Saturday, October 31, 2020

October 31: 7899 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

IDPH

@IDPH

·

5h

Public Health Officials Announce 7,899 New Confirmed Cases of Coronavirus Disease https://shar.es/abNx4l Record 1-day number of cases. Mask up. Wash up. Back up. #SleeveUp


Coronavirus in Wisconsin: 5,096 new cases, 24 deaths, 142 more hospitalized

Wisconsin is averaging 4,231 new cases every day over the past 7 days

WISCONSIN state map with CORONAVIRUS lettering, on texture, finished graphic

WISCONSIN state map with CORONAVIRUS lettering, on texture, finished graphic(Associated Press)

By WBAY news staff

Published: Oct. 30, 2020 at 2:14 PM CDT|Updated: Oct. 30, 2020 at 3:49 PM CDT

<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" />

MADISON, Wis. (WBAY) - COVID-19 testing confirmed 5,096 new cases in Wisconsin, the second time this week -- and the second time in the pandemic’s history -- there were more than 5,000 new cases identified in Wisconsin in a 24-hour period. The record is 5,262 cases this past Tuesday.

The new cases were part of 18,692 test results, the most received by the state in one day. The positivity rate -- a key metric indicating the spread of the virus -- was 27.26%. That means more than 1 in 4 tests came back positive. That’s down from the past three days, which ranged from 31.84 to 38.86 percent, and it’s lower than the 7-day average, which is at an all-time high of 29.49%.

Since February, more than 220,000 (220,092) coronavirus cases have been confirmed in Wisconsin, which is almost 22,000 more people than 5 days ago.

Friday, October 30, 2020

October 30: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report



COVID-19


Updates on the COVID-19 pandemic from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Additional resources are available on our website.

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also produces US Travel Industry and Retail Supply Chain Updates that provide a summary of major issues and events impacting the US travel industry and retail supply chain. You can access them here.

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 44.59 million cases and 1.18 million deaths as of 4:30am EDT on October 30.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC reported 8.83 million total cases, 227,045 total deaths, and 521,726 new cases in the past 7 days. The daily COVID-19 incidence continues to increase, now up to 81,599 new cases per day, representing a 22% increase in daily reported cases compared to last week and now surpassing the previous highest peak in mid-July.

The US CDC reported 1,060 new deaths per day on October 29, an increase from the 483 new deaths per day reported on October 26. This increase in mortality approximately represents a 15% increase in daily reported mortality compared to last week. Mortality in the US has been relatively steady for the month of October, but could potentially increase with the current rise in cases as several hospitals in the Midwest report becoming overwhelmed.

Most US states have at least 100,000 cases, including 13 states with more than 200,000 cases:

>900,000: California

>800,000: Texas

>700,000: Florida

>400,000: New York

>300,000: Georgia, Illinois

>200,000: Arizona, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania

In terms of cases per 100,000 population, states in the West and Midwest including but not limited to Montana, North and South Dakota, Wisconsin, Wyoming and have reported at least 50 new cases per 100,000 population within the past 7 days. Idaho, which was in that category last week, reported 48 new cases per 100,000 and is still of concern for high levels of new cases. North and South Dakota have reported a staggering 114.2 and 112.6 cases per 100,000 population, after slow adoption of social distancing and public health measures. North Dakota received criticism from Dr. Deborah Birx over the lack of mask wearing in public spaces.

The Johns Hopkins CSSE dashboard reported 8.95 million US cases and 228,696 deaths as of 9:24am EDT on October 30.

NEW RESTRICTIONS IN EUROPE

France

On Tuesday October 27, 33,000 new cases were confirmed in France, at their highest level since April. French President Emmanuel Macron announced that the entire country will be re-entering a nationwide lockdown beginning today, October 30, and lasting until December 1. People may only leave their homes to seek medical care, buy essential goods, or use their daily 1 hour of outdoor exercise. Businesses not selling essential goods must close for at least the next 2 weeks, if not longer. Employers are allowed to bring in their employees if they deem that they cannot perform their job from home. Unlike the first nationwide lockdown in the spring, schools will remain open. Already, about half of France’s ICU beds are occupied by COVID-19 patients. In Paris, about 70% of ICU beds are occupied by COVID-19 patients. The French government hopes that the renewal of these strict measures will prevent their healthcare system from being overwhelmed. According to a recent Lancet paper, the first nationwide lockdown successfully decreased population mobility across many scales, local, regional, and national.

Germany

Similar to France’s actions, German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced that Germany would be entering a nationwide partial lockdown. The lockdown period is set to begin on November 2 and end on November 30. Non-essential businesses, such as bars, movie theaters, and nightclubs, must close down and restaurants will be limited to carry-out only. People may not gather in groups larger than 10. Professional sports will be allowed to play with no fan attendance. Like France, schools will remain open, signaling the intention of the German government to prioritize education over entertainment. However, entertainment and other non-essential businesses will be provided with subsidies to partially cover their financial losses. Germany recorded over 22,000 new cases last Friday, a new record for the country. Merkel further announced that health authorities are unable to trace the origin of over 75% of reported cases, indicating rapid and uncontrolled spread of COVID-19.

Belgium & Czech Republic

Compared to other countries across Europe, Belgium and the Czech Republic have significantly higher cases per 100,000 population. By comparison, all EU countries together average about 33 cases per 100,000 while Belgium and Czech Republic report 146 and 115 per 100,000, respectively. Experts are struggling to find a specific reason that these two countries are doing worse compared to their neighbors, but some believe that high population density in cities and travel patterns to visit relatives could be factors. Both governments also were slow to implement control measures, such as mask mandates and event closures, when cases began to climb in late August. Despite new efforts to control the spread of COVID-19, Belgium’s top health official warned that the country could run out of its 2,000 ICU beds in as little as 2 weeks.

Belgium’s newly installed Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has worked with opposing political factions to implement new control strategies. These include a curfew from midnight to 5 am, restricting restaurants to carry-out service only, and encouraging working from home where possible. In the Czech Republic, gatherings of more than 10 people indoors and 20 people outdoors are banned, high schools and universities must switch to online learning, non-essential businesses are closed, and a mask mandate has been reintroduced. Unfortunately, public faith in the Czech health minister Roman Prymula has greatly decreased after he was photographed dining in a restaurant owned by a personal friend after he had forced sit-in dining to close. The Czech Prime Minister has told Prymula to resign or be fired, as the scandal has reached high levels of outrage.

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH REPORT A new report by Human Rights Watch stresses the need for transparency and maintaining commitments to equity in the development of COVID-19 vaccines. The report outlines key elements needed for COVID-19 vaccine development and distribution to continue with a human-rights based approach for all. High income countries, where a significant portion of vaccine development is occurring, have discussed or secured deals with developers in which that country reserves future doses for their exclusive use. This concept of “vaccine nationalism” is inherently detrimental to any global effort to provide equitable access to a future COVID-19 vaccine, the report says. Human Rights Watch says that governments should take all measures possible to ensure that scientific benefits of research are shared as widely as possible “to prevent the unacceptable prioritization of profit for some over benefit for all.”

ARGENTINA WASTEWATER SURVEILLANCE Diagnostic testing and contact tracing have been limiting factors for many governments as they struggle to contain and control their respective COVID-19 outbreaks. The WHO recently released a scientific brief that suggests countries with limited resources for clinical surveillance could conduct environmental surveillance in wastewater systems. By pooling samples that represent a large group of people, such as an office building or military base, countries can maximize limited testing resources. Several countries have implemented a wastewater surveillance strategy for these reasons, but authors of a pre-print study in Argentina wanted to explore this strategy in settlements that do not have sewer networks or wastewater treatment facilities. Informal settlements already are at higher risk of COVID-19 outbreaks due to crowded living situations and poor access to hygiene and sanitation facilities. The authors studied a low-resource settlement within Buenos Aires of which only 25% of residents are connected to municipal sewage. The remaining residents dispose of their waste in a communal lagoon which then is pumped into the municipal waste system. Surface wastewater samples were taken from the pumping station and RT-PCR was used to identify and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The authors found that they could achieve a sensitivity of identifying 1 reported case per 135 residents using this strategy. They further found that the concentration of viral RNA correlated well with the number of cases identified through traditional contact tracing and testing methods within the settlement. Further research in this area could create a wider evidence base for environmental surveillance in settings without traditional wastewater treatment systems.

CHINA CASES Mainland China reported 42 new cases on October 27, the highest daily count in nearly two months, since August 10 when 44 cases were reported. 22 of the new cases were asymptomatic. The city of Kashgar aims to test 4.6 million residents to contain its latest outbreak after a 17-year-old tested positive during routine testing, who is thought to be the root of 183 case cluster. The National Health Commission has sent teams to assist in the endeavor and raised the emergency response indicator to the highest level. Kashgar is not the first city to implement city-wide testing; Qingdao tested 11 million people in five days following a cluster of cases in early October. While Chinese health authorities clearly have the ability to test large numbers of people in urban settings, some health authorities have noted the difficulties of large-scale testing in rural settings and especially among rural ethnic minorities.

SUCCESS IN TAIWAN Taiwan, an island of 23 million people, recently achieved an impressive milestone in their COVID-19 response this week when it reached 200 days without recording a single locally transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection. The last reported domestic case of COVID-19 was on April 12, and the island has reported a little over 550 cases and 7 deaths. Taiwan is one of the only places in the world to have achieved this, and demonstrates that implementation of robust public health response measures can control SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Early in the pandemic, experts were concerned that Taiwan would experience a large outbreak, particularly due to its proximity and connectivity to China. However, Taiwan’s COVID-19 response was extensive and proactive, taking in lessons learned from their 2003 SARS epidemic. When China’s epidemic was surging early in the year, Taiwanese officials instituted widespread contact tracing and public health containment measures, as well as technologies to support those initiatives. Additionally, officials connected their national health insurance database to immigration and customs data to support real-time alerts to medical staff of patient travel history during clinical visits. Officials also used QR code scanning and online systems to assess risk levels among travelers and triage them through customs and immigration accordingly.

Furthermore, the Health Ministry and Taiwanese Vice President, an epidemiologist, gave frequent announcements to the public that encouraged uptake of behaviors including mask wearing and hand washing. Notably, unlike other areas also known for their robust and successful COVID-19 responses, Taiwan achieved control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission without implementing an extensive lockdown. While some have argued that it is possible that some transmission is occurring undetected in Taiwan, and not all of the Taiwanese response measures are feasible in other countries, Taiwan’s experience has been far more successful than that of other high-income settings like the US. The experience of Taiwan demonstrates that proactive and expansive implementation of public health measures, paired with clear communication from trusted officials, can successfully manage and contain epidemics of highly transmissible pathogens.

MELBOURNE’S LOCKDOWN Australia’s second largest city, Melbourne, has finally ended the world’s longest lockdown, clocking at 111 days as of this Wednesday. The lockdown was originally imposed in response to the high incidence of 700 cases or more per day and included strict stay-at-home restrictions and curfews. Adapted mitigation measures are now in place for the metropolitan area such as mandated mask usage when outside the home and restrictions on travel from the home; residents are allowed to travel up to 25 kilometers from their home unless they are traveling to seek care, deliver caregiving, go to work, attend in-person education, utilize childcare services, purchase essential goods if there is no nearby vendor, or seek help for an emergency. Public gatherings are limited to 10 people or less with more people allowed in certain cases, such as funerals or outdoor religious gatherings. Up to two individuals from the same household are allowed to visit another household per day. Various businesses are open with distancing and capacity caps in place. Children may participate in contact or non-contact sports while adults are allowed to participate in outdoor non-contact sports with physical distancing in place. Individuals who do not follow new restrictions may be fined up to $20,000 per individual or $100,000 per business.

IMMUNITY IN ICELAND A new article in The New England Journal of Medicine measured humoral immunity over time among 30,576 people in Iceland. Humoral immunity refers to B-cells and antibody production. This study’s sample size is considerable compared to the overall population size of 361,313 in 2019 and could be a fairly accurate representation of Iceland’s COVID-19 seroprevalence. Eight sample groups were tested using six different assays. Two of the sample groups, hospitalized and recovered individuals with confirmed COVID-19, were tested using all six assays including Pan-Ig antibody assays and assays for antibody quantification. The six other sample groups were tested with just the two Pan-Ig antibody assays. These six groups included one group of individuals completing quarantine, two groups from two regional hotspots, one group of individuals tested upon seeking medical care, one group of pre-pandemic samples from 2017 and one group of pre-pandemic samples from early 2020. Among other findings, authors estimated that 0.9% of the Icelandic population had been previously infected by SARS-CoV-2 with an infection fatality rate of 0.3%. Authors also predicted that 30% of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Iceland occurred among individuals who were not quarantined and were not tested by qPCR. 56% of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Iceland were diagnosed properly using qPCR while the remaining 14% were infections that occurred during quarantine but were not diagnosed via qPCR.

RUSSIA MASK MANDATE AND VACCINE The Russian government issued an order, effective Wednesday, mandating that masks be worn in all public spaces or where more than 50 people may gather. Published on the federal health watchdog agency site, Rospotrebnadzor, the department also advised local authorities to ban all entertainment activities between 11 pm and 6 am, in addition to strengthening safety protocols for public transit, taxis, restaurants, shops, and theaters. The nationwide mask mandate now counters President Vladimir Putin’s previous resistance to nationwide measures in earlier months, which largely left response efforts to the discretion of Russia’s 85 regional governors.

Eight of the 25 Moscow clinics involved in Russia’s vaccine trial are temporarily halting vaccination of new trial participants due to a shortage of doses. The high influx of new participants at the clinics has meant several clinics have administered all their allotted first-dose supply. Three clinics are now only administering the second dose to already enrolled participants, which is administered 21 days after the first dose. The vaccine is developed and manufactured by the Gamelaya Institute, who is partnering with private Russian pharmaceutical companies to increase production. The vaccine manufacturers and study coordinators hope to restart the vaccine trials around November 10.

MARSHALL ISLANDS’ FIRST CASES The Marshall Islands, a remote sovereign nation composed of a group of islands located in the Pacific Ocean, has recorded their first cases since the beginning of the pandemic. The two cases arrived on the Marshall Islands on a US military flight. Both were asymptomatic when tested and did not have any interaction with the general population; instead, both persons immediately entered quarantine upon arrival as dictated by entry procedures. US military members are allowed to enter the US military base as long as they immediately begin a 3 week quarantine. The Marshall Islands government has reassured its citizens that these cases have been contained to avoid spread. The Marshall Islands quickly closed itself off from travel when the COVID-19 pandemic began, much like other Pacific island nations. Its neighbors, including Kiribati, Vanuatu, Micronesia, and Samoa, likewise have not experienced cases of COVID-19 and are remaining firm on travel restrictions in order to maintain that streak.

SYSTEMIC RACISM & COVID-19 The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security’s journal, Health Security, issued a call for papers for an upcoming Special Feature on systemic racism in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (scheduled for May/June 2021). Additional information is available here.

October 30: 6943 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

Secret Illinois COVID-19 Outbreak locations

Apparently in future the list will be released on a regular basis by the state starting next week.  The current list was released in error by the state and subsequently published by Channel 5, Chicago.,

BOONE COUNTY

IL2020-2323
Belvidere FiatChrysler Autos (FCA) Boone
Confirmed
11 cases

IL2020-1848
Boone County Sheriff. Belvidere. Boone
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-2293
Faith Baptist Church. Boone. 2293
Confirmed
15 cases

IL2020-1283
Harris Rebar (Boone) IL2020-1283
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1813
Heritage of Woods. Supp Liv. Boone. 1813
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-2052
LawnCare by Walter. Cherry Valley. Boone
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-2070
Magna Exteriors. Belvidere. Boone. 2070.
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-1227
Park Place Belvidere. LTC. Boone. 1227
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-0606
Symphony Northwoods. Boone. 606
Not A Case
2

IL2020-0606
Symphony Northwoods. Boone. 606
Confirmed
89 cases

IL2020-1872
Yanfeng Auto. Belvidere. Boone 1872
Confirmed
6 cases

WINNEBAGO COUNTY

IL2020-0718
Rockford Gastroenterology Assoc. 718
Confirmed
3

IL2020-0721
Peterson Meadows. Rockford. Winnebago
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-0764
Rockford Mass Transit Dist. Winnebago
Confirmed
6 cases

IL2020-0847
Rockford Rescue Mission. Wnnebago. 847
Confirmed
12 cases

IL2020-0883
PCI Pharma. Rockford. Winnebago 883
Confirmed
44 cases

IL2020-1108
Woodward Governor. Rockford. Winnebago
Confirmed
15 case

IL2020-1204
Stepping Stone Rockford. LTC Winnebago
Confirmed
26 cases

IL2020-1389
Winnebago County jail. Rockford. Winneba
Confirmed
14 cases

IL2020-1420
Mosaic-Appletree Group Home. Rockford
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-1448
Amazon. Rockford. Winnebago. 1448
Confirmed
34 cases

IL2020-1508
Cor Mariae. Rockford. Winnebago 1508
Confirmed
1 case

IL2020-1516
Lowes. Springfield Ave. Rockford. 1516
Confirmed
6 cases

IL2020-1528
Sotos. Rockford. Winnebago. 1528
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1543
Wesley Willows. Rockford. Winneb 1543
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-1635
Rockford Fire Dept. Winnebago. 1635
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-1640
Housing Authority Rockford. Winnebago
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1754
Sems&Specials. Rockford. Winnebago. 1754
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-1912
Absolute Grinding. Rockford. Winnebago
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-1933
Sams Club Rockford. Winnebago. 1933
Confirmed
1 case

IL2020-1949
Rockford Police District 2 Winnebago
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1448
Amazon. Rockford. Winnebago. 1448
Confirmed
34 cases

IL2020-2029
County Courthouse. Winnebago. 2029
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-2238
Winnebago County Coroner's Office
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-1389
Winnebago County jail. Rockford. Winneba
Confirmed
14 cases

DEKALB COUNTY

L2020-2081
McDonalds on Lincoln Hwy. Dekalb. 2081.
Confirmed
3 cases


IL2020-1765
3M. DeKalb. Dekalb. 1765
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Not A Case
1

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Probable
2 cases

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1123
Adria Meat Packing. DeKalb. IL2020-1123
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-1979
Agro Solutions. DeKalb. 1979
Confirmed
15 cases

IL2020-1087
Alexander Lumber. DeKalb. 1087
Confirmed
10 cases

IL2020-1894
Algus. Dekalb. Dekalb. 1894
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-1578
Bethany Rehab and HC LTC Dekalb 1578
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-1763
Bull Moose Bar and Grill Dekalb 1763
Confirmed
3 cases

IL2020-2588
Camelot NW Center for Autism. DeKalb.
Confirmed
1 cases

IL2020-2186
Custom Aluminum Prod. Genoa. Dekalb
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-2656
Dawn Equipment Co. DeKalb. 2656
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-1280
Dekalb Co Nursing and Rehab. DeKalb.
Probable
1

IL2020-1280
Dekalb Co Nursing and Rehab. DeKalb.
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-1052
DeKalb County Packing Co. DeKalb. 1052
Not A Case
1

IL2020-1052
DeKalb County Packing Co. DeKalb. 1052
Confirmed
2 cases

IL2020-2688
Dekalb County Rehab & Nsg. LTC. 2688
Probable
1 case

IL2020-2688
Dekalb County Rehab & Nsg. LTC. 2688
Confirmed
6 cases

IL2020-2732
DeKalb Police Dept. DeKalb. 2732
Confirmed
1 case

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Not A Case
1

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Probable
2

IL2020-2185
Adient. Sycamore. DeKalb. 2185
Confirmed
3

IL2020-2227
Innovative Growers.Sycamore. Dekalb.
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-0866
Proctor Geropsychiatric BHU
Confirmed
5 cases

IL2020-1530
Suter Company. Sycamore. DeKalb. 1530
Probable
1 case

IL2020-1530
Suter Company. Sycamore. DeKalb. 1530
Confirmed
7 cases

IL2020-1088
Sycamore Precision. Dekalb. 1088
Confirmed
4 cases

IL2020-2186
Custom Aluminum Prod. Genoa. Dekalb
Confirmed
2 cases

For the entire list go to:  https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/illinois-keeps-a-secret-list-of-thousands-of-coronavirus-outbreaks-now-nbc-5-has-it/2361313/

The website is searchable.  See if any of your local establishments are on the list. 

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

October 28: 6110 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

No photo description available.

October 28: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report



COVID-19


Updates on the COVID-19 pandemic from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Additional resources are available on our website.

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also produces US Travel Industry and Retail Supply Chain Updates that provide a summary of major issues and events impacting the US travel industry and retail supply chain. You can access them here.



EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 43.5 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 1.16 million COVID-19 deaths as of 8:30am EDT on October 28.

The US CDC reported 8.68 million total cases, 225,084 total deaths, and 492,026 new cases in the past 7 days. The daily COVID-19 incidence continues to increase, now up to 63,589 new cases per day, compared to 59,699 new cases reported last Wednesday and almost as high as the peak incidence in late July. Following the previous peak (66,960 new cases per day on July 24), the US daily incidence fell by 48% to its most recent low (34,371 new cases per day on September 12). Since that time, however, the US has climbed about 94% of the way back to this previous peak. The 7 day moving average of mortality was 797 deaths for October 26, compared to increasing numbers of daily deaths in recent weeks, with most recently 815 deaths on October 25th.

Most US states now have at least 100,000 cumulative cases, including 12 states with more than 200,000 cases:

>800,000: California, Texas

>700,000: Florida

>400,000: New York

>300,000: Georgia, Illinois

>200,000: Arizona, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio, Wisconsin

Per capita, states in the West and Midwest - including but not limited to Montana, North and South Dakota, Wisconsin, Wyoming and Idaho - have reported at least 50 new cases per 100,000 population per day within the past 7 days. North and South Dakota have reported 102.7 and 95.6 cases per 100,000 population.

The Johns Hopkins CSSE dashboard reported 8.78 million US cases and 226,752 deaths as of 10:30 AM EDT on October 28.

US HOSPITAL CAPACITY Healthcare systems across the United States are feeling the burden of increased COVID-19 incidence. Hospitals in communities across the country are nearing full capacity as the number of currently hospitalized patients exceends 41,000. According to The Atlantic’s COVID Tracking Project, there is an estimated 46% increase in domestic hospitalizations, a continuation of a disconcerting trend. Despite this surge in new infections, the mortality rate for COVID-19 has remained relatively stable. This is good news considering the rise in new infections, but the quality of care could be at risk if availability of care becomes more limited. Individual states have taken new actions to accommodate the rise in COVID-19 hospitalizations. Wisconsin has opened a field hospital at their state fair grounds, and other states have begun discussions about rationing care if infections continue to rise. In Utah, Governor Gary Herbet spoke with the president of the Utah Hospital Association about a potential need to decide which patients receive treatment in intensive care units. The state has not had to put these measures into place, but the discussion underscores the severity of the current epidemiological situation.

AIR TRAVEL The United States Transportation Command released results of a study looking at SARS-CoV-2 exposure on a contracted airline. The test used a Boeing 767-300 and 7770200 aircraft to map particle concentration for passengers in different zones of the aircraft in real time. Over the course of 8 days, the research team conducted over 300 aerosol releases in different situations to get a better picture of the risk of transmission during all aspects of a commercial flight. In total, the researchers found little evidence of aerosol exposure during the tests they performed. They attribute this to the high air exchange rates, and found that aerosol particles remained detectable within the cabin less than 6 minutes on average. The researchers noted that their test conditions only took into account the presence of a single infected passenger.

This research adds to the growing body of literature examining the safest ways for individuals to conduct air travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Southwest Airlines cited the study above, as well as studies from IATA and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, while announcing the reversal of a policy that blocked individuals from filling the middle seat in their plane’s three-seat passenger rows. The discussion to open the middle seat back to travelers is at odds with an earlier study from MIT that cited a protective value from flying with these seats empty. And a new study from Eurosurveillance describes a COVID-19 outbreak linked to a flight from Ireland this past summer.

VACCINE TRIALS Vaccine manufacturers Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline have agreed to provide 200 million doses of their joint SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate to the COVAX Facility to foster equitable distribution of the vaccine. The candidate is a recombinant protein-based antigen with an adjuvant developed by GSK. The candidate is currently at the stage of phase I/II trials, with initial results expected by December. Sanofi has also been engaged with Translate Bio to develop a separate mRNA vaccine candidate, but that has not yet reached clinical trials. In other news, Pfizer recently announced that they have not yet been able to conduct an analysis of efficacy of their mRNA candidate vaccine. The announcement indicates that the trial is progressing more slowly than initially anticipated, with earlier estimates of the timeline suggesting that an analysis could be conducted as early as September. The news also follows discussions last week from the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee that expressed some hesitancy in prematurely issuing an emergency use authorization (EUA) without longer term assessment of the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, particularly because issuing an EUA would likely impact the ability for the longer trials and more robust analyses to occur.

VACCINE ROLLOUT Members of the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), an independent federal advisory board advising on the use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, published guiding principles last week on how vaccines should be allocated within the US population. The JAMA viewpoint focuses on ethical principles and allocation when supplies are limited, noting that more detailed recommendations will be issued once safety data is available following licensure or authorization under EUA. Recommendations from ACIP will be sent to the CDC director, and if approved, will become official CDC recommendations for immunizations in the US. Around the same time, stakeholders involved in Operation Warp Speed efforts discussed the preliminary distribution plans and potential challenges that would need to be addressed. Some of the key logistical challenges associated with vaccine distribution include the need for certain vaccine candidates to require -70 degree C freezers, which not all clinics have on hand. This week, the federal government is reportedly announcing a plan to cover out-of-pocket expenditures for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to people enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid plans. The ruling, which to our knowledge has not yet been officially announced, is expected to determine that Medicare and Medicaid will cover out of pocket costs for vaccines that have an emergency use authorization.

SPORTS New publications in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are shedding light on the effectiveness of mitigation measures for preventing the spread of COVID-19 among amateur, collegiate and professional sports teams. One article described an outbreak among recreational hockey players in Florida. After the indoor game, nine players of one team and five players of the opposing team, as well as a rink staff member, reported symptoms of COVID-19. Eleven of the 15 individuals reporting symptoms tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and two others reported positive antigen tests. The other two symptomatic players and asymptomatic players were not tested. Mask usage and distancing were not adhered to during the game, which may have contributed to spread amongst the players.

The second article described an outbreak among men’s and women’s collegiate soccer teams. Seventeen of 45 players across both teams tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with whole genome sequencing, indicating that all cases were linked to the same cluster. While team members were mandated to wear masks during practice, social gatherings without masks or distancing in place and shared accommodations between players were found to be the most likely circumstances where spread occurred.

The third article described SARS-CoV-2 transmission among 20 players and associated staff on a Major League Baseball team that resulted in no secondary transmission to other teams. Mitigation measures in place included regular diagnostic testing, isolation and quarantine as needed, mask usage, and social distancing. The authors concluded that transmission most likely occurred off-field during interactions that lacked physical distancing and proper mask usage, particularly social interactions occurring indoors. Major League Baseball concluded its 2020 season last night.

COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES Colleges and universities across the country have experienced substantial financial and logistical challenges as a result of the pandemic, with some schools eliminating programs, furloughing faculty, and implementing austerity measures. The financial strain preceded the pandemic, but has been exacerbated by reduced enrollment and revenue, paired with substantial expenditures to support expansive testing, contact tracing, and quarantining of students. The American Council on Education published a letter last week stating that the pandemic would cost higher education institutions $120 billion. As part of response efforts, some universities are implementing studies to test wastewater and sewage for COVID-19. Testing wastewater is much cheaper than testing individual students, and implementation is more feasible in a dorm environment. The testing approach cannot identify which individuals are infected with SARS-CoV-2, nor how many infections there are. However, the data can indicate potential trends or the occurrence of an outbreak in a setting.

POLL WORKERS As the US approaches the general election on November 3rd, the CDC has published a study in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on Delaware’s efforts to protect poll workers and voters during their September 15, 2020 primary election. This study was performed as part of a collaboration between the CDC, the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, and the Delaware State Election Commission. 522 poll workers were invited to participate in a self-administered survey about their experiences and observations during the 2020 Delaware primary election. The survey included questions on training, availability of personal protective equipment, polling location set-up, and mitigation measure compliance. Poll workers reported that personal protective measures, such as mask wearing and physical distancing, were generally well followed by fellow poll workers and voters. Despite personal measures and adjustments to distancing of polling booths, 72% of poll workers reported that they had been in close contact (<6 feet and >15 minutes) with more than 100 people on election through the course of performing their duties. Nearly half (45%) of surveyed poll workers were older than 65 years old, which may put them at higher risk of severe illness.

The results of this study reinforce the need for strict adherence to mask wearing, handwashing, and physical distancing while voting in-person. The CDC also proposed that recruiting younger poll workers could decrease the overall risk of severe disease within the voluntary workforce. Other recommendations to reduce crowding at polling locations include extending polling hours, reconfiguring polling booths and waiting lines to promote physical distancing, and encouraging greater adoption of voting options that are not in person.

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Four inmates have died from COVID at East Moline Correctional Center



061620-qc-nws-emcorrections-001

Four inmates at the East Moline Correctional Center have died from COVID-19.


Sarah Hayden , Robert Connelly

Four inmates at the East Moline Correctional Center have died from COVID-19.

The fourth death, a man in his 50s, was Monday, according to Lindsey Hess, public information officer for the Illinois Department of Corrections.

As of Tuesday, 343 inmates and 33 staff have tested positive for coronavirus at the minimum-security prison, 100 Hillcrest Road, East Moline. Deaths are not being reported on the websites for the facility or IDOC.

Hess said no EMCC staff members had died. 

"East Moline Correctional Center activated its Incident Command Center and is using FEMA's national incident command system model to set and achieve aggressive objectives to respond to COVID-19," Hess said. "If an offender develops any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 they are assumed to be at high risk for the disease, and pursuant to CDC and (Illinois Department of Public Health) guidelines, these individuals are isolated and tested.

"To manage outbreaks, the IDOC utilizes point prevalence testing in asymptomatic and potentially exposed offenders. Additionally, exposed asymptomatic offenders are quarantined and monitored for symptoms."

When employees arrive at the correctional facility, Hess said, they are screened, temperatures are checked and they are given personal protective equipment. The facility has an appointed safety officer whose responsibility is to ensure proper use of PPE, deep-cleaning routines, temperature checks and screening measures.

Olegario Banuelos, 45, is an inmate who tested positive at the East Moline facility in early September. He alleged correctional officers often kept their masks down around their chins and only pulled them up when a supervisor came around. He alleged on several occasions he witnessed correctional officers exit the COVID-19 unit adjacent to his and then enter his unit without changing PPE or washing hands.

Banuelos' fiancée, Lauren Hitchcock, said Tuesday that Banuelos has recovered and is back in his own cell.

All four deaths at EMCC have been in October and were men in their 50s, 60s and 70s.

Cody Dornes, an East Moline correctional officer and president of AFSCME Local 46, said the men died at area hospitals.

"Nobody wants to see anybody die. It's really unfortunate this is happening," Dornes said. "We've been taking better precautions at the facility. With the country reopening, these things are inevitable, not only in prisons, but in any communal-living environment. The majority of the prison is an open dormitory-style of living. There is only one housing unit that is a typical prison setup with two-man doors with doors that lock.


"That's why our facility has been hit as hard as it has been is because of the open environment."

According to Hess, there have been 29 inmate deaths from COVID-19 at Illinois prisons. Stateville Correctional Center, near Chicago, has had 13 inmates die; a man in his 50s was the first death on March 29. The next highest number of COVID-19 deaths has been at Robinson Correctional Center, where three of the five deaths were men in their 70s.

Hess said IDOC had taken measures to protect the health and safety of staff and inmates. Visitation at all correctional facilities was suspended March 14, and on March 20, the facilities were placed on administrative quarantine with restricted movement. Prisons with confirmed cases of COVID-19 are placed on medical quarantine.

PPE is provided to all staff, and KN95 masks are distributed weekly to all men and women in custody. Additionally, Hess said IDOC is working with Gov. JB Pritzker's office and the Prisoner Review Board to review inmates who are eligible for early release.

"Hand sanitizer, antibacterial soap and cleaning supplies are being made available to all staff and incarcerated individuals," Hess said. "We are closely monitoring our supply levels at each facility and are in close communication with our vendors to maintain adequate inventory. All staff are screened and temperature checked upon arrival to their correctional facility. All correctional facilities and transport vehicles are being routinely cleaned and disinfected.

"We are communicating regularly with staff and people in custody to ensure they feel safe," Hess said.

Jennifer Vollen-Katz, executive director of the John Howard Association, a prison watchdog group in Illinois, alleged staff could be the only way the virus was brought into prisons since outside visits were stopped in March.

"It’s deeply concerning that the protocols are not strict enough or the enforcement of the protocols aren’t strict enough to protect people in prisons from the behavior of people that can come and go from the prisons right now," she said.

Vollen-Katz alleges the main issue is compliance of staff wearing their masks when supervisors are not present.

"When the leadership isn’t in the prison with eyes on staff, they stop wearing their masks or wear them blow their chin," she said. "And (it) makes the people in prisons incredibly anxious because they understand these are people that come and go.

"The people in prison are powerless to enforce this kind of practice among guards."

Vollen-Katz said her organization continued to get calls, letters and emails from current inmates and family members about the state’s prison system. She said the John Howard Association planned to release comments from inmates that were collected during its COVID-19 survey earlier this year.

COVID-19 offender deaths

Field 1
Field 2
Field 3

Facility
Age
Date of Death

Stateville
50's
3/29/2020

Stateville
60's
4/3/2020

Stateville
60's
4/5/2020

Stateville
60's
4/7/2020

Stateville
70's
4/9/2020

Stateville
40's
4/13/2020

Stateville
50's
4/15/2020

Stateville
80's
4/18/2020

Stateville
50's
4/20/2020

Stateville
70's
4/21/2020

Stateville
60's
4/30/2020

Stateville
50's
5/3/2020

Pontiac
70's
5/20/2020

Stateville
60's
8/16/2020

Robinson
70's
9/18/2020

Jacksonville
50's
9/20/2020

Robinson
50's
9/23/2020

Robinson
70's
9/24/2020

Taylorville
40's
9/26/2020

Menard
70's
9/27/2020

Robinson
70's
9/27/2020

Taylorville
60's
10/1/2020

East Moline
60's
10/11/2020

East Moline
70's
10/14/2020

East Moline
60's
10/15/2020

Robinson
60's
10/16/2020

Pontiac
50's
10/20/2020

East Moline
50's
10/26/2020

Centralia
60's
10/26/2020

Above is from:  https://qctimes.com/news/local/four-inmates-have-died-from-covid-at-east-moline-correctional-center/article_330366c1-c1bc-501d-a05f-b83a5b0eb0d3.html#utm_source=qctimes.com&utm_campaign=%2Fnewsletter-templates%2Fbreaking&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_content=47c18a370a6a122eb49503aabc2708b3790b0eab

Trump supporters come back to reality

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Register Star



I plead for Trump supporters to come back to reality

Here’s yet another election letter. I’ll start this by stating that I’m no liberal elitist. I was born and raised in a small town, hometown of Ronald Reagan in the Land of Lincoln. I’m politically independent and a proud American.

That said, I want to point out just how far the party of Lincoln and Reagan has fallen in the era of Trump. Republicans once supported our great military and especially soldiers that were prisoners of war, missing in action. Remember when Trump (a draft dodger) questioned John McCain’s heroism and patriotism? Remember when he said, “I prefer my heroes not get captured”?

In case you didn’t notice, he just insulted every POW. Republicans were once known as the party of family values. Remember when Trump bragged about grabbing women? Remember that? He just bragged about sexual assault. This isn’t a spin by the liberal media or “fake news,” either. We all heard it. These are words straight from the horse’s mouth. These examples barely scratch the surface.

I don’t really blame Trump, he’s just a buffoon and B-list reality TV star playing his part. I blame his supporters. He showed us exactly who he was. Anyone with an ounce of sense or a shred of dignity knew this man had no business being anywhere near the Oval Office.

I’m reminded of a quote from a truly wise American, Mark Twain: “It’s easier to fool someone than it is to get them to admit they’ve been fooled.” Please admit your mistake and come back to reality and decency. America is best when we work together.

Josh Price, Dixon



Page 10, Register Star, October 25, 2020.

October 27: 4000 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

No photo description available.

Boone County Republican Officials gang up on school board

Great timing—as county reaches new infection numbers.

Page 1 of Belvidere School District 100 letter 10.21.20




Page 2 of Belvidere School District 100 letter 10.21.20

Above is from:  https://www.wifr.com/2020/10/26/syverson-sosnowski-send-letter-to-belvidere-school-district-supporting-in-person-instruction/


Boone County Health Department waded in with the following graphs.  They did not recommend a return to in person classes.  SEE:  https://www.boonecountyil.org/sites/default/files/images/file/10-26-2020%20School%20Metrics%2010_26_2020.pdf

Is this the answer to Chief Justice Barrett?



The Other Tool Democrats Have to Rein in the Supreme Court

By Kia Rahnama

,

PoliticoOctober 26, 2020

The Other Tool Democrats Have to Rein in the Supreme Court

More

After the fast-tracked confirmation process of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Democrats have offered up a now-familiar solution to a court dominated by conservatives: packing the court if they win the White House and the Senate in 2020. The idea was famously endorsed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, when his New Deal initiatives faced opposition from a conservative bench. In response, Roosevelt simply tried to add more liberal justices to the court, which would have paved the way for decisions more favorable to his administration. His court-packing bill ultimately failed in Congress, but today, the idea has resurfaced with new popularity among liberals—even if it remains unpopular among most Americans.

But there might be another way to block a hard, sudden swing to the right on the Supreme Court. Legal theorists largely agree that the Constitution actually allows Congress to restrict the Supreme Court’s authority to hear cases on a specific subject matter, such as abortion. Lawmakers have tried to use this power by passing legislation declaring certain topics off-limits for the court, but they have failed to rally the necessary majorities to pass those bills. Now, with what some see as a nakedly political play by Republicans to shape the ideology of the court, the American public and lawmakers might be more open to such a strategy, which might be a more palatable option to Americans for safeguarding precedent on issues like abortion.

The legislative maneuver could come in handy after the election. If Democrats keep control of the House and take over the Senate in November, they could be the first to put this little-known power of Congress to the test.

Article III of the U.S. Constitution lays out not only the structure of the Supreme Court but what cases the court has the authority to decide—in other words, the court’s “jurisdiction.” The Constitution also separates the court’s jurisdiction into two distinct categories. For some rare cases that are highly-sensitive to national interest, such as cases involving U.S. diplomats or disputes among the states, the parties involved can take the dispute directly to the Supreme Court, skipping all lower courts and benefiting from what is called the court’s “original jurisdiction.” For everything else, the Supreme Court is actually not given the power to decide the case on its own, but instead is granted only the power to review a lower’s court’s decision. This is what is referred to as the court’s “appellate review” jurisdiction.

-

Although the court’s original jurisdiction is clearly spelled out in this part of the Constitution, with a clear list of the limited types of cases the court can decide on its own, the text takes an indirect route to explain the court’s appellate jurisdiction. And this section also contains something known as the Exceptions Clause, which gives Congress the power to make exceptions to the court’s appellate jurisdiction. In the original text: “In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

Stripping the Supreme Court of jurisdiction over certain classes of cases, such as abortion cases, would not mean that Americans would not have access to a judicial tribune for resolving cases. In the absence of Supreme Court jurisdiction over such cases, the final say on these issues would rest with the highest state courts or any of the 13 federal courts of appeal, each of which have jurisdiction over certain parts of the U.S. territory.

It is perhaps the strongest tool in the legislative arsenal that has not yet been used in American history and is fodder for many disputes among giants of the legal academy. If the Constitution gives Congress the power to make exceptions to the court’s appellate jurisdiction, can Congress pass a law to prevent the highest court from reviewing lower courts’ decisions on certain subject matters?

Not only has the legal academy leaned towards an affirmative answer, but Congress itself on several occasions has attempted to exercise this power. During the antebellum period, those in favor of state interposition or nullification—the belief that federal laws could not be imposed on the states without their consent—raised the idea of stripping the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over all state court decisions interpreting federal laws. The brash polemicist John C. Calhoun was a leading proponent of this argument. In 1827, Calhoun, then vice president, began lobbying congressional members to introduce legislation that would take away the Supreme Court’s power to review state courts’ decisions interpreting federal laws. Largely due to his efforts, the House Judiciary Committee in 1831 issued a report calling on Congress to do just that. Ultimately, those in favor of preserving the Supreme Court’s power over state courts were able to convince the House to not take up any such legislation.

In 1957, and at the height of the Second Red Scare, the Supreme Court was pitted against a staunchly anti-Communist Republican majority in Congress. The court, in a series of decisions, drastically limited the Republicans’ efforts to investigate and punish Communist sympathizers, e.g. by holding that government agencies could not discharge employees deemed to be disloyal, by preventing federal prosecutors from keeping relevant evidence hidden from the courts in criminal cases if such evidence implicated national security, and by greatly increasing the court’s purview over how congressional investigations were conducted.

In response, Senator William Jenner introduced legislation that would have stripped the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over such cases and others involving subversive activities. Despite the Senate’s serious consideration, the bill was ultimately defeated, to no small degree because then-President Dwight Eisenhower’s attorney general opposed its passage.

The next period of Court-Congress high drama arrived in 1964, when a congressional proposal aimed to remove the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over cases involving apportionment of representation in state legislative bodies. This time, Congress was reacting to the Supreme Court decisions in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims—two cases through which the court formally introduced the idea of “one person, one vote” and prevented states from apportioning seats in their state legislatures in a way that clearly discriminated against their Black population. The bill passed the House but was not taken up by the Senate.

The 1980s proved to be yet another highly contentious period in the court’s history, when a string of cases touching on sensitive social issues greatly increased public pressure on the court. As a result, up to 30 bills were introduced in Congress to strip the court of its jurisdiction on cases involving flag burning, school prayers, and abortion. But once again, legislative support for such bills faltered after Reagan’s attorney general at the time, William French Smith, wrote letters to the House and Senate Judiciary Committee communicating the DOJ’s hesitation on any legislation that would restrict Supreme Court review based on subject matter.

Although those letters played a big role in the bills’ ultimate demise, Reagan’s DOJ did not reach its final conclusion easily. In fact, in a bizarre twist, the current chief justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, who was serving as a special assistant to the Attorney General in 1981, was one of the main dissenters to the DOJ’s position. Roberts himself penned a memo for the department arguing in favor of Congress’ power to remove the court’s jurisdiction over certain subjects—reiterating the arguments advanced by many other conservative legal thinkers, including Antonin Scalia.

Even if such a law passes Congress, it could throw the U.S. system of checks and balances into chaos. It is still unclear what would happen if the Supreme Court itself is called upon to review the constitutionality of the law and finds it to be unconstitutional. Although many believe that Congress and the White House could simply ignore such a decision, the Supreme Court’s refusal to simply accede to a jurisdiction-stripping law would impose a tough test on the political branches.

Regardless of these residual ambiguities, jurisdiction-stripping has its advantages over court-packing. Packing the court would involve confirming new justices that upon confirmation would be subject to life tenure and protection against removal, subject only to impeachment for cause. This makes the court-packing decision rather difficult to reverse. Jurisdiction-stripping on, the other hand is achieved through normal legislative procedures, and can therefore be easily reversed should the voters decide to change the political makeup of Congress and the White House again. In this way, jurisdiction-stripping measures are far more responsive to the will of the electorate.

Despite these legal uncertainties, the main impediment to passing such laws has always been political and not legal. In all instances, the party in control of Congress ultimately faced a reluctant White House which, at the last minute, saw the political damage to the administration’s credibility as serious enough to dissuade them from working with their party in Congress to move jurisdiction-stripping legislation through. Today, though, many people could see the confirmation of Barrett and the sudden rightward shift of the court as an overtly political takeover, and thus might be more disposed to viewing jurisdiction-stripping legislation as an antidote to hostility rather than hostility itself.

If Democrats are in control of Congress after the 2020 election, it might all come down to whether the White House would stop them.