Showing posts with label Koch Brothers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Koch Brothers. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Trump and the Koch Brothers—Where are they now?

 

image

border tax

Billionaire Koch Brothers Launch Effort to Kill Republican Border Tax Plan

Reuters

Jan 30, 2017

Billionaire industrialist Charles Koch is launching a campaign to sink a border tax under consideration by Republican leaders in Congress, a move that could complicate the lawmakers' efforts to find a way to pay for President Donald Trump's proposed wall on the U.S. border with Mexico.

Americans for Prosperity, a conservative political advocacy group founded by Charles Koch and his brother David, plans to use its network of wealthy political donors and activists to kill the proposal, which aims to raise $1.2 trillion over 10 years on goods coming into the United States, according to officials from the group, which gathered this weekend for a conference.

Republican House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan is pushing the tax as part of a broader overhaul of the U.S. tax code.

The White House has given mixed signals on whether Trump supports the approach, but proponents say revenue collected from the border tax could finance Trump's drive to build a wall along the southwestern U.S. border. Proponents also say it would discourage U.S. manufacturers from moving abroad.

On Thursday, AFP sent a letter expressing its opposition to the border tax to a House panel in charge of writing tax legislation.

AFP Chief Executive Officer Luke Hilgemann, in an interview, called the measure "a massive tax increase" on U.S. consumers, who would pay more for foreign goods. He urged Ryan to "go back to the drawing board."

AFP and its offshoot organizations have become a powerful force in U.S. politics, bolstering candidates and issues on federal and state levels.

Besides defying Republican leaders on the border tax, the Koch-led organization on Sunday challenged Trump on a policy he implemented on Friday to stop the movement of people from countries with large Muslim populations from traveling to the United States.

"The travel ban is the wrong approach and will likely be counterproductive," said an official of the Koch network.

Koch refused to endorse Trump during his presidential campaign, differing with the candidate over his positions on immigration and trade policy, and his practice of singling out companies for possible retribution if they move jobs abroad.

Nevertheless, Hilgemann said AFP had a "developing relationship" with the Trump White House, which he said had reached out to his organization to discuss some policy matters.

At the same time, former AFP officials have landed high-level jobs in the Trump administration, giving the group a conduit for airing its policy wishes.

Looking toward the 2018 congressional and gubernatorial elections, AFP officials said they planned to boost the network's spending on policy and political activities to between $300 million and $400 million, up from an estimated $250 million for the 2016 campaigns.

Hilgemann also said AFP was laying plans to mobilize activists to help win Senate confirmation of Trump's pick for the Supreme Court nominee. The White House said Trump was planning this week to announce his pick to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia

Above is from:  .http://fortune.com/2017/01/30/billionaire-koch-brothers-launch-effort-to-kill-republican-border-tax-plan/

Friday, January 13, 2017

The Trump White House is going to be very, very Koch-y.

By Alex Kotch

The Trump White House is going to be very, very Koch-y.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, billionaire industrialists and Republican mega-donors Charles and David Koch made headlines by refusing to endorse a candidate. But ads in U.S. Senate races paid for by Koch-linked independent political groups hurt the image of Donald Trump's foe, Hillary Clinton, whom they criticized while associating Democratic Senate candidates with her. And the massive ground game of the Kochs' well-known political group, Americans for Prosperity, helped turn out thousands of Trump voters in battleground states.

From the time Trump picked his vice presidential running mate, Koch favorite Mike Pence, the brothers' influence on Trump World has grown ever stronger.

From transition team staffers to his cabinet, Trump has brought numerous Koch lieutenants and allies into his inner circle. His taunting of Marco Rubio for being a "puppet" of the Koch brothers is long gone. It's very likely that Trump is eager to work with Charles and David Koch, who represent exactly what Trump values most—wealth and power—which is also reflected in his potential Cabinet of billionaire executives. And though the Kochs may object to Trump's Islamophobia or other select viewpoints, they stand to add to their combined $88 billion through Trump's planned environmental deregulation, privatization, corporate tax cuts and other policies favoring the wealthy to be carried out by his U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pick, who recently sued that agency; his secretary of state choice, the CEO of Exxon; his labor pick, a fast-food CEO who doesn't believe in the minimum wage; and others.

David Koch attended Trump's election night victory party. Then on Dec. 21, Trump had an informal chat with Koch at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida (where Koch is a member) about "preparations for his administration."

The Kochs' allies have been helping shape the Trump administration for some time. The liberal Center for American Progress's political arm found that one-third of Trump's transition team, which recommends Cabinet nominees, ambassadors and advisers to the president-elect, has ties to the Koch brothers. These transition team members include Trump mega-donors who are also part of the Koch political network, such as Rebekah Mercer, and employees of Koch-funded think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Institute for Energy Research.

Here's a look at some of the top Koch allies who'll be running the government very soon and what kinds of Koch-backed policies we can expect them to champion.

The Koch Brothers' Darling

The Kochs must have popped champagne when Trump announced that Mike Pence, the conservative governor of Indiana, would be his running mate. Pence is adored by the Kochs and their vast political donor network; Ken Vogel and Maggie Haberman described him in Politico as "among the best … messengers for this new Koch brand in a field of prospective [presidential] candidates who fit some portions of the brothers' political bent but not others." Pence has addressed a gathering of Americans for Prosperity, the Kochs' most well-known political group that spends millions on elections each cycle opposing liberal policies and helping elect conservative Republicans. This year he planned to speak at one of the Kochs' donor seminars, where the brothers meet with uber-wealthy allies and pool their hundreds of millions of dollars for joint political spending, but canceled two weeks beforehand.

David Koch gave Pence's two gubernatorial campaigns $300,000. Americans for Prosperity ran ads supporting Pence, and the Republican Governors Association, to which Koch and Koch Industries have donated a combined $10.8 million since 2003, spent $4.2 million in 2012 and 2016 backing Pence.

Pence, who may be an even more powerful vice president than Dick Cheney, will be in prime position to advocate for the issues about which the Kochs care most, including corporate tax cuts, which he instituted in Indiana, and opposition to bailouts and market regulation. According to Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr., Pence will be in charge of both domestic and foreign policy. And he'll preside over the U.S. Senate, over which Republicans have a narrow majority.

"Indiana is one big free market, [and] much like Koch Industries, Mike Pence … picks the right fights," said Kellyanne Conway, a Republican pollster whose company has worked for Pence and for Americans for Prosperity. Conway became Trump's campaign manager last August and was recently named a "counselor to the president" who will help "effectively message and execute the Administration's legislative priorities and actions." Conway is also a board member of the Koch-aligned and Koch-funded Independent Women's Forum, which, The Nation reports, has pushed the Koch agenda.

Several of Pence's former staffers have gone on to work in the Koch political network, including Marc Short, who went from being Pence's chief of staff when Pence was a congressman to president of Freedom Partners, the Koch political operation's "central bank," which gives out enormous amounts of money to right-wing political spending groups. Short returned to advising Pence this summer when the governor joined Trump's campaign and will soon take a job in the West Wing, likely heading legislative affairs, according to the Washington Post.

Above is from:  http://www.ecowatch.com/koch-brothers-trump-team-2188567799.html

Friday, May 27, 2016

Koch-Backed Group Drops $3 Million Against Democrat In PA Senate Race

 

image

by Leigh Ann Caldwell

The Charles and David Koch backed super PAC Freedom Partners Action Fund has purchased a $3 million advertising buy targeting the Pennsylvania Senate race. It's a large investment in a Senate race six months before Election Day, signaling that the group is going to aggressively play in races where they are ideologically aligned with the candidate.

Freedom Partners, the main political organization of the conservative billionaire political activists, have indicated they will not get involved in the presidential election this cycle because of their dislike of presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.

Instead, the group said it would focus its monetary heft on key Senate races.

This Pennsylvania ad, which attacks Democrat candidate Katie McGinty, who is running against incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Toomey, comes less than two weeks after a $2 million ad purchase in Ohio. which is another state with a highly contested Senate race as Republican incumbent Sen. Rob Portman is trying to hold on to his seat.

With this Pennsylvania purchase, it brings the Koch network's spending in Senate races to $15.4 million, and they are in the process of reserving nearly $30 million worth of advertising, mostly in August and September. In addition to Ohio and Pennsylvania, the group plans to also back Republican candidates in Nevada, Wisconsin and possibly Florida.

But still, the $42 million being allocated is far less than the more than couple hundreds of million the group had budgeted to spend if it engaged in the presidential cycle.

"If a candidate were able to garner support from the public with a positive message in support of the issues we care about, and did not engage in personal attacks and mudslinging, we would consider potentially getting involved. That hasn't happened yet and there is no indication that this will happen given the current tone and tenor of the campaign," Mark Holden, Chairman of the Board of Freedom Partners said in a recent statement.

The ad, titled "Whose Job," charges that McGinty, as head of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection sought subsidies for companies that later paid her after her role in the government ended.

McGinty's Communications Director Sarbina Singh responded to the ad, calling it "desperate."

"Toomey - the best Senator Wall Street and the Koch Brothers ever had - is going to need all the help he can get to hide his abysmal record of putting his special interest allies ahead of Pennsylvania's middle class families," Singh said in a statement.

Above is from:  http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/koch-backed-group-drops-3-million-against-democrat-pennsylvania-senate-n580851

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Koch group launches ad campaign against NC GOP lawmaker

 

By Harper Neidig

59 Comments

A conservative group backed by Charles and David Koch is launching an advertising campaign aimed at defeating Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) in her district’s Republican primary.

This will be the first time that Americans for Prosperity has taken on a Republican lawmaker.

“Renee Ellmers ran on a conservative, limited-government platform, but went to Washington and quickly became part of the problem,” Americans for Prosperity President Tim Phillips said in a statement.

 

"Rep. Ellmers has had every chance to match her votes to her prior conservative rhetoric, but instead ignores the voices and concerns of voters who have been let down. North Carolinians deserve a representative in Washington who will fight for them, not vote for corporate welfare and wasteful spending."

In the statement, the group criticized Ellmers over her support for the 2013 Murray-Ryan budget deal, the Export-Import Bank reauthorization and the 2014 farm bill.

The group’s first ad, which was released on Thursday, attacks Ellmers for those positions and praises her opponent, Rep. George Holding (R-N.C.). Holding currently represents another North Carolina district but decided to challenge Ellmers after a court-ordered redistricting in the state.

Above is from:  http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/279728-koch-group-launches-ad-campaign-against-ellmers

Monday, May 2, 2016

Koch brothers buying kid’s brain???

 

 

image

 

image

 

A protest in Palm Springs.

A protest in Palm Springs. (Photo: The Desert Sun)

Funding for the state’s universities doesn't usually include “earmarks” for specific programs favored by right-wing billionaires.

That kind of blatant politicizing of academic integrity doesn’t happen in state-run, state-owned institutions of higher learning.

Except here.

(And several other universities around the country.)

In a cleverly subversive but legal way Arizona State University and the University of Arizona are now owned – in part – by billionaires Charles and David Koch, the dark knights of the  “dark money” who helped Gov. Doug Ducey get elected,.

According to a telling report by The Arizona Republic’s  Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, five million tax dollars would be specifically allocated from the pending state budget to the “freedom centers” at the two universities that were created with the generous financial assistance of the billionaire brothers.

The Charles Koch Foundation gave $3.5 million in ASU's new Center for the Study of Economic Liberty in order to spread the brothers political and economic philosophy in the guise of academic scholarship. In addition, ASU accepted more than $1 million in Koch money for a history professor's position in the Center for Political Thought and Leadership, a job right out of the public relations department of the billionaires.

Then there is the UA Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, housed in the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences and, likewise, with lectures that should be titled Koch 101, Koch 102, etc.

According to Ducey’s spokesman Daniel Scarpinato, “The governor ... believes it’s important that students in our university system are exposed to a broad range of viewpoints and academic views on a number of issues, including economics. So this fits in with that priority.”

In other words, we’re spending tax dollars for Koch brothers' propaganda. In this case, $3 million for ASU’s center and $2 million for UA’s.

It’s a form of ivy-covered brainwashing.

Democrats at the Legislature have complained, but they don’t have the numbers to stop it.

“These freedom schools advocate for things that will help to abolish public education as we know it,” said Democratic Minority Leader Eric Meyer said. “We have all these needs, and they’re talking about $5 million for a think tank that spews out propaganda.”

Yes.

On the bright side, Koch Brothers University only has branch campuses at UA and ASU. For now. If Ducey and his friends in the Legislature persist, it someday will be the other way around.

At least then the devil mascot will be appropriate.

Above is from:  http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2016/04/27/montini-gov-doug-ducey-state-budget-koch-brothers/83583032/

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Koch group AFP ratchets up climnate change denial for 2016


Koch group AFP ratchets up climate denial for 2016

 
Aliya Haq
Posted December 16, 2015


Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the crown jewel of the Koch Brothers' conservative network, is well-known for its attacks on "Obamacare" in recent years. Now, the Koch front group is putting climate and clean energy in the crosshairs for 2016. AFP is gearing up its state-level ground game, and the Clean Power Plan is emerging as its favorite target.
AFP NC door hanger.jpg
Door hangers popped up in North Carolina this fall, accusing the Attorney General Roy Cooper of supporting a "22% hike in utility rates" - a false claim from a flawed report, debunked here.
AFP's state directors have been sending action alerts, publishing op-eds, and delivering testimonies around the country with similarly specious claims about electric rate increases, based on this same bad analysis of an old proposal. In Montana, AFP has sent action alerts and published op-eds to pressure Governor Bullock to "stop Obama from hiking your power bill." A former Montana utility commissioner penned a rebuttal pointing out that renewable energy is often cheaper than coal power, and clean energy standards can actually reduce electricity costs. The commissioner adds that it's not in Montana's interest to ignore climate change, as much of the economy relies on agriculture and outdoor recreation.
Beyond Montana, AFP's false assertions about climate and clean energy solutions have surfaced in Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah and Virginia. Here is our tracking document of AFP's recent climate denial activities in states, showing that the Koch group is ratcheting up its rhetoric against the Clean Power Plan. (Thanks to my colleagues Juanita Constible and Alex Krefetz for this compilation.)
It's no secret that the oil billionaires Charles and David Koch have dumped millions of dollars into Americans for Prosperity and many other organizations in the climate denial machine. David Koch actually founded AFP and serves as the Chair of the Board. This Koch influence is especially troubling in light of a new study out of Yale University last month. Yale sociology professor Justin Farrell shows that front groups funded by the Koch brothers or by ExxonMobil "have greater influence over flows of resources, communication, and the production of contrarian information." Another study released by the same author last month also shows that corporate funding influences the language and content of polarizing discourse on climate change.
We can watch these academic studies play out in real-time. AFP is gearing up activities around the country to oppose President Obama's signature climate effort, the Clean Power Plan (CPP). The CPP sets the first-ever carbon pollution limits on power plants, our nation's largest source of carbon emissions.
When the final CPP was released in August, AFP began attacking the new pollution limits along with any politician it could vaguely associate with the new standard. AFP did not waste time waiting for an updated evaluation-- instead the group drew from a shoddy, outdated polluter-funded analysis of last year's proposed CPP. The old study, paid for by the coal mining association, grossly exaggerates costs while ignoring the economic, health and environmental benefits of these new pollution limits. Check out my colleague Starla Yeh's blog on the many tragic flaws in this polluter report, and her takedown of their new analysis just released a few weeks ago.
In a sense, AFP is returning to its climate denial roots. Back in 2008, AFP launched a "Hot Air Tour," which involved shipping a hot air balloon across the country to "expose the unaffordable costs of climate change policies." The difference today is that the Koch brothers have invested more in the AFP state infrastructure and "homegrown" appearance. Unfortunately, you just can't buy local authenticity. Take earlier this year, for example, when AFP claimed that "millions of Montanans" oppose the Affordable Care Act. Governor Bullock and many others couldn't help but mock AFP knowing well that Montana has barely one million residents.
At the current pace of AFP attacks, I won't be surprised if AFP begins to speak on behalf of "billions of Americans" that oppose climate solutions and clean energy. It would complement AFP's other false and hyperbolic claims on the Clean Power Plan so far.

Above is from:  http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ahaq/koch_group_afp_ratchets_up_cli.html

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Koch Brothers Deny Buying Nevada's Largest Newspaper

Gatehouse Media is the owner of the Rockford Register Star.  GateHouse Media Inc. (formerly Liberty Group Publishing), former symbol on OTC Markets Group's OTCQB tier GHSE, is a U.S. newspaper publisher, headquartered in the town of Perinton, New York,[a] that publishes 97 dailies in 20 states and 198 paid weeklies, in addition to free papers, shoppers and specialty and niche publications.  To read more regarding Gatehouse, go to:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GateHouse_Media
The media elites are a little obsessed about who is the secretive new owner who paid $140 million to buy The Las Vegas Review-Journal, Nevada’s largest daily newspaper with a circulation in excess of 175,000.  “But one rumored purchaser tells Fortune — via a spokesman — that it wasn’t them: Charles and David Koch, co-founders of Koch Industries and major donors to conservative candidates.”
The Koch brothers are infamous capitalist villains to Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the leader of the Senate Democratic minority. Gatehouse Media sold the paper last week to a company called simply “News + Media Capital Group,” shielding the identity of the new owner (or owners). Another popular rumor is major GOP donor Sheldon Adelson, who has offered no comment. Fortune added:
Given Nevada’s recent history as an important swing state in presidential races — Nevadans have picked the winning presidential candidate in 9 straight elections — there has been a lot of speculation that the secretive purchase was made for the purpose of swinging local political opinion. The Kochs were among the possible names bandied about, but a spokesman says it wasn’t them.
The Left was paranoid in 2013 that the “Kochtopus” was going to take over the Tribune Company and its newspapers (including the Los Angeles Times, the Baltimore Sun, and the Chicago Tribune). “Stop the next Fox News before it starts,” warned one petition. Instead, Tribune split its broadcast and print entities into two separate companies in 2014.
- See more at: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2015/12/15/koch-brothers-deny-buying-nevadas-largest-newspaper#sthash.9FpbPDdY.dpuf

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Anti-WInd power groups full of hot air


Anti-wind power groups full of hot air



12
The wind industry’s growth is an American success story, and should be celebrated.
Unfortunately, fossil fuel-funded special interest groups like Americans for Prosperity are working to mislead the public and elected officials regarding the wind industry. In a recent column in The Hill, Americans for Prosperity claimed the wind industry is relying on backroom deals and that the Production Tax Credit (PTC) has provided little in return on investment for taxpayers.
The wind PTC and solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) have fueled a new American energy industry, with which AFP’s fossil fuel beneficiaries do not want to compete. Instead, the fossil fuel industry funds front groups to push their political goals – groups like AFP, which we have documented extensively in our report “Attacks on Renewable Energy Policies.”
In reality, the wind Production Tax Credit has helped spark technological innovation, expand high-tech manufacturing in the United States, and create jobs. As a result of the tax break and good, old-fashioned American ingenuity, wind’s costs have fallen 66% in the last six years. Each day, 73,000 people work in all 50 states and in over 500 wind-related manufacturing facilities to expand the use of clean wind energy.
By continuing to support the PTC and ITC, our country can speed the transition from fossil fuels to clean technology while supporting private sector investment and economic opportunity.
Let’s recall that Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is a front group that refuses to disclose its major contributors. AFP was founded and is funded by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, the owners of Koch Industries, a major fossil fuel conglomerate with a direct financial interest in stopping the growth of clean energy. In the 2012 presidential election, AFP was a significant component of the Koch’s $400 million political operation, receiving large amounts of money from Koch-linked dark money groups like Freedom Partners, American Encore, and DonorsTrust. This year, Politico reported that the Koch brothers’ political network plans to spend $889 million in the run-up to the 2016 election, including an estimated $125 million for just AFP in 2015. Yet, AFP is taking issue with the clean energy industry’s political deal-making?
AFP also recently spearheaded a letter calling for the elimination of the crude oil export ban and advocating against tax credits for wind and solar. An Energy & Policy Institute investigation revealed that 19 of the 21 organizations signing the letter have either received funding from fossil fuel interests like the Koch brothers or ExxonMobil or have ties to the Koch political network.
All forms of energy in the United States benefit from federal incentives. Conventional fuels have received taxpayer handouts for 100 years, with American taxpayers spending hundreds of billions and counting on subsidies for fossil fuels. Overall taxpayer handouts for dirty fossil fuels like oil, gas, and coal dwarf the incentives provided for renewable energy and energy efficiency deployment.
Lawmakers should ignore fossil fuel special interests like AFP that have a financial interest in eliminating clean energy tax breaks. Instead, elected officials should support tax breaks and incentives that will help continue the expansion of clean energy industries and support hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Elsner is executive director of the Washington, D.C.,-based Energy & Policy Institute, which works to expose attacks on clean technology and counter misinformation by fossil fuel and utility interests.

Above is from:   http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/262957-anti-wind-power-groups-full-of-hot-air

Monday, November 30, 2015

Koch brothers' Libre Initiative to target Wisconsin Latinos

By Mary Spicuzza of the Journal Sentinel

Nov. 29, 2015

 

A multimillion-dollar effort aimed at winning over Latinos funded by conservative billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch is looking to expand in Wisconsin.

The Libre Initiative is now hiring a state field director to be based in the Milwaukee area. It will be the first full-time paid staffer the group has had in the state, with the exception of its national spokeswoman — Rachel Campos-Duffy, the wife of U.S. Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.).

"Are you looking for an exciting opportunity to promote free-market principles?" the job description reads. "The Libre Initiative is seeking a Wisconsin Field Director to develop, implement, and manage a statewide outreach strategy to ensure an effective grass-roots operation to support the organization's vision and mission."

Libre is a nonprofit organization that promotes economic freedom and small government principles. The group, which was founded in 2011, says its goal is "to empower the U.S. Hispanic community so it can thrive and contribute to a more prosperous America."

Brian Faughnan, a Libre spokesman, said the group isn't focused on specific political races, but rather issues like school choice and immigration reform.

Libre also opposes government "overregulation" as well as the federal Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, describing it on its website as "a tax in disguise that forces citizens to purchase insurance plans and threatens our small businesses with penalties."

While the group has specific initiatives targeting young people, Faughnan said it's working to empower Latinos of all ages.

"We try to reach out across the board to help people become more prosperous and self-reliant," he said. "We believe in the power of free markets and limited, constitutional government to increase opportunity and empower people to make their lives better — and help them achieve their American dream. Our goal is to carry that message into the Hispanic community nationwide."

Democrats accuse Libre of essentially being a shadow group aimed at pushing the Kochs' conservative message.

"This is another example of the Koch brothers' willingness to say or do anything to buy Wisconsin's elections to support their out-of-touch agenda on the backs of Wisconsin middle-class families and workers," said Kory Kozloski, executive director of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin.

Libre is not required to disclose its donors, because it is a 501(c)4 organization. But it has received millions of dollars from the Koch brothers as the Latino outreach arm of the brothers' sprawling political network. Libre has received about $15.8 million from Freedom Partners, a group that serves as the hub of Koch-backed political operations.

Wisconsin had about 135,000 Latinos eligible to vote in the 2014 midterm elections, according to the Pew Research Center.

Nationally, conservatives and Republican candidates have struggled to win over Latino voters.

Latinos voted for President Barack Obama over Republican Mitt Romney by 71% to 27%, an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center found.

Wisconsin Republicans have made an effort to change that in recent years.

At least two local millionaires underwrote a six-figure radio campaign aimed at persuading Latino and black Milwaukee residents to vote Republican in the fall of 2014, when Gov. Scott Walker faced an unsuccessful challenge from Democrat Mary Burke. The advertising campaign, which focused on taxes, abortion, education and gun rights, was launched by Americas PAC, a conservative organization based in Iowa.

It's unclear how much Libre plans to spend in Wisconsin, as Faughnan said the group doesn't disclose its spending plans. But a recent report by The New York Times said Libre is expected to spend more than $9 million nationally during this election cycle.

The group also recently spoke out about federal immigration policy in the wake of Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump's comments calling for an end to birthright citizenship and deportation of the estimated 11 million immigrants in the country illegally.

"Such proposals are not in line with our principles and are not in the best interest of the country," Daniel Garza, Libre's executive director, wrote in an open letter released in September.

Faughnan said Libre isn't pushing for specific legislation but supports immigration reform that would include a path to legal status for minor children.

Faughnan said Libre's focus is on states with a "significant" Latino population, adding that the group has paid staffers in Texas, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia and Ohio, as well as Campos-Duffy in Wisconsin.

Libre, which shares the voter information gathered at its events with the Kochs' i360 data operation, hopes its staff and volunteers make 3 million phone calls and knock on 1 million doors this election cycle, Faughnan said.

© 2015, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved.

About Mary Spicuzza
author thumbnail

Mary Spicuzza covers politics and breaking news for the Journal Sentinel

Koch brothers' Libre Initiative to target Wisconsin Latinos

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Behind the scenes, Koch brothers spent big in Colorado, filings show - The Denver Post

 

 

Swing-state conservatives reaped benefits

By John Frank
The Denver Post

 

Charles Koch

Charles Koch

The conservative political network connected to the billionaire Koch brothers spent millions in Colorado in 2014, according to new federal tax records, playing a behind-the-scenes role to boost local organizations that played a prominent role in the election and public policy.

The Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, a hub for businessmen Charles and David Koch's political activity, gave money to six state-based organizations, three of them in Colorado, the IRS filings show. The attention reflects the prominence of Colorado on the political map in 2014 — and offers a glimpse of what's to come when the spotlight returns in 2016.

David Koch

David Koch

The largest beneficiary in Colorado — where the Koch brothers own homes — is CitizenLink, the Colorado Springs-based political arm of Focus on the Family and a prominent anti-abortion and religious freedom organization. In 2014, the group received $1 million and an additional $1.3 million through Evangchr4 Trust, another Koch organization.

The two other local groups that benefited from Koch money: IACE Action, a political nonprofit run by Colorado Springs conservative activist Laura Carno, received $95,000, and the Colorado Women's Alliance, a conservative-leaning organization based in Greenwood Village, took $50,000.

The IRS tax records are the first indication the local groups were tied to the Koch organization.

Freedom Partners gave a total of $88 million in grants in 2014, and tens of millions went to national political organizations that played a significant role in Colorado's high-profile U.S. Senate race in 2014 between Democratic incumbent Mark Udall and Republican Cory Gardner.

The major players include limited-government advocates Americans for Prosperity, the Latino-focused Libre Initiative, business-centric U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the industry-backed American Energy Alliance, which alternatively organized supporters or aired TV ads designed to boost Gardner.

Freedom Partners also paid $1.3 million in consulting fees to Aegis Strategic, a firm run by Jeff Crank, a Colorado Springs political consultant and radio show host who worked for Americans for Prosperity.

The big money in the Koch political coalition makes it a target for Democratic-aligned organizations.

"In Colorado, the Koch network is bankrolling the far-right by sending hundreds of thousands to extreme groups at the federal, state and even local level — all in the interest of pushing their agenda that's good for billionaires like them but hurts Colorado families," said Regan Page, a spokeswoman for the Bridge Project, which is part of an organization that focuses on conservative groups and the Koch brothers. "Coloradans were kept in the dark until more than a year after the Kochs spent millions through shadowy front groups."

Freedom Partners, a 501(c)(6) nonprofit, did not disclose its donors in the tax filings because it is not required by federal law. A message sent to the organization Wednesday went unanswered.

CitizenLink president Paul Weber and the leader of the organization's local affiliate, Colorado Family Action, were not available for an interview.

Carno said the $95,000 that went to her organization, I Am Created Equal Action, helped pay for a pro-energy industry mailer to educate voters about Udall and his stance on oil and gas issues.

The money also helped pay for an intern through the Koch-funded Liberty at Work training program. The staffer helped Carno with general administrative support during the 2014 election season.

Debbie Brown, the executive director at the Colorado Women's Alliance, said the money her group received went to general support, not a particular purpose.

The organization, however, did advocacy work in 2014 to support Gardner and Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez.

The Koch network's focus on Colorado makes sense to Brown, who is also an energy industry consultant.

"When you look at politics, naturally Colorado is a tier-one state ... for a lot of things," she said, mentioning oil and gas issues, ballot initiatives and national politics. "Colorado is a battleground state."

John Frank

Behind the scenes, Koch brothers spent big in Colorado, filings show - The Denver Post

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Democrat Strategy to Take Back the Senate: Attack the Koch Brothers

Written by  Bob Adelmann

Upon learning that the Koch brothers, Charles (shown) and David, and their network of conservative donors, were planning on spending upwards of $750 million over the next two election cycles, Harry Reid, the Senate minority leader and harsh critic of the Kochs, enlisted the help of two hard-left political strategists to respond. David Brock, the founder of Media Matters in 2004 and the super-PAC American Bridge in 2010, joined with Geoff Garin, president of Hart Research Associates, to build a plan for Democrats to take back the Senate in 2016.

Brock investigates strategy via focus groups while Garin digs up dirt on Republican opponents. Combined with lots of money, attack ads then are constructed to sway low-information voters in Democrats' direction.

The task of taking back the Senate in 2016 is manageable for the Democrats: 34 Senate seats are up for reelection and Democrats need only four or five victories to return control to their party. By tying the 24 Republican candidates to the Kochs, Reid, Brock, and Garin are predicting success.

For Reid, it’s personal. He repeatedly excoriated the Koch’s influence on the floor of the Senate, with attacks like this one:

     “We’ve proven in the long run that [the Koch brothers] are interested in one thing: their bottom line. They’re trying to buy the country. They want to be America’s oligarchs.

For Brock and Garin, it’s redemption. Attack ads attempting to tie Republicans to Koch money failed almost completely in 2014, with only one contested seat going to the Democrats while nine others went Republican. But they say that their strategy is long-term, that results from focus groups show the strategy works, and that last year's victory in Michigan proves it.

First, the focus groups. Six of them were held around the country in August, where “swing” voters were exposed to anti-Koch rhetoric for an hour and then asked if any of them had made up their minds about whom them would support next November. The rhetoric included “evidence” that the brothers want to cut Pell grants and reduce environmental regulations. The implication was that the brothers were anti-student and pro-pollution, implying that the Kochs wanted more freedom to pollute the air and water in order to help their bottom line.

By the time the brainwashing sessions were complete, so was the transformation of these swing voters into rabid anti-Koch activists. Some of them, following the sessions, called the brothers “whores,” “bullies,” and “Nazis.” Said one: “They’re rich white guys who want rich white guys to succeed.” Said another: “Anyone who spends that much money to get somebody elected wants something back what that person is elected.”

Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat senator from North Dakota whose seat isn’t up until 2018, disagreed that the strategy will necessarily work: “When you start making [the Kochs] front and center, you are losing sight of what you need to do. We need to be more mindful of what the message is, not who the messengers are and who’s paying for them.”

Brock and Garin are touting their success in destroying the Republican candidate in the contest for Senator Carl Levin’s seat in Michigan last year. According to Guy Molyneux of Hart Research, their exposure of Terri Lynn Land’s Koch brothers funding did her in, by 14 percentage points, when she lost to now-Senator Gary Peters.

A closer look reveals that the victory was not nearly that simple. First, the race would have been tough for any Republican to win because Republicans haven’t elected a U.S. senator in Michigan in 20 years.

Second, Land was the runt of the Republican litter. After Representatives Dave Camp and Mike Rogers bowed out of the contest, Land was the only one left. Even Republicans admitted they had a weak candidate, one who lacked sufficient public persona or panache to carry the day. In its review of Land’s cratering, Chris Gautz, in Crain’s Detroit Business, wrote:

Poor decisions included the near-invisible nature of Land’s campaign.… [It] rarely, if ever, announced where it would be ahead of time. Land only did a handful of appearances with statewide media, and declined to debate Peters.

The few times she did talk with reporters, her lack of a grasp on national issues was apparent.

The focus groups upon which Reid, Brock, and Garin are relying also show that the strategy might be flawed. In one focus group/brainwashing session that gathered middle-aged Latinos in Las Vegas, some of them said that Democrats were equally guilty of the Koch’s alleged sins, with many of them mentioning one name repeatedly: George Soros. Said a bartender after the session: “The only difference between him [Soros] and them [the Koch brothers] is that they [the brothers] are out there. [Soros] is more of a behind-the-scenes puppet master, like the Wizard of Oz.”

Said another coming up for air after one of the sessions: “They all do it. They’re all going to ask for money from someone, some billionaire. Just like the Koch brothers have all this negative stuff, so do a bunch of other ones.”

Aside from Soros, would some of those “other ones” include John Tyson, chairman of Tyson Foods, who has been helping to fund Hillary Clinton’s campaigns for years? What about David Stevens, the CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association? Or Richard Parsons, former chairman of Citigroup and Time Warner? Or how about Goldman Sachs, which, between 1999 and 2016, has given $711,000 to Clinton? Or JPMorgan Chase, with gifts of $620,000? Or Morgan Stanley, unloading $543,000 into Clinton’s coffers? Or Time Warner — $411,000?

If Reid, Brock, and Garin are relying on these focus group results and electoral “victories” to win the necessary four to five Senate seats in November for the Democrats, it is, as Alex Roarty, writing in the National Journal, expressed it, "a strategy that Democrats will have to repeat several million times over if they want to succeed."

A graduate of an Ivy League school and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at badelmann@thenewamerican.com .

Democrat Strategy to Take Back the Senate: Attack the Koch Brothers

New Filings Show Koch Brothers Give Millions To Anti-Gay, Anti-Choice Groups | ThinkProgress

 

New Filings Show Koch Brothers Give Millions To Anti-Gay, Anti-Choice Groups

by Josh Israel Nov 18, 2015 9:27am

CREDIT: AP Photo/Paul Vernon

David Koch at an August Americans for Prosperity conference

 

Over the past year, petrochemical billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch have gone to great pains to change their public image and sell themselves as social moderates who “don’t want the federal government in your pocketbook” or “in your bedroom.”

But IRS filings released on Tuesday by Freedom Partners, the Kochs’ secretive tax-exempt organization that serves as the ATM for their anti-government activism, show they also continued to help distribute millions of dollars to anti-choice and anti-gay organizations in 2014.

Last December, ABC’s Barbara Walters interviewed David Koch and noted that he was “not well-liked, primarily because of [his] very conservative politics.” She asked him why a supporter of LGBT equality and abortion rights supports social conservatives. Koch, not disputing her characterization of his own public standing, responded, “Well that’s their problem. I do have those views… I want these candidates to support a balanced budget. I’m very worried that if the budget is not balanced, inflation could occur and the economy of our country could suffer terribly.”

Earlier this year, Politico Magazine suggested Charles Koch might now be labeled a “liberal crusader,” based on his work on criminal justice reform, including a partnership with the Center for American Progress (ThinkProgress is an editorially independent news site associated within CAP). After he and his wife hosted MSNBC’s Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough at a closed-to-the-public GOP candidate forum, the former Republican Congressman raved that the Kochs were mainstream social moderates with little patience for those who want “huge bloody battles on social issues.”

On its own website, Freedom Partners reprints a USA Today article that identifies the 501(c)(6) organization (curiously registered under the section of the tax code for chambers of commerce and similar groups) as “the center of the Koch’s expansive operation.” Politico called it the Koch Brothers’ “secret bank,” though as the group does not disclose its donors, it is unclear how much of its hundreds of millions came from the Kochs themselves.

Where did the money go? In addition to going to an array of other Koch network groups like Americans for Prosperity ($16 million), Generation Opportunity (more than $14 million), and the Libre Initiative ($6.5 million), a good chunk of it went to the very anti-LGBT and anti-abortion groups from which the duo has sought to disassociate themselves.

Freedom Partners gave $5,745,000 to Evangchr4 Trust, a Koch-tied Evangelical Christian pastoral outreach organization that itself gave more than $1.3 million in 2013 to Focus on the Family’s CitizenLink and $375,000 to the anti-LGBT hate group Family Research Council Action.

The group also gave $885,000 for advocacy and another $125,000 for general support directly to CitizenLink — which describes itself as “deeply concerned about the hearts and souls of those who identify themselves as gay, lesbian, bisexual or ‘transgendered.'” It also sent $225,000 to Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion and anti-contraception organization, and $150,000 to Heritage Action for America.

Freedom Partners reported giving $0 to socially progressive organizations in 2014.

Above is from:  New Filings Show Koch Brothers Give Millions To Anti-Gay, Anti-Choice Groups | ThinkProgress

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

A New Book Looks at the Koch Brothers' Role in Politics - The New York Times

 

In a 2010 profile of the billionaire industrialist brothers Charles and David Koch, the New Yorker writer Jane Mayer described how, from 2005 to 2008, the brothers had vastly outspent ExxonMobil in financing organizations that fight legislation aimed at curbing climate change. Their company, the conglomerate Koch Industries, was also listed as one of the top 10 air polluters in the country, she wrote.

She wrote about the brothers again in 2013, focusing on David Koch’s efforts to influence coverage at a public television station, one of several to which they had donated money. The article prompted a lengthy, scathing rebuttal on the Koch company website, which accused Ms. Mayer of distorting the facts.

Ms. Mayer is undeterred, apparently. Her coming book, “Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right,” explores how a network of deep-pocketed conservatives — foremost among them the Koch brothers — are seeking to fundamentally reshape American politics.

 

 

“She digs up documents people want to keep secret; she writes clear and powerful narratives about events others try to obfuscate; she gets sources to talk even when they’re afraid to,” said Bill Thomas, the publisher and editor in chief of Doubleday. “I thought I understood the last 30 years of American political history until I read this book.”

The book, which Doubleday will publish in January, could scarcely be timelier. It will land during a heated presidential primary season that has prompted a national debate about issues like income inequality, tax reform and the regulation of businesses.

In January, the Koch brothers’ political and philanthropic network, backed by hundreds of like-minded donors, revealed plans to spend $889 million in the nearly two years leading up to the 2016 election.

Ms. Mayer has been a co-author of books about Ronald Reagan and about the controversial appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. Her 2008 book “The Dark Side,” about the use of torture as an interrogation technique in America’s counterterrorism efforts, was a finalist for the National Book Award.

Ms. Mayer spent five years researching the new book. She interviewed hundreds of sources and unearthed confidential documents related to efforts that illustrate how donors within the network have funneled their fortunes to promote a political agenda of cutting corporate taxes, dismantling environmental regulations and reducing government oversight of corporations.

The Koch brothers declined to be interviewed for “Dark Money,” and a spokesman for the Kochs declined to comment ​on the book’s premise.

A New Book Looks at the Koch Brothers' Role in Politics - The New York Times

Monday, November 16, 2015

We kicked the Koch Brothers’ a**: How Denver parents beat back big money, charter schools, right-wing lies - Salon.com

This election cost over three quarters of a million, SEE:  http://boonecountywatchdog.blogspot.com/2015/10/school-board-recall-vote-in-colorado.html

Although many Democrats are disappointed, even in a “panic,” with the results from last week’s off-year elections, they need to be aware of where progressives won and learn from communities that bucked the influences of big money, especially in contests where education was a top-tier issue.

Most notable of the wins was a school board race in Jefferson County, Colorado, just outside Denver, that many national media outlets had actually hyped but then mostly ignored once the results were in.

The vote, the New York Times reported before Election Day, was about “whether to oust a polarizing school board that has championed charter schools, performance-based teacher pay, and other education measures.”

“The skirmish has been tense,” the Washington Post explained, “with alleged death threats, social media clashes, and attacks on talk radio.”

Both news stories told of a national program bearing down on the school district, with “money pouring in from Americans for Prosperity, the national organization founded by the Koch brothers,” in an effort to impose an agenda from outside the community that included a new history curriculum, new restrictions on teachers’ job security, and more privately-operated charter schools.

Students, teachers and parents were openly revolting against the school board, staging school walkouts, holding boisterous protest rallies and waging a petition campaign to demand an election to recall the school board majority.

The national outlets consistently got the story of the election wrong, adopting a talking point from a libertarian think tank that the contest was a “proxy war” between the Koch Brothers and “teachers’ unions,” when, in fact, the recall effort was mostly led by parents.

Then, when the results came in last week, and voters recalled the board majority and voted in a new slate of progressive-minded candidates, national outlets generally ignored the story, and the news was relegated to local outlets and bloggers to report.

But what the national media have misreported and overlooked is an important story of how communities fighting to control their education destinies can win against big-moneyed interests and a charter school industry that want to dictate what schooling is like across the country.

A Major Battle to Preserve Public Schools

I went to Jeffco (what the locals call it) this summer and reported about the emerging national story for Alternet.

I found this outstanding school district – where real innovation is taking place in the public schools – is “under assault by right-wing groups, some with connections to evangelical Christianity” and “a powerful charter school industry, different from the ‘organic charters’ Jeffco parents already send their kids to.”

My firsthand investigations, which included more than a dozen interviews and visits to community events and school sites, revealed a fight over “who gets to call the shots in education systems strained by unending financial austerity and an unremitting ‘reform’ agenda whose intent is unclear to the people in its way.”

I met with local Jeffco citizens who engaged in scores of house parties, circulated flyers and repeated a message of dissent against the three board members who were intent on imposing a market-based philosophy of education conceived in libertarian think tanks and charter school corporate offices.

Why should you care about a school board election in suburban Denver?

As a reporter at Al Jazeera correctly understood in her pre-election report, the contest had “national implications.”

The race, Sandra Fish writes, “has ramifications far outside the school district … Because Jeffco is the ultimate swing county in the key swing state of Colorado,” Fish finds, “that means success – or defeat – there could be replicated across the U.S.”

She quotes a professor of education history at New York University saying, “Colorado has become a kind of test case for these issues. Others around the country will be watching to see if the money and the influence matters … It’s going to be a very close election is my guess.'”

The professor was mostly right, except about the margin of victory. It wasn’t close. Voters “overwhelmingly,” according to the Denver Post, voted for the recall, with the charter school-backed board members going down by an average of 64 percent to 36 percent.

A Jeffco classroom teacher involved in the resistance effort, Paula Reed, had this to say in an email to me about the importance of the recall win: “This was a major front in the battle to preserve public schools for kids and stop privatization for profit. I said to myself and everyone I pulled in that if we won, we would know for the rest of our lives that we had been part of something huge.”

Why Grassroots Matters Most

“The success of this recall has been a true testament to what grassroots can accomplish,” Jeffco parent activist Jonna Levine tells me in an email. “We sent a strong message that community can win over big corporate machines like the Koch Brothers.”

Levine co-founded and leads, with Jeffco parent Shawna Fritzler, the grassroots group “Support Jeffco Kids.” Organizing parents into these grassroots groups, including Jeffco United, that helped lead the petition effort proved to be a key to the successful campaign. Parents have an undeniable stake in anything related to public schools. And unlike teachers, they can’t be intimidated by school administration or be fired.

advertisement

Above is from:  We kicked the Koch Brothers’ a**: How Denver parents beat back big money, charter schools, right-wing lies - Salon.com

Saturday, November 14, 2015

How the Kochs launched Joni Ernst - POLITICO

 

Joni Ernst was surprised to receive an invitation in the summer of 2013 that she later credited with starting her meteoric rise to the U.S. Senate.

Ernst was then a little-known Iowa state senator and lieutenant colonel in the National Guard who was considering a long-shot campaign for the GOP nomination for U.S. Senate. Polls showed more than 90 percent of her state’s voters had no opinion of her. At least a half-dozen other Republicans ― some with better funding and connections and stronger establishment support ― also were positioning themselves to run against the presumptive Democratic nominee, Rep. Bruce Braley.

But Ernst was being watched closely by allies of the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, who saw in her an advocate for their brand of free-market, libertarian-infused conservatism. Operatives affiliated with the Kochs’ political network invited Ernst to the network’s August 2013 gathering of wealthy conservative donors at a posh resort in Albuquerque’s Santa Ana Pueblo.

Ernst later told POLITICO she had no idea "how my name came through those channels." But her appearance at the event impressed donors and was followed by an infusion of support that helped Ernst win the GOP nomination and, eventually, a Senate seat. It also represented a new phase in the rapid expansion of the Koch-backed political network ― its willingness to become involved in primary fights among GOP candidates — potentially putting it on a collision course with the official Republican Party.

Until now, little has been known about the secretive role played by the Kochs' donors and operatives in boosting Ernst. The Koch network has focused primarily on policy fights, mostly leaving the spadework of recruiting and nurturing candidates to the party.

But the network's financial support for Ernst ― detailed here for the first time ― offers the first signs of a move into GOP primaries. The Kochs and their allies are investing in a pipeline to identify, cultivate and finance business-oriented candidates from the local school board all the way to the White House, and Koch operatives are already looking for opportunities to challenge GOP incumbents

deemed insufficiently hard-line in their opposition to government spending and corporate subsidies.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/the-kochs-vs-the-gop-215672#ixzz3rVxDsF3c

Thursday, November 12, 2015

The Koch Brothers Aren't Supporting Anyone in Republican Primary

 

Some Republican presidential contenders are probably disappointed.

The Koch Brothers are arguably the most important donors in the Republican Party, and they won’t be backing any of the current candidates in the primaries, reports USA Today.

Charles Koch, who leads Koch Industries with his brother David, told the paper that he “has no plans” to pick a candidate to back financially in the primaries, perhaps signalling that he isn’t happy with the current state of his party.

The brothers have been on a bit of a media tour this fall, and this isn’t the first time they have expressed disappointment about how the primary has been going.

“If they start saying things we think are beneficial overall and will change the trajectory of the country, then that would be good, but we have to believe also they’ll follow through on it, and by and large, candidates don’t do that,” Charles Koch said to the paper.

Koch did concede that he will likely help the eventual Republican nominee in the general election.

Charles Koch and his brother David aren't picking a Republican horse.

The Koch Brothers Aren't Supporting Anyone in Republican Primary

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Koch Brothers Two-Faced On Crime: The Hypocrisy Behind Their Calls For ‘Reform’

 

WASHINGTON — Supporters of criminal justice reform have found an unexpected ally in their efforts to reduce America’s massive prison population: the notoriously conservative Koch brothers. Yet a new investigation suggests the billionaires still support “tough on crime” politicians whose policies contribute to the expansion of mass incarceration.

In recent public statements, Charles and David Koch or their representatives have affirmed their support for reducing prison populations and opening up new opportunities to the formerly incarcerated — statements that line up with their avowed libertarian ethics. For example, on Nov. 3 the Koch brothers appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” where Charles told Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough:

“Somebody goes to jail, and they get out and no one will hire them. And so what do they do? The only way they can survive is to go back to crime … We’ve got to change that if we want to break this cycle of poverty and dependency.”

Listen to the MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ Airs Koch Brothers Interview:

Video Player

http://www.mintpressnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/42380_110315.mp4

 

But a Nov. 3 report by Lee Fang, an investigative journalist writing for The Intercept, states that “Koch money continues to finance election-year efforts that promote tough-on-crime politics.” Among the advertisements that the brothers’ money funded is an advertisement widely aired in Pennsylvania demanding that judges impose longer prison sentences:

In Louisiana, the Kochs supported Sen. David Vitter’s bid for governor by paying for an advertisement attacking President Obama’s clemency program, which has been responsible for releasing thousands of nonviolent drug offenders from prison:

Fang also noted that “Koch Industries has been widely hailed for donating to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and partnering with groups such as Families Against Mandatory Minimums … and other left-leaning groups.” But he added that the Kochs are likely more concerned with guarding their own interests than protecting or decreasing the prison population:

“Koch’s interest in criminal justice reform was sparked not by the plight of overcrowded prisons or racial disparities in law enforcement, but by the company’s own environmental crimes. In 2000, Koch was indicted over claims that it had polluted huge amounts of benzene, a known carcinogen, from a Texas refinery and then attempted to cover up the crime.”

A 2014 investigation of Koch Industries by Rolling Stone revealed a history of “pollution, speculation, law-bending and self-righteousness,” including “record civil and criminal environmental penalties” under Charles Koch’s leadership.

“What they’re all concerned about is money,” Matthew Menendez, counsel for the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program, which tracks judicial elections, told The Intercept. Indeed, Fang reports:

“The Republican State Leadership Committee, which is sponsoring the group behind the pro-Republican judicial ads, is funded this year by Koch Industries, General Electric, General Motors, Eli Lilly and other large corporations that have lobbied to minimize awards against them in class-action suits.”

Further noting that issues related to class-action lawsuits may be too complicated to galvanize support in a short political ad, these donors are instead channeling funds toward campaigns toward judicial elections that will benefit their bottomlines. Ultimately, though, Menendez said: “The collateral damage is to criminal justice reform.”

Koch Brothers Two-Faced On Crime: The Hypocrisy Behind Their Calls For ‘Reform’

Monday, November 9, 2015

Solar Fight in Florida Heats Up with Mysterious Donor | PR Watch

 

The largest contribution so far to an anti-consumer measure to impede access to solar energy just came from a mysterious new donor.

This new donation comes as the battle over whether consumers in Florida can install home solar is heating up, with rival state constitutional amendments both aiming for the ballot in 2016.

On one side are consumer and environmental groups promoting home solar, and on the other—trying to block consumer access—are major utilities, groups linked to the Koch brothers and a new mysterious funder.

"Consumers for Smart Solar" is the misleading name of the group created to promote an amendment to the Florida Constitution that would protect the monopoly of the utilities. CMD/PRWatch has reported on its known funders and activities, and has jointly with the Energy & Policy Institute published research on the corporate ties of Consumers for Smart Solar.

These funders include Duke Energy ($160,000), Florida Power and Light ($175,000), Gulf Power ($180,000,) and Tampa Electric Company ($175,000). It has also received checks from groups known to be backed by the Koch brothers: the 60 Plus Association ($150,000) and the National Black Chamber of Commerce ($50,000). A complete list is below.

"Let's Preserve the American Dream" Spends $200K

The largest contribution so far, for $200,000, was reported by Consumers for Smart Solar as being received in September from a state Political Action Committee called "Let's Preserve the American Dream PAC," a group that is run by leadership from Associated Industries of Florida (AIF), a powerful industry lobby group.

Under Florida's campaign finance system, Let's Preserve the American Dream PAC is required to disclose its expenditures and sources of funding, but in its own September filing it made no reference to having given $200,000 to Consumers for Smart Solar.

So what gives?

Jeremy Wallace of the Miami Herald, who first reported on this, asked Ryan Tyson, Executive Director of the PAC, about the discrepancy and was told it was an error by Consumers for Smart Solar.

According to Tyson, the grant should have been reported as being from a newly formed group, also called Let's Preserve the American Dream (yes, that is the exact same name as the PAC), but which has been created as a 501(c)(4) Social welfare organization, and so it does not have to disclose its funding. Since the Miami Herald ran its story, the filings have been updated and now record the grant as coming from the new 501(c)(4) group.

Tyson separately claimed to CBS Miami that "the Let's Preserve the American Dream organizations are entirely different, with separate missions and purposes."

As if that were not confusing enough, leadership for Let's Preserve the American Dream, former U.S. Congressman Tom C. Feeney (President) and Ryan Tyson (Executive Director), are also the President and Vice President respectively of AIF.

And yet, AIF claims that it is itself not taking a position on the solar fight. Perhaps unsurprisingly, AIF's own Political Action Committee receives funding from Florida utilities, having received $156,500 from Florida Power & Light in 2015

Despite the tangle of relationships between Let's Preserve the American Dream (both entities), their shared leadership with each other and with AIF, and the identified connections to the Florida utilities, it may never be possible to discover the original source of the $200,000 grant.

The funding might be from the Florida utilities, but it could also be some other donor trying to keep voters in the dark.

This is unfortunate, both because this ballot initiative is of significant consequence for Florida energy consumers, but also because the state otherwise has relatively good disclosure requirements.

The sunshine state is famous for its year-round sun, but it is also known for its commitment to open government, including through Florida's so-called "Sunshine Law." That system has been tested in recent years, in particular through the actions of Republican Governor Rick Scott, who has often been accused of trying to avoid disclosure.

Similarly, Florida operates a campaign finance system which requires monthly disclosure of contributions and expenditures, which should allow the tracking of money spent and received by Consumers for Smart Solar.

Florida Utilities Benefit from Anti-Consumer Solar Access

Florida is one of the few remaining states that limits consumers access to generate their own energy using solar power, by blocking homeowners ability to enter into contracts for no up-front-cost installation of solar systems.

By state law, Floridians are barred from entering into contracts with companies that then install and maintain solar systems on consumers homes, with the firm paying the up-front costs and both the customer and the installation firm benefiting. The net effect would be that the consumers save money on their electricity bills and have more money in their pockets each month while using plentiful renewable energy.

Earlier in 2015, Google invested $300 million in Solar City, one firm installing home solar systems outside Florida to consumers with no up-front costs. As the Washington Post described the contracts with homeowners: "Solar City generally installs the systems at no charge to customers, and then charges the residents slightly less per month for the energy than they'd pay their traditional utility."

These contracts—aided by the increasingly cheap cost of photovoltaic systems manufactured in China—is a large reason that solar is such a booming industry in the U.S., with an 80% increase in installations in 2014 from the year before.

The arrangement is a win for consumers and a boon for green contracting jobs, but it is a threat to the monopoly of the utilities, and they have been fighting back in Florida.

With the U.S. needing to significantly reduce its dependence on fossil fuels because of the very real threats of the climate changes that are underway, the boom in home solar has the obvious benefit of reducing reliance on fossil fuels. It has also generated huge numbers of "green jobs," with the industry now employing 175,000 workers in the U.S. According to the White House, the solar industry is creating jobs at ten times the rate of the rest of the economy.

In a state with as much year-round sunshine as Florida, home solar should be booming, but whether it will is now the subject of a high-spending political fight being fueled in part by dark money interests.

------

Here is a list of contributions to anti-consumer Consumers for Smart Solar:

Electric Utility Companies Funding Consumers for Smart Solar:

  • Duke Energy, $160,000
  • Florida Power and Light Company, $175,000
  • Gulf Power Company, $180,000
  • Tampa Electric Company, $175,000
  • Powersouth Energy Cooperative, $30,000

Outside Groups Funding Consumers for Smart Solar:

  • National Black Chamber of Commerce,* $50,000
  • 60 Plus Association,* $150,000
  • Energy & Social Justice Project, $15,000
  • Energy Equity Alliance, $1,000
  • Partnership for Affordable Clean Energy, $76,000
  • Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, $50,000
  • Florida Faith And Freedom Coalition Inc., $125,000
  • Florida Council For Safe Communities, $20,000
  • Floridians For Government Accountability, $61,750
  • Let's Preserve the American Dream, $200,000

* Groups known to have funding ties to the Koch Brothers, the billionaire heads of Koch Industries, which is one of the largest privately held fossil fuel conglomerates in the U.S.

Solar Fight in Florida Heats Up with Mysterious Donor | PR Watch