker. Both conservatives have been raked over the coals this week by the liberal corporation-hate machine in its faulty narrative of right-of-center corruption in Wisconsin politics.”

Apparently the $750,000 secret payment by St. Simmons, whose bigheaded lobbyist Eric Petersen demanded the law change as a “Major EP Priority” in the memo given to legislators, was a plot by the left to embarrass Walker and Simmons.

The $750,000 included personal and corporate checks. This is significant because since 1905 Wisconsin has banned corporate checks in campaigns and elections. “These potential violations of our corporate contribution ban and a pay for play scheme must be investigated. These issues were not raised or considered previously, and the public deserves a thorough investigation,” said Representative Chris Taylor (D-Madison) as she and 16 other legislators sent a letter to Madison District Attorney Ishmael Ozanne asking for an investigation.

O’Keefe and his cohorts in the right-wing echo chamber don’t just defend secret money in politics, they get quite poetic about it. Wrapping dark money in the flag and the Federalist Papers, they argue in endless articles, books, and speeches, that “anonymous speech” goes back to the founding fathers and that secrecy of donors is essential to protect First Amendment rights.

You can hear the Koch Brothers cheering now.

But the American public has it right. They know that secret money hides the dirty deals and the embarrassing givers, the payday loan operators, Wall Street crooks, and other bottom feeders that bankroll Wisconsin Club for Growth and its ilk. That is why overwhelming majorities of citizens in both political parties support transparency in campaigns and elections. 84 percent of Democrats and 72 percent and Republicans want to limit the amount of money individuals and organizations can spend on campaigns and elections.

And the public isn’t too fond of lead either. The disgraceful treatment of the children of Flint, Michigan caused a national uproar and state and federal investigations.

Wisconsin lead lovers defend it by saying it was “required” by the big bad government. But the truth is that over 100 years ago, paint manufacturers knew that lead was a “deadly cumulative toxin,” but they still lobbied to get governments to require its use in pipes, paint and other products. Since the 1920s, the industry has battled bans, restrictions, and even warnings labels as children suffered catastrophic poisonings and brain damage. Even today, old lead paint is still the most significant source of poisoning for children.

Now they say the “big government” made them do it, but the record is clear, and the result is that today in Wisconsin Walker’s own Department of Health Services (DHS), says that 21 percent of children under the age of 6 suffer from lead poisoning.

The scheme to strip Wisconsin children of their legal rights, failed. The retroactive cancellation of lawsuits on behalf of 173 children was struck down as unconstitutional by state and federal courts and Wisconsin kids are still in court with their attorney Peter Earle battling to hold the industry accountable for the harms it has caused.

But Walker’s DHS steadfastly refuses to adopt lead-poisoning standards consistent with federal standards even though they are required to do so, says Rep. Taylor who has been battling for the change.

Now we know why.

Above is from:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scott-walker-backers-defend-lead-and-wisconsins-poisoned_us_58039587e4b0f42ad3d2633f

Friday, September 16, 2016

John Doe still has affect on Gov Walker

 

 

image

GOP eases lead paint laws after $750,000 in donations

Daniel Bice, Jason Stein and Patrick Marley, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 7:47 p.m. CDT September 14, 2016

Madison — Gov. Scott Walker and the GOP-controlled Legislature approved a measure aimed at retroactively shielding paint makers from liability after a billionaire owner of a lead producer contributed $750,000 to a political group that provided crucial support to Walker and Republicans in recall elections, according to a report released Wednesday.

Citing leaked documents gathered during a now-shuttered investigation into the governor's campaign, the Guardian U.S., an arm of the British newspaper, reported that Harold Simmons, owner of NL Industries, a producer of the lead formerly used in paint, made three donations totaling $750,000 to the Wisconsin Club for Growth between April 2011 and January 2012.

Simmons' donations were made before and after Republicans approved two laws helpful to the industry — one in January 2011 and the other in June 2013. The 2013 measure was inserted in a budget bill in the middle of the night despite warnings about its constitutionality.

The documents confirm earlier reports that Walker solicited millions of dollars for Wisconsin Club for Growth, a group then run by R.J. Johnson, one of his top campaign advisers. The Guardian story says Walker was warned in an email about potential "red flags" with Simmons, who died in 2013, including a magazine story that described him as "Dallas' most evil genius."

 

Simmons' contributions mirror a $700,000 donation from mining firm Gogebic Taconite to Wisconsin Club for Growth around the same time, a donation that was earlier disclosed in court records. After that contribution, the GOP-controlled Legislature and Walker approved legislation aimed at streamlining regulations for an iron ore mine in northern Wisconsin.

The 1,352 pages of leaked John Doe records provide a window into the case that prosecutors were putting together in arguing that Walker's campaign and conservative groups such as Wisconsin Club for Group were illegally coordinating campaign activity. The Wisconsin Supreme Court shut down the probe last year, finding the prosecutors' case was "unsupported in either reason or law."

Walker's campaign said Wednesday that there was no sign that the Republican governor had done anything wrong but did not directly address the donations from Simmons or the legislation touching on lead paint lawsuits.

"As widely reported two years ago, the prosecutor’s attorney stated that Governor Walker was not a target," said Walker campaign spokesman Joe Fadness. "Several courts shut down the baseless investigation on multiple occasions, and there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing."

Club For Growth attorney David Rivkin said in an email that prosecutors made up crimes that don’t exist and called their attempt to get the case to the Supreme Court  “legally frivolous and just another publicity stunt intended to tarnish their targets’ reputations and salvage their own.”

Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, a Democrat who launched the investigation in 2012, noted in a statement that it is illegal to leak records from a John Doe investigation. Chisholm has been critical of past leaks to the Wall Street Journal that have been favorable to the John Doe targets.

"The public release of this John Doe evidence without court authorization is not merely a violation of the John Doe secrecy order; it is a crime under Wisconsin law," Chisholm said. "As Special Prosecutor Fran Schmitz has done in the past when other secret materials have been publicly disclosed, we support any effort that may be undertaken to determine the source of these newest leaks."

Such an investigation appears possible.

GOP Attorney General Brad Schimel "is currently reviewing the available options to address the serious legal questions raised by the leak and publication of these sealed documents," Schimel spokesman Johnny Koremenos said in a statement.

State Rep. David Craig (R-Town of Vernon) said he wants to form a special legislative committee with subpoena power to look into how the investigation was conducted and the leak of documents. Craig, who is running for state Senate without opposition, helped lead the effort to end the ability of prosecutors to use John Doe investigations to investigate campaign finance matters.

This leak of John Doe documents comes just weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court is to meet in closed session on a petition from prosecutors to revive the investigation.

Prosecutors argue that former state Supreme Court Justice David Prosser and current Justice Michael Gableman should not have been allowed to hear the case because their campaigns benefited from work by some of the groups being investigated.

The Guardian story quotes a Walker email to Karl Rove, a former top aide to President George W. Bush who oversaw a major political action committee, in which the Republican governor credits Johnson and Wisconsin for Growth in the election of Gableman and Prosser. Both justices voted to shut down the John Doe investigation.

"RJ was the chief adviser to my campaign," Walker wrote on May 4, 2011. "He put together the team to flip the Senate three times and the Assembly two times.

"He ran the effort that defeated the first incumbent Supreme Court Justice in decades back in 2008, and Club for Growth-Wisconsin was the key to retaining Justice Prosser."

Since the recalls, Walker and Republicans in the state have sought to shield paint makers from liability in lawsuits involving lead paint, although federal courts have in turn blocked some of those actions from standing.

For instance, in an overnight meeting in June 2013, Republicans on the Legislature's Joint Finance Committee inserted a provision into the budget long sought by the paint industry that was meant to block lawsuits pending against them by 171 children sickened by lead paint.

But in July 2014 a federal appeals court ruled that a lawsuit by one of those children could continue despite the 2013 state law. The boy who suffered lead poisoning can sue a half-dozen major manufacturers of paint used on the Milwaukee house where he lived, based on a theory approved in a controversial 2005 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago ruled.

In an interview Wednesday, the boy's attorney, Peter Earle, said he was "trembling with rage" at the news of the contributions by the industry, saying that they were meant to block claims by "the most vulnerable among us." He said Republican leaders in Wisconsin had benefited from industry money and then acted to try to retroactively block lawsuits by children harmed by lead paint.

"What I see is a corrupt morass of government in Wisconsin that has been fueled by corporate money," Earle said. "How can people have faith in a system like that?"

State Sen. Jon Erpenbach (D-Middleton) said he was shocked by the lead paint company's donations.

"He answers first and foremost to large donors and that's kind of underscored in the lead paint (example)," Erpenbach said of Walker.

He said it was frustrating that the state Supreme Court had concluded prosecutors weren't allowed to look into whether there was a connection between the money from

the lead paint industry and legislation helping it. He said conservatives on the state court benefited from their own decision to shut down the investigation into these contributions.

"A majority of the Supreme Court benefited directly from the dark money that flowed into this state," he said.

Walker won his recall election in June 2012, becoming the first governor in U.S. history to do so, and GOP senators faced recalls in both 2011 and 2012.

Three GOP senators faced recalls and then voted on the Joint Finance Committee budget motion in June 2013 that sought to retroactively shield the lead paint industry from lawsuits. Those senators were Alberta Darling of River Hills, the panel's co-chairwoman, Luther Olsen of Ripon, and Sheila Harsdorf of River Falls. None responded to requests for comment.

That controversial motion came at the end of the panel's budget-writing work and, as is common, came in the middle of the night and included a grab bag of special interest moves, including a failed attempt to allow bounty hunters to start work in Wisconsin. The lead paint provision was added to the bill despite a memo from the nonpartisan Legislative Council that warned that the retroactive change would "raise significant constitutional concerns."

Erpenbach said he didn't know if Republicans in the state Senate were aware of the donations to the Wisconsin Club for Growth that helped them in their recall elections, but he expects them to face tough questions about it now.

"Republicans bent over backward to get this (lead paint) legislation through," Erpenbach said.

A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) had no immediate comment.

A controversial 2005 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision intensified legal and political fight in  the state over who is responsible for paying for those sickened by lead

paint in cities like Milwaukee.

The decision in the case Thomas vs. Mallett was written by then-Justice Louis Butler, who was later defeated for re-election, based partly on a backlash by business interests against the ruling.

In 2010, then-U.S. District Judge Rudolph Randa in Milwaukee threw out a young plaintiff's lawsuit on the grounds that the "risk contribution theory" advanced in the 2005 state Supreme Court decision violated the substantive due process rights of the defendants — the makers of lead carbonate pigment. In its 2014 ruling, the U.S. 7th Circuit reversed Randa and let the lawsuit continue.

In December 2011 and January 2012, GOP state Sen. Glenn Grothman was drafting legislation to make immunity from liability lawsuits retroactive. The drafting file for the bill shows that Grothman, now a congressman, and his aides gave drafting attorneys an unsigned memo on the issue that appears to have been written by an outside attorney.

Grothman declined to comment. The proposal failed to pass in 2012, but Grothman was on the Joint Finance Committee when it ended up passing a similar measure in 2013.

The leaked documents were gathered during the secret probe launched by Chisholm.

The investigation focused on whether Walker's campaign had illegally coordinated with the Wisconsin Club for Growth and other conservative groups. The documents

released Wednesday once again made clear that the GOP governor was active in raising money for the group.

One donor gave the group $10,000 in 2011, writing on the check's memo line that he made the contribution "because Scott Walker asked."

It was not clear who leaked the documents to the Guardian. Some of them have been already disclosed during various court cases and reported by the Journal Sentinel, among other media outlets, while others have never been released before because they were filed under seal or never showed up in court documents at all.

Special prosecutor Francis Schmitz led the probe, which was conducted under the John Doe law. That law allowed prosecutors to force people to testify and turn over documents, while barring them from talking about the investigation with others.

The probe was effectively halted in January 2014 when the state judge overseeing the investigation found the activities in question were not illegal. Schmitz sought to overturn that finding, while the Wisconsin Club for Growth and two of its advisers brought legal challenges to stop the investigation for good.

Johnson worked for Walker and the Wisconsin Club for Growth at the same time.

The state Supreme Court last year ruled 4-2 against the prosecutors. The court initially determined all evidence prosecutors had gathered had to be destroyed but later told prosecutors they should instead turn it over to the justices. The high court has allowed prosecutors to hang onto it while they pursue their appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court.

Chisholm has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the decision by Wisconsin's high court to shut down the investigation.

They also want the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the Wisconsin court got it right when it ruled that candidates have free speech rights to work closely with advocacy groups during their campaigns, according to sources.

Dave Umhoefer, John Diedrich and Bruce Vielmetti of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contributed to this report.

Above is from:  http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2016/09/14/report-lead-paint-makers-helped-gov-walker/90349256/

Monday, November 9, 2015

Wisconsin gets D grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation - Yahoo News

 

While Wisconsin voters tracked the doomed presidential ambitions of Republican Gov. Scott Walker this summer, legislators in Madison brawled over changes that Walker and his allies had proposed to the state’s open records law.

Related Stories

  1. Delaware gets F grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation Center for Public Integrity
  2. Only three states score higher than D+ in State Integrity Investigation; 11 flunk Center for Public Integrity
  3. Tennessee gets D grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation Center for Public Integrity
  4. New York gets D- grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation Center for Public Integrity
  5. North Carolina gets D grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation Center for Public Integrity
  6. Mindblowing Golf Swing You Can't Miss! (See Here) Web Brewed Sponsored

As a parched summer gave way to September in the state’s leafy capital on five lakes, the town was buzzing over news that weeks earlier, Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos had begun work to draft a bill that would exempt the Legislature’s two houses from the state’s records law. The draft would allow lawmakers to write their own rules governing whether their emails, memos and other documents, all currently considered public, would instead be shielded from view.

The move came to light only after a liberal advocacy group released emails about the plan that it obtained through a public records request. And the Vos effort came just weeks after a failed attempt by Republican leaders to add to a budget bill even broader exemptions from the open records law.

Immediately after the draft surfaced, Vos held a news conference to say his office had abandoned the effort for this session. "We're not changing the open records law,” Vos said.

But transparency advocates saw something more sinister. “I think what is happening is an aberration, and a major departure from past Wisconsin tradition,” said Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. “What we are seeing, for the first time in my experience, is the emergence of a culture of contempt for the public's right to know.”

The differences of opinion in the Badger State go beyond public records. Almost from the day Walker took office in 2011, the Republican-controlled Legislature has waged war on Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board — the latest iteration of a state ethics watchdog. The governor also led a successful push to strip most public employees of their collective bargaining rights.

All of this has contributed to Wisconsin earning a score of 64, or a D, placing it 20th among 50 in the State Integrity Investigation, a data-driven assessment of state government accountability and transparency by the Center for Public Integrity and Global Integrity.

Over the past few weeks, both houses of the Legislature have also approved sweeping changes to the state's campaign finance laws and a bill that would dismantle the Government Accountability Board by splitting it into two agencies, though the Assembly must now approve versions of the bills passed by the Senate. Last month, Walker signed a law that prohibits prosecutors from using a form of secret investigation — known as a John Doe — to probe allegations of public corruption. None of the recent moves factor into Wisconsin's D grade because they came after the project's study period had ended.

Wisconsin earned a grade of C- in 2012, when the State Integrity Investigation was first carried out. The two scores are not directly comparable, however, due to changes made to improve and update the project and methodology, such as eliminating the category for redistricting, a process that generally occurs only once every 10 years.

The report also found that Wisconsin has a significant "enforcement gap," which measures the difference between the laws on the books and how well they’re actually implemented.

Laurel Patrick, a spokeswoman for Walker, said in an email that while she couldn’t comment on the new scores without seeing all the data behind them, “the governor is committed to ensuring state government is transparent and accountable to the public.” Laurel pointed to a new website that publishes spending data for state agencies and the Legislature as evidence that “Walker and his administration have a proven record of implementing common-sense reforms and policies to promote transparency in state government while also working to streamline state government.”

Late night moves on open records

Wisconsin's open records laws have remained generally untouched since 1981 — well before widespread Internet use, emailing, and text messaging; experts insist an update is in order. But advocates for reform say the latest proposals look more like gutting than revising.

In the wee hours of an early July night, as the Republican-controlled Joint Finance Committee prepared to pass a budget bill, committee co-chairs John Nygren and Alberta Darling, after a request from Walker and his staff, slipped in language that could have eviscerated the open records law. The wording exempted from public disclosure any documents used during the “deliberative process” by the governor, lawmakers and other state and local government officials. Effectively, it could have been used to shield opinions, analyses, briefings, correspondence about drafts and any notes that lawmakers or their staff created in the process of drafting a bill.

There had been no public input on the proposal, which most people learned of the next morning, only after the committee approved the budget bill.

The move sparked outrage among the public and many political leaders. Within 24 hours, Republican Attorney General Brad Schimel criticized the plan. "Transparency is the cornerstone of democracy and the provisions in the Budget Bill limiting access to public records move Wisconsin in the wrong direction," Schimel said. Even some Republican lawmakers denounced the move. “I will not support a budget that includes this assault on democracy," Republican state Sen. Robert Cowles told reporters the next day.

Republican leaders backed off two days after introducing the change and withdrew the language from the budget bill. But as became clear in September, that was just the beginning of the fight.  In secret, Vos, the assembly speaker, had begun devising a draft bill that would exempt legislators and their staff from the open records law.

While Vos said later he had abandoned the proposal, his statement left the door open for future changes. “It is not our goal to make any changes this session,” he said.

Wisconsin was one of many states to receive a failing grade from the State Integrity Investigation in the category of access to information.

Attack on an ethics watchdog

Ethics enforcement has also been a battleground. Back in 2002, five lawmakers were charged with illegally running political campaigns out of their state offices in what became known as the “caucus scandal.” All five were eventually convicted or pleaded guilty, and the fallout led lawmakers in 2007 to merge a largely ineffective state Ethics Board with the State Elections Board to create the Government Accountability Board.

The six-member board — all retired state judges — was charged with administering and enforcing Wisconsin law on campaign finance, elections, ethics and lobbying. But over the past three years, the board has been dragged into an ongoing, bitter partisan fight between Walker and the state’s Democrats. It started when local prosecutors initiated a secret investigation — using the John Doe system that Walker and the Legislature have since prohibited — into whether the governor and his allies had coordinated with independent political groups in 2012, in violation of campaign finance laws. Conservatives argued that no law had been broken, and the matter ended up before the state Supreme Court. The Wall Street Journal later reported that a staff counsel for the accountability board pushed an unsuccessful plan to force some conservative justices to recuse themselves from deciding on the Walker probe. Republicans charged that board staff members had taken sides.

In July, the Supreme Court ruled 4-2 in favor of Walker, finding that no laws were broken, in part because the state's campaign finance laws were "unconstitutionally overbroad and vague," and ordering the investigation to be closed.

Though Walker won out, state Republicans remained livid over allegations of the board's interference. Walker has called for the nonpartisan watchdog agency to be dismantled, and the Legislature is poised to do just that. Both houses have passed bills that would split the board back into two entities comprised of partisan appointments. The Assembly is slated to meet later this month to consider changes made by the Senate.

Campaign finance laws in tumult

As the campaign finance oversight agency has struggled, a series of federal court rulings has also challenged and undermined the laws it is charged with overseeing, forcing the board to back off enforcement of several campaign contribution restrictions. In addition, Walker’s budget bill in 2011 eliminated a state program for public campaign financing.

Since 2010, courts have struck down the state’s limits on how much corporations can spend to support and recruit for their political action committees — which had been capped at either $20,000 or 20 percent of the amount the committee had raised the previous year, whichever was greater — as well as the state’s “aggregate limits” on contributions — a cap on the total amount that an individual could contribute to all candidates and committees, once set at $10,000 per year.

The result has been a series of decisions by the accountability board to effectively cease enforcing many of the state’s limits on campaign contributions.

At a hearing last spring on legislative plans to rework the state’s campaign finance law, Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause in Wisconsin, an advocacy group, said both sides view the shifting legal environment as an opportunity. His organization wanted “to strengthen our once effective and widely admired campaign finance laws and return Wisconsin elections and state government to the citizens,” while others wanted to “deregulate” campaign financing in the state.

Lawmakers are now tweaking a rewrite of campaign finance law that, among other changes, would allow candidates and independent political groups to coordinate their operations under certain conditions — potentially legalizing the same practices that were the subject of the secret investigation into Walker's campaign. Both houses have approved versions of the changes, and the Assembly is expected to take up the Senate version when it meets later this month.

With Walker back in Wisconsin full time after ending his presidential run, he has refocused on his proposals — and added major changes to Wisconsin’s historic civil service system to his agenda. Partisan battles are a way of life in Madison.

This story is part of State Integrity 2015. How do each state's laws and practices deter corruption, promote transparency and enforce accountability?. Click here to read more stories in this investigation.

Wisconsin gets D grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation - Yahoo News

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Governor Walker attacks Trek Bike owner/gubernatorial candidate for paying too little tax

image

image

Gov. Scott Walker has attacked Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke and her family's bicycling business because it hasn't paid corporate income taxes to Wisconsin in decades.

Trek Bicycle Corp. is a tax-dodger, much to Burke's personal benefit, according to the GOP governor.

But Burke officials said Trek's owners — like many other businesses — pay taxes on the company's profits as individuals rather than through corporate taxes.

So exactly how much has the Burke clan forked over to the state?

A lot, it turns out.

Records show Burke, her mother and three siblings living in Wisconsin paid a total of $1.77 million in personal income taxes in 2012. That would mean the five Burke family members reported a total adjusted gross income of at least $22.8 million during that year.

It is not known what percentage of Trek is owned by the Burke family.

The company's largest individual shareholder, John Burke — Mary's brother and Trek's CEO — had a state tax bill of $841,781 in 2012. Given the state's top tax rate, he reported an adjusted gross income of at least $10.8 million that year.

The Burkes, in short, are a wealthy family with a healthy tax bill.

But Joe Fadness, executive director of the state Republican Party, suggested that Trek and its owners still aren't paying all they should. That's because Trek takes advantage of Subchapter S of the IRS code that allows the company to pass on its tax obligation to its shareholders at lower rates.

"At the same time millionaire Mary Burke didn't pay income taxes at several points, they (Trek officials) ironically boast about how they avoid paying their fair share of corporate taxes in order to pay a much lower rate by shifting the profits to shareholders," Fadness said.

​Trek isn't the only company in the state that does this.

In fact, the majority of Wisconsin businesses operate as S corporations.

Many companies choose to do so to avoid what shareholders see as double taxation inherent in the traditional tax structure. That would mean the company pays a tax on its earnings, and then shareholders who receive a dividend must pay taxes on that income.

Joe Zepecki, spokesman for Burke, accused the governor of trying to "knowingly mislead" voters about a major Wisconsin business and its tax burden.

"As Mary has said from the start," Zepecki said, "Trek pays its fair share of taxes through its shareholders, just like 90% of Wisconsin businesses."

The tax information for the Burke family was obtained from the state Department of Revenue. Only the net income tax paid to the state is publicly available. The agency does not release other tax information, such as whether a taxpayer filed a joint or individual return.

John Burke declined to comment to No Quarter on his personal taxes.

But in a recent interview with Journal Sentinel reporter Bill Glauber, John Burke expressed dismay at the governor's criticism of Trek, saying the veteran politician understands how S corps work.

ADVERTISEMENT

John Burke also was surprised to find out that his tax information was publicly available.

"I'm not running for governor. My mother is not running for governor," he said. "Scott Walker can get my mother's taxes? Why?"

Records show Mary Burke paid $516,965 in state income taxes from 2008 to 2012. That would mean she reported an adjusted gross income of at least $6.8 million during that time. The figure could be much higher because her charitable donations result in large deductions on her tax bill.

In 2012, the Democratic candidate paid $120,316 in state income taxes. With the state's top tax rate of 7.75%, she would have reported an adjusted gross income of at least $1.5 million.

Her payment was more than 100 times the state average. Wisconsin collected $1,128 in state income taxes per state resident in 2011, according to the Tax Foundation.

Mary Burke's tax payments were the smallest of the five Burke family members living in Wisconsin. Each one has been paying a six-figure sum to the state annually in recent years.

Like her mother and siblings (she has one brother and two sisters in Wisconsin and one outside the state), Mary Burke's tax payments increased dramatically in 2008 after the death of her father, Richard, Trek's co-founder. His estate sold Trek stock to family members, meaning they were hit with increased taxes on the company's profits.

As a group, the five Wisconsin Burke family members coughed up more than $6.2 million in net state income taxes from 2008 to 2012.

The annual amounts paid by several individual family members now routinely exceed the most ever paid in a single year by Richard Burke. In 2005, he was nicked by the state for $244,467, his largest Wisconsin tax bill.

In 1998, the father stepped down as Trek CEO, turning over the reins to his son and focusing his time and efforts on creating the family's charity. The Burke Foundation, which gives money to a number of Milwaukee groups and schools, had a balance of nearly $117 million in 2012, according to tax records.

According to the state Department of Revenue, Mary Burke paid little state income taxes during her first stint working at Trek from 1990 to 1993 — a point of contention in the gubernatorial race. There is no record of a tax filing in 1994, a time when she took a yearlong sabbatical to go snowboarding in Argentina and Colorado.

Zepecki, the campaign spokesman for Burke, said she had no tax liability in 1990 because she lost money on some New York rental property, offsetting her Trek earnings. As for 1992 and 1993, she was living in Europe as Trek's head of European operations.

The federal government allows individuals living abroad for more than 330 days in a year to exempt foreign earnings up to a certain amount, thus lowering the amount of taxes owed. The figure was $70,000 for 1993.

Fadness, the GOP chief and Walker ally, has raised questions as to why Burke did not pay any state income taxes during these years. The Burke campaign has acknowledged making minor errors early in the campaign regarding her work history when discussing this issue.

Mary Burke "did not pay taxes at several points in her career at the same time middle-class families were working hard to put food on the table — something she is desperately trying to justify with lame excuses and repeated edits to her résumé," Fadness said.

But Zepecki said this is not an issue.

"Mary Burke has paid all the taxes she's owed," Zepecki said Friday. "Any suggestion to the contrary is completely false."

Above is from:   Daniel Bice - Burke, family paid $1.7 million in 2012 state income taxes

Beloit billionaire pays zero in 2010 state income tax bill

image

image

The goose egg in 2010 was the first zero obligation posted by the Beloit billionaire since at least 2002, according to records from the state Department of Revenue and ABC Supply Inc., the nation's largest wholesale distributor of roofing, windows and siding and owned by Hendricks. She had a seven-figure Wisconsin tax bill in four of the previous five years, the records show.

Hendricks was thrust into the spotlight last month when a videotape showing her talking with Gov. Scott Walker about strategies to fight unions was released. In the tape, which is part of a documentary under production, Walker talked about using a "divide and conquer" strategy toward unions through his budget-adjustment bill, which curtailed most collective bar gaining for most public employee unions and created a political uproar that will culminate with Tuesday's recall election.

An active financial supporter of conservative causes, Hendricks has given Walker's campaign more than $500,000, making her Walker's largest donor.

Her state tax obligation dropped from $2.26 million for 2009 to zero for 2010 because of a change in the corporate structure of ABC Supply said Scott Bianchini, ABC tax director. The company paid taxes of $373,671 for the second half of 2010, the records show.

Bianchini explained that before 2010, ABC Supply was an "S" corporation, meaning the profits and the tax obligation flowed to Hendricks as the owner of the firm. In 2010, the company changed its structure so the profits and the tax obligation stay with the company.

"Now ABC is paying taxes on its own," Bianchini said.

Hendricks' March net worth was estimated by Forbes Magazine to be $2.8 billion - some $300 million more than Helen Johnson-Leipold, chief executive of Johnson Outdoors Inc. The magazine last year listed Hendricks as No. 188 on its ranking of the wealthiest people in America, a spot that had her as the financial equal of William Randolph Hearst III.

Bianchini declined to comment when asked whether Hendricks, who is chairman of ABC, had other income such as salary or dividends that could have been taxed in 2010.

He also declined to say why ABC's tax bill in 2010 was so low compared with what Hendricks had paid on its behalf in prior years, when its profits flowed to her bottom line.

"Diane is not willing to divulge any more," Bianchini said. "ABC converted to a 'C' corporation - that's a substantial part of why there's no 2010 tax liability (for Hendricks)."

He added that there were other reasons Hendricks paid zero state income taxes in 2010.

"We're just not willing to get into it," Bianchini said. "It's just digging, in our opinion, too deep into her taxes."

Hendricks, who worked with her husband, Kenneth, in building ABC, became chairman of the company after her husband died in 2007. The company now posts annual revenue of more than $4 billion.

Jon Peacock, research director of the Wisconsin Council on Children and Families - a liberal-leaning advocacy group - said the lack of a 2010 tax liability can make people question the fairness of the state tax code.

"It creates a suspicion that there is some gaming of the tax system going on," Peacock said.

Todd Berry, president of the nonpartisan Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance, said legislators, not wealthy taxpayers, are to blame.

"If the legislators choose to create all sort of deductions, credits and exclusions to state tax law, then you're going to create strange situations," Berry said. "Both sides of the aisle have used the tax laws as a Christmas tree to hang all sorts of things on."

Bianchini said that despite the 2010 bills, ABC and Hendricks have paid their fair share in taxes.

"Diane Hendricks and Ken Hendricks paid $10 million in (state income) taxes since 2005," Bianchini said, adding that focusing on the tax bill of zero in 2010 is "meaningless and minutiae."

Besides, he said, ABC is a national company, and Hendricks and the company have paid millions of dollars in taxes in other states.

In addition, Bianchini provided records showing that the company paid Wisconsin income taxes of more than $1 million last year and said that Hendricks' 2011 income tax liability is "substantial." He declined to provide more specific information.

Hendricks declined to be interviewed, and the company declined to disclose any information about federal taxes paid by ABC or Hendricks.

The Journal Sentinel purchased from the Revenue Department records showing how much the company paid in taxes from 2006-2010 and the amount Hendricks paid from 2008-2010. ABC supplied information for prior years.

Above is from:  Beloit billionaire pays zero in 2010 state income tax bill

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Koch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support of Wisconsin Corruption Measures

The Koch-backed measures to eviscerate Wisconsin's limits on money in elections and neuter the state's election watchdog hit a stumbling block in the state senate recently, with a handful of Republican senators expressing concern that the measures go too far.

So the Kochs are going on the offensive.

David Koch's Americans for Prosperity is up with ads targeting constituents of GOP Senators Rob Cowles of Green Bay, Luther Olsen of Ripon, Sheila Harsdorf of River Falls, and Jerry Petrowski of Marathon, who have expressed reservations about the measures. The ads portray the nonpartisan Government Accountability Board (GAB) as a cold war-era agency "silencing free speech" and "raiding conservative's (sic) homes." AFP Wisconsin's director Eric Bott also said the group would be mobilizing its activists recently. AFP is the only group registered to lobby in favor of dismantling the GAB.

Wisconsin Club for Growth also launched a robocall campaign on Tuesday, with a recording of the Club's director Eric O'Keefe urging the wavering senators' constituents to demand the senators vote "yes" on the bill.

Wisconsin Club for Growth and Scott Walker were part of a $20 million scheme during the recall elections to evade the state's campaign finance laws and disclosure requirements, prosecutors believed. The GAB assisted in that investigation, sparking a legal and media counter-assault from the Club, with O'Keefe as its most visible proponent. The Wisconsin Supreme Court, whose majority was elected to the bench with at least $10 million in spending from the Club and other groups under investigation, shut down an investigation into the scheme earlier this year.

The Club has previously coordinated with Walker to support his legislative agenda. In 2011, for example, the Club ran ads supporting Walker's controversial union-busting Act 10 just days after it was introduced, and targeting moderate Republicans who were wavering in their support.

Citizen Opposition Slowed Bills' Progress

The bills to gut campaign finance laws and dismantle the GAB passed the Assembly last week, and seemed destined to quickly pass the Republican-controlled Senate. Voters from both the Republican and Democratic parties oppose more secret money in elections by wide margins, however, and a barrage of phone calls from concerned citizens has helped slow the bill's progress.

Some Republicans may be seeing through the rhetoric from their party leaders.

Although Walker and right-wing outlets closely associated with the groups under investigation have tried to smear the GAB as a partisan agency that used aggressive techniques during the John Doe probe, these allegations don't stand up to scrutiny.

"The reasons given for doing away with the G.A.B. are based on inaccurate, incomplete and, in many cases, completely false assertions by the proponents of this legislation," wrote GAB director Kevin Kennedy in a letter to Sen. Leah Vukmir, a leading critic of the GAB. He also submitted a response to her claims about the agency. "This point-by-point refutation of those specific assertions demonstrates that while the GAB. is not perfect, it is clearly not the 'failed experiment' that some claim it to be."

Some senators may also be wary of dismantling a nonpartisan board of retired judges that they voted to create just a few years ago, and replacing it with a board of partisan appointees that has proven ineffective in the past.

And, although Assembly Speaker Robin Vos says that court decisions like Citizens United require that the legislature erode disclosure laws and sanction coordination with outside groups, legal experts have proven these claims false.

The Brennan Center for Justice recently sent a letter to legislators noting that the bill's most egregious provisions "are not required by any recent federal or state court case; in fact, SB292/AB387 would leave Wisconsin with far weaker transparency protections than those upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC."

Senate leaders cancelled a floor session scheduled for Tuesday to try and wrangle their caucus. It remains to be seen whether the holdout Senators will yield to this Koch attack.

Koch Brothers Hit the Airwaves in Support of Wisconsin Corruption Measures

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

How Scott Walker and the Kochs Are Making Wisconsin Corruption-Friendly

 

Now that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has abandoned his presidential bid, he and a network of powerful conservative allies with close ties to the Koch Brothers are exacting what critics say is blatant political vengeance on his in-state critics, by targeting the laws that have effectively deterred or punished political corruption.

Last week, Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled Assembly passed three bills that together would completely gut existing campaign-finance laws, blunt prosecutors’ ability to investigate political corruption, and turn the state’s elections and ethics board into a partisan-controlled paper tiger. Two of the bills are now before the Republican-controlled Senate, while the third has already been signed by Walker.

Good-government advocates can’t seem to overstate the impact these bills could have on a state that’s long been a beacon of government transparency and strong campaign-finance laws. “I think the implications, long-term, could be even more horrendous than [Act 10—the bill that gutted state workers’ collective bargaining rights],” says Peter Barca, a long-time Wisconsin politician and current Democratic state assembly member, calling the past week the worst he’s experienced in any legislative body.

Advocates for open government fear the changes may be too “inside baseball” to rouse public anger—at least until scandals beset state government. “It’s a recipe for political corruption. Even worse, the public won’t know about it,” says Brendan Fischer, general counsel at the Center for Media and Democracy. “There’s unlimited opportunities for corruption as a result for these bills and limited opportunities for the public to keep tabs.”

“It’s very strategic and very shrewd,” says Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause Wisconsin. “Ever since Act 10, there’s been this synergy between the Koch Brothers and Americans for Prosperity with the legislative Republicans and Scott Walker. It’s part of the broader agenda—one they know is an agenda that doesn’t resonate with any people’s lives. They want to get away with it quickly.”

The legislative push is an attempt by Republicans to codify a controversial Wisconsin State Supreme Court decision, which involved an investigation into Scott Walker’s 2012 campaign to oppose an effort to recall him.

The legislative push is an attempt by Republicans to codify a controversial Wisconsin State Supreme Court decision, which involved an investigation into Scott Walker’s 2012 campaign to oppose an effort to recall him. The ongoing investigation into allegations of illegal coordination between Walker’s 2012 campaign and outside conservative advocacy groups was abruptly halted this July—at the apogee of Walker’s presidential campaign—by the court. The justices ruled not only that the instances of coordination were legal, but also that all evidence in the case was to be destroyed. It’s worth noting that justices who signed on to the decision were elected with millions in spending from the same outside groups that were at the heart of the case. Court critics had demanded that at least two conservative justices who had received campaign support from groups like the Wisconsin Club for Growth (suspected of illegal coordination with Walker) recuse themselves. They didn’t—and voted to stop the investigation.

So what exactly is in these pieces of legislation? While they are three separate laws, together they could create a less accountable, less transparent, and more corruptible state government.

Breaking Up a “Gold Standard”

Unlike the Federal Elections Commission and many state agencies, Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board (GAB) is a nonpartisan body made up of six appointed retired judges charged with enforcing the state’s ethics, lobbying, campaign-finance, and election law.

The board was formed in 2007 with bipartisan support after nine Wisconsin legislators and staffers—Democrat and Republican alike—were found guilty of using taxpayer funds for political campaigns. The state assembly speaker was sentenced to 15 months in prison.

In election law circles, the system is held up as a gold standard for ensuring integrity in the political process—especially because of the independent funding mechanism for corruption investigations, which works as a firewall from political agendas.

Critics think Republicans are targeting the GAB partly because it authorized the probing form of investigation known as “John Doe” into Walker and his staffers. Republicans—echoed by a succession of conservative editorials from The Wall Street Journal—have sought to cast the board as a partner to the prosecutors who went on a “political witch hunt” of Republicans. They contended that the investigation was based on a false interpretation of campaign coordination law.

The bill to repeal the GAB would replace the retired judges with partisan appointees, create separate entities for ethics and elections, and give the legislature the authority to cut off investigative funding if it sees fit.

Republican Assembly Member Joe Sanfelippo penned an op-ed last month saying that the GAB should operate more like the FEC. “If it works for the Federal Election Commission, there’s no reason it won’t for Wisconsin as well,” he wrote. The problem is that it doesn’t work for the FEC. The commission’s chairperson has said that due to crippling partisan gridlock (by law, it has three Democratic and three Republican commissioners), the FEC can’t enforce federal campaign-finance laws. As the Campaign Legal Center’s Larry Noble told the Wisconsin State Journal, "It's like setting up a disaster-relief agency and saying you're going to use the FEMA handling of Hurricane Katrina as your model."

According to Common Cause’s Heck, some Republican state senators who helped implement the GAB back in 2007 and who are still in office are reportedly pushing to allow retired judges to stay on the board. Their numbers are small, however, and it remains to be seen if they will be enough to force an amendment.

Welcoming Unlimited Dark Money

In one of the most expansive deregulations of existing campaign-finance law, the state assembly also passed a bill Wednesday that guts existing regulations, ushers in an even larger windfall of dark money than Citizens United, and removes certain campaign coordination rules that previously served as a firewall between candidate and super-PAC campaigns.

The bill would create a loophole for political groups to skirt traditional disclosure regulations of “express advocacy,” so long as more than 50 percent of total spending doesn’t go to such activity. Experts say that the loophole, which would be one of the most lax in the country, would allow groups to flood the airwaves with un-attributable attack ads. And with this bill, campaigns and “issue advocacy” groups are free to work together.

Advertisement

As Fischer explains, under the bill the Assembly passed, a campaign could set up a shadow campaign committee that could take donations from corporations, foreigners, and those trying to avoid public scrutiny without having to disclose who is contributing. All the while, the official campaign and shadow group could legally coordinate on campaign strategy.

Additionally, the bill removes the requirement that direct contributors to candidates specify their employer, which helps illuminate which industries are supporting which politicians. Unlimited contributions to political parties and legislative leaders would be allowed, as well.

John Doe No More

Rather than using a grand jury system, since statehood, Wisconsin has used a “John Doe” investigation process, which allows prosecutors to covertly investigate wrongdoing by questioning unnamed suspects before a judge.  The process was used to bring down politicians for corruption back in 2006, as well as for the campaign coordination investigation into Scott Walker. “John Doe” has been in Republicans’ political crosshairs since the Walker investigation and they have long been working to portray it as purely a means for partisan attacks—despite the fact that Republican prosecutors were leading the investigation into Walker’s campaign. 

This bill has passed both the assembly and senate and was signed into law by Walker on Friday, effectively ending “John Doe” political corruption investigations in the state.

Taken together, these three bills mark a wholesale dismantling of good-government policies, likely turning Wisconsin into a political Wild West. If all are enacted, outside groups would be able to dump untraceable money into elections. The campaign-finance laws that remain on the books would be lightly enforced, if at all, as the new agencies become mired in FEC-style partisan gridlock. The ability to effectively investigate instances of corruption would be curtailed—with the legislature vested with the power to cut off the funding for such investigations.

The Koch Connection

The spate of anti-reform legislation comes at a moment of electoral peril for the state’s Republican Party. “Walker has never been weaker and the fractures between the two (Republican-controlled) houses are more pronounced than ever,” says Common Cause’s Jay Heck. “This is sort of a last attempt to tie all the factions together.”

Walker’s lackluster candidacy for president appears to have hurt his support back home. A recent survey puts his disapproval rating at 60 percent, 10 percentage points higher than when he pushed through Act 10 in 2011. But, as last week’s legislative victories showed, he can still rely on the Republican legislature and his loyal band of conservative groups to offer up support—particularly when that support gives the GOP’s big-money backers more sway in state elections.

Indeed, those big-money backers are the prime movers of these measures. As the Center for Media and Democracy’s Fischer has thoroughly documented, these government “deforms” are central to the agenda of the Koch Brothers and their deeply entrenched Wisconsin political infrastructure. The only group that was lobbying in support of the disintegration of the state’s Government Accountability Board was the brothers’ Americans for Prosperity (AFP), which also spent $10 million in support of Scott Walker during his recall election.

Similarly, the sole lobbying proponent of the push for new campaign-finance deregulation is Wisconsin Right to Life, which is run by a former AFP state operative. In a statement to the Prospect, the group said “We are glad the Wisconsin State Legislature is addressing the fact that Chp. 11, our state's current campaign finance law, is unconstitutional as it stands."

Along with AFP, Wisconsin Family Action, a group that seeks to advance “Judeo-Christian values in Wisconsin by strengthening, preserving and promoting marriage, family, life and liberty,” and was implicated in the recent John Doe investigation, lobbied to do away with that very prosecution tool. Intertwined with these organizations is the Wisconsin Alliance for Reform, a recently formed group that has been running radio spots backing the legislation, and has clear ties to AFP, ALEC, and prominent conservative state politicians.

Political Blowback?

Will this brazen agenda of political “deform” lead to the kind of public pushback that arose in opposition to Act 10?  Deregulating campaign finance and breaking up the GAB are hardly policy priorities for the average Wisconsin voter. In fact, there’s plenty of evidence to show that Wisconsinites—and Americans more broadly—want to get money out of politics. In Wisconsin, 61 cities and counties, representing 42 percent of state residents, have passed resolutions in support of overturning Citizens United. Across the country, 84 percent of Americans think money has too much influence in politics and 75 percent believe there needs to be fundamental changes to the campaign-finance system.

Good-government advocates were heartened a few weeks ago, when there was substantial public rancor after Scott Walker and State Assembly Speaker Robin Vos attempted to include a last-minute provision in the budget bill that would have gutted the state’s open records law.

“A lot of work needs to be done to educate voters about what [this new legislation] actually does,” says Fischer. “There’s a lot of misinformation coming from supporters. But as the public grows more aware about what this bill actually does in promoting secrecy, they will grow outraged.”

However, there’s little opportunity to challenge these laws. Experts don’t see much room to stage a legal challenge in the courts and a ballot measure to repeal the laws would first have to be approved by the legislature. Both the state’s 2010 redistricting and the impending flow of more secret money make a Democratic takeover of either chamber in 2016 highly unlikely.

Strategically, this legislation works to help entrench Republican power in a competitive state, and will likely leave state Democrats looking beyond the next redistricting, rather than to 2016, for a new political opening.

How Scott Walker and the Kochs Are Making Wisconsin Corruption-Friendly

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Rauner: Time to sell Thompson Center; Architect, former governor less than thrilled – Illinois News Network

 

SPRINGFIELD — Need a full city block in Chicago’s Loop?

Gov. Bruce Rauner may have a deal for you.

Rauner, R-Winnetka, on Tuesday announced his plan to sell the James R. Thompson Center, the state’s massive office and retail building at 100 W. Randolph St.

Although home to about 2,200 state employees, the 17-story building of nearly 1.2 million square feet is expensive to heat and cool, needs about $100 million in repairs and is inefficient as an office complex, the governor said.

“We intend to close and sell the state of Illinois building, the James R. Thompson Center, move our people out into existing space … in Springfield and in the city of Chicago and put this building onto the market to be sold to a private developer,” the governor said.

The sale, Rauner said, would probably mean demolition of Thompson Center to be replaced by a “more impactful, positive, commercial office building and retail space.”

Rauner declined to say how much he believes the state can get for the property because his plan calls for public auction, but he described the location as among the best in the city and state.

“It’s attractive,” the governor said. “We can can get good value for taxpayers by selling this building and moving out.”

Even without cash from a sale, the state cannot afford to stay in the building, Rauner said.

“We could pay people to take this building from us and save a lot of taxpayer money,” he said.

The state’s cost to keep its people in the Thompson Center are two to three times that of putting them in comparable office space in the city or elsewhere in the state, Rauner said.

By moving out and using existing or even newly leased space, the state could save $6 million to $12 million per year, Rauner said.

Redeveloped and put to better use, the property could also generate as much as $20 million in tax revenue for the city and for Chicago Public Schools, Rauner said, adding that new construction could generate 8,000 short-term jobs.

“By any measure we’re high cost here and need to move,” Rauner said.

Rauner said the proposed sale has nothing to do with the state’s budget crisis or his “Turnaround Agenda” but simply represents good financial management.

He also said it’s not part of some larger plan to move more state jobs to Springfield.

The plan would need legislative approval, and the Republican governor said he’d spoken with House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton, both Chicago Democrats. He described them as open to the idea.

Steve Brown, spokesman for Madigan, said the speaker was aware the governor was announcing his plan and remains willing to listen.

That said, Brown added, there are questions still to be answered, including where workers would move to and to what ends the sale revenue and savings would be put.

Rauner said he’d also notified both Gov. James R. Thompson, for whom the center is named, and the building’s architect, Helmut Jahn.

Thompson, a Republican and the governor from 1977 to 1991, didn’t sound overjoyed about the idea in a short conversation with Illinois News Network.

“Well, as to Gov. Rauner’s proposal, I don’t have any comment because that’s up to him and the Legislature to determine the reason why deferred maintenance is so high,” Thompson said.

That maintenance was neglected during the administration of Gov. Pat Quinn, a Chicago Democrat in office from 2009 to 2015, Thompson said, “and that’s the problem.”

Quinn’s predecessor, Democrat Rod Blagojevich, at one time essentially proposed a complex mortgaging scheme for the building, but that plan fell through.

Gov. Rauner on Tuesday declined to characterize the aesthetics or architectural significance of the Thompson Center, instead telling the media, “I’ll leave that for you to discuss.”

Architect Helmut Jahn criticized the state for not maintaining the building and said it should be repurposed, not demolished.

The architect suggested the building’s restaurants and retail outlets be upgraded and part of the building be converted for round-the-clock uses including a hotel, apartments and condominiums.

“Architectural history is full of examples where such repurposing has brought new life to structures like this,” he said in a prepared statement. “The building will only survive this way, and will become a landmark for the 21st Century.”

James R. Thompson Center

Originally: State of Illinois Center
Renamed: In 1993 to honor James R. Thompson, governor from 1977 to 1991
Architect: Helmut Jahn
Built: 1979 to 1985
Cost: About $172 million
Size: 17 stories tall, 1,193,163 square feet
Location: 100 W. Randolph Street, Chicago. Occupies the block bounded by LaSalle, Randolph, Clark and Lake streets
Materials: Steel, pink and gray granite, concrete
Houses: About 2,200 employees from dozens of state agencies, plus shops and restaurants
Called: Everything from “visionary” and “a strong, powerful and important statement ” to “The Cash Register” and an “impractical monstrosity”

Rauner: Time to sell Thompson Center; Architect, former governor less than thrilled – Illinois News Network