Friday, September 18, 2015

AP Exclusive: Highly paid Rauner aides did work for governor while on comptroller's payroll

 

SPRINGFIELD, Illinois — Three government administrators began working on hiring employees for Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner's administration last winter while on the comptroller's office payroll, using taxpayer dollars from a separate constitutional office before Rauner had even taken the state's reins.

Rauner, a Republican who promised to clean up clout-laced government hiring, relied on at least three comptroller employees to get his administration running, including recommending candidates for politically affiliated jobs, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. Two went on to become senior Rauner managers, including one who oversees hiring for the governor's office.

Rauner aides say the practice was an appropriate and efficient way to get the new administration up and running, and that the comptroller's independent inspector general gave approval in advance. But political experts and reform advocates say the practice was improper and breached divisions between constitutional offices.

"You want to help out the governor? Do it on your time, on your nickel," said Kent Redfield, an expert on political ethics at the University of Illinois-Springfield. "To me, that's pretty clearly wrong. One of the functions of the state comptroller's office is not to act as an HR department for the governor's office."

A new governor's transition costs are typically covered by private funds. So, the use of comptroller employees by the multimillionaire former venture capitalist, who vowed to "shake up" how Springfield does business, raises questions about whether he didn't want to be hampered by bureaucratic restraints or was cutting corners and blurring lines set up to prevent conflicts between separate units of government.

Rauner spokesman Lance Trover scoffed at the reproach, emphasizing the inspector general's blessing.

"Only in Illinois do you get attacked for doing things the right way," he said.

It's impossible to say how many taxpayer dollars, appropriated for the comptroller's job of paying the state's bills, financed the work of Judith McAnarney and Matthew Magalis, who were were setting up meetings with Cabinet-level agencies and discussing applicants to fill jobs during the workday while Rauner was still a private citizen.

The emails reviewed by the AP came from a half-dozen state agencies under a Freedom of Information Act request. But 20 agencies — including the comptroller's office — are keeping related documents secret, despite Rauner's pledge of government transparency.

Redfield called the situation improper, if not illegal. The state Constitution bars using tax dollars for private purposes, he said, suggesting the situation could fall into that realm, particularly because Rauner wasn't sworn in until Jan. 12.

"It raises ethical issues," he said. "It's better to have bright-line distinctions and if you start justifying getting into gray areas on the basis of whether it's for a 'good cause' or a person's 'motives are good,' that's a slippery slope."

Inspectors general for each constitutional office routinely investigate and recommend discipline for employees who abuse work time, engage in activities outside their job descriptions or conduct political tasks.

The pre-approval by Michael Drake, appointed 10 years ago by a Democratic comptroller, allowed the transition committee to use "experienced government human resource professionals with bipartisan backgrounds to ensure state hiring was done legally and appropriately," Trover said.

Brad Hahn, chief of staff to current GOP Comptroller Leslie Munger, released a letter from Drake dated Nov. 24, 2014, in which he OK'd transition-team participation by Nancy Kimme, chief of staff for late Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka, whom officials said had approved before her death in December. "Gov. Rauner will need critical advice from qualified people within government," he wrote. The letter does not mention McAnarney, Magalis or other comptroller employees, saying to Kimme, "It is likely that you will need to perform transition committee tasks while on state time."

The emails began in mid-December, about six weeks after the Rauner won the election. State ethics law prohibits political activity on state time, but the emails indicate that, in many cases, McAnarney and Magalis were discussing positions that are exempt from hiring rules — meaning the governor may fill the posts based on political considerations.

McAnarney had been a contractual employee making $55 per hour; now she is Rauner's $115,000-a-year human resources manager. Magalis, a human resources manager who made $95,000 with the comptroller, became the Transportation Department's chief of staff with a $120,000 salary.

Kimme is mentioned rarely in the emails, although one dated Dec. 16, 2014, from McAnarney invites the Department of Veterans Affairs' chief of staff to a discussion about personnel issues in Kimme's Chicago office. Kimme did not respond to a request for comment.

McAnarney and Magalis communicated with at least two dozen state agencies, six of which provided documents in response to the FOIA request. Another 22 reported having no relevant documents. The 20 agencies refusing to disclose relevant records overwhelmingly contended that the documents may be withheld under an exemption for "preliminary" records, in which officials express opinions or formulate policy.

None of the FOIA denials addressed whether the comptroller's office has the authority to engage in discussions with state agencies over hiring that belongs to the governor.

"They have their own duties as members of the comptroller's staff," said David Melton, executive director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform. "That is what they're supposed to be doing on state time."


Contact Political Writer John O'Connor at https://twitter.com/apoconnor

AP Exclusive: Highly paid Rauner aides did work for governor while on comptroller's payroll

Cupich to Chicago union workers: 'I am with you' - Story | WFLD

 

CHICAGO (FOX 32 News) - Chicago is considered to be expensive because the cost of doing business in the area, which often includes higher wages won by labor unions.

But Archbishop Blase Cupich is singing unions' praises, and they gave him a series of standing ovations on Thursday.

As FOX 32’s Political Editor Mike Flannery reports, the debate over ‘Right to Work’ has Chicago at the tipping point.

Photo

Cupich to Chicago union workers: 'I am with you'

 

Chicago at the Tipping Point

Cupich to Chicago union workers: 'I am with you'

Chicago is considered to be expensive because the cost of doing business in the area, which often includes higher wages won by labor unions.

Gov. Bruce Rauner says one way to reduce the cost of government, and the cost to taxpayers, is to reduce the power of government worker unions. Democrats oppose that.

There's now little doubt where the archbishop stands.

“I have come today to tell Chicago workers, the Catholic Church is with you. Pope Francis is with you. I am with you,” Cupich said.

Unionists at Plumbers Hall jumped to their feet when Archbishop Cupich challenged Gov. Rauner's Turnaround Agenda. The governor insists a balanced budget must include measures to save taxpayers money by weakening the bargaining power of labor unions, often called "Right to Work."

“So-called Right-to-Work laws - the Church is duty bound to challenge such efforts by raising questions based on longstanding principles. We have to ask, "Do these measures undermine the capacity of unions to organize, to represent workers and to negotiate contracts?"

While the answer is yes, that's precisely the point of Right-to-Work. Supporters argue it ultimately helps the poorest of the poor, the unemployed, by stimulating new business investment and creating more jobs.

Click to see the video:  Cupich to Chicago union workers: 'I am with you' - Story | WFLD

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Many Illinois state employees must pay cash for health care

 

SPRINGFIELD — About 150,000 Illinois state employees, retirees or dependents are or soon will be stuck paying cash up-front for medical services, according to updated numbers from the Illinois Department of Central Management Services.

Those employees are covered via the state’s self-insured program administered by groups such as Cigna and HealthLink, CMS spokeswoman Meredith Krantz said Wednesday.

About another 213,000 people are covered in fully insured programs through companies including Health Alliance, Coventry HMO and BlueAdvantage, Krantz said in an email to Illinois Network.

Those participants will be required to pay only copayments at time of service.

The fully-insured or managed-care plan providers made the decision to pay now and wait for state funds to come through, Strantz said, adding that was not by state request.

Krantz said CMS has exhausted its fiscal year 2015 revenues and, without an appropriation in place for fiscal year 2016, which began July 1, cannot make provider payments.

“Without a budget in place, there is no mechanism to pay healthcare providers,” Krantz said.

State employees first learned of the medical payment problem after CMS on Sept. 9 posted a memo on one of its Web pages.

First-term Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner and legislative Democrats remain locked in a budget impasse with the state now more than 75 days into fiscal year 2016.


RELATED

For state employees, it’s cash up front for medical services


Rauner complains the Democrats have sent him a spending plan that’s $4 billion heavier in spending than estimated revenue.

Democrats complain Rauner and the GOP have been unwilling to work with them on a plan until the governor gets movement on his own agenda items, which Democrats do not consider directly related to the annual budget.

In the meantime, without a budget Illinois is spending at a clip that could see fiscal year 2016 expenditures outstrip revenue by $5 billion or more.

The only large piece of the fiscal year 2016 budget made law this spring was the budget for primary and secondary education. The rest of the spending is is attributable to items covered by continuing appropriations, such as debt service and pension payments, and to spending demanded by consent decrees and court orders.

State Rep. Raymond Poe, R- Springfield, said his insurance is through one of the self-insured plans, and he may soon feel the financial bite, as he’s headed to Houston, Texas, for a checkup with oncologists. Poe has been battling myelodysplastic syndrome, or MDS, a slow-growing cancer.

“I know first-hand what an interruption in service will be,” Poe said. The state’s financial crisis also disturbs him because of the high number of state employees and retirees in his district, he said.

Poe said there’s plenty of blame to go around, and both parties need to get to the table and work out a budget deal.

“It’s getting past the point of being excusable, he said. “We need to move forward … (and) if that means locking us all in a room until we settle this budget, fine.”

State Rep. Mary Flowers, D-Chicago, put the onus on Rauner administration.

“I think it’s, unfortunately, the governor really just trying to put pressure on us to do what he wants us to do by not paying our bills.”

Flowers, a longtime proponent of a single-payer healthcare system, said the current situation is another example of why the single-payer method needs further exploration.

Matt Murphy of Palatine, deputy GOP leader in the Senate, said Democrats in general and specifically House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, need to accept their share of the responsibility for the budget stalemate.

“Sometimes when two people can’t get along, it really is just one of them,” said Murphy.

Many Illinois state employees must pay cash for health care

Illinois to fund services for disabled kids amid budget feud 2 - Story | WFLD

 

FOX 32's Mike Flannery contributed to this report.

CHICAGO (AP) - Illinois will begin paying for services to help young children with developmental disabilities and to assist seniors in their homes despite not having a budget in place and warnings from lawmakers that the state is spending billions more than it's taking in.

 

Illinois Comptroller Leslie Munger said Wednesday her office determined the early intervention services, provided to children up to age 3, should have been paid for under a previously issued consent decree that requires some social services be funded. In a separate action, a federal judge ruled a program that aims to help seniors avoid costly nursing home care is covered by a court order requiring state payment.

 

Politics

Illinois to fund services for disabled kids amid budget feud 2

Illinois will begin paying for services to help young children with developmental disabilities and to assist seniors in their homes despite not having a budget in place and warnings from lawmakers that the state is spending billions more than it's taking in.

Munger said she learned last week the program was "slipping through the cracks" and some providers were about to suspend programs. After consulting with attorneys, she decided payments to providers should be processed immediately and are a "relatively low amount" compared with the state's overall budget crisis.

Meanwhile, Munger is still not paying hundreds of other social service agencies, pushing them to a financial Tipping Point.

The agencies have been told to keep working and that they will be paid, if Gov. Bruce Rauner and the General Assembly ever agree on a state budget. At this point, hundreds, perhaps thousands of social service workers are losing their jobs.

Up to 70 homeless gather during the day at the South Side's Matthew House, where they can get help finding work, medical care and are served two hot meals.

“If there not here, we have nowhere to go, but on the street,” said Andre Haynes, who was released from State Prison in April.

After serving a year in state prison for selling illegal narcotics, Haynes said he had one overriding goal: never to be locked up again. He's found occasional part-time work, but not enough to be able to leave the homeless shelter.

Illinois to fund services for disabled kids amid budget feud 2 - Story | WFLD

Do you want input into the selection of a new District 100 Superintendent?

There is an on-line survey which asks for your opinion on the decision.  GO TO:  http://www.district100.com/Newsroom/Pages/Community-asked-to-complete-survey-for-superintendent-search.aspx  and complete the survey.  A survey is available in both English and Spanish.

 

 

image

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Volunteers work to improve the lives of others in Boone County - Special - Rockford Register Star - Rockford, IL

 

BELVIDERE — Good volunteers aren’t as hard to come by as you’d think, according to Diana Peterson, Boone County volunteer coordinator at the Retired Senior Volunteer Program.
“As a whole, we have over 200 volunteers all over the county in the 100 or more stations we serve,” she said, adding, “Of course we are always looking for more to add to our amazing group.”
Lutheran Social Services of Illinois manages the program, known as RSVP, for Winnebago and Boone counties. Volunteers are offered supplemental, personal liability and accident insurance at no cost as a perk for lending a hand.
Peterson’s role is that of a matchmaker. She has potential volunteers who are 55 and older fill out forms telling her about themselves and their interests.
She meets with them and shares some of the options available. Based on their personal schedules, abilities and needs, she sets them up with an organization.
RSVP serves schools, police and sheriff’s departments, the senior center, Girl and Boy Scouts, area food pantries, the Conservation District, historical center, Health Department, veterans groups, American Red Cross, American Cancer Society, AARP, the city of Belvidere and the Boone County Jail, to name a few.
“They are all wonderful programs,” Peterson said. “At the jail, our seniors work with inmates and even have developed a library for them. They teach parenting classes, self-help, math, reading, yoga, nutrition and health, and another class that helps them to re-enter the workforce after incarceration.”
A former teacher in School District 100 for 35 years, she retired for about seven months. “It didn’t take very well," she said. "I started volunteering and all of a sudden, I had a full-time job again.
“I really love the program. There’s something for everyone and we have some of the most wonderful people come in here. Our volunteers live and die for their community. It is so refreshing to see that kind of admiration for community, because you don’t see it anywhere else.”
The rewards of giving of yourself are far too numerous to list, volunteer Barbara Hammond, 82, of Caladonia, said. She has helped all over the county with various tasks both with RSVP and on her own. One of her earliest assignments was at the Keen Age Center. She was a member of the now disbanded singing group The Silver Bells.
“We used to go into nursing homes and sing to residents,” Hammond said. “There was a woman sitting in a wheelchair singing along with us. And a man, possibly her son, was standing at her side watching her and crying, just sobbing. We found out later, she hadn’t spoken more than two words a day for years.

Read more by clicking on the following:  Volunteers work to improve the lives of others in Boone County - Special - Rockford Register Star - Rockford, IL

RENEWABLE ENERGY: Wis. 'health hazard' ruling could shock wind industry -- Wednesday, September 16, 2015 -- www.eenews.net

 

Wisconsin town of fewer than 1,200 stands on the verge of sending shock waves through the wind energy industry.

Late last year, Glenmore, a rural community just south of Green Bay, persuaded its county's board of health to declare that the sounds of an eight-turbine wind farm pose a "human health hazard."

It was the first time a health board has made such a determination. Wind energy opponents from across the country seized on the decision as proof of "wind turbine syndrome," a supposed illness caused by low-frequency noise and "infrasound" that is typically undetectable to the human ear.

Local activists have continued to press the issue in hopes of shutting down the turbines, pointing to families who complain of sleep deprivation, headaches, nausea and dizziness -- symptoms similar to sea sickness. Lawns display signs saying, "Turbines kill: Birds, Bats, Communities" and "Consider How Your Turbine May Harm Your Neighbor." More than one family has moved out of their home.

Duke Energy Corp., which purchased the Shirley wind farm in 2011, has strongly pushed back against the hazard determination, pointing to a series of studies that have found no connection between infrasound and the symptoms described by the local residents. The case has caught the attention of the national wind industry, which is concerned about the precedent it could set and whether it could embolden local activists around the country. They claim it is part of a politically motivated campaign by anti-wind advocates.

Attention has now turned to the county's lead health official, who has said she will rule on the issue by the end of the year. It's unclear whether the official can force the wind farm to shut down, but if she does, Duke will be quick to challenge the decision in court.

By the end of the month, the local campaign, Duke Energy and other parties will submit binders of public comments making their cases. The local advocates appear bullish about their chances.

"Abandoned homes, sick families, continued Duke Energy ordinance violations," said Steve Deslauriers of the Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy, the principal group opposing the farm. "If this were any other industry, they would already be shut down. It is high time that wind developers are held accountable for the hell they levy upon families."

The Shirley wind farm looms large over Glenmore, with its sweeping turbines situated close to farms and family homes. It went online in December 2010 amid local opposition. Local newspapers featured opinion pieces and letters to the editor that expressed various concerns about the project, including health effects.

It produces 20 megawatts of electricity that it supplies to the utility Wisconsin Public Service Corp., enough to power 6,000 homes.

The controversy over the farm ramped up after Duke purchased it at the end of 2011. As the state was preparing to permit a larger wind farm elsewhere, it requested a study on the sound and health issues reported at the Shirley turbines.

In December 2012, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, which is an independent regulatory agency, and the environmental group Clean Wisconsin released a study that included the findings of four acousticians. The consultants spanned the ideological spectrum; some worked primarily for opponents of wind farms, while others had worked on both sides of the issue.

Homemade signs

Local advocates are posting home-made signs on their lawns in Glenmore. Photo by Noelle Straub.

The report's top-line conclusion appeared incriminating.

"The four investigating firms are of the opinion that enough evidence and hypotheses have been given herein to classify [low frequency noise] and infrasound as a serious issue, possibly affecting the future of the industry," it said.

It acknowledged that there is "sparse or non-existent" evidence of sickness in "peer-reviewed literature" but concluded that the four specialists "strongly recommend additional testing" at the Shirley farm.

Local advocates seized on the findings as validation that their symptoms were caused by the turbines. They pressed the seven-member Brown County Board of Health to declare the farm a health hazard. In particular, they highlighted the conclusions of Robert Rand, a Maine-based "acoustics investigator" who has primarily worked for groups opposing wind projects.

Rand said turbine sounds and infrasound cause effects similar to sea sickness and health boards shouldn't need peer-reviewed scientific papers to accept the health impacts.

"Most people accept -- because it's been occurring for thousands of years -- that people get motion sickness," Rand said in an interview. "And yet, in this particular case, there seems to be a lot of pushback."

The findings grabbed the attention of the health board. Audrey Murphy, its president, said in an interview that the "symptoms are pretty universal throughout the world."

Murphy insisted the board doesn't oppose wind energy, saying the turbines should be located farther from homes. In Wisconsin, they must be at least 1,250 feet away.

There is some precedent for the board's decision. The issue has long plagued local health boards in Massachusetts. Fairhaven, Mass., for example, in June 2013 shut down the town's two turbines at night in response to complaints about sleep deprivation.

Falmouth, Mass., found in 2012 that one turbine was violating local ordinances because it was too close to a home and emitting too much audible noise -- not infrasound. But the controversy spurred studies by acousticians, including Rand, that concluded the turbines produce sounds capable of disturbing nearby residents and may lead to annoyance, sleep disturbance and other impacts. That led multiple residents to file lawsuits seeking damages for their health problems, claiming the turbines were to blame.

But wind supporters cite other studies showing no such linkages.

Murphy said the Wisconsin board has sought to take all the relevant findings into account.

"This has been done very slowly and very methodically," she said. "The board has been concerned about the health of these people."

'No factual basis'

Wind proponents are quick to try to poke holes in the board's findings, as well as the local activists' evidence.

They start in Massachusetts. After the action in Falmouth, the state agency convened a panel of independent scientists and doctors. They found no evidence that wind turbines pose a tangible health risk to those living near them.

Plus, there have been several peer-reviewed scientific studies since then that have reached similar conclusions, including one by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and another by Canada's health ministry. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention doesn't recognize "wind turbine syndrome" as an illness. The term was created by a pediatrician, Nina Pierpont, around 2006. Pierpont's husband is an anti-wind activist.

Health Canada's 2014 study, for example, found no evidence to suggest a link between exposure to turbine noise and any self-reported illnesses, including dizziness, migraines and chronic conditions.

North Carolina-based Duke Energy claims the complaints are unique to Brown County.

"Duke Energy Renewables operates about 1,200 wind turbines around the United States, and we've only had health complaints about the eight turbines we operate in Brown County," said Tammie McGee, a company spokeswoman. "We don't see these kinds of complaints, for the most part, anywhere else."

She added: "We feel confident that we've met all the state and the town of Glenmore's conditions for operations and compliance with all noise ordinances and laws and regulations."

The American Wind Energy Association has also responded to the local group's claims and pointed to some research on a "nocebo" effect. The concept is the opposite of the placebo effect, meaning that people who are told to expect certain symptoms may experience them whether or not the supposed cause of the symptom -- in this case, turbines -- is actually present.

But perhaps most importantly, some who were involved in the 2012 Public Service Commission study dispute the advocates' interpretation.

Katie Nekola, the general counsel of Clean Wisconsin, which helped fund the study, said it was only an inventory of noise levels and shouldn't be used to draw conclusions on health effects.

The local groups, she said, "took the equivocal nature of the preamble to mean that things are falling apart and everyone is going to die."

There is "no factual basis in what they found for the health determination that the county made," she added. "Nothing in our study provided any kind of basis to say that noise was making them sick."

Rand, the acoustician who worked on the earlier study, contended that the results show what he's argued for years: Some people experience the health effects, and they are real and scary. Others simply don't and refuse to acknowledge they exist.

"Some people are saying this isn't happening -- or people are making it up in their heads," Rand said. "People who don't get seasick will never understand what you're talking about. ... It doesn't require peer-reviewed scientific studies to accept that some people get motion sickness and sea sickness."

What comes next

Deslauriers, the representative of the local group opposing the farm, declined to comment further, citing the ongoing public comment period on the health board's finding.

That window closes at the end of September. Then the county's top health officer, Chua Xiong, will rule on the issue by the end of the year after meeting with stakeholders and doctors.

It is unclear, however, whether she has the authority to shut down the turbines. Murphy, the head of the county's health board, thinks Xiong does. Duke isn't sure but will challenge such a determination in court.

The county lawyer, Juliana Ruenzel, refused to answer a question on Xiong's enforcement authority before abruptly ending an interview with Greenwire. Xiong did not return several messages seeking comment.

Nekola of Clean Wisconsin said a county determination would apply only to local projects and shouldn't affect other wind farms that have obtained permits from the state.

She said the Brown County effort was indicative only of a localized desire to block wind farms motivated by a not-in-my-backyard sentiment.

"There is just a contingent of people who oppose wind," she said. "And they will use any mechanism they can think of to stop a project."

But Rand sought to emphasize that the symptoms are real and he has felt them.

"This isn't an intellectual exercise," he said. "People get sick."

RENEWABLE ENERGY: Wis. 'health hazard' ruling could shock wind industry -- Wednesday, September 16, 2015 -- www.eenews.net