Friday, August 14, 2020

Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report: August 14



COVID-19


Updates on the emerging novel coronavirus pandemic from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

The Center for Health Security is analyzing and providing updates on the COVID-19 pandemic. If you would like to receive these updates, please subscribe below and select COVID-19. Additional resources are also available on our website.

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also produces US Travel Industry and Retail Supply Chain Updates that provide a summary of major issues and events impacting the US travel industry and retail supply chain. You can access them here.

Starting Monday, August 17, we will be updating the format of our COVID-19 updates. Mondays will include country-specific data in the Epi Update section, including on the top 10 countries in terms of total and per capita daily incidence. The Epi Update section on Wednesdays and Fridays will focus more on epi trend analysis. We will also largely be shifting to 7-day averages, rather than daily incidence totals, when reporting national daily incidence for all countries in order to provide a higher-level perspective on national trends. Many countries do not directly report weekly averages, so we will rely on other sources. The principal exceptions will likely be data published by the WHO and US CDC.

For the rest of the content, Mondays will focus on a variety of events and topics reported over the weekend. On Wednesdays and Fridays, we will dedicate one day to US-specific topics and one day to international issues. It may be longer between updates on specific topics, but it will allow us to include more diverse content rather than more frequent but incremental updates, particularly in light of the considerable volume of US-specific content on any given day. Thank you for continuing to read these updates.

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Situation Report for August 13 reports 20.44 million cases (276,398 new) and 744,385 deaths (6,933 new). We expect the global mortality to surpass 750,000 deaths in this afternoon’s or tomorrow’s Situation Report.

NOTE: With the WHO shifting to weekly epi updates, we will transition to reporting data from the WHO’s COVID-19 global dashboard starting Monday, August 17.

The Central and South America region remains the primary global COVID-19 hotspot, with 5 of the top 10 countries in terms of total daily incidence and 6 of the top 10 for per capita daily incidence. Brazil’s daily incidence continues to hold relatively steady at 43-46,000 new cases per day, and it remains #3 globally in terms of daily incidence. Following a slight increase earlier this week, Colombia’s daily incidence remains elevated at 10,870 new cases per day, down slightly from its record high yesterday (10,972). Colombia remains #4 globally in terms of daily incidence. Peru has reported steadily increasing daily incidence since late June. With 7,513 new cases per day, Peru remains #5 globally with respect to daily incidence. Argentina’s COVID-19 epidemic continues to accelerate steadily as well, up to 6,841 new cases per day, its highest average to date. Argentina remains #6 globally in terms of daily incidence. Mexico is reporting 6,152 new cases per day, climbing to #7 globally. Multiple other countries in the region are also reporting more than 1,000 new cases per day. Suriname climbed into the global top 10 in terms of per capita daily incidence, jumping to #7. Additionally, Panama fell to #2, Peru remained #3, Colombia fell to #5, Brazil fell to #6, and Argentina fell to #10. Several other countries in the region are reporting more than 100 new daily cases per million population as well.

India is reporting more than 62,000 new cases per day and still increasing, and it remains #1 globally with respect to daily incidence. The global record for average daily incidence is 67,374 new cases per day, set by the US on July 23, and India could soon surpass this mark if it continues along its current trajectory. The Philippines’s daily incidence appears to have leveled off, holding steady at approximately 4,000 new cases per day since August 5. The Philippines remains #10 in terms of daily incidence. After decreasing 25% from its peak, the Maldives’ daily incidence increased again, and it climbed to #4 globally in terms of per capita daily incidence.

South Africa has reported steadily decreasing daily incidence since its peak on July 20 (12,584 new cases per day). South Africa is currently reporting 4,954 new cases per day, its lowest average since June 26, and it fell to #9 in terms of daily incidence.

After consistent decreases in daily incidence since late June, Bahrain reported increasing daily totals over the past several days, climbing again to #1 globally in terms of per capita daily incidence. Kuwait fell out of the top 10 again, but only just. Qatar also continues to report more than 100 new daily cases per million population. Nearby Israel, in the WHO’s European region, fell to #8 in terms of per capita daily incidence.

While Europe does not have any countries in the top 10 in terms of total or per capita daily incidence (with the exception of Israel), a number of countries are reporting more than 1,000 new cases per day. Additionally, Spain is reporting more than 3,900 new cases per day, which puts it just outside the top 10 for total daily incidence.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC reported 5.18 million total cases (56,307 new) and 165,148 deaths (1,497 new). Following steady declines since July 24, the average daily incidence in the US increased slightly over the past 2 days, up from 52,193 new cases per day to 53,361. Additionally, the US continues to average more than 1,000 new deaths per day, a trend that has persisted for more than 2 weeks. Numerous states that were severely affected during the summer COVID-19 resurgence—including Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas—appear to be at or past their peak in terms of daily COVID-19 mortality, but others are still reporting increasing mortality or still approaching a peak. Considering that the national daily incidence peaked 3 weeks ago, we expect to start seeing an associated decline in national COVID-19 deaths in the near future.

In total, 17 states are reporting more than 100,000 cases, including California, Florida, and Texas with more than 500,000 cases; New York with more than 400,000; and Georgia with more than 200,000. We expect Illinois to surpass 200,000 cases in the next update. Additionally, Puerto Rico is currently reporting more than 225 daily cases per million population and increasing steadily. It is a US territory, but its current per capita daily incidence would be #4 globally, falling between Peru and the Maldives—up 2 spots since our last briefing.

The US remains #2 globally in terms of total daily incidence, and it fell to #9 in terms of per capita daily incidence.

The Johns Hopkins CSSE dashboard reported 5.27 million US cases and 167,528 deaths as of 1:30pm on August 14.

UN SCHOOLS REPORTS More than 1 billion children worldwide have been affected by school closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The UN has provided educational resources, including for virtual or remote learning options, for children around the world, but educational disruption remains a major challenge in many parts of the world. The UN published a policy brief on schooling in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which discusses the substantial ways in which the pandemic has disrupted education, particularly in low-income settings where remote learning is not feasible on a wide scale. In many settings, school closures were occurring even before the pandemic began, due to political or social instability. The pandemic has exacerbated these disruptions, leading UN Secretary-General António Guterres to warn of a “generational catastrophe” that could “undermine decades of progress...and exacerbate entrenched inequalities.”

The UN report highlights that these disruptions in education widen social disparities for vulnerable populations and reduce access to valuable resources typically provided by schools. Additionally, disruptions in education have downstream effects on national economies, as parents, particularly women, may not be able to return to work. The report provides high-level recommendations, including calling on stakeholders to plan extensively for how schooling can resume in ways that mitigate transmission risk, ensure sustainable financial support for educational systems, and re-imagine education to foster resilience and innovation.

The UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) published guidance that addresses strategies for catch-up learning to support students for whom educational disruptions have put their learning behind schedule. The recommendations include teaching only what must be learned at a certain grade level and utilizing “microschools” or “microlearning” in smaller groups. Appropriate strategies will likely be context- and setting-specific.

UNICEF and the WHO Joint Monitoring Programme published a report on the availability of drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) resources in schools around the world. Substantial gaps remain in the availability of WASH resources, with only 57% of the world’s schools having basic hygiene services (including soap for handwashing) in 2019. As the world considers ways to reopen schools safely, careful consideration will need to be provided to ensure that students have the WASH resources they need to return safely, especially in light of enhanced hygiene and sanitization mechanisms needed to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk.

RWANDA POOL TESTING Rwanda has implemented a novel “pooled” testing strategy in order to make more efficient use of limited testing supplies and capacity. Like many countries, including the US, Rwanda is facing challenges to scaling up testing capacity. Pooled testing combines specimens from multiple people into a single sample for testing. If the pooled sample tests positive, then all individuals in that sample are tested individually. A single infected individual among the pool should result in a positive test, so a negative test means that nobody in that pool is positive. By testing multiple people with a single test and only testing individual specimens when necessary, pooled testing can increase testing capacity, as long as the expected prevalence of active infection is sufficiently low.

Rwanda is reportedly taking the pooled testing concept a step further by implementing an adaptive algorithm to further increase testing efficiency, developed by Dr. Wilfred Ndifon, “a mathematical epidemiologist and director of research at the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences Global Network” in Rwanda. Following a positive test in a pooled sample, the algorithm determines the most efficient way to conduct tests on smaller, overlapping pooled samples from among the affected individuals, rather than testing each specimen individually. This novel approach further reduces the number of tests required (and money needed to purchase the tests) as well as the time necessary to return accurate results without sacrificing accuracy. In a recent publication (preprint), Dr. Ndifon and his colleagues describe the algorithm and the potential impact on tests, time, and financial costs. Other African countries, including South Africa, have expressed interest in utilizing the algorithm.

UK SEROPREVALENCE Researchers at Imperial College London reported findings from a large seroprevalence study involving more than 100,000 participants in the UK, using a self-administered lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The LFIA selected for this study previously demonstrated sensitivity of 84.4% and specificity of 98.6% using finger-prick blood specimens. Analysis of multiple LFIAs, recently published in BMJ: Thorax, determined that these performance characteristics make this assay “suitable for seroprevalence studies.” The seroprevalence study, conducted under the UK’s REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-2 (REACT-2) program, was implemented after the UK’s epidemic peak. It estimates the overall UK seroprevalence to be 6.0%, which translates to approximately 3.36 million adult infections through June 20. For comparison, the UK has reported 313,798 cumulative cases to date, which corresponds to approximately 0.6% of the total UK adult population.

Seroprevalence was found to be the highest among individuals aged 18-24 years (7.9%), compared to other age groups. The study identified racial and ethnic disparities as well, with seroprevalence of 17.3% and 11.9% among those of “Black or Asian (mainly South Asian) ethnicity,” respectively, compared to only 5.0% among Whites. Seroprevalence also varied geographically, with the highest rate reported in London (13.0%). Nearly one-third of those with detectable antibodies reported experiencing no symptoms. The study also reports seroprevalence among various professions, including essential workers and healthcare personnel.

These results align relatively closely with previous seroprevalence studies in the UK. A study conducted by the UK Biobank, published July 30, involved 20,000 participants. This study found that 7.1% of participants had detectable antibodies. Seropositivity was higher among individuals under 30 years old (10.8%), racial and ethnic minorities (11.3% among Black participants and 9.0% among South Asian participants), and individuals living in London (10.4%).

SPAIN RESURGENCE Spain faced one of the most severe COVID-19 epidemics early in the pandemic. After extended “lockdowns” brought community transmission under control, Spain is reporting increasing incidence that could potentially signal the beginning of a “second wave” of transmission. In May and June, Spain reported only 1 day for which daily incidence exceeded 1,000 new cases. Over the last 2 weeks, however, Spain reported 3 days with more than 5,000 new cases. Last week, The Lancet published a commentary that called for an independent investigation into Spain’s handling of the COVID-19 epidemic, including at both the national and regional levels, in order to identify lessons with respect to governmental decision-making, healthcare and public health operations, and the public’s response that could inform efforts to prepare for subsequent waves of transmission. The authors stressed that this investigation should not be an effort to assign blame, but rather, an opportunity to identify and strengthen weaknesses in the system.

“CONTAMINATED” FOOD PRODUCTS Chinese officials issued a warning that frozen chicken wings originating in Brazil and frozen shrimp originating in Ecuador tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Following the positive tests, Chinese officials conducted contact tracing to identify individuals who may have come into contact with the frozen food products, and no one has yet tested positive. Additionally, authorities disinfected the area where the products were stored. The positive tests were reportedly from “the surface of frozen chicken wings” and “the packaging of frozen shrimp,” but it is unclear when or where these items were originally contaminated. Additionally, it is unclear if the virus detected on the products was viable (ie, capable of infecting a human) or if the test detected dead virus or portions of dead virus.

While scientists and health officials—including at the US CDC, US FDA, and WHO—believe that the risk of foodborne transmission is low, the announcement prompted concerns that food packaging could potentially play a role in virus transmission. Fomite transmission is possible, particularly if people touch their face without washing their hands thoroughly, but it is not expected to be the primary mode of transmission. Handling food packaging that may contain virus particles is currently not expected to be a substantial contributor to SARS-CoV-2 transmission; however, it remains important to wash hands thoroughly and regularly, including before eating or handling food. The US FDA has issued guidance on safe food handling in the context of COVID-19. In response to these reports, senior WHO officials—including Dr. Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme—emphasized that “people should not fear food or food packaging or the processing or delivery of food.”

US COVID-19 REPORTING Last month, the US government announced the creation of a new COVID-19 reporting system for hospitals, which would require direct reporting to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), rather than via state health departments and the US CDC. The effort was initiated to expedite the provision of relevant COVID-19 data to the federal task force; however, numerous health officials and experts called attention to the risk of bypassing the CDC and added burden on hospitals. Multiple reports indicate that data reporting from the federal level has lagged significantly since transitioning to the new system, which is hindering state and local officials from implementing effective response activities and policies. In fact, some key data are lagging by more than a week, which impairs the ability to understand the current state of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the epidemic’s impact on health systems. HHS officials argue that the delays are an inevitable part of quality control checks to ensure the system is working properly and that the data reported provides more detail and includes more facilities than the previous method, providing improved awareness of the current COVID-19 situation. A myriad of experts and government officials have emphasized the potential damage caused by an interruption in the availability of critical data, particularly as the country attempts to gain control of a major resurgence in transmission.

The New York Times published an open letter from more than 30 current and former members of the federal Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), which cites the dangers of the new HHS COVID-19 reporting system. The authors argue that the transition endangers the integrity of national COVID-19 data and that new reporting requirements put increased stress on the national healthcare system. They also note that the CDC maintains robust and established disease reporting systems, including the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) that was previously used to report COVID-19 data, and that the new system is unnecessary. The letter was reportedly written as an unpublished document following the announcement of the new reporting system last month, but it was only made public earlier this week.

US SCHOOLS Many school systems in the US have begun their transition to the 2020-21 school year, with some moving forward with in-person classes and others adopting virtual/remote or hybrid models. The results have been mixed, with some in-person attempts leading to sizable exposures. Reportedly, more than 2,000 individuals—including students, teachers, and other staff—across multiple states have been quarantined following exposures at schools, and at least 230 positive cases have been identified. In numerous instances, schools that resumed in-person classes have been forced to shift to virtual/remote models following the detection of COVID-19 cases. In one example, Cherokee County School District—outside of Atlanta, Georgia—has reportedly quarantined at least 1,193 individuals after starting the school year with in-person classes, and multiple schools in the district suspended in-person classes after opening for less than a week. In other examples, schools have provided parents and the students the option of attending in-person or remote classes, and COVID-19 cases detected in the schools have reportedly driven some students to shift from in-person to remote classes. Most schools are just starting to resume classes, so any effect on incidence, within schools or in the community, may not be evident for several more weeks.

As these types of reports continue to raise questions about the feasibility of having safe, in-person schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic, some school districts are beginning to invest in what seems like an inevitable continuation of distance learning that most schools utilized in the spring. In Harris County, Texas—which hosts one of the largest school districts in the country—the local government announced that it is investing US$32 million to increase access to computers and wifi for students in order to improve their ability to take part in virtual/remote learning options. The county will utilize emergency COVID-19 funding provided under the CARES Act to implement the program. The effort will reportedly provide more than 200,000 computers and 80,000 wifi hotspots.

US MASK MANDATE Yesterday, US Presidential candidate Joe Biden called on state governors to implement mask mandates nationwide to mitigate COVID-19 transmission risk. He framed mask use as an issue of individual responsibility instead of individual rights, noting that wearing a mask to protect others is the patriotic thing to do. Similarly, experts from Georgetown, Harvard, and Emory Universities published a commentary in JAMA calling for universal mask use in the US. They highlight the need for state governments to implement mask mandates, as a uniform approach is critical to combating a health emergency like COVID-19 that can “spill over to adjoining states [or] even the entire country.” Researchers have conducted a number of studies to model the impact of mask use, and several indicate that universal masking could potentially save tens of thousands of lives in the US over the course of several months. As of August 4, 35 states have implemented some form of mask mandate, although the details vary from state to state. Mandates have also been implemented by local governments where statewide mandates do not exist; however, some states, like Georgia, have prohibited local officials from instituting their own mask policies. Mask use is not wholly sufficient for containing the US epidemic, but it is a “minimally invasive” tool that nearly everyone can utilize to reduce transmission risk in the community.

NEW ZEALAND DOMESTIC TRANSMISSION New Zealand extended its Alert Level 3 “lockdown” of Auckland, the country’s most populous city, through August 26 as a result of an ongoing COVID-19 outbreak. Since the first case tested positive on Tuesday, New Zealand has identified 29 cases linked to the Auckland cluster, including 13 in the past 24 hours. One additional case is suspected to be linked to the cluster, and 38 individuals are currently under quarantine. An ongoing epidemiological investigation has identified cases with symptom onset as early as July 31, but it is not yet clear if this corresponds to the index case for this outbreak.

In addition to enhanced social distancing measures in Auckland, Alert Level 3 restricts travel into and out of the affected area, and checkpoints have been established around the city. The checkpoints are principally aimed at education and awareness efforts regarding the new restrictions; however, law enforcement officers are also screening travelers. While New Zealand had largely lifted all COVID-19-related social distancing measures in June, following the interruption of domestic transmission, it maintained travel restrictions and border screening for arriving travelers. Genomic analysis indicates that the current outbreak is not directly linked to the strain that previously circulated in New Zealand, suggesting that it could be the result of a recent importation, as opposed to ongoing undetected circulation; however, the investigation has not yet identified a link to international travel.

BRUSSELS MASK MANDATE Earlier this week, the city council of Brussels, Belgium’s capital city, mandated mask use in public spaces. The order was issued in the hopes of curbing a surge of COVID-19 cases over the past several weeks. The daily incidence in Brussels is approximately 50 cases per 100,000 population, which is more than double the highest national per capita daily incidence globally (Bahrain; 23.8 daily cases per 100,000 population). The city has approximately 1.2 million residents, and masks were previously only required in indoor or crowded public spac

Boone County Board approves new county administrator


August 13, 202010:30 amJena KleindlTOP STORIES

BELVIDERE (WREX) — The Boone County Board approved the appointment of a new Boone County Administrator during a special meeting on Wednesday.

Kevin A. Catlin will be Boone County’s next County Administrator after the former County Administrator Ken Terrinoni retired in April after 32 years.

“I am excited to begin a new chapter and looking forward to building on Ken Terrinoni’s success," Boone County Board Chairman Karl John said.

Catlin works as the city manager in Springfield, Michigan. He previously worked in local government in Brookings, South Dakota and Tulsa, Oklahoma.

He also worked for the Illinois Department of Transportation as a technical manager of the department’s sole financial program to provide financial assistance to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. Catlin said he's excited to return to “the Great State of Illinois.”

Catlin starts as the County Administrator on Sept. 14.

Less Food Aid as COVID 19 numbers again increase?

USDA Rolling Back SNAP Flexibility That States Need in Current Crisis

AUGUST 10, 2020 AT 11:00 AM

The Agriculture Department (USDA) is restricting key flexibility in SNAP (food stamps) that the President and Congress gave states in the Families First Act of March to help them manage an applications influx due to COVID-19 and the recession — saying states must return to “normal operations,” even though current circumstances are anything but normal.

SNAP responded quickly, as it’s designed to do, to the sharp rise in unemployment and food insecurity, especially among households with children. Caseloads jumped by more than 6 million people or about 17 percent nationally between February and May, as household incomes fell precipitously. SNAP could manage this unprecedented increase largely because Families First allowed USDA to let states temporarily change their SNAP procedures to make it easier for people to receive food assistance while state SNAP agencies operate remotely. Policymakers sought to give states the flexibility to accomplish two things during this national crisis, while still verifying core elements of eligibility like income and identity:

  1. Ensure that participating households don’t lose benefits. Ordinarily, SNAP households must periodically prove that they’re still eligible by submitting paperwork and completing an interview; if they don’t, or if the state doesn’t input the needed information by a specified date, most states’ computers will cut off food benefits. But the vast majority of states are using their flexibility under Families First to waive these requirements or extend deadlines, both to preserve participants’ benefits and to streamline administrative work. With job losses at historic levels and hardship rising dramatically, we must not cut off eligible people because their paperwork is lost or delayed or they can’t reach a caseworker for an interview.
  2. Make it easier for newly eligible people to start receiving benefits. SNAP’s rigorous eligibility and enrollment process requires applicants to document their circumstances and complete an interview. With 20 million nonfarm jobs lost in April alone, most states used their flexibility under Families First to simplify the application process in order to prioritize access to food assistance for the swelling numbers of unemployed.

Almost every state asked for waivers of federal requirements from March through June, mainly so they could extend eligibility periods for households already on SNAP and revise interview procedures. These changes worked: unlike state unemployment insurance (UI) programs, which struggled with the huge influx early on, SNAP added people at unprecedented levels.

Since June, however, USDA has restricted states’ flexibility, arguing that they should begin to “return to normal processing” by September. That’s far too soon, for several reasons.

While SNAP caseload growth nationally apparently has slowed substantially in July, that likely isn’t due to reduced need. Instead, as state flexibility ends, states are likely cutting off some eligible households for not fulfilling paperwork and interview requirements within strict deadlines, partly because many states can’t manage the workload surge. Also, the temporary federal increase in UI benefits is making some households ineligible for SNAP — but that extra UI income just ended, so the need for SNAP could rise even as USDA forces states to reimpose strict eligibility procedures.

Further, as COVID-19 hot spots continue to flare up and some areas that began reopening reverse course, individual states continue to see rising need for SNAP. States that may have hoped the crush of SNAP applications was temporary are now planning for a long period of increased need while facing budget shortfalls and long-term economic uncertainty.

Also, many states haven’t yet set up virtual eligibility processing, and some have reduced staff capacity. These challenges aren’t limited to just a few states, as the American Public Human Services Association noted in calling for continued administrative flexibility. Attorneys general from 22 states recently wrote USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue to warn that withdrawing flexibility would delay getting benefits to eligible households.

In contrast to USDA, the Department of Health and Human Services is still approving states’ waivers and other changes to their Medicaid procedures. States can use less restrictive methods to determine eligibility, adopt a streamlined application, and let health care providers temporarily enroll seniors and people with disabilities who appear eligible.

Policymakers gave USDA the tools to respond to the extraordinary circumstances that state SNAP agencies and millions of low-income households face. Now, USDA needs to continue giving states the flexibility to respond to the unprecedented increase in need until COVID-19 is under control and agency operations have returned to something like normal.

Above is from:  https://www.cbpp.org/blog/usda-rolling-back-snap-flexibility-that-states-need-in-current-crisis

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************

Illinois and Wisconsin’s AG and 20 Other States Attorney Generals ask for  Rollback

KARL A. RACINE ATTORNEY GENERAL

July 13, 2020


Secretary George Ervin Perdue III

U.S. Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Avenue,\

SW Washington, D.C. 20250



Administrator Pamilyn Miller Food and Nutrition Service Braddock Metro Center II 1320 Braddock Place Alexandria, VA 22314 Dear Secretary Perdue and Administrator Miller: We, the Attorneys General of the District of Columbia, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin, write to urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) to reconsider recent denials of requests by state SNAP agencies for waivers of SNAP operating procedures during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to continue granting waivers for the duration of the pandemic. These waivers provide much needed flexibility that have allowed state and local SNAP agencies to meet the influx in demand for SNAP benefits while operating remotely, which in turn has limited exposure to COVID-19 for both SNAP recipients and agency employees. Denying extensions of these waivers while the pandemic persists will require rapid adjustments in operating procedures that could delay the administration of SNAP benefits and pose a risk of infection for those agency employees and SNAP recipients who must visit service centers in-person to complete procedures like applications and certifications.

To limit exposure to COVID-19, and in compliance with the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the White House, as well as state-specific mandates and guidelines, state and local SNAP agencies have largely transitioned their staff to remote work, with only very limited staff working on-site at SNAP service centers. In doing so, these agencies revamped their information technology services to ensure both seamless continuation of the administration of SNAP benefits and improved remote accessibility to resources for SNAP recipients. Readjustments in operating procedures, as permitted in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, Pub. L. 116-127, 134 Stat. 178, 188 (2020) (“Families 2 First Act”), were key to ensuring that state agency employees could continue to administer and SNAP recipients could continue to receive their benefits uninterrupted throughout the public health crisis, without fear of exposing themselves and their families to COVID-19.

Section 2302(a)(2) of the Families First Act allows for states to request adjustments to SNAP operating procedures “to be consistent with what is practicable under actual conditions” in areas affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The provision requires the USDA to consider several factors in granting these waivers, including “the availability of offices and personnel in State agencies…and any health considerations that warrant alternative approaches.” Id. Examples of waivers include delays of re-certifications and mid-certifications for six months and allowing agencies to forgo interviews normally required at the time of application.

In response to Secretary Azar’s declaration of a national public health emergency, and in accordance with the Families First Act, FNS has granted waivers of these operational requirements, and extensions of these waivers, since March 2020. Throughout the ongoing pandemic, state agencies have supplied substantially similar data in their requests for waivers and for extensions, including in their most recent requests for waivers through July and August 2020. Although FNS made no changes to its guidance for information to be provided to support these requests, and although the national public health emergency is ongoing, FNS denied such requests or urged that applications be withdrawn for a number of states for July 2020. FNS provided no explanation for the denials, and agencies were notified of the denials only two days before these denials became effective on July 1. Without justifications for the denials, it is unclear whether FNS adequately considered the factors required in the Families First Act. We therefore urge FNS to reconsider its denials of waivers (and to maintain waivers in the coming months) based on the following reasons:

• Congress intended for FNS to take into consideration the burdens that state agencies face in trying to operate in the midst of a pandemic and the potential health risks posed by reinstating pre-pandemic operational requirements. Despite herculean efforts to ensure continuity of operations, even as applications have increased dramatically, state and local agencies continue to face obstacles to completing their normal processes for tasks like certifications and re-certifications. The operational flexibilities granted by FNS allowed state agencies to shift operations to a telework model within a very short period and focus on administering benefits during the public health crisis.

• The denials leave in doubt whether FNS considered “what is practicable” for SNAP recipients during the pandemic. Not all SNAP recipients have reliable access to the internet to remotely reapply for benefits, and some even lack access to telephones. Without the waivers, these individuals will likely have to go in-person to the service centers for interviews and to fulfill other paperwork requirements for their certifications and re-certifications. SNAP recipients have been particularly susceptible to health complications from COVID-19 and should not have to needlessly risk exposure to reapply for benefits as the pandemic continues. Even those SNAP recipients who do have  (See fns.usda.gov/disaster/pandemic/covid-19/snap-application-waivers.) phone access may incur long wait times, and the agency employees more work, as recipients and agency employees exchange multiple calls to reach each other in real time and complete interviews. Particularly as staff is working remotely, completing phone interviews will add a layer of difficulty and administrative burden as well as potential expense for the state and local agencies. Moreover, the sudden and unexpected shift back to procedural requirements will cause a bottleneck effect with limited in-office staff working to implement remote and in-person interviews for all SNAP recipients, which could result in further delays and impair other functions at the state agencies.

• Finally, with these denials, USDA is effectively pushing certain jurisdictions to reopen earlier than local officials have deemed safe. State and local governments have been evaluating the best approach to reopen economic activity while ensuring that residents are not needlessly exposed to the dangers of COVID-19. Public gatherings are still limited, and individuals are still encouraged to stay home as much as possible. Many states have seen a recent spike in COVID-19 cases, causing them to slow down or even step back their schedules for reopening. The pace of reopening is properly within the discretion of state governments. With the reinstatement of operational requirements, though, agency employees and SNAP recipients may have to violate the mandates of their local government leaders and leave their homes in the midst of a pandemic.

We urge USDA and FNS to reconsider these denials and to continue extending waivers of operating procedures while states determine what is in the best interest of public health and sequence an orderly and safe reopening. Ensuring continuity of services and the health and safety of our citizens should remain of the utmost importance, and continuing to grant waivers of SNAP operating procedures is an essential means of doing so.

Sincerely, _____________________________

KARL A. RACINE Attorney General for the District of Columbia _____________________________ XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California _____________________________ PHIL WEISER Attorney General of Colorado _____________________________ WILLIAM TONG Attorney General of Connecticut 4 _____________________________ CLARE E. CONNORS Attorney General of Hawaii _____________________________ KWAME RAOUL Attorney General of Illinois _____________________________ AARON M. FREY Attorney General of Maine _____________________________ BRIAN E. FROSH Attorney General of Maryland _____________________________ MAURA HEALEY Attorney General of Massachusetts _____________________________ DANA NESSEL Attorney General of Michigan _____________________________ KEITH ELLISON Attorney General of Minnesota _____________________________ AARON D. FORD Attorney General of Nevada _____________________________ GURBIR S. GREWAL Attorney General of New Jersey _____________________________ HECTOR BALDERAS Attorney General of New Mexico LETITIA JAMES Attorney General of New York _____________________________ ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM Attorney General of Oregon _____________________________ JOSH SHAPIRO Attorney General of Pennsylvania _____________________________ PETER F. NERONHA Attorney General of Rhode Island _____________________________ THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR. Attorney General of Vermont _____________________________ MARK R. HERRING Attorney General of Virginia _____________________________ BOB FERGUSON Attorney General of Washington _____________________________ JOSHUA L. KAUL Attorney General of Wisconsi

August 13: 1834 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

24 additional deaths in Illinois.  No changes in Boone County numbers from 8-12-2020.