Thursday, May 31, 2018

Kmart on East State Street in Rockford is set to close


By Breane Lyga

Connect

Posted: May 31, 2018 2:37 PM CDT

ROCKFORD (WREX) -

The Kmart on East State Street in Rockford will close, in another sweep of store closings by Sears Holdings Company.

The store, located at 5909 East State Street, will close along with 14 other Kmart stores and 48 Sears stores.

Other locations in Illinois include the Sears stores in Vernon Hills, Aurora, Gurnee and Springfield.

In January, Sears Holdings announced the Kmart on Sandy Hollow Road would close.

Sears has cut its store count in half over the last 5 years.

Above is from:  http://www.wrex.com/story/38319948/2018/05/31/kmart-on-east-state-street-in-rockford-is-set-to-close

What Do Steel Tariffs Have to Do With Iran? Plenty


Politics & Policy     OPINION

What Do Steel Tariffs Have to Do With Iran? Plenty

It involves exchanging trade peace for concessions on defense spending and Iran.

by

Melvyn Krauss

3

May 31, 2018, 7:42 AM CDT

Loud and clear.

Photographer: AFP Contributor/AFP

Europe's temporary waiver from U.S. import quotas on steel and aluminum is about to expire and most experts are pessimistic that a U.S.-EU trade war can be avoided. They can’t fathom a trade deal that would satisfy both U.S. President Donald Trump and European Union leaders -- at least not a conventional trade deal.

But a conventional trade deal does not seem to be what the Trump White House really has in mind. Instead, it wants to exchange trade peace for foreign and security policy concessions. That's a novel -- and potentially fraught -- way for an American president to do business with his closest allies. But in the short term, it might deliver some results that Trump can use to declare victory.

Trump's hope seems to be that the threat of tariffs gives him leverage to get the cooperation he wants on European defense spending and sanctions on Iran. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently told CNBC, the U.S. cable news network, that President Trump would factor military contributions to NATO into the application of a 25 percent tax on imported steel and 10 percent on aluminum.

The implication was that the U.S. would climb down from its threat to impose steel and aluminum tariffs so long as EU countries keep their promises, made at the 2014 NATO Summit in Wales, to increase their defense spending to 2 percent of GDP. Since Trump is also threatening the EU with tariffs on imported cars, he might be willing to bargain those away too for more European defense spending.

In another sign of Trump's new approach, U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, in an interview with the New York Times, suggested the president might be willing to grant the EU bloc permanent exemption from the trade tariffs in exchange for strong co-operation with the US on Iran.

The linkage tactic may seem outrageous to politicians in Berlin and Brussels. It may be dismissed as mere Trumpian impulse by others. But it's not so easily ignored or countered.

One in every two jobs in German industry (and one in every four jobs generally) is directly or indirectly related to German exports. Trump’s threat may spur these export interests to pressure Berlin for more German (and European) co-operation with the U.S. on Iran sanctions or defense spending -- whatever it takes to return to business as usual.

Trump's demands on the defense spending front are not some new red line. They actually echo those of previous administrations, with the difference being that he is willing to force the issue with his linkage tactics.

Berlin may be responding to the ramped up pressure. It will reportedly tell NATO that it expects to increase military spending to 1.5 percent of GDP by 2025, from 1.2 percent currently. That is more defense spending than what was in the draft federal budget which was so low that German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyden protested and asked for more money. That’s a positive for the U.S.: Germany’s policy of military neglect that makes it much harder for the EU to project influence and weakens the overall credibility of the Atlantic Alliance.

German defense spending still falls short of the promised 2 percent and is unlikely to change much more under the current coalition government. But while Trump can't push Germany further on its military budget, he can still try to secure more concessions on Iran, another key demand.

At last week’s summit between French President Emmanuel Macron and Vladimir Putin, the Russian president seemed to offer support to Macron’s plan for an upgraded Iranian deal that would include Iran’s ballistic missiles and its destabilizing activities in the Middle East. Trump’s threat of sanctions against EU companies doing business with Iran is likely to have been a factor behind Macron’s willingness to facilitate pressure on Iran to accept new terms.

None of this means Trump will get his way entirely. Germany has pushed back against Trump's defense spending demands and his criticism of the Nordstream 2 gas pipeline from Russia. There is plenty of domestic mileage for Merkel in standing firm. And, of course, bullies don't tend to keep friends, so Europe's acquiescence may come at a later price. Trump isn’t concerned about the mess that has to be cleaned up later. For now, it seems, his strategy of linking trade concessions to security policy demands is getting him somewhere.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

    To contact the author of this story:
    Melvyn Krauss at melvynbkrauss@gmail.com


    Above is from:  https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-31/what-do-steel-tariffs-have-to-do-with-iran-plenty

    Thursday, May 24, 2018

    The Trump presidency is a win for China

    Analysis by Stephen Collinson, CNN

    7 hrs ago

    Donald Trump, Xi Jinping are posing for a picture © Photo Illustration: Getty Images/Shutterstock/CNNMoney

    There's been a whole lot of winning so far during the Trump presidency -- for China.

    After accusing China of "raping" American workers and stealing their jobs in his White House campaign, Donald Trump has found it harder to hold Beijing to account as President.

    In fact, his unpredictable policy moves and temperament are offering openings to China that could help it fulfill its mission of cementing its rise to superpower status more quickly than expected.

    Trump has shown the policy reflexes best suited for a pinball machine when it comes to Beijing, threatening to crush it in trade wars one day and then being ready to make deals the next.

    He's obsessed with one economic issue above all others: the $375 billion US trade deficit with China, which appears to be distracting him from goals that include halting Chinese intellectual property theft, which represents a far more serious threat to the American economy.

    Trump's decision to anchor US-China relations on a hyper-personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping also opens the US President to the possibility of manipulation. Chinese leaders have long used flattery to court American politicians -- and the current commander in chief seems especially susceptible to such an approach.

    Trump's desire to maintain China's help on the North Korea nuclear crisis gives Beijing leverage. And his abandonment of US leadership on issues like global warming and global trade has given China the opportunity to claim the former US role as a steady steward of world affairs.

    The administration's rejection of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, for instance, allows Beijing to argue to US allies in Asia that Washington's promise to remain engaged in the region as a counterbalance to China's rise is empty.

    And while Washington slogs through a daily riot of scandal and chaos, China is pressing forward with its aggressive territorial gambits in the South China Sea in areas also claimed by US allies and is expanding its soft-power trade and investment expansion throughout Eurasia. These are developments that rarely make the news in the US but are vital to Beijing's aspirations to challenge American power.

    It's not as though the administration has not noticed all these developments.

    The Chinese strategy actually validates the strong line that was spelled out in Trump's own new National Security Strategy, which describes Beijing as a competitor to "American power, influence and interests" in Asia and around the world.

    Then, on Wednesday, the Pentagon pulled an invite to China to take part in a huge international naval exercise after it landed a bomber on a disputed island in the South China Sea and deployed missile launchers, after previously undertaking not to militarize the area.

    But Trump's own approach to seems to be at odds with his stated policy.

    "While the administration at the bureaucratic level is trying to think and talk about long-term issues, the President himself is very focused on the short term," said Aaron Friedberg, who served in the office of Vice President Dick Cheney and is now a professor at Princeton University.

    The potential damage to US interests is compounded by the fact that China, now led by its strongest President in generations, is rarely accused of playing a short-term game -- and thinks in decades and centuries rather than the blinks of time between US elections.


    Trends in US-China relations that seem to favor Beijing have been in evidence in recent days.

    Last weekend, Trump shelved his threat of waging a trade war with China -- perhaps after concluding, at least for now, that it would not be so easy to win as he predicted.

    Ryan Hass, a former State Department and National Security Council staffer who's now with the Brookings Institution, said Trump had judged that he could not afford a rupture with Xi before his summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, which is planned for June 12.

    "Whereas six weeks ago, the administration was running headlong at the trade issue, now it appears to be, at the most charitable interpretation, putting the pause button on things," Hass said.

    Of course, temporarily muting US competition in China might eventually be seen as a shrewd tactic should Trump secure a deal to end Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program, an achievement that would rank as one of the biggest US foreign policy coups in decades.

    But the reception to a trade deal reached with China over the weekend to avert a looming tariff battle suggests there is disquiet in Washington about ground being lost.

    Although it offered concessions on lowering tariffs on auto imports and opening its financial markets, China was not forced to fold on some of the most bitter disputes with the US -- on intellectual property, for instance.

    But it appeared to convince Trump to pull back a threat to levy $150 billion in tariffs on Chinese products, after offering to buy an unspecified amount of US agricultural products.

    "We have been taken again," trade expert William Reinsch said on the new "Trade Guys" podcast produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    "Last summer they played us. They played us again," he said.

    Details of the deal are still unclear, and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is expected to travel to Beijing next week to finish it off.

    But even the President on Wednesday appeared to admit that it would fall short of expectations.

    "Our Trade Deal with China is moving along nicely, but in the end we will probably have to use a different structure in that this will be too hard to get done and to verify results after completion," Trump tweeted.

    The President's apparent climbdown has dismayed some Republicans, including his onetime GOP primary foe, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida.

    "I have urged @potus to follow his initial instincts on China & listen to those in his administration who understand that a short term trade deal that sounds good but poses long term danger is a #BadDeal" Rubio tweeted Wednesday.

    Given Trump's fixation with the deficit and belief that China has been exploiting the US on trade for decades, it's almost inevitable that tensions on the issue will bubble up again -- since the fundamentals of the case have not been solved.

    While Trump is being criticized now, the President is right to argue that previous presidents have also been unable to reshape the US-China trade relationship.


    Another aspect of US-China relations that Beijing is playing to its advantage is Trump's view that relations with other countries are directly reflected in the strength of his personal connections with their leaders.

    Trump frequently gushes over the lavish welcome he received during his state visit to China last year.

    "I have a great relationship with President Xi. He's a friend of mine. He likes me. I like him. That was two of the great days of my life, being in China. I don't think anybody has ever been treated better in China -- ever in their history," Trump said on Wednesday.

    The President's supporters often point to that relationship as being responsible for China signing up to the most punitive sanctions yet imposed on North Korea, which some experts credit for helping to bring Kim to the table.

    Yet Xi seems to have exploited the friendship to save Chinese smartphone manufacturer ZTE, which was facing its demise under US punishments imposed for for infringing US sanctions against North Korea and Iran.

    Trump tweeted this month that he had ordered the Commerce Department to give the company a reprieve after being asked to intervene by Xi, even though US intelligence agencies worry that ZTE devices could offer an opening for Chinese espionage agencies.

    The President defended himself on Wednesday, pointing out that it was his administration that "closed" ZTE in the first place, after he was accused of giving away considerable US leverage of the firm for very little in return.

    Friedberg suggested that Trump's backward step on ZTE could start to convince China that the President is a "paper tiger."

    He argued that Trump's style was "all about creating drama and attention and pressure and then cutting some kind of deal."

    "But once they (China) have figured that out, then they start discounting the pressure and the noise and so on and they focus just on the bottom line."

    The White House disputes the idea that Trump has gone soft on China and is certain to bill the trade deal, when it is confirmed, as a significant step, however it is portrayed by experts.

    "We finally have a President who is actually calling out China on their unfair trade practices -- and not just calling them out, but actually doing something about it, and aggressively pushing forward in negotiations, something that we haven't seen in decades," White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Wednesday.

    Above is from:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-trump-presidency-is-a-win-for-china/ar-AAxJ6Ur?ocid=spartandhp

    Rep Kinzinger’s prediction on EU trade with Iran


    Kinzinger: EU Will Do 'The Right Thing,' Back Away From Iran

    (Fox News' "America's Newsroom")

    By Sandy Fitzgerald    |   Tuesday, 22 May 2018 03:40 PM


    The European Union is looking at its dealings with Iran as an economic opportunity and not because of the country's behavior, and as a result, they might think they will be able to make an end run around sanctions against conducting business, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., said Tuesday, but he thinks eventually the "right choice" will be made and they will stick with the United States.

    "In this case they look at Iran and not the behavior, at a half a million dead Syrians, the threat to Israel, Yemen," Kinzinger told Fox News' "America's Newsroom." "They are looking at it from an economic opportunity. They may think they'll be able to make an end run. When it comes out that you either can choose to do business with the United States of America or do business with Iran, think they'll make the right choice: 'let's go with America in this case.'"

    The Iranian government has destabilized the Middle East, Kinzinger added, and threatened U.S. allies.

    "They've created a whole new generation of terrorists by what they've done in Syria with Assad and Russia," said Kinzinger, and he thinks President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have done the right thing to take aim at the Iranian regime through economic treats.

    "We're saying we'll take these sanctions and reenact them again, but not just do a flawed nuclear deal," he said. "We'll include your behavior in a region. Iran has a choice. If they come to the table serious about doing this, they'll have to come to the conclusion it is either the economy or their behavior.

    "Trust me, the people in Iran who rose up six months ago because they're tired of being cheated by their resources will make the decision for the regime."

    Read Newsmax: Adam Kinzinger: EU Will Do 'The Right Thing,' Side With US Over Iran | Newsmax.com

    Mensa convention in San Francisco

    There was a Mensa convention in San Francisco. 

    Mensa, as you probably know, is a national organization for people who have an IQ of 140 or higher. 

    Several of the Mensa members went out for lunch at a local cafĂ©. 

    When they sat down, one of them discovered that their salt shaker contained pepper, and their pepper shaker was full of salt.

    How could they swap the contents of the two bottles without spilling any, and using only the implements at hand? 

    Clearly, this was a job for the mighty Mensa minds. 

    The group debated the problem and presented ideas and finally came up with a brilliant solution involving a napkin, a straw, and an empty saucer. 

    They called the waitress over ready to dazzle her with their solution.

    "Ma'am," they said, "we couldn't help but notice that the pepper shaker contains salt and the salt shaker has pepper." 

    But before they could finish, the waitress interrupted: “Oh, sorry about that." 

    She leaned over the table, unscrewed the caps of both shakers and switched them.

    There was dead silence at the Mensa table. 

    Friday, May 18, 2018

    TB case at Belvidere North


    image

    Above is from:  http://www.wrex.com/story/38217442/2018/05/17/confirmed-case-of-tuberculosis-found-at-belvidere-north-high-school



    imageata  Statistics


    Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world’s deadliest diseases:
    • One fourth of the world’s population is infected with TB.
    • In 2016, 10.4 million people around the world became sick with TB disease. There were 1.7 million TB-related deaths worldwide.
    • TB is a leading killer of people who are HIV infected.

    A total of 9,272 TB cases (a rate of 2.9 cases per 100,000 persons) were reported in the United States in 2016. This is a decrease from the number of cases reported in 2015 and the lowest case count on record in the United States. The case rate of 2.9 per 100,000 persons is a 3.6% decrease from 2015. While the United States continues to make slow progress, current strategies are not enough to reach the goal of TB elimination in this century.

    CDC estimates that about 14% of U.S. TB cases with genotype data are attributed to recent transmission. Distinguishing the numbers of cases attributed to recent transmission from those likely due to reactivation of longstanding, untreated latent TB infection is one of many tools state and local TB programs can use to design and prioritize effective public health interventions.

    Above is from:  https://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/default.htm


    image

    Boone County Health Department

    5 hrs · (approximately 3PM, May 18, 2018)

    There has been a diagnosed case of Tuberculosis (TB) at Belvidere North High School. Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious disease that is transmitted from an ill person to others through the air. People who are in direct and prolonged contact with the ill person and share the same airspace for a prolonged period of time can become infected with the germ (bacteria) that causes TB.

    You can only get infected by breathing in TB germs that a person coughs into the air. You cannot get TB from someone’s clothes, drinking glass, eating utensils,
    handshake, toilet, or other surfaces where a TB patient has been.

    Skin testing for every student attending Belvidere North High School is not necessary. Students and staff who have come in direct and prolonged contact in the classroom setting are considered school contacts that need to have a TB skin test. Those students and staff received a letter about their need for a skin test. We will be taking appointments for skin tests for the targeted students and staff on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Call 815-544-9730 for more information.

    Actual Letter which went out to all Belvidere North students


    Letter to Students with direct/prolong contact with the active TB patient

    image