Tuesday, September 28, 2021

September 28: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report

COVID-19 Situation Report

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 231.7 million cumulative cases and 4.75 million deaths worldwide as of September 27. Global weekly incidence and mortality continue to decrease for the third consecutive week.

Global Vaccination

The WHO reported 5.92 billion cumulative doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered globally as of September 27. A total of 3.38 billion individuals have received at least 1 dose, and 2.46 billion are fully vaccinated. Analysis from Our World in Data indicates that the overall trend in global daily vaccinations continues to decline, down to approximately 30 million doses per day*. The global trend continues to closely follow Asia. Our World in Data estimates that there are 3.52 billion vaccinated individuals worldwide (1+ dose; 44.7% of the global population) and 2.59 billion who are fully vaccinated (32.9% of the global population).

*The average daily doses administered may exhibit a sharp decrease for the most recent data, particularly over the weekend, which indicates effects of reporting delays. In an effort to reflect the longer-term trends, the numbers reported here may not correspond to the most recent data.

As we observed previously with 1+ dose coverage, Oceania’s full vaccination coverage (30.8%) is quickly approaching the global average (32.9%). Oceania could surpass this benchmark in the next several days, which would leave Africa (4.2%) as the only continent below the global average. Oceania and Africa were reporting similar full vaccination coverage as recently as late May, but vaccination efforts in Oceania have progressed rapidly over the past several months.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC reports 42.9 million cumulative COVID-19 cases and 686,639 deaths. Daily incidence continues to decline at the national level, down to approximately 115,000 new cases per day, which would be the lowest average since early August. Daily mortality appears to have leveled off at approximately 1,500 deaths per day.

It appears that daily mortality in Florida has continued to increase since late August, when the state changed its COVID-19 mortality reporting policy. The Florida Department of Health shifted from assigning dates to COVID-19 deaths corresponding to the date they were reported to the date of death. This results in lower reports for recent days due to the inherent reporting lag, which can give a false impression of rapidly declining daily mortality. Deaths are then filled in retrospectively on the date of death as they are reported to the state, which can take days or weeks after the death occurs. At the time of the change, we estimated that Florida’s daily mortality was likely greater than 200 deaths per day. Since then, the average increased to at least 363 (September 1), and it has remained greater than 200 from at least August 7 through September 15. Florida’s daily incidence plateaued from approximately August 10-30 before decreasing. If historical trends continue, we can expect to observe a corresponding decrease in daily mortality around this time; however, it could be another several weeks before Florida’s mortality reporting fills in enough for that trend to be evident.

US Vaccination

The US has administered 391 million cumulative doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The daily vaccination trend continues to decline from the most recent peak on August 29* (approximately 850,000), down to fewer than 600,000 doses per day. There are 213.7 million individuals who have received at least 1 dose, equivalent to 64.4% of the entire US population. Among adults, 77.1% have received at least 1 dose, as well as 14.6 million adolescents aged 12-17 years. A total of 183.9 million individuals are fully vaccinated, which corresponds to 55.4% of the total population. Approximately 66.6% of adults are fully vaccinated, as well as 11.8 million adolescents aged 12-17 years.

*Due to delays in reporting, estimates for the average daily doses administered are less accurate for the most recent 5 days. The most current average provided here corresponds to 5 days ago.

NOVAVAX WHO EMERGENCY USE LISTING APPLICATION On September 23, Novavax announced its submission to the WHO for Emergency Use Listing (EUL) for its SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate. This submission was made in partnership with the Serum Institute of India, which will manufacture the vaccine. Novavax is prioritizing access to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and it has already submitted regulatory documents to several individual countries including India, the Philippines, and Indonesia. Novavax and the Serum Institute have jointly pledged to provide more than 1.1 billion doses to the COVAX facility, which also targets LMICs. Phase 3 clinical trials are still ongoing in several countries, including Mexico, the UK, and the US, and preliminary analysis estimates strong efficacy against the original strain of the virus as well as multiple variants of concern (VOCs). 

PFIZER-BIONTECH SUBMIT PEDIATRIC PHASE 2/3 DATA Pfizer and BioNTech announced today that they submitted preliminary data from Phase 2/3 clinical trials on pediatric use of their SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to the US FDA. The submission includes data from nearly 2,300 participants ranging from age 5 years to less than 12 years, and the trial tested a regimen of 2 doses of 10μg each—compared to 30μg for the adult formulation. According to a press release from Pfizer, “the vaccine demonstrated a favorable safety profile and elicited robust neutralizing antibody responses” that were comparable to individuals aged 16-25 years. The companies intend to apply for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)—as and submit applications to the European Medicines Agency and other national regulatory agencies—for this age group in the coming weeks. White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci indicated that vaccinations for this age group could potentially begin before the end of October. The full trial data have not yet been published publicly or subjected to peer review. Phase 2/3 clinical trials are ongoing for younger children—2 years to less than 5 years and 6 months to less than 2 years—who received 2 doses of 3μg each.

PRIOR INFECTION & IMMUNE PROTECTION As we have discussed previously, protection conferred by vaccination has been demonstrated to be better than protection conferred via natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two recent studies, however, provide further analysis of the immune response during and following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including possible protection against re-infection. A study from Japan, published in the Journal of Medical Virology, analyzed the IgG and IgM responses against 2 SARS-CoV-2 proteins (N and S1) in 231 COVID-19 patients. The researchers found that mild cases exhibited stronger immune responses (IgM and IgG) against both proteins early after symptom onset than severe or critical cases. As the disease progressed, the IgM and IgG responses increased in severe and critical cases higher and more rapidly than for mild cases. Additionally, the immune responses remained elevated for longer periods of time in patients with severe or critical disease, while they declined more rapidly for patients with mild disease. ELISA analysis demonstrated that a significantly higher proportion of severe and critical patients remained seropositive at 22 days after symptom onset than for mild patients for the S1 protein but not the N protein. The researchers note that lower immune response among mild cases could potentially signal lower levels of neutralizing antibodies and a shorter period of conferred immune protection against re-infection. Further analysis is needed to better characterize the duration and strength of protection, including the role of the innate immune response and memory B and T cells, and any association with disease severity during the initial infection.

A study in rhesus macaques, published in Science Translational Medicine, evaluated the immune response to re-infection with the Alpha and Beta variants of concern (VOCs) following infection with the original strain of SARS-CoV-2. Researchers infected 18 rhesus macaques with the original strain of the virus (WA1/2020) and then exposed them to either the original strain (control), the Alpha variant, or the Beta variant 35 days later. The animals re-infected with the Alpha variant did not exhibit a notable difference in the concentration of breakthrough virus compared to the control group, whereas the animals re-infected with the Beta variant exhibited much higher concentrations of breakthrough virus. Three (3) additional naïve animals were exposed a single time to the Beta variant in order to compare the immune responses to an original infection and a re-infection. Notably, the animals that were re-infected exhibited lower concentrations of virus, and the re-infected animals exhibited increased neutralizing antibody levels after the second infection, compared to the first. These results suggest a boosted immune response conferred by the initial infection. Interestingly, the animals re-infected with the original strain or the Alpha variant exhibited lower neutralizing antibody responses against the Beta variant, whereas the animals re-infected with the Beta variant generated similar neutralizing antibody responses for all 3 variants. This illustrates that natural infection with one variant can provide some, although not complete, protection against re-infection with other variants, including VOCs; however, the degree of protection could be dependent on the strain or variant. The Delta variant, which has become the dominant strain in many countries, was not evaluated in this study, and as we have covered previously, animal models do not always accurately reflect the immune response in humans.

PANDEMIC ORIGINS Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been at the forefront of international debate since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO’s Scientific Advisory Group on the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) was created in May 2020 to identify novel pathogens and advise the WHO on technical and scientific considerations regarding their emergence and re-emergence. SAGO recently released a call for international experts to join the group, with an emphasis on increasing global representation and coordination in the effort to identify the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Some studies have linked SARS-CoV-2 virus to other endemic human coronaviruses and identified genetic similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses. International debate around the origins of SARS-CoV-2 continues, however, with some experts advocating for a revival of scientific investigations in China and elsewhere, to provide additional information regarding various origin scenarios, including zoonotic transmission or laboratory research. Leading WHO infectious disease epidemiologist Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove emphasized that SAGO is not a new fact-finding mission to China. Rather, SAGO advises the WHO on a framework of study to understand the origins of emerging and re-emerging pathogens, and any future missions, to China or elsewhere, will be coordinated directly between the WHO and national governments.

JAPAN EASING COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga announced yesterday that Japan will lift its nationwide COVID-19 state of emergency on September 30 and begin relax associated restrictions. While Japan will lift many COVID-19 protective measures, it will reportedly implement testing and vaccine passport programs to mitigate risk while facilitating increased social and economic activity. Local governments may continue to recommend voluntary restrictions on businesses, such as reduced hours of operation and alcohol sales at bars and restaurants, after the emergency is lifted. Japan faced a surge in COVID-19 incidence that coincided with the 2020 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games, but it has receded rapidly in recent weeks.

AFRICA VACCINE HESITANCY In addition to barriers to accessing sufficient SARS-CoV-2 vaccine supply, African countries are also facing challenges with vaccine hesitancy. Dr. John Nkengasong, Director of the Africa CDC, recently commented on a potential link between international travel restrictions in the UK and hesitancy among African populations. The concern stems from the limited list of countries for which travelers arriving in the UK can “qualify as fully vaccinated.” Travelers vaccinated under a UK, EU, or US vaccination program or individuals arriving from a list of 18 countries who can show proof of full vaccination can enter the UK as “fully vaccinated” travelers, with limited restrictions or quarantine or testing requirements. Notably, the list does not include any countries from Africa, which Dr. Nkengasong argues could serve as a disincentive to get vaccinated. If travelers from African countries cannot qualify as fully vaccinated, even with documentation of full vaccination, some individuals may not see value in the vaccination. Similar opposition has been reported in India and other parts of Asia as well as Latin America. Dr Richard Mihigo, an official from the WHO's Africa region, called on countries to develop a cohesive global system for demonstrating vaccination status and lift travel restrictions for vaccinated travelers that are dependent on country.

SOUTHEAST ASIA ECONOMIC IMPACT The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions continue to have long-term negative effects on local, national, and global economies. In Southeast Asia, several major economic forecasts have downgraded their previous projections and warn of slower economic growth in 2021. The Asian Development Bank lowered its previous regional projection from 4.4% to 3.1% growth over the course of 2021, which signals slower economic recovery from the pandemic. Additionally, the bank lowered its growth projections for all national-level economies, with the exception of the Philippines and Singapore, and Singapore is now the only country in Southeast Asia projected to grow its economy by more than 5% in 2021.

Similarly, the World Bank downgraded its economic growth projections for “developing countries in East Asia.” The new 2021 projection for these countries falls from 4.4% growth to just 2.5%, which stands in stark contrast to the projected 8.5% growth in China. Even in countries that are currently exhibiting stronger economic growth, the trend is slowing as COVID-19 surges continue, driven largely by the Delta variant. The report emphasizes that the pandemic is compounding growing inequality in the region, which will have negative impacts on future economic growth.

Following COVID-19 surges tied to Delta variant, some Southeast Asian countries are once again opening borders to allow travel and tourism, including to some population island destinations in the region. Countries are implementing combinations of vaccine mandates and testing requirements in order to allow international travelers to arrive without lengthy quarantines. Some national and local economies rely heavily on tourism to drive their economies, and they have been severely impacted by travel restrictions during the pandemic. Some countries are moving slowly, with initial limits on traveler volume for specific destinations (including some local areas with high vaccination coverage), before expanding. Some countries that limited domestic travel during the pandemic (eg, to remote islands) are also resuming some domestic travel and tourism opportunities.

NEW YORK HEALTHCARE WORKERS The New York Governor Kathy Hochul, signed an executive order on September 27 to address potential worker shortages as the state’s vaccine mandate goes into effect. The executive order allows the Governor to activate the National Guard or bring in healthcare workers from other states to fill critical personnel shortages. Early evidence indicates that thousands of previously unvaccinated healthcare workers showed up to vaccination sites to receive their first dose in the hours before the mandate went into effect. Approximately 5,000 employees remain unvaccinated, which is a sharp decline from 8,000 a week ago. The statewide vaccination coverage for hospital employees is now reported as 92% with at least 1 dose, and the vaccination also increased among nursing home employees, up from 84%to 92%. Despite these encouraging signs, some hospital employees are still threatening to accept being fired rather than get vaccinated. Some of these individuals indicated that they feel betrayed by the hospital system and government, and they do not trust the vaccine, despite widespread evidence of safety and efficacy. Employees who remain unvaccinated could be put on unpaid leave and eventually fired. The CEO of the New York City Health+Hospitals health system reported that all facilities are currently functional and that there are no serious reports of staffing shortages.

US SCHOOL TESTING Inconsistent SARS-CoV-2 testing procedures and requirements at schools across the US are raising concerns with parents and stressing the capacity of the school systems trying to implement them. Even school districts in the same city can have very different testing and isolation standards. In Texas, for example, the San Antonio Independent School District offers weekly testing for all students and staff, which consumes a lot of time and resources, even though only 30% of students are participating in the program. Conversely, nearby Boerne Independent School District offers testing only by appointment, and symptomatic students and staff are not referred for testing or sent home unless they can no longer participate in classroom instruction.

While some school districts are foregoing robust testing programs based on the belief that they are unnecessary, others are unable to implement them due to a lack of resources, including access to test kits and personnel to conduct large numbers of regular tests. In Illinois, the state reported surge of enrollments in its statewide school-based testing program as daily incidence increased across the state and the new school year approached. But because schools enrolled late in the process, most do not yet have the logistics and operational systems in place to implement the testing programs. It can take 3-6 weeks to establish these systems, which has delayed testing in some schools, even after classes have already resumed. The Berkeley (California) Unified School District used state COVID-19 funding as well as its own budget to hire 21 personnel, just to implement its testing program; however, most school districts do not have the funding available to hire new, dedicated staff for testing programs.

US RAPID TEST SHORTAGE A nationwide shortage of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests has been reported in the US, while capacity for PCR-based tests remains high. PCR tests must be processed by a lab, however, and results can often take between 1-3 days (or longer). Rapid tests and at-home tests may have a slightly lower accuracy than PCR tests, but they can still identify nearly 98% of infectious cases and provide convenient results within 15-20 minutes. The shortage of rapid testing kits means that schools, nursing homes, shelters, and workers that rely on fast testing results to go to work each day or prevent outbreaks among at-risk populations are struggling to access adequate resources. Increased wait times for testing results mean that shelters, clinics, and schools are at increased risk for outbreaks, and workers who require daily testing could be forced to miss work and lose income.

The nationwide shortage of rapid tests may be a function of decreased testing demands and increasing vaccination coverage over the summer. The Delta variant surge and slowing vaccination progress are driving increased demand for rapid tests, and manufacturers have not yet increased production capacity to catch up. Insufficient supply of rapid and at-home tests is driving up testing demand at other locations, including urgent care centers.

The increased demand and supply limitations for rapid tests is driving up the prices of some other testing products. The CARES Act passed in 2020 requires that insurers pay the cost of SARS-CoV-2 testing conducted at out-of-network laboratories. One company, GS Labs, is routinely charging US$380 per test, and insurers argue that the high cost is “price-gouging,” and in some instances, they are refusing the pay. The elevated cost of these tests could result in higher insurance premiums. GS Labs argues that it approached insurers about becoming an in-network provider for reduced costs, but it was generally rejected. The company also cites its excellent service and a high start-up cost as justification for the elevated price for its tests. A representative for the company emphasizes that customers can schedule an appointment for immediate testing and receive results within 15-20 minutes, while many drugstores and pharmacies have no rapid tests available. There are currently several ongoing lawsuits that aim to determine how much insurers have to pay. Increasing the availability of rapid and at-home tests, which typically cost on the order of US$20, would help increase testing access and reduce the need for higher-cost testing options.

Monday, September 27, 2021

Interesting Article Regarding Advantages of Moderna Vaccine

Business Insider

4 charts show why Moderna vaccine recipients may not need boosters as much as people who got Pfizer's vaccine

Hilary Brueck

Mon, September 27, 2021, 11:45 AM

Pfizer and Moderna vaccine vials

Vials of the Pfizer (left) and Moderna (right) COVID-19 vaccines. Hazem Bader/AFP via Getty Images

  • Millions of adults across the US are now eligible for booster shots of Pfizer's vaccine.

  • Federal authorities are still waiting for more data on Moderna and Johnson & Johnson before recommending a boost to those vaccines.

The US is now offering booster doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine to tens of millions of people who've been fully vaccinated with Pfizer's shots for at least six months.

man in a mask getting his third booster shot of Pfizer vaccine injected into his right arm by a healthcare worker (also masked).

Booster shots began to be administered at the VA Hospital in Hines, Illinois on September 24, 2021. Scott Olson/Getty Images

Booster doses are most recommended for adults age 65 and up, who don't generally have the same kind of strong, lasting immune response to vaccines as younger people.

But there's not yet any federal guidance about whether, or when, people who've gotten Moderna or Johnson & Johnson's COVID-19 vaccines might need a boost.

a healthcare worker holds a syringe inserted into a vial of pfizer's comirnaty vaccine

Booster shots are being offered to some adults in the US who got Pfizer's vaccine, called Comirnaty. Jens Schlueter/Getty Images

More evidence is beginning to emerge suggesting that people on #TeamModerna may not need a booster as much as others, though.

Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released data sets from hospitals around the country, which are starting to show that people who've gotten Moderna's vaccine are less likely to be hospitalized than those with Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson.

Another CDC report released earlier in September suggested that Moderna's two-dose vaccine reduced the risk of hospitalization by 93%. For Pfizer, that figure was 88%, and for Johnson & Johnson it was 71%.

Dr. Robert Atmar, who's leading a pivotal COVID-19 booster study at Baylor College of Medicine, says while it "wouldn't surprise me" if J&J recipients get a booster recommendation soon, "for the Moderna, it is an open question."

The protection Moderna's vaccine offers against hospitalization seems to last longer than other brands.

chart showing vaccine effectiveness appears to wane more with pfizer than with moderna after 4 months

CDC ACIP meeting, September 22-23, 2021.

This data, collected from hospitals in 20 cities across the country, suggests that Moderna's vaccine protects people against hospitalization for longer than both Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.

After four months, Moderna's vaccine remained 92% effective at preventing hospitalizations, while Pfizer's was 77% effective, and J&J's 68%.

One reason why Moderna may be holding up better in long-term protection is because the vaccine dosage is higher.

vaccine effectiveness chart showing slightly lower effectiveness against hospitalizations for pfizer vaccine than for moderna

CDC ACIP meeting, September 22-23, 2021.

Moderna's shot consists of 100 micrograms of mRNA vaccine, while Pfizer's is 30 micrograms. That may mean lighter side effects for Pfizer's shot, but in the long run the protection might not be as strong.

According to a study of hospitals in New York, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Utah, California, Oregon, Washington, Indiana, and Colorado, Moderna's vaccine is triggering far fewer hospitalizations when people aged 65 and older do get sick.

Another possibility is that the four week interval between doses of Moderna is better than the three week waiting time between shots one and two of Pfizer.

vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization lower with pfizer than moderna

CDC ACIP meeting, September 22-23, 2021.

Both vaccines are still great at preventing severe disease and hospitalization, especially in adults under the age of 65.

Still, this data from five veterans affairs medical centers in the US suggests that Moderna's vaccine is superior at protecting elderly adults, with a vaccine effectiveness of 87% against hospitalization in patients aged 65 and up, whereas Pfizer is 77% effective in that same group.

Since the Delta variant took over in the US, both Moderna and Pfizer recipients are getting sick more often. But Moderna's vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization, for people over age 30, is looking slightly stronger - for now.

charts showing vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization remains very high for both vaccines

CDC ACIP meeting, September 22-23, 2021.

These estimates of vaccine effectiveness, broken down by age group, come from data on over 74,000 hospitalizations across 187 hospitals nationwide.

Here, we can see that Moderna has been outperforming Pfizer among adults ages 30-64. From June to August, Moderna's vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization was 99% in the 30-49 year old age group and 91% among 50-64 year olds. Pfizer's vaccine during that same time period was roughly 82% effective among 30-49 year olds, and 84% effective among 50-64 year olds.

But in younger adults, ages 18-29, the two vaccines performed almost identically, with vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization of 82% for Moderna and 85% for Pfizer.

It's tough to know exactly how the arrival of the Delta variant in the spring may be impacting how well vaccines work.

Whichever way you slice the data, all the vaccines are still pretty stellar at their primary job - keeping people alive and out of the hospital. Still, older adults remain more vulnerable to severe COVID-19 outcomes, even when they're vaccinated.

vaccine effectiveness chart showing protection remains high against hospitalization

CDC ACIP meeting, September 22-23, 2021.

This data, taken from more than 250 hospitals across 14 states, combines both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in a single chart. It shows the vast majority of COVID-19 cases and deaths nationwide are now among unvaccinated people.

"We will not boost our way out of this pandemic," CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said during a White House COVID-19 briefing on Friday. "The most vulnerable are those unvaccinated."

Read the original article on Business Insider

Friday, September 24, 2021

Females are 60% of College Students?

What's behind the unexpected gender gap on college campuses?

Mike Bebernes

Mike Bebernes

·Senior Editor

Wed, September 22, 2021, 3:45 PM

“The 360” shows you diverse perspectives on the day’s top stories and debates.

1:20

1:57

Gabby Petito case draws renewed spotlight to Lauren Cho and others who have gone missing

What’s happening

In most conversations about the gender gap — whether the topic is income, professional achievement or presence in leadership roles — it’s typically women who are struggling to keep up with men. When it comes to higher education, however, the disparity is reversed.

At the end of the 2020-21 academic year, nearly 60 percent of all college students were women, according to data from the National Student Clearinghouse. Women have outpaced men in college enrollment for decades, but last year’s gap represents an all-time high. If the trend continues, twice as many women as men will earn college degrees within the next few years, the NSC’s executive director told the Wall Street Journal.

As much as this disparity is a sign of success for women, many experts worry about the wider effects of a worsening education deficit among men. Men with bachelor’s degrees earn about $900,000 on average more than high school graduates over the course of their careers. Less-educated men are also more likely to be unemployed and are more vulnerable to economic shocks like the recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic. At a society-wide scale, these shortfalls could dampen growth of the U.S. economy and make inequality more severe.

Universities across the country have quietly tried to reverse this trend, knowing that prospective applicants find schools with a significant gender divide in either direction less appealing. One college enrollment consultant told the Journal there is a “thumb on the scale for boys” in admissions at many prestigious schools, a reality she called “higher education’s dirty little secret.”

Why there’s debate

About 50 years ago, when women were underrepresented in colleges, sexism provided a simple answer as to why. But experts say the forces keeping men out of higher education today are complex and won’t be easy to reverse.

The role of college in American life has changed substantially in recent decades, in a way that has made higher education feel less essential to many men, some say. This is true in a practical sense. Women-dominated fields like teaching, nursing and counseling require at least a bachelor’s degree, while predominantly male professions like construction typically don’t. Conservative pundits often argue that what they see as anti-male liberal political culture in academia has made men feel they don’t belong on campus.

Many education experts say the causes of the college gender gap are established much earlier. Boys are much more likely to struggle academically in early school years and are more likely to be punished for misbehavior. They’re also more reticent to seek help, which can throw their education off track at an early age. Research also suggests that boys experience the negative economic impacts of poverty and of growing up in a single parent household more acutely than girls, effects that can make them more likely to pursue low-wage jobs available right away rather than investing in a college education.

What’s next

The college gender gap shows no sign of reversing, as states like Iowa and Minnesota are noting the dips. Women submitted nearly a million more college applications for the 2021-22 school year than men did, according to data obtained by the Journal.

Perspectives

Women have fewer career options if they don’t get a college degree

“Women surged into college because they were able to, but also because many had to. There are still some good-paying jobs available to men without college credentials. There are relatively few for such women. And despite the considerable cost in time and money of earning a degree, many female-dominated jobs don’t pay well.” — Kevin Carey, New York Times

Well-established systems that have helped women succeed don’t exist for men

“Female students in the U.S. benefit from a support system established decades ago, spanning a period when women struggled to gain a foothold on college campuses. … Young men get little help, in part, because schools are focused on encouraging historically underrepresented students.” — Douglas Belkin, Wall Street Journal

Many young men feel there is no place for them on college campuses

“A generation of white men who grew up hearing that the problem with American institutions is that there are too many white men in them apparently has been listening.” — Kevin D. Williamson, New York Post

Pressure to make money in the short term can steer men away from college

“Sometimes there’s the sense that young men will come back to the system when they enter into their career and realize that they do need a college degree for advancement, and a lot of the data shows that just doesn’t happen. Once students start this path and don’t pursue college, it’s really hard to get back into the system. Really hard, because life happens.” — Jens Larson, Eastern Washington University vice president, to The Spokesman-Review

Many boys are thrown off from college early in their education

“The differences between boys and girls emerge as early as elementary school, where boys lag in literacy skills and are overrepresented in special education. Boys are also more likely than girls to be punished for misbehaving — an experience that can sour them on school. … Boys are also less likely than girls to seek or accept help for their academic and emotional struggles, having been socialized to be self-reliant. By the time they’re in middle school, some boys have disengaged from school entirely.” — Kelly Field, Chronicle of Higher Education

Young men of color may feel like they have no place in society

“We have a lot of young men who are completely disengaged from our society because quite frankly they don’t feel they’re being valued as men. So they think, why even try when everybody sees me as a thug, as a delinquent, when everyone assumes the worst of me instead of assuming the best of me?” — Luis Ponjuan, higher education researcher, to Hechinger Report

Schools don’t have room to make male enrollment a priority

“With men still dominating the worlds of business, politics — and the faculty rosters of higher ed institutions themselves — it’s hard to generate the same attention to, or sympathy for, the growing gender gap in educational attainment.” — Michael Jonas, Commonwealth Magazine

Boys are especially hurt by the decline of marriage in the U.S.

“Marriage matters. Children from single-parent households, particularly boys from single-parent households, fare far worse than children from married households. Until our public policy elites admit our nation has a marriage crisis, the ‘guy problem’ at colleges will only get worse.” — Conn Carroll, Washington Examiner

The college gender gap is a societal problem that requires society-wide solutions

“This gender gap is an economic story, a cultural story, a criminal-justice story, and a family-structure story that begins to unfold in elementary school. … Rather than dial up male attendance one college-admissions department at a time, policy makers should think about the social forces that make the statistic inevitable.” — Derek Thompson, The Atlantic

Is there a topic you’d like to see covered in “The 360”? Send your suggestions to the360@yahoonews.com.

Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Getty Images

Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/news/whats-behind-the-unexpected-gender-gap-on-colleges-campuses-204548329.html

September 24: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report



COVID-19 Situation Report

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 229.9 million cumulative cases and 4.71 million deaths worldwide as of September 23. Global weekly incidence decreased by 5.9% compared to the previous week, and mortality fell by 3.1%.

Global Vaccination

The WHO reported 5.87 billion cumulative doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered globally as of September 23. A total of 3.36 billion individuals have received at least 1 dose, and 2.43 billion are fully vaccinated. Analysis from Our World in Data indicates that the overall trend in global daily vaccinations continues to decline, down to fewer than 28 million doses per day*. The global trend continues to closely follow Asia. Our World in Data estimates that there are 3.46 billion vaccinated individuals worldwide (1+ dose; 44.13% of the global population) and 2.54 billion who are fully vaccinated (32.24% of the global population).

*The average daily doses administered may exhibit a sharp decrease for the most recent data, particularly over the weekend, which indicates effects of reporting delays. In an effort to reflect the longer-term trends, the numbers reported here may not correspond to the most recent data.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC reports 42.5 million cumulative COVID-19 cases and 680,688 deaths. The US has passed a peak in terms of daily incidence. The most recent high was 160,200 new cases per day on September 1, and the trend began to decline slightly before the Labor Day holiday weekend. The current average is approximately 121,532 new cases per day and appears to be decreasing. Daily mortality continues to increase slowly, now up to 1,556 deaths per day—the highest average since February 27. If the daily incidence peaked on September 1, mortality could peak in the next week or so*.

*Changes in state-level reporting may affect the accuracy of recently reported data, particularly over the weekend. In an effort to reflect the longer-term trends, the numbers reported here may not correspond to the most recent dates.

The US surpassed 675,000 cumulative deaths on September 20, which makes the COVID-19 pandemic more deadly than the 1918 influenza pandemic in the US. Notably, the US population in 1918 was less than one-third of the current population (approximately 105 million), so the COVID-19 mortality is much lower on a per capita basis.

US Vaccination

The US has administered 388 million cumulative doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The daily vaccination trend continues to decline from the most recent peak on August 29*, worrying some officials as flu season approaches. There are 212.6 million individuals who have received at least 1 dose, equivalent to 64.0% of the entire US population. Among adults, 76.7% have received at least 1 dose, as well as 14.4 million adolescents aged 12-17 years. A total of 182.6 million individuals are fully vaccinated, which corresponds to 55% of the total population. Approximately 66.2% of adults are fully vaccinated, as well as 11.6 million adolescents aged 12-17 years.

*Due to delays in reporting, estimates for the average daily doses administered are less accurate for the most recent 5 days. The most current average provided here corresponds to 5 days ago.

US BOOSTER DOSES Third doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are now recommended for certain US populations at least 6 months after their primary 2-dose series. Following the US FDA’s authorization of third doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on September 22, the US CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) on September 23 voted to recommend booster doses be offered to people aged 65 years and older, residents in long-term care facilities, people aged 50-64 years with underlying medical conditions, and individuals aged 18-49 who have underlying medical conditions. The ACIP rejected a proposal to offer the shots to people aged 18-64 who are at an increased risk of COVID-19 because they live or work in high-risk occupational and institutional settings, including healthcare workers and teachers. Later the same day, in an unusual move, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky aligned her recommendation with the FDA’s authorization instead of the CDC committee's recommendations, to include those who work in high-risk settings to be eligible for booster shots. Several ACIP members expressed surprise over Dr. Walensky’s decision, which highlights ongoing divisions and confusion among federal regulators, Biden administration officials, and outside advisers about efforts to bring the pandemic under control.

While the new CDC recommendations authorize millions of US residents to receive a third dose, the plan still falls short of US President Joe Biden’s original announcement that booster shots would be available to all US residents. Biden administration officials are expected to announce a plan for rolling out booster shots as soon as today. The current recommendations only apply to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but a decision on boosters for the Moderna and J&J-Janssen vaccines could come within weeks.

VIRTUAL COVID-19 SUMMIT One day after UN Secretary-General António Guterres scolded the world for its inequitable distribution of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on September 21, US President Joe Biden hosted a virtual COVID-19 summit—bringing together world leaders, advocacy groups, nonprofit organizations, and business leaders—in an effort to end the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022 and bolster support for a list of targets that includes vaccinating 70% of the world’s population by September 2022 and alleviating a global oxygen shortage. Calling the COVID-19 pandemic an “all-hands-on-deck crisis,” President Biden confirmed the US will donate another 500 million Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine doses by mid-2022, announced a partnership with the European Union (EU) to improve access to vaccines and therapeutics, and called on other wealthy nations to increase their pledges to countries in need. To facilitate several nations’ purchasing of vaccines through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the COVAX facility, the US International Development Finance Corporation announced it will provide US$383 million in political risk insurance, one of the conditions for self-financing countries to obtain doses through the initiative.

Questions remain over whether the new vaccine-related commitments will help, as many rich countries’ donation pledges have yet to materialize and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine requires specialized infrastructure to store and ship the shots, unavailable in most low-income nations. Advocates said the virtual summit, which was held behind closed doors and involved many pre-recorded speeches, was a missed opportunity to end the piecemeal international approach, increase the urgency for actually delivering vaccines, and coalesce global leadership and coordination to end the pandemic. With growing pressure on US pharmaceutical companies to share vaccine technology, some experts regretted that the summit’s lack of interactive conversation did not permit discussion over the potential for international property rights waivers, which the US has said it supports but has not taken steps to finalize. Additionally, the US government continues to face criticism over its plan to soon begin administering vaccine booster doses for some adults, but officials continue to claim they can vaccinate both US residents and people around the world.

Looking toward the future, US Vice President Kamala Harris announced the US will contribute US$250 million in startup funding for a new global health security fund, with the goal of raising US$10 billion to help confront future pandemics. The Biden administration has asked the US Congress to allocate an additional US$850 million for the new financial intermediary fund (FIF), according to Vice President Harris. Both she and President Biden, in his address to the UN General Assembly on September 21, called for the creation of a Global Health Threats Council that could elevate health threats to heads of state, as well as ensure nations’ transparency and accountability.

ECONOMIC RECOVERY Global vaccine inequity will directly impact economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, and many of those same countries struggling for vaccine access likely will face difficulties financing their healthcare systems as governments cut overall spending, several new reports warn. The global economy has managed to bounce back this year, and likely will be able to rebound close to its pre-crisis trend, driven by growth in wealthy nations that have vaccinated large portions of their populations, a new report from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shows. But the gap between rich countries and the developing world is expanding due to continuing unequal access to vaccines. In its report, the OECD urged wealthy nations to share excess vaccine doses with countries in need, invest in resources to facilitate administration of the shots, and not be too quick to withdraw the “extraordinary support” they provided to their own economies during the pandemic. The OECD warned that the outlook remains uncertain, as employment levels in many countries have been severely impacted and not yet recovered.

In a separate report, the World Bank cautioned that at least 52 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that are experiencing declines in overall per capita government spending will be unable to adequately fund their healthcare systems, further threatening COVID-19 recovery and health security. Some nations will struggle to finance SARS-CoV-2 vaccine purchases and administration, or prepare for future disease outbreaks, the report noted, calling on wealthier nations to “recognize their interests” in a stable global recovery and commit the necessary resources. Another report, from Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies, based at New York University’s Center on International Cooperation, warns that more than 100 countries are facing cuts to public spending on health, education, and social programs while simultaneously confronting problems paying down debt amid the pandemic, leading to growing inequality. The report cautions that cuts to government spending for vital services could lead to a reversal in development gains and unrest in some of these countries.

ENGLAND TRAVEL RULES England’s new “simplified” international travel rules—which come into effect on October 4—are igniting outrage and frustration across Africa, South Asia, and Latin America, with some calling the government’s decision to recognize only vaccinations in certain countries discriminatory and racist. Under the new rules, people who received the AstraZeneca-Oxford, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or J&J-Janssen vaccines in countries with approved health bodies—including the US, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, an EU country, and several other nations—will be considered “fully vaccinated” and exempt from a 10-day quarantine upon arrival in England from an Amber list country, while people vaccinated with the same vaccines in African or Latin American countries or India will be considered “not fully vaccinated” and subject to quarantine when arriving from an Amber list country. The African Union’s lead health official said the policy is confusing and regrettable and asked why England would not recognize vaccination with shots it sent to the continent. England claims its policy is based on concerns over vaccine certification, but other European nations have found ways to alleviate concerns by allowing anyone vaccinated with a shot authorized by the European Medicines Agency to apply for a vaccine certificate before visiting. While the initial guidelines excluded India’s Covishield vaccine, which has been distributed in the UK, the vaccine was added to the travel list this week, even though it has not yet been formally authorized by UK regulators. A UK government spokesperson said additional changes to the policy would be considered during regular reviews every 3 weeks.

REMDESIVIR EFFECTIVENESS Gilead Sciences’ antiviral COVID-19 treatment Veklury, also known as remdesivir, appeared to reduce hospitalization among non-hospitalized patients at high risk of disease progression when given early in the disease, according to Phase 3 clinical trial results released in a September 22 press release. The results have not yet been published or peer-reviewed. The randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 3-day regimen of remdesivir, which is delivered intravenously. Among the 562 patients assigned 1:1 to receive remdesivir or placebo, the remdesivir group experienced a statistically significant 87% reduction in risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause death by Day 28 when compared with the placebo group. The treatment group also had an 81% reduction in risk for medical visits due to COVID-19 when compared with the placebo group. No deaths occurred in the study by Day 28. The safety profile between remdesivir and placebo were similar, with the most common adverse events in the remdesivir group being headache and nausea. Veklury was the first COVID-19 treatment to receive full FDA approval, for use among adult and pediatric patients requiring hospitalization. However, there remains controversy over its effectiveness, with clinical trials showing varying success of the drug. Although antivirals tend to work better early in the course of disease, the drug’s intravenous administration presents logistical challenges for its use in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

RONAPREVE/REGEN-COV The WHO today added the combination monoclonal antibody treatment known as Ronapreve, or REGEN-COV in the US, to its list of recommended COVID-19 therapeutics and called for producing companies and governments to address the high price and limited production of the drug, which contains casirivimab and imdevimab. The WHO urged US-based Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which holds the patent on the combination drug, to share technology to allow for more widespread manufacturing, and said UN agencies are negotiating with Roche, which is currently manufacturing the drug for distribution at lower costs with a focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The WHO made conditional recommendations for the combination therapy—which is authorized for use in the US and the UK—to be used in patients with non-severe COVID-19 who are at high risk of hospitalization and individuals with severe cases but no existing antibodies.

US HOSPITAL CAPACITY Alaska is the latest US state to impose crisis standards of care this week, as hospitals nationwide are facing a continuing surge in severe cases. Alaska has set new single-day case records over the past several days due to the spread of the Delta variant, which is “crippling the health system,” according to Alaska Chief Medical Officer Dr. Anne Zink. In Idaho, which has seen a surge in COVID-19 cases and related deaths, health officials expanded to the entire state crisis standards of care already in place for health districts in the northern part of the state. Idaho currently has the lowest vaccination rate of any state, according to CDC data. Echoing the early days of the pandemic, elective surgeries again are being postponed across many states—including Idaho, Alaska, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon—in an effort to ration care in areas where hospital bed availability is limited. According to the US HHS Protect Public Health Data Hub, 78.6% inpatient beds across the nation are currently occupied.

SOUTHERN US BLACK COMMUNITIES Rural communities in the US South are disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, most likely due to disparities in social determinants of health such as employment and access to healthcare. In the region's predominantly Black communities, the pandemic has exacerbated ongoing medical and financial inequities. In a photojournalism report, titled “Distanced: Pandemic stories of Black life in the rural South,” STAT News examines the challenges these communities face and how they have found strength in the midst of this unprecedented public health emergency. Although the racial gap in COVID-19-related deaths seems to have shrunk in recent months, data can obscure the nuances in disparities; for example, Black people are less likely to live into older age, when COVID-19 is most lethal. Even when controlling for individual factors such as economic status, housing, education levels, preexisting health conditions, and occupation, researchers warn that structural racism contributes to demographic disparities in COVID-19 deaths, and the recent wave of cases due to the Delta variant have worsened these imbalances.