Saturday, February 6, 2016

Wheaton decides not to fire professor who said Muslims and Christians worship the same God

 

By Kirkland An and Sarah Pulliam Bailey

February 6 at 8:50 PM

 

Wheaton College’s provost has withdrawn charges for firing political science professor Larycia Hawkins just five days before a faculty hearing was scheduled to help decide her fate at the school.

In an email sent to faculty on Saturday, which was provided to The Washington Post, provost Stanton Jones said that he asked Hawkins for forgiveness.

“I asked Dr. Hawkins for her forgiveness for the ways I contributed to the fracture of our relationship, and to the fracture of Dr. Hawkins’ relationship with the College,” he wrote.

Jones wrote that he apologized for his “lack of wisdom and collegiality” in his original contact with Hawkins, which was through another colleague, as opposed to through direct contact.

Hawkins was placed on administrative leave on Dec. 15 after she published a Facebook post suggesting that Christians and Muslims worship the same God. The statement set off a wave of controversy across the country amid larger debates about the role of Muslims in America. The college said at the time that her comments raised significant theological questions and requested the professor provide a theological statement. Faculty are required to sign a statement of faith, which some felt Hawkins could not affirm after making her comments.

After Hawkins issued her theological statement, Jones requested further clarification, and upon the request, she declined to continue the conversation, telling The Post, “I don’t want to be subjected to a theological inquisition.” Jones then issued a notice for termination-for-cause, which he has now revoked.

Saturday’s email from Jones came one day after 78 current Wheaton faculty members signed a letter petitioning for Hawkins’ reinstatement, and after the school’s 12-person Faculty Council, which represents the faculty, issued a similar letter, outlining their concerns with Hawkins’ termination proceedings. There are 211 faculty.

Jones said in the email that while he still has concerns that Hawkins’ theological statements “raised important questions,” he revoked his termination charges because of the “deficiencies” in his early responses, and recognizing that Hawkins’ theological response was a “promising start” toward the conversation he wished to hold.

Hawkins remains on administrative leave, a matter, Jones said in his email, Wheaton’s president Philip Ryken will resolve.

Political science professor Leah Anderson, who is Hawkins’s department chair, said that faculty she spoke with on Saturday are rejoicing.

“We’ve been hallelujah-ing,” Anderson said. “Everybody is just so relieved. I’m so impressed with the provost because I just can’t imagine the courage it took to reverse that decision.” Anderson believes that there could be backlash among some of the college’s alumni, but she hopes Wheaton can “gently educate” and help people “understand why the issue is more complicated than it looks to them.”

Anderson said she does not know what the next steps will be in the process.

“I think there are still issues and concerns and questions among faculty that we’ll have to work out as a community, but this creates a foundation on which we can work on,” she said.

Calls to Wheaton’s spokeswoman and Hawkins were not immediately returned on Saturday.

Hawkins’s comments that she would wear the hijab in solidarity with Muslim women during Advent, and her comment — Christians and Muslims worship the same God — became especially controversial in evangelical circles. She received criticism from leading evangelicals, including evangelist Franklin Graham, and was defended by others, including theologian Miroslav Volf.

Hawkins is one of Wheaton’s five black tenured professors, who make up 2 percent of the faculty, and its only full-time black female professor.

The underlying debate taking place among evangelicals is complex, centered on how the Christian belief in a Trinitarian God — God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit — differs from the God of Islam and Judaism.

Theologians have debated whether Christians and Muslims understand God in the same way, and if so, whether they worship the same “one God.” Do they define the word “worship” in the same way?

But those questions have been set aside amid the personnel dispute that had faculty concerned about the process the college used.

Above is from:  https://www.facebook.com/sarahpulliambailey

 

Joint Statement by Wheaton College and Dr. Larycia Hawkins Announcing a Resolution

February 6, 2016

Wheaton College and Associate Professor of Political Science Dr. Larycia Hawkins announce they have come together and found a mutual place of resolution and reconciliation. The College and Dr. Hawkins have reached a confidential agreement under which they will part ways.

“Wheaton College sincerely appreciates Dr. Hawkins’ contributions to this institution over the last nine years,” says Wheaton College President Dr. Philip Graham Ryken. “We are grateful for her passionate teaching, scholarship, community service and mentorship of our students.”

In reflecting on her years at Wheaton, Dr. Hawkins says, “I appreciate and have great respect for the Christian liberal arts and the ways that Wheaton College exudes that in its mission, programs, and in the caliber of its employees and students.”

Both parties share a commitment to care for the oppressed and the marginalized, including those who are marginalized because of their religious beliefs, and to respectful dialogue with people of other faiths or no faith. While parting ways, both Wheaton College and Dr. Hawkins wish the best for each other in their ongoing work.

In pursuit of further public reconciliation, a joint press conference will be held at the Chicago Temple First United Methodist Church, 77 W. Washington St., in Chicago, on Wednesday, February 10, at 10:00 a.m.

Neither Wheaton College nor Dr. Hawkins will speak to the press about their relationship or their reconciliation before the scheduled press conference, and there will be no questions taken by the parties at or after the press conference.

Kevin Borgia: Wind energy a low-cost, reliable part of Illinois's electricity mix

  • Posted Feb. 5, 2016 at 10:02 PM

  • Thanks to incredible innovations in clean power technologies, wind energy is rapidly becoming a crucial part of our electricity mix while saving money for homeowners and businesses along the way.
    The Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), which manages Central Illinois' power grid, receives on average over 12 percent of MISO's electricity demand, much more than nuclear power. At one point last year, wind supplied over 25 percent of MISO's electric demand.
    Using wind to create this electricity saves consumers money. MISO has previously explained , "Wind represents one of the fuel choices that helps us manage congestion on the system and ultimately helps keep prices low for our customers and the end-use consumer. When we have significant quantities of wind being generated, we use less of other, more expensive, generation types to keep the system in balance."
    Wind can also be reliably integrated into the grid without batteries. Its output may be variable, but it's also predictable; as one wind farm ramps down, another ramps up. Wind forecasting technology makes variations more predictable, while real-time dispatch allows other generators to fill in the gaps and ensure reliability. A robust transmission system makes this process cheaper and more effective.
    Meanwhile, outages at conventional power plants occur suddenly and unexpectedly, removing large amounts of electricity from the grid, whereas changes in wind output are gradual and predictable, occurring gradually over many hours. This gives grid operators ample time to adapt.
    Because of technological advancements, wind power costs two-thirds less than just six years ago, and those savings are passed on to consumers. A 2012 study by the Illinois Power Agency found adding wind power to the grid reduced wholesale electric prices by $176.8 million, while creating jobs and economic growth in the process.
    More of those savings could be on the way. The Department of Energy says growing wind power could help save Illinois consumers $1.16 billion through 2050, with another $14 billion in savings possible by wind's effect on lowering natural gas prices.
    To fully tap into these benefits to our economy and our environment, we will need to invest in in upgrading our grid, which includes adding new transmission. Building transmission acts as a bridge that brings the lowest-cost wind in the country to places where the majority of Americans live.
    For example, as result of Texas' investment in new transmission, consumers are saving billions. The transmission lines are also already paying for themselves by allowing the state to double its use of low-cost wind energy. The Illinois Commerce Commission should be commended for taking steps to modernize the electric grid by approving transmission projects that will give Illinois access to more low-cost wind.
    A January 2016 study by the Southwest Power Pool found that transmission upgrades are smart investments: a $3.4 billion investment by the grid operator in transmission improvements is expected to result in $16.6 billion in benefits over the life of the project.
  • - While coal is a significant part of the mix today, market forces and environmental rules are increasing its cost and diminishing its role.
    When President Barack Obama speaks at the Illinois State Capitol Wednesday, I hope he mentions the Clean Power Plan rules that will increase wind and decrease polluting sources like coal. These rules, along with the bipartisan Clean Jobs Bill now pending in the General Assembly, will make Illinois healthier and more economically competitive.

    Kevin Borgia is a Public Policy Manager with Wind on the Wires, a wind power advocacy group that works across the Midwest.

    Above is from:  http://www.sj-r.com/opinion/20160205/kevin-borgia-wind-energy-low-cost-reliable-part-of-illinoiss-electricity-mix?Start=2

    Rauner-ites doing dirty tricks?

     

    *** UPDATED x2 - A clue? - Rauner denies involvement *** AFSCME warns of “phony poll”

    Friday, Feb 5, 2016

    * From AFSCME Local 51…

    Spread the word. Folks should refuse to take this phony poll. Below is a sample of a phone call received from a Local 31 member:

      Call from a local leader re phone survey she believed came from the Governor’s Office:

      just received a call from I believe Rauners office asking me about the union informing me about contract negotiations. He wanted to know my stance on paying dues, am I for unions and will I strike. He wanted to know how do I feel abou medical & merit comp. He asked a lot of personal questions and wanted to know my name which he already knew and asked to speak to me by my full name.

      He asked me how much of my salary was I willing to go without.

    It is recommended that you do not answer these questions.

    In Solidarity
    Lori Gladson
    President, Local 51

    * A reader forwarded me that e-mail and said he had also received the call. I asked for details…

    Received a call at 6:13 pm yesterday from a [redacted] number. I’m in [redacted], so I answered. They confirmed my name, that I was a state employee, and represented by AFSCME. I assumed it was a poll commissioned by AFSCME, since they had all this information. I agreed to answer their questions believing it was an AFSCME poll (dumb, I know). The first few questions regarded opinion of the Governor (very unfavorable), opinion of AFSCME (favorable), opinion of state finances (very dire), etc. They then asked about my willingness to strike (refused to answer), how much money I would be willing to give up for a strike (refused to answer), how often do I hear updates from the union (once a week), do I believe the union is representing me well (yes). They then confirmed my name, which I found odd because they stated my name at the beginning of the call. They asked my “position”.

    When I started getting suspicious (around the time of the strike questions), I asked who the poll was for. The poller stated that he didn’t even know who it was for. I confirmed that my name would not be used with my answers, and he agreed. The call lasted 9 minutes. Needless to say, I became more and more uncomfortable as the night wore on and wish I had refused to answer any of the questions.

    I convinced myself that the Governor’s office wouldn’t share my personal information (phone number) with a polling agency for political reasons. Now I’m not so sure.

    Shortly after receiving the call, I started going through the comments on yesterday’s AFSCME posts on the blog looking for anybody mentioning something similar, but found none.

    Then I received the forwarded email this morning. Crap… Hopefully we’re just paranoid….

    * Council 31 is now warning members about the poll

    PHONY POLL: Company tied to the Raunerites is using a phony “poll” to pressure state employees to make negative statements about our union. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE THIS CALL. If you get it, you can just hang up immediately.

    Anyone else get this call?

    *** UPDATE *** From the governor’s office…

    Hi, Rich:

    The administration is not aware of this survey and has nothing to do with it.

    Best,
    ck

    * From a reader…

    Rich-

    This may or may not be a coincidence. I am a county official, and received this FOIA request at the end of January.

    The e-mail…

    From: Research Policy [mailto:research@illinoispolicy.org]
    Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:19 PM
    Subject: Illinois Policy FOIA 1.27.2016

    To whom it may concern,

    This is a request for information under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (5 ILCS 140).

    I am seeking documents related to the number of and names of (redacted) employees who are union members with the name of their affiliated union and residential zip codes.

    As I am a researcher acting in the public interest, I ask that you waive any fees. Please notify me by telephone at 217.528.8800 or by email if you have any questions regarding my request. If possible, please forward the requested document(s) by e-mail.

    I will expect to receive your response within five business days, as required by the statute (5 ILCS 140/3(d)).

    Thank you very much for your assistance.

    Chris Andriesen
    Illinois Policy Institute

    I’ve asked the Illinois Policy Institute about this. Stay tuned.

    - Posted by Rich Miller

    170 Comments » </ID="COMMENTS">

    See the comments by clicking on the article:  http://capitolfax.com/2016/02/05/afscme-warns-of-phony-poll/

    Rauner now says he supports opening the State Museum

     

    Friday, Feb 5, 2016

    * The Illinois State Museum closed last fall. The GA passed a bill to reopen it, but didn’t provide revenue. The governor rewrote the bill and announced he was all for it opening, but with private funding.

    Press release…

    Governor Bruce Rauner issued an amendatory veto today on SB 317 to reopen the Illinois State Museum while developing a model for funding that does not rely solely on state support.

    The current bill as written is an unfunded mandate with no appropriations to support the Museum or its branch sites. The Governor’s amendatory veto instructs the Museum to partner with public and private third-parties to invest in the Museum’s mission.

    In addition, the Governor’s changes to the bill authorizes the Director of Illinois Department of Natural Resources to establish entrance fees. Many of Illinois’ neighboring states charge admission at their respective museums.

    * The veto message wasn’t posted online as I wrote this, but it will be here soon. An excerpt…

    I hereby return Senate Bill 317 with specific recommendations for change to develop a sustainable fiscal model for the continued operation of the Illinois State Museum.

    The Illinois State Museum preserves and showcases the proud history of Illinois. The Museum helps educate Illinoisans of all ages on their unique heritage. As a research institution, the Museum is a leader in the advancement of not only Illinois, but U.S. and natural history. I support Senate Bill 317’s fundamental purpose of opening the Museum to the public again.

    However, despite the good the Museum does, its operations are not fiscally sustainable. The State invests more than $6 million per year, despite attendance of only 200,000 visitors per year. When the General Assembly failed to pass a balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2016, our Administration was required by the Illinois Constitution and our responsibility to taxpayers to take whatever steps we could to cut non-essential costs. While the State is in the midst of a crisis caused by decades of fiscal mismanagement, as long as this bill fails to offer any plan to help the Museum become self-supporting, it is just an empty and broken promise to the taxpayers of Illinois.

    But there is a path to sustainability. I propose not merely re-opening the Museum while continuing its status quo, but re-energizing its operations and partnering it with other public and private entities to make it truly self-supporting and to relieve the fiscal burden to taxpayers.

    - Posted by Rich Miller

    Above is from:   http://capitolfax.com/2016/02/05/rauner-now-says-he-supports-opening-the-state-museum/