Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Actions by Chairman Walberg may affect Plote Construction law suit

 

 

 

 

Bob Walberg, County Chair

 

 

The following was sent July 28, 2015 to the Boone County Board

 

Subject: Boone County v. Plote

As you may already be aware, I filed suit against Plote for operating beyond the hours approved by the County Board.  We obtained a temporary restraining order against Plote from Judge Tobin, and they since violated that order.  As such, we filed a motion for sanctions which was set to be heard today.

At the beginning of the hearing, Judge Tobin announced that he had an ex parte communication he needed to disclose to the parties.  In sum, he described a phone call that Chairman Bob Walberg made to him.  He said that as Chairman it was not unusual for Bob to call him, especially in regards to budget issues.  So, he saw nothing inappropriate about taking the call.  The content of the call, however, was inappropriate.  Judge Tobin described that Bob advised him that he (Bob) did not approve of the lawsuit against Plote.  At that point, Judge Tobin told Bob that he could not talk to him about the case and ended the conversation. 

He assured the parties that he was not political.  While Bob Walberg ran as a Republican, Judge Tobin ran as an Independent and did not owe anyone anything.   He then asked the parties whether they wished him to step down from the case.  I indicated that I did not wish for him to step down.  Plote’s attorney asked for another date to discuss it with his client.   An order was entered, a copy of which is attached.  

The purpose of this email is to keep the County Board apprised of what occurred in this case as it was the county board who passed the ordinance that restricted Plote’s hours of operation.  It is also to advise all members that actions such as this are inappropriate.  While there is a pending case, judges are forbidden to have ex parte communications about that case.  

Sincerely,

Michelle J. Courier

Boone County State's Attorney

 

Michelle Courier

 

image

 

image

 

Judge TOBIN

************************************************************************

 

 

If you think Chairman Walberg was “out on bounds” you may wish to call your county board members: 

 

 

image

image

Illinois House agrees to eliminate FY 2016 lawmaker raises - Yahoo News

 

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The Illinois House on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a bill stopping a cost-of-living increase for state lawmakers in the current fiscal year, which continues to lack an approved budget.

 

The 101-1 bipartisan vote sends the measure to the Senate, which is scheduled to return to session Aug. 4.

Republican Governor Bruce Rauner has publicly criticized Democrats who control the legislature for allowing their paychecks to grow, while Illinois struggles financially.

Despite the near unanimous vote, the standoff continues between Rauner and Democrats over a budget for fiscal 2016, which began July 1.

House Speaker Michael Madigan, who sponsored the bill, said despite making "a good faith effort to meet the governor half way," the impasse continues. He said the bill follows other actions by the House to accommodate some of the governor's so-called turnaround agenda, which includes worker compensation reforms and a local property tax freeze.

"We are involved in a historic struggle between two branches of government," he said on the House floor.

The bill removes a $1,350 per legislator pay increase, saving the state $238,950. Following the vote, Rauner's office released a statement making it clear that he is still pushing for structural reforms. Last month, he vetoed most of the $36 billion budget passed by Democrats because it was short about $4 billion in revenue.

Illinois has a chronic structural budget deficit, as well as the lowest credit ratings and worst-funded pension system among the 50 states.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, Michael Madigan's daughter, is keeping the state's options open regarding a 2013 cost-saving pension reform law voided by the state supreme court in May on constitutional grounds.

Lisa Madigan asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday for an extension until Sept. 10 to file a possible appeal of the ruling by the state's high court, which rejected Illinois' argument that it needed to invoke police powers and cut pension benefits to deal with a fiscal emergency.

"With the decision in the City of Chicago's pension case late last week, we are continuing to consider all of the arguments and the best next step,” her office said in a statement.

A Cook County Circuit Court judge on Friday struck down a 2014 law aimed at shoring up the shaky finances of two Chicago retirement systems. That ruling also cited protections for public worker pensions in the Illinois Constitution.

(Reporting by Karen Pierog; Editing by Matthew Lewis

Illinois House agrees to eliminate FY 2016 lawmaker raises - Yahoo News

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Top Republican donor takes back call for Kirk to quit - Chicago Tribune

 

Hours after reportedly calling on U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk to halt his re-election bid, a major Republican fundraiser backtracked Tuesday and hailed Kirk as the party's best candidate for one of the nation's most hotly contested Senate seats.

lRelated Sen. Mark Kirk and his comments could tank GOP ticket in 2016

John Kass
See all related

8

Kirk's re-election bid complicated by controversial statements

Kirk's re-election bid complicated by controversial statements

 

Republican businessman and fundraiser Ron Gidwitz told Crain's Chicago Business that Kirk's recent misstatements and gaffes have put the Illinois GOP on the defensive. "I call on him to step aside and allow other Republicans to seek his seat," Gidwitz told Crain's.

Asked about the comments later, Gidwitz told the Chicago Tribune he believes "Mark Kirk is the strongest candidate to win the seat. I fully support his re-election." Crain's also acknowledged that Gidwitz sought to retract his earlier comments.

Still, Gidwitz's initial comments underscore the uncertainty many Republicans have privately expressed toward Kirk's re-election chances in 2016 — a presidential year in which Illinois traditionally trends Democratic.

Illustrating the early intensity of the Senate contest, Kirk has found himself facing criticism over a series of controversial statements. In February, Kirk said "coffins" should be placed outside Democratic offices if the Department of Homeland Security were to be shut down in a budget dispute.

Last month, Kirk joked over an open microphone that his colleague, Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., was a "bro with no ho" because he  was unmarried

This month, Kirk questions at a Senate panel made it sound as though he thought the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was collecting personal data on Supreme Court justices and members of Congress. Shortly before that, Kirk, an outspoken opponent to the multination Iran nuclear deal led by the White House, accused President Barack Obama of wanting to "get nukes" to the country.

Kirk apologized for the Graham comment and acknowledged that his Obama Iran comments were just "me being too carried away with" his opposition.

Kirk, who suffered a major stroke in January 2011, already was facing a difficult bid for a second term for a seat that Democrats view as one of their top targets next year.

Kirk has enlisted the resources of the Illinois Republican Party to help with his re-election, and he has the backing of GOP Gov. Bruce Rauner, whom he actively campaigned with last year.

Seeking the Democratic nomination are two-term U.S. Rep. Tammy Duckworth of Hoffman Estates and Andrea Zopp, former chairman of the Chicago Urban League. Duckworth has been endorsed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a move criticized by Zopp and her supporters.

Top Republican donor takes back call for Kirk to quit - Chicago Tribune

Gov. Rauner Asks Retirees, National Guard to Work in Case of Strike | NBC Chicago

Rauner's administration and AFSCME have been negotiating a new agreement, but the one-month extension expires Friday

By Mary Ann Ahern

 

Getty Images

Updated at 4:48 PM CDT on Monday, Jul 27, 2015

Retired state employees and members of the National Guard may be called upon by Gov. Bruce Rauner to step up in case of a workers' strike.

The governor's administration has called some retired state employees to determine if they are willing to come back on short-term contracts if workers represented by AFSCME — the state's largest union — decide to strike.

  •  

Anders Lindall, a spokesperson for AFSCME, denied the union is planning to strike, but he said the governor's attempts to reach out to "strike breakers" suggests he wants a fight.

"To see the governor out there trying to recruit strike breakers suggests he wants confrontation, he wants a crisis, he wants disruption," Lindall said.

  •  

Rauner spokeswoman Catherine Kelly did not deny that the office reached out to retired state workers and the National Guard, saying the administration is "pursuing all options."

"We are actively pursuing all options to continue important state services in the event that AFSCME chooses to strike, rather than agree to proposals similar to those recently ratified in the Teamsters," Kelly's full statement reads.

  •  

Rauner's administration and AFSCME have been negotiating a new agreement, but the one-month extension expires Friday.

Above is from:  Gov. Rauner Asks Retirees, National Guard to Work in Case of Strike | NBC Chicago

Monday, July 27, 2015

Gov't: Fiat Chrysler must offer to buy back 500,000 pickups - Yahoo News

 

DETROIT (AP) — Fiat Chrysler must offer to buy back from customers more than 500,000 Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles in the biggest such action in U.S. history as part of a costly deal with safety regulators to settle legal problems in about two dozen recalls.

The Italian-American automaker also faces a record civil fine of up to $105 million. In addition, owners of more than a million older Jeeps with vulnerable rear-mounted gas tanks will be able to trade them in or be paid by Chrysler to have the vehicles repaired.

The settlement is the latest sign that auto safety regulators are taking a more aggressive approach toward companies that fail to disclose defects or don't properly conduct a recall.

The Ram pickups, which are the company's top-selling vehicle, have defective steering parts that can cause drivers to lose control. Some previous repairs have been unsuccessful, so Fiat Chrysler agreed to the buyback, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Owners also have the option of getting them repaired, the agency said in documents released Sunday.

The older Jeeps have fuel tanks located behind the rear axle, with little to shield them in a rear crash. They can rupture and spill gasoline, causing a fire. At least 75 people have died in crash-related fires, although Fiat Chrysler maintains they are as safe as comparable vehicles from the same era.

Both the Jeep and Ram measures are part of a larger settlement between the government and the automaker over allegations of misconduct in 23 recalls covering more than 11 million vehicles. Besides the civil penalty, which was reported Saturday by The Associated Press, Fiat Chrysler agreed to an independent recall monitor and strict federal oversight. It's another step in NHTSA's effort to right itself after being criticized for lapses in some highly-publicized safety recalls.

"Today's action holds Fiat Chrysler accountable for its past failures, pushes them to get unsafe vehicles repaired or off the roads and takes concrete steps to keep Americans safer going forward," Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in the statement.

In a separate statement, Fiat Chrysler said it accepted the consequences of the agreement "with renewed resolve to improve our handling of recalls and re-establish the trust our customers place in us."

NHTSA has been involved in vehicle buybacks in the past, but never one of this size. A buyback usually happens when a problem is so serious that it can't be fixed and the vehicles need to be removed from service.

Under the agreement, Fiat Chrysler has to buy back the Ram trucks for the purchase price, minus depreciation.

It's unclear just how many Rams the automaker will have to repurchase, but the cash outlay could be substantial. According to Kelly Blue Book, a 2010 Dodge Ram 1500 — one of the smaller, less-expensive trucks involved in the recalls — could fetch $20,000 in a dealer trade-in, assuming the truck has 60,000 miles on it and is in "good" condition. At that rate, if Chrysler had to buy back even a quarter of the trucks at issue, it could spend $2.5 billion.

Fiat Chrysler said more than 60 percent of the trucks already have been fixed, and the company is allowed to repair and resell the trucks it buys back.

The Jeep trade-ins could add to the tab, but they also could generate more new vehicle sales by getting customers into showrooms. Still, the total could strain the parent company, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV. The company posted a first-quarter net profit of $101 million and had more than $20 billion in cash and securities on March 31.

The consent order that Fiat Chrysler agreed to requires it to notify owners who are eligible for buybacks and other incentives.

Models included in the buyback offer are certain Ram 1500s from 2009 to 2012; the Ram 1500 Mega Cab 4 by 4 from 2008; and the Ram 2500 4 by 4, 3500 4 by 4, 4500 4 by 4, and 5500 4 by 4, all from 2008 through 2012. Also part of the offer are 2009 Chrysler Aspen and Dodge Durango SUVs and the Dodge Dakota pickup from 2009 through 2011.

The fine against FCA beats the old record of $70 million assessed against Honda Motor Co. for lapses in recalls of air bags made by Takata Corp.

Fiat Chrysler also received a $70 million fine, and must spend at least $20 million to meet performance requirements detailed in the agreement. Another $15 million could come due if the recall monitor finds any further violations.

Earlier this month, the safety agency held a rare public hearing where regulators detailed a litany of shortfalls: failure to notify customers of recalls, delays in making and distributing repair parts and in some cases failing to come up with repairs that fix the problems. Some of the recalls date to 2011.

___

Gov't: Fiat Chrysler must offer to buy back 500,000 pickups - Yahoo News

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Rauner administration asking if state retirees would work in event of strike - News - Journal Star - Peoria, IL

 

By Doug Finke of GateHouse Media Illinois

Posted Jul. 25, 2015 at 9:04 PM

SPRINGFIELD — The administration of Gov. Bruce Rauner has been contacting retired state employees to determine if they would be willing to return to work on short-term contracts in the event of a strike.
The calls apparently have been made over the last several weeks as the Rauner administration and the largest state employee union, Council 31 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, have continued negotiations on a new labor agreement.
David Scheina, 65, of rural Sangamon County said he got a call from an administrator at the Department of Children and Family Services about two weeks ago. He was not available to take the call, and the employee left a voice mail message.
“The message asked me to call her back if I was interested in going to work should the possibility occur that the employees go out on strike,” Scheina said.
Scheina said he did not return the call.
“I was somewhat appalled by it,” he said. “I feel it was wrong, an employee on state time trying to line up retirees to cross a potential picket line that I didn’t see being suggested. I thought it wasn’t bargaining in good faith.”
Scheina retired three years ago after a 25-year career in state government. Most of that time he worked at DCFS. He said that during his career he’s held positions that were both union and non-union.
“I think it’s important that the retirees also understand that these negotiations have an impact on their future also,” Scheina added. “Our medical and dental and vision care benefits could still be on the table.”

Rauner administration asking if state retirees would work in event of strike - News - Journal Star - Peoria, IL

Saturday, July 25, 2015

10 States to Earn a Bigger Paycheck

 

10 States to Earn a Bigger Paycheck

1. Illinois

 

DowntownChicagoILatNight

 

 

With an adjusted-average income of about $42,000, Illinois grabs the top spot as the best state for making a living . While the state’s unemployment rate remains high at 8.9 percent, Illinoisans benefit from reasonably high average wages, low state taxes, and a below-average cost of living.

SEE MORE GO TO:  10 States to Earn a Bigger Paycheck