Thursday, November 2, 2017

FBI plants bull's-eye on GM, Ford as UAW scandal widens


image

Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press Published 1:01 p.m. ET Nov. 2, 2017

Pause

0:17

0:58

Fullscreen

The intertwined lives of a UAW official and a Fiat Chrysler executive

Over a period of years, former Fiat Chrysler executive Al Iacobelli and former UAW Vice President General Holiefield helped to save Chrysler and then stole millions intended for worker training, authorities say. Wochit

FBI probe into crooked dealings between UAW and auto execs now involves FCA, GM and Ford. At issue is whether training funds tied to all three automakers were stolen

636452244096334924-GM-Ford.jpg

(Photo: Associated Press/Getty Images)

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 6 COMMENTEMAILMORE

The FBI's probe into financial shenanigans by UAW and auto executives has extended to General Motors and Ford, which join FCA in a growing scandal that focuses on stolen training funds, according to a source familiar with the investigation.

At the heart of the probe is whether funds that were meant to train autoworkers at all three companies were instead secretly funneled to union officials and auto executives who were scheming together to line their own pockets.

Since the investigation surfaced four months ago, criminal charges have been filed against two FCA officials and three UAW officials, including ex-FCA Vice President Alphons Iacobelli and Monica Morgan-Holified, the widow of the late UAW Vice President General Holiefield. The pair, along with others, are accused of  siphoning millions of dollars from a UAW training center and spending it on themselves, buying everything from luxury vehicles to $35,000 Mont Blanc ink pens.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles headquarters, located inBuy Photo

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles headquarters, located in Auburn Hills, left, and UAW headquarters. (Photo: Detroit Free Press)

The Free Press has now learned that the FBI is also eyeing at least one GM official for similar conduct, and is looking into the financial records of  training centers that are funded by GM and Ford with the goal of training union autoworkers.

“We are cooperating with the inquiry,"  Kelli Felker, manufacturing & labor communications manager at Ford, said in a statement. "We are confident in the UAW-Ford National Programs Center leadership team and the policies and procedures used to govern the program operations that benefit approximately 57,000 members of our UAW-Ford hourly workforce.”

GM also is cooperating, stating:  "We have been contacted by the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Attorney’s Office regarding an investigation into the UAW-GM Center for Human Resources. We are fully cooperating with the investigation."

The UAW declined comment on the latest development, but has emphasized that the union continues to cooperate with the investigation.

As first reported by the Detroit News, the FBI's latest targets in the probe include Joe Ashton, 69, a retired UAW vice president who was appointed to GM’s board in 2014, and Cindy Estrada, Ashton's successor who oversaw the union’s GM department.

Neither could be reached for comment this morning.

Related:

Feds: UAW and FCA execs laundered money through fake hospice center

Feds: Bargaining rivals stole millions from FCA; kept UAW officials 'fat, dumb and happy'

So far, the investigation has focused on allegations that FCA auto executives and UAW officials ran a sophisticated money laundering scheme,  The executives allegedly stole money from the training center, then funneled it to themselves through various organizations, including a children's charity called the Leave the Light On Foundation and the Hospice of Metropolitan Detroit.

As prosecutors alleged in court documents, the scam was part of a bigger goal by at  FCA execs to keep UAW officials "fat, dumb and happy." And the schemers were careful not to get caught, they said, claiming they warned one another not to leave a paper trail about what was going on.

According to court documents, the training center was funded by FCA and received between $13 million  and $31 million a year.  Prosecutors say least $4.5 million of that money was misspent.

Here is what the accused have been charged with:

The Rochester Hills home of Al Iacobelli

The Rochester Hills home of Al Iacobelli (Photo: Eric D. Lawrence)

  • Iacobelli is accused of steering $1.2 million in employee-training funds to Morgan, Holiefield and others. Iacobelli also is accused of pocketing $1 million in training funds and using it to buy a Ferrari, pay off his personal American Express and Chase credit cards, buy two Mont Blanc pens at $35,700 each, install a swimming pool, outdoor kitchen and spa at his Rochester Hills home. 
  • Morgan, whose photo business allegedly once received $70,000 from a charity that was supposed to help children struggling with hardships. The government claims the charity was really a sham, set up by Holifield and Iacobelli.
  • Virdell King, 65, of Detroit, the first African-American female to be elected president of a local union in UAW-Chrysler's history.  She is accused of buying designer shoes, clothing, jewelry and luggage using credit cards that were issued through the UAW-Chrysler National Training Center. King also is accused of making more than $40,000 in additional purchases that pampered other senior UAW officials, including a shotgun, golf equipment, luggage, concert tickets, theme park tickets and other items.
  • Jerome Durden of Rochester, a financial analyst at FCA who allegedly helped conceal the fraud. He pleaded guilty to his role in the scheme and faces up to five years in prison.

UAW and FCA officials have said that no labor contracts were  perverted by the alleged scandal. Prosecutors have said they don't know if that happened, but that laws were broken: auto executives were giving things to union officials when the law prohibits that.

Fiat Chrysler officials declined comment on the latest developments, but FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne has previously expressed “disgust” at the alleged conduct and called it the “most egregious breach of trust by the individuals involved.”

"These acts were of course neither known nor sanctioned by FCA US," Marchionne has previously stated. "In fact, upon learning of some possible malfeasance in June 2015, the company investigated and, once credible evidence of wrongdoing was discovered, the individuals involved were immediately separated from the company."

Iacobelli, who had led the company's contract talks with the UAW in 2011, abruptly resigned one month before he was set to lead negotiations on a new four-year contract with the UAW in 2015.

"This conduct had nothing whatsoever to do with the collective bargaining process," Marchionne previously said, "but rather involved two bad actors who apparently saw an opportunity to misappropriate funds entrusted to their control and who, unfortunately, co-opted other individuals to carry out or conceal their activities over a period of several years."

The U.S. Attorney's office and FBI both declined comment.

Free Press reporters Eric Lawrence and Phoebe Wall Howard contributed to this report.

Above is from:  http://www.freep.com/story/news/2017/11/02/uaw-scandal-gm-ford/824911001/

House Dems sue for records on Trump Hotel lease


Michael Isikoff

20 minutes ago


The Trump International Hotel is shown on Aug. 10, 2017 in Washington, DC. The hotel, located blocks from the White House, has become both a tourist attraction in the nation’s capital and also a symbol of President Trump’s intermingling of business and politics. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON – All seventeen Democratic members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today filed a novel lawsuit against the Trump administration to force it to turn over documents about the Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C.—records, they say, that will reveal details about how the president is personally profiting while in office.

The lawsuit represents the latest legal challenge to Trump’s controversial decision to retain ownership of his international real estate firm, which operates the Trump Hotel in a building leased from the government’s General Services Administration.

“This hotel is not just a building with Donald Trump’s name on it,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the ranking Democrat on the House committee.  “It is a glaring symbol of the Trump Administration’s lack of accountability and a daily reminder of the refusal by Republicans in Congress to do their job.  This may be standard operating procedure in foreign countries—but not here.  Not in America.”

Guided by a Georgetown law professor, the Democrats are employing an unusual legal tactic to get Trump Hotel records: they are using an obscure law, enacted during the presidency of Calvin Coolidge, that authorizes any seven members of the House oversight panel to obtain records from a federal agency.

The Trump Hotel has been a lightening rod for the president’s critics ever since he took office last January . Almost immediately, the GSA stopped providing Congress with regular updates on the hotel’s expenses and profits under its government lease.

Nevertheless, some records about the hotel’s operations have surfaced: In August, the GSA “inadvertently” posted “privileged and confidential” documents showing the hotel earned $1.97 million in profits during the first four months of this year. The business has become a favorite of lobbying groups and foreign governments seeking to influence the administration.

The documents showing the hotel’s profits have since been removed from the GSA website and no further updates have been made available to the public or Congress. The GSA did not respond to requests for comment from Yahoo News about the removal of the records or the filing of the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks GSA documents including monthly expense records so the committee can investigate “whether the Office of the Presidency is being used for private gain” and “the extent to which the Trump Hotel is receiving payments from foreign governments,” according to a “fact sheet” explaining the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Washington. The panel also wants to see records relating to why the GSA reversed an earlier legal interpretation of the lease, which prohibits any “elected official of the Government of the United States” from sharing in the profits of the hotel.

The lawsuit is not the first to be filed over Trump’s business operations while he is serving as president.  Three other suits have been filed contending that the president is receiving unconstitutional “emoluments” from foreign governments through his ownership of the hotel.

A judge in New York is currently weighing a motion by the Justice Department to dismiss one of the suits on the grounds that the plaintiffs, including a liberal legal group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, lack standing to bring the case because they can’t show they have been injured by the president’s conduct.

But the new lawsuit being brought Thursday by the House members is significant because, if it survives a court challenge, it could give congressional Democrats new leverage to pry documents out of the Trump administration on a host of other issues.

Their case relies on a little known law known as the “seven member” statute. Enacted in 1928 and signed by President Calvin Coolidge, it provides that any seven members of the principal House oversight committee can request—and receive–  reports and documents from federal agencies.

The law has only occasionally been used over the years—with varying results. Rep. Dennis Hastert (a future Speaker of the House) and Rob Portman (now a U.S. Senator), both Republicans, successfully invoked the law in 1994 to obtain documents about a Texas savings and loan from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

But in 2006, when Rep. Henry Waxman, then ranking Democrat on the House panel, along with other Democrats, filed a lawsuit under the “seven member” statute to obtain Medicare records from the Bush administration, they lost on the grounds they lacked “standing” to bring the case. (Before the Democrats had a chance to appeal, they regained control of the House that year and the case became moot.)

David C. Vladeck, a Georgetown law professor who drafted the complaint being filed today, said the House Democratic case gained new traction last summer after the GSA notified Cummings in a letter it would refuse to turn over records about the Trump Hotel. In doing so, a GSA official cited a new Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel opinion that the administration would only produce records when requested by a full committee or subcommittee (currently controlled by Republicans.)

“Individual members of Congress, including ranking minority members, do not have the authority to conduct oversight in the absence of a specific delegation by a full house, committee, or subcommittee,” the Justice Department legal opinion read.

“They basically said, ‘we’re not going to give the stuff to Democrats,’” said Vladeck. But in so doing, he argued, they ignored the fine print in the 89-year-old “seven member statute” and gave the Democrats new grounds to bring their lawsuit.

Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-dems-sue-records-trump-hotel-lease-160856792.html

Plote Contempt Case may actually be going to trial?

UPDATE:  Case to continue now on December 13, 2017.


Or perhaps there will be a settlement on November 14

The following is from:  http://www.judici.com/courts/cases/case_information.jsp?court=IL004015J&ocl=IL004015J,2014CH170,IL004015JL2014CH170D1

My reading of the case information from the website is that there are two hearings in mid-November and then the case  goes to trial in December.  If anyone knows more please let me know.

The highlighted items should clue you into what’s happening.

2014CH170 PLOTE CONSTRUCTION, INC

Case Information

Case
2014CH170  
Last Update
10/30/2017
Last Upload
10/30/2017 @ 11:55

Case Category
Civil
Case Type - Subtype
CH - 101
Chancery - Injunction

Other Litigants

Role
Name

Defendant/Respondent
BELVIDERE MATERIALS, LLC

Defendant/Respondent
CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST COMPANY

Plaintiff/Petitioner
COUNTY OF BOONE

Litigant Information

Full Name
PLOTE CONSTRUCTION, INC

Date of Birth
Role
Defendant/Respondent
Physical File Location

Impounded
No
Initial Open Date
08/21/2014


Attorney
FULLER, WARREN R  


10 - Motion hearing
08/29/2014
9:00 A.M.
YOUNG  
3

82 - Motion/substitute
08/29/2014
9:00 A.M.
YOUNG  
3

35 - Status hearing
09/18/2014
1:30 P.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
11/13/2014
1:30 P.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
11/13/2014
2:13 P.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
01/15/2015
9:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
04/14/2015
9:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
05/12/2015
9:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
06/02/2015
9:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

23 - Petition hearing
07/07/2015
9:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

23 - Petition hearing
07/28/2015
10:00 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
08/17/2015
8:45 A.M.
TOBIN  
1

35 - Status hearing
08/21/2015
3:00 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

10 - Motion hearing
10/26/2015
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

115 - Decision
11/23/2015
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI
  
2

10 - Motion hearing
01/25/2016
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
02/08/2016
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
04/11/2016
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
04/25/2016
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
10/24/2016
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
02/13/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
05/08/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
07/10/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
08/14/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
10/05/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
11/14/2017
11:00 A.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

35 - Status hearing
11/17/2017
11:00 A.M.
NICOLOSI
  
2

2 - Bench trial
12/11/2017
9:00 A.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

2 - Bench trial
12/11/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

2 - Bench trial
12/12/2017
9:00 A.M.
NICOLOSI  
2

2 - Bench trial
12/14/2017
1:30 P.M.
NICOLOSI  

Partial History

11/17/2017
SA Smith pres. No other parties appears. By agreement 12/11/17 date is stricken and case is cont to 12/13/17 at 11am. See Order ORDER

PJN


10/30/2017
Status hearing set for 11/14/2017 at 11:00 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

10/27/2017
SA Smith pres. No other party appears. By agreement, case cont to 11-14-17 at 11:00 a.m. for possible settlement. ORDER
UNASSIGNED

10/23/2017
Status hearing set for 11/17/2017 at 11:00 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

10/05/2017
Status hearing set for 10/27/2017 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

10/05/2017
SA Smith pres for Pl. Atty Fuller pres for Def. Case comes on for status. By agreement, case cont to 10-27-17 at 1:30 p.m. for status on possible settlement.
PJN

08/14/2017
ASA Karla Maville and SA Tricia Smith pres for the pl. Atty Fuller pres for defs. Case comes on for status. By agreement, case is set for status on 10/5/17 at 1:30 p.m. By agreement, the bench trial dates are set as follows: 12/11/17 at 9:00 a.m. for a full day, 12/12/17 at 9:00 a.m. for the entire morning, and if needed, on 12/14/17 at 1:30 p.m. for the entire afternoon. See Order. ORDER
PJN

07/19/2017
Notice of Filing Plaintiff's Response to Supreme Court Rule 213(f) Interrogatories Directed to Plaintiff, County of Boone Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Second Rule 214 Production Request Directed to Plaintiff, County of Boone
UNASSIGNED

07/10/2017
SA Smith pres for pl. No other party appears. Case comes on for status. By agreement, case is cont'd to 8/14/17 at 1:30 p.m. for further status. AGREED ORDER
PJN

05/25/2017
MANDATE The Judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.
UNASSIGNED

05/08/2017
Status hearing set for 07/10/2017 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

05/08/2017
SA Smith pres for Pl. Atty Fuller pres for Defs. Case comes on for status. Court is advised that the Appellate Court-Second District will issue it's mandate 35 days from 4-20-17. Case cont to 7-10-17 at 1:30 p.m. for further status. ORDER
PJN

02/13/2017
Status hearing set for 05/08/2017 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

02/13/2017
SA Smith pres for Pl. Atty Andrew Fuller pres for Defs. Case comes on for status. By agreement, case cont to 5-8-17 at 1:30 p.m. for further status. ORDER
PJN

10/26/2016
Status hearing set for 02/13/2017 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

10/24/2016
ASA Goulart pres for Pl. No other party appears. By agreement, case cont to 2-13-17 at 1:30 p.m. for status. ORDER
PJN

10/24/2016
Court Correspondence
UNASSIGNED

04/25/2016
Status hearing set for 10/24/2016 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

04/25/2016
SA Courier pres for Pl. Atty Andrew Fuller pres for Defs. Case comes on for status. Upon hearing arguments of counsel and reviewing briefs, Court hereby grants Def's request for stay. The hearing scheduled for 5-9-15 is stricken. Case cont to 10-24-16 at 1:30 p.m. for status on appeal. ORDER
PJN

04/22/2016
Notice of Filing Boone County's Response to Defendant's Claim for Stay
UNASSIGNED

04/18/2016
Defendants Brief in Support of Objections to Proceed and Claim of Stay
UNASSIGNED

04/12/2016
Status hearing set for 04/25/2016 at 1:30 in courtroom 2.
UNASSIGNED

04/11/2016
SA Courier pres for Pl. Atty Andrew Fuller pres for Defs. Case comes on for status. State represents that they are ready to proceed for hearing on 5-9-16. Def objects due to the filing of an appeal. Argument heard. Case remains set for hearing on 5-9-16 at 1:30 p.m. Case is also set on 4-25-16 at 1:30 p.m. for status on the appeal issue. Def has until 4-15-16 to submit a brief in its position. Pl has 7 days thereafter (4-22-16) to submit a response. ORDER Receipt for payment on contempt fine ($3000.00)
PJN

2 


For information regarding the issues involved in the case go to the following postings: 

http://boonecountywatchdog.blogspot.com/2014/12/county-seeks-injunctive-relief.html

http://boonecountywatchdog.blogspot.com/2016/03/is-plote-now-appealing-their-contempt.html

http://boonecountywatchdog.blogspot.com/2016/02/status-of-plote-case.html

Monday, October 30, 2017

Manafort/Gates Indictment; Popadopoulos Plea


Manafort/Gates Indictment  GO TO:  https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download


Popadopoulos guilty plea GO TO:  https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download   The facts are fairly well laid out.




Trump Campaign Foreign Policy Adviser Pleads Guilty In Russia Probe


WASHINGTON ― A foreign policy adviser to President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has pleaded guilty to a charge of lying to FBI agents.

WASHINGTON ― A foreign policy adviser to President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has pleaded guilty to a charge of lying to FBI agents.

George Papadopoulos, 30, pleaded guilty on Oct. 5, but the case wasn’t unsealed until Monday, when two other Trump associates were indicted by a federal grand jury.

Papadopoulos reached a plea deal with prosecutors, and has since been cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Prosecutors’ statement of the offense alleges Papadopoulos “made material false statements and material omissions” during a Jan. 27 interview with the FBI. He was arrested July 27. Prosecutors agreed to recommend between no prison time to six months under the plea agreement.

Papadopoulos told the FBI an overseas professor had “told him about the Russians possessing ‘dirt’ on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’ but stated multiple times that he learned that information prior to joining the campaign,” according to court documents. In fact, Papadopoulos was contacted after he learned he’d be joining the campaign, and the professor only mentioned the “thousands of emails” after he’d been on the Trump campaign for more than a month.

The professor, the statement indicates, had “substantial connections to Russian government officials” even though Papadopoulos claimed the professor was “a nothing.”

Papadopoulos, The Washington Post reported earlier, is a 2009 graduate of DePaul University. Previously, he was an adviser to Ben Carson’s presidential campaign and was the U.S. representative at the Geneva International Model United Nations in 2012.

Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/nyt-manafort-gates-told-surrender-mueller-probe-122235635--politics.html

This is a developing story. Check back for updates at YAHOO

  • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Illinois House overrides veto of bill requiring monthly reports on state’s debt


Chicago News 10/25/2017, 09:25pm

Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza meeting with the Sun-Times Editorial Board in September. File Photo. | Rich Hein/Sun-Times

Tina Sfondeles


SPRINGFIELD—Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza is one step closer to gaining the ability to get a closer look at the state’s giant pile of unpaid bills on a monthly basis — a move the Democrat achieved with unanimous support on Wednesday in an Illinois House veto override.

The Illinois Senate plans to take up the override in November.

The Debt Transparency Act would require state agencies to report monthly the amount of bills being held, liabilities that are being appropriated and liabilities that may have late interest penalties. State agencies currently submit their unpaid bills once a year in October.

The state’s bill backlog is at a staggering $16.5 billion, according to the comptroller’s office.

“The one person in the state responsible for managing through any type of fiscal crisis or even good times fiscally has very limited visibility on the financials for the state of Illinois. It doesn’t make any sense,” Mendoza said after the House override.

Mendoza called it “an almost impossible task” to safeguard taxpayer dollars and manage cash or debt management without being able to see the bills more transparently.

Rauner vetoed the measure on Aug. 18, saying “the inclination” to be more transparent about the state’s finances is a “good one.” But he said her bill “more closely resembles an attempt by the Comptroller to micromanage executive agencies than an attempt to get the information most helpful to the monitoring of state government.”

Rauner too said it would divert limited funds and staff attention from their main duties in providing services to Illinois citizens.



Though the veto message appeared to take a political shot at Mendoza, bill sponsor state Rep. Fred Crespo, D-Hoffman Estates, said the intent of the bill wasn’t a continuation of the Mendoza-Rauner war.

“I know on her end I can attest to this, it was never political. It’s just doing the right thing,” Crespo said.

Also on Wednesday, the House voted to override Rauner’s veto of a bill that would stop employers from asking for wage histories from job applicants. Proponents of the bill said it was intended to try to narrow the pay gap between men and women by keeping low salaries from following them to a next job. The House also voted to override a veto of a bill that requires that cursive writing be taught in schools, with its main sponsor arguing cursive can be used for note taking, signing documents and reading historical texts. The governor vetoed it because he said it was an unfunded mandate on schools. Both of those bills now head to the Senate.

And a bill heralded by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan to establish a Student Loan Bill of Rights was also overridden by the House and now heads to the Senate. It was created as a way to address widespread abuses and failures in the student loan industry, which were revealed by Madigan’s investigation and lawsuit against Navient, one of the country’s largest student loan companies.


Above is from:  https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/house-overrides-veto-of-bill-requiring-monthly-reports-on-states-debt/

Women are sending President Trump their birth control bills


Jennifer Gerson Uffalussy,Yahoo Beauty 13 hours ago


Many women are none too thrilled about the Trump administration’s new rules that roll back the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — the part of Barack Obama’s health care bill that guaranteed insurance plans would cover all forms of prescription birth control with a zero-dollar co-pay for women — and, starting today, they are sending their bills straight to President Trump.

Donald Trump on Oct. 23, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Getty Images)

Keep Birth Control Copay Free campaign created a digital invoice generator for women to send the White House a bill for what birth control would cost should their employers move to end their no-cost contraception coverage.

One simply enters their FDA-approved form of prescription contraception, and the campaign’s online tool calculates the average annual cost — $600 for oral contraceptives, $800 for an implant, and $1,111 for an IUD.  And then the invoice generator immediately sends the bill to Trump and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Women at a birth control protest in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Getty Images)

Each invoice generated through the campaign’s tool will also be submitted to the Federal Register as an official comment opposing the new birth control rules. The comment period on the new rules will end on Dec. 5, 2017.

Kristen Bell, Gloria Steinem, Kate Walsh, Martha Plimpton, Sasheer Zamata, Ana Gasteyer, Margaret Cho, Franchesca Ramsey, and Cecily Strong are just some of the boldface names of women who have come out to endorse the campaign — and would really love for you to send an invoice to President Trump.

The cost of birth control pills is $600 per year. This is an example of the invoice the Keep Birth Control Copay Free campaign will send to President Trump. (Photo: Keep Birth Control Copay Free)

The ACA, known colloquially as Obamacare, made no-cost contraception accessible to 62.4 million American women, saving these women an estimated $1.4 billion annually.

“Women are tired of footing the bill for male politicians’ attacks on essential reproductive health care,” said Amy Runyon-Harms, the Keep Birth Control Copay Free campaign coordinator. “Together, we are pushing back against President Trump’s dangerous political decision to reduce access to birth control, and today we are sending him the bill.”

Polling released in March 2017 by nonpartisan research firm PerryUndem found that 75 percent of all voters consider birth control to be a part of preventive health care for women, with 85 percent of women voters in agreement with that.

Furthermore, 33 percent of women of reproductive age polled said they could not afford to pay more than $10 a month for birth control. Fourteen percent said they could not afford it at any price should they have to pay for it out of pocket today.

And 68 percent of voters said that Congress and President Trump’s top health care priority should be lowering people’s out-of-pocket costs — in other words, the exact opposite of what these new birth control rules stand to do.

Polling released this month by the Small Business Majority found that 71 percent of female small-business owners say health insurance issuers should be required to include birth control coverage in their health plans, with this majority opinion extending across all political, racial, religious, and age lines. And 56 percent of these women business owners said that the ability to access birth control and to decide if and when to have children allowed them to advance in their careers and start their own businesses.

However, Heritage Foundation research associate Melanie Israel told Yahoo Lifestyle this month that the Obamacare mandate was “onerous,” and a ”burden on employers, individuals, and religious organizations who, because of their beliefs concerning the protection of unborn human life, are faced with the decision to violate sincerely held religious or moral beliefs, pay steep fines, or forgo offering or obtaining health insurance entirely.”

Above is from:  https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/women-sending-president-trump-birth-control-bills-135938134.html

President Trump may be focused on saving coal miners, but solar continues to be the hot spot in today's jobs market.


Solar employment expanded last year 17 times faster than the total US economy, according to an International Renewable Energy Agency report published on Wednesday that cited data from the Solar Foundation.

Overall, more than 260,000 people work in the solar industry, up by 24% from 2015.


The solar business has benefited from the falling cost of solar energy and generous federal tax credits that make it more affordable for businesses and homeowners to install solar panels.

"It seems to be one of the few areas of high-paying, blue-collar jobs -- and you don't have to learn to code," said Bryan Birsic, CEO of Wunder Capital, a fintech company that allows investors to help finance solar panel installations.

Awareness is also up as Americans concerned about climate change look for cleaner energy options. Elon Musk has helped add to the solar buzz. Musk's Tesla recently started taking orders for solar roofs that is made of shingles to ease concerns that solar panels are ugly.

Most solar workers are in the installation business, the IREA report showed. Other leading jobs include manufacturing, project development, sales and research-and-development.

Related: Elon Musk's plan to make every solar roof beautiful

Men have most of the jobs in solar, but that is starting to change, especially in the sales business. Women now hold 28% of solar jobs, up from 19% in 2013, IREA said. By comparison, women make up just under half of the US workforce.

Solar isn't the only hot part of the clean energy job market -- wind jobs grew by 28%. About one-quarter of the roughly 102,000 jobs in the wind business are in manufacturing.

Both solar and wind scored a big victory in December 2015 when Congress decided to extend renewable tax credits that were set to expire.

The coal mining industry is grappling with far tougher conditions right now. Almost half of US coal jobs have disappeared just since the end of 2011, according to a Columbia University study. Kentucky, a state that overwhelmingly voted for Trump, lost an incredible 64% of its coal jobs over that span.

Attempting to revive coal jobs, Trump has signed executive orders aimed at easing the regulatory burden on the industry. But Columbia's study warned that Trump's regulation-busting is unlikely to spark a revival because coal's main problem is the abundance of cheap natural gas, not regulation.

Related: Why Trump's coal promises are doomed

Besides being better for the environment, the solar industry is considered to be fairly labor intensive.

Wunder Capital's Birsic said that's because unlike fossil fuels, solar energy in the form of sunlight is available in many environments naturally. That allows for more costs to go towards paying workers to install, manufacture and sell solar panels.

"Sunshine is free. You don't have to bring sunshine out there in the desert," said Birsic.

Solar costs have also come down dramatically. Birsic estimates that solar energy was 50% more expensive just five years ago. "It's showing no signs of stopping," he said.

While renewable energy job growth has slowed globally in recent years due to declines in Japan and Europe, IREA believes it will accelerate again. The group predicted that global renewable energy employment will nearly triple by 2030 to 24 million.

"The scales continue to tip in favor of renewables," the report said.

CNNMoney (New York) First published May 24, 2017: 12:52 PM ET