Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Another extension for Great Lakes Basis RR

 

image

 

Great Lakes Basin asks for more time for railroad application

Great Lakes Basin Transportation is asking the federal government to wait until at least April 30 to resume an environmental review of the freight railroad the company hopes to build as a bypass around Chicago.

The Surface Transportation Board's Office of Environmental Analysis suspended the environmental review on Dec. 13, 12 days after GLBT requested it be allowed to focus on completing its official application to build and operate the railroad.

The OEA granted the request with the requirement that the company provide an update on Feb. 28.

GLBT Chairman Frank Patton did that Tuesday, in a letter to OEA Director Victoria Rutson. Patton wrote: "Great Lakes Basin continues to prepare its application for authority to construct and operate a new line ... We are preparing the required application content for project overview, information on the proposal, operational data, and financial data. We are holding discussions with potential customers, shippers, and other parties who may file statements in support of the application."

Patton wrote that he expects those discussions to last several more weeks. He asked that the suspension of the environmental review continue until April 30, "at which time we will either file the application or provide another status report."

The railroad would run about 260 miles from the LaPorte area through southern Porter and Lake counties, around Chicago and into southeast Wisconsin.

The environmental review process ultimately produces an Environmental Impact Statement, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA. The application GLBT is preparing provides more detailed financial and operational information.

"The application likely will provide information that will help the accuracy of OEA’s NEPA review," Rutson wrote in a letter to Patton on Dec. 13. "I must note, however, that stopping and starting the NEPA review process often adds time and expense to the process and increases the burden on all stakeholders."

The suspension hasn't stopped residents opposed to the project from continuing their activity. Six citizen groups, including RAILED from Northwest Indiana, submitted in February a statement to the STB in the form of a motion prepared by Chicago attorney Thomas McFarland.

Describing the Great Lakes Basin Railroad as a "boondoggle" and "folly," the motion's main claims revolve around the question of whether there would be demand for the railroad.

It points out two of the major freight railroads have said publicly they would not use GLBT's railroad, and the others likely would not; a partnership among federal, state and local governments and major railroads, called the Chicago Regional Environmental and Transportation Efficiency program, or CREATE, is alleviating congestion in Chicago and making Great Lakes Basin unnecessary; and, the Chicago Integrated Rail Operations Center, or CIROC, established by freight haulers in 2015, is also alleviating congestion.

For more information on the project, visit the Surface Transportation Board's website on the environmental process at www.greatlakesbasinraileis.com and GLBT's website at www.greatlakesbasin.net.

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Belvidere City/Township Primary

 

image

image

image

image

Above is from:  http://www.wrex.com/category/152845/electionresults

Fact Check: Trump’s First Address to Congress

 

image

 

Fact Check: Trump’s
First Address to Congress

Reporters from The New York Times fact checked President Trump’s first address to Congress. FEB. 28, 2017

"The murder rate in 2015 experienced its largest single-year increase in nearly half a century."

True, but somewhat misleading.

F.B.I. crime statistics estimate that there were 15,696 murders in 2015, up 10 percent from 2014. (Last year's figures are not available yet.) The increase was largely driven by street crime in a handful of large cities, like Chicago and Baltimore.

But one reason for such a large uptick was that crime had been falling for a generation. In 1991, the F.B.I. estimated that there were 24,703 murders.

— Charlie Savage

"Obamacare premiums nationwide have increased by double and triple digits."

True, but cherry-picked.

Double-digit increases in premiums are common. President Trump cited Arizona's 116 percent increase; it is the only state that experienced a triple-digit hike. Premiums for a popular group of health plans sold on HealthCare.gov rose this year by an average of 25 percent, according to the Obama administration.

While subsidies are available to people with low and moderate incomes, people who do not qualify for financial assistance must bear the full cost.

— Robert Pear

Families of people killed by undocumented immigrants have been "ignored by our media."

They have received coverage.

The individuals killed by undocumented immigrants mentioned by President Trump in his speech received widespread coverage in local newspapers and on television. For example, the death of Jamiel Shaw Jr., who was shot and killed in 2008 in Los Angeles, was widely covered by The Los Angeles Times and local television stations.

— Ron Nixon

"Obamacare is collapsing."

This is an exaggeration.

Premiums for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act increased substantially this year. Deductibles are often high. The number of insurance companies offering coverage has shrunk in many states. Big insurers, losing money in the public marketplaces, have curtailed their participation.

But millions of people with modest incomes have obtained coverage, with federal subsidies that reduce their premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Republican efforts to repeal the health care law have created greater uncertainty, which threatens to destabilize the markets even more.

— Robert Pear

A National Academy of Sciences report found that immigrants cost the country billions.

This needs context

The 2016 National Academy of Sciences report found that the net cost of immigrants varies drastically by region, but that their average cost to the United States economy between 2011 and 2013 was $57.4 billion. However, the same report found that the children of immigrants make up much of that cost, adding a net benefit of $30.5 billion. Third-generation immigrants far exceeded the cost of their grandparents, adding a $223.8 billion benefit.

— Caitlin Dickerson

"Over 43 million Americans are on food stamps."

The number is correct.

According to the Agriculture Department, 43.3 million Americans use food stamps. As with the poverty rate, though, the number has been trending downward over the past several years.

— Dana Goldstein

"We've lost more than one-fourth of our manufacturing jobs since Nafta was approved."

Not because of Nafta.

The United States has lost a lot of factory jobs since 2000, but the biggest reason is technological progress, not foreign competition. America's manufacturing output is at the highest level in history — it just doesn't take as many workers to make stuff anymore. Some jobs have been lost to foreign competition, but studies assign a modest role to Nafta.

— Binyamin Appelbaum

"Over 43 million people are now living in poverty."

True — but the number has also fallen.

According to the Census Bureau, 43.1 million Americans were living below the federal poverty line in 2015. But that number is lower than it was in the depths of the recession, in 2009 and 2010.

— Dana Goldstein

The Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines will create "tens of thousands of jobs."

This needs context.

President Trump has signed executive orders intended to clear the way for the construction of the Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines. This will create jobs, although most of the jobs will be temporary. A 2014 State Department environmental review estimated that Keystone would support 42,000 temporary jobs over its two-year construction period — about 3,900 of them in construction, the rest in indirect support jobs, such as food service. It estimated that Keystone would create about 35 permanent jobs.

— Coral Davenport

"Ninety-four million Americans are out of the labor force."

This is misleading.

That is roughly the number of Americans older than 15 who do not have jobs. But it includes high school and college students, people with disabilities, stay-at-home parents and millions of retirees. The number of Americans who would like to work but can't find jobs is much smaller. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that about 7.6 million people were unemployed in January.

— Binyamin Appelbaum

"We've defended the borders of other nations, while leaving our own borders wide open for anyone to cross."

Open in parts, but heavily patrolled as well.

Individuals cannot just walk across the borders without fear of interception. Some do sneak across, but the borders are guarded by 21,000 Border Patrol agents along with a similar number of Customs and Border Protection officers at the 325 official ports of entry, which include airports, seaports and land border crossings.

— Ron Nixon

"We are removing gang members, drug dealers and criminals."

Not a big change.

President Barack Obama already ordered the Department of Homeland Security to make serious criminals a primary focus of his deportation efforts. President Trump has called for all undocumented immigrants to be deported. With limited manpower and resources, that could mean a higher share of nonviolent offenders among those who are deported. Multiple studies have concluded that immigrants commit fewer crimes per capita than people born in the United States.

— Nicholas Kulish

President Trump said he ended a regulation that threatened "the future and livelihoods of our great coal miners."

This is partly true but misleading.

Mr. Trump did indeed sign a bill rolling back a regulation that would have prevented coal mining companies from polluting streams. But there is no evidence that the rule threatened a significant number of coal mining jobs, or that rolling it back will create new ones.

There are only about 70,000 direct coal mining jobs in the United States. But most economists have concluded that the decline is due to increased mechanization in the mining industry and a market shift by electric utilities away from coal and toward natural gas, which is cheaper. No credible studies have shown that rolling back major regulations on coal pollution will contribute to a major increase in coal mining jobs.

— Coral Davenport

Enforcing immigration laws will raise wages.

Maybe a little.

Economists are deeply divided about the effect of immigration on the wages of native-born workers. Some see evidence that increased competition has modestly reduced the wages for some kinds of work, particularly low-skilled labor. But the effects are relatively small — perhaps a few percentage points — and the overall effect on the economy is most likely positive.

— Binyamin Appelbaum

"I have directed several federal agencies to fight crime and dismantle the criminal cartels that have spread across our nation."

True, but they don't do much.

President Trump signed two crime-related executive orders on Feb. 9 that did little of substance. The order on reducing crime essentially just directed the Justice Department to develop a strategy to do so by coordinating with other agencies. The order on combating criminal cartels largely consisted of stating opposition to such groups. It directed the government’s interagency Threat Mitigation Working Group, which has existed since 2011, to review various efforts to battle them and “work to improve” those efforts.

— Charlie Savage

Above is from:  https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/28/us/politics/fact-check-trump-congress-address.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

The Democratic Response to
Trump's Speech: Fact Checks

Reporters from The New York Times fact checked the Democrats' response to President Trump's address to Congress, which was delivered by former Gov. Steve Beshear of Kentucky. We fact checked Mr. Trump's speech, too. FEB. 28, 2017

President Trump has attacked intelligence agencies, the courts, the military, the news media and individual Americans.

Few have been spared.

President Trump has tweeted criticism of the F.B.I.; the court and judge who ruled against his travel ban; major news outlets; individual lawmakers; and celebrities.

He did refer to the military as a "disaster" during the election but has since focused on what he views as a depletion of its resources and a lack of funding.

— Linda Qiu

Twenty-two million Americans gained insurance under Obamacare.

Slightly high estimate.

Steve Beshear may be mixing up the effect of Obamacare's potential repeal with the effect of Obamacare itself.

The Department of Health and Human Services estimated that 20 million people gained insurance under Obamacare, while the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that repealing the health care law would cause 22 million to lose coverage.

— Linda Qiu

We can enforce our immigration laws without tearing apart families.

False, unless the laws change. Hundreds of thousands of American citizens are born each year to parents who are in the country illegally. The Pew Research Center found that in 2012, 4.5 million American children were living with undocumented parents. Unless the current immigration laws are changed, enforcing them fully would tear those families apart.

— Caitlin Dickerson

"Every Republican idea to replace the Affordable Care Act would reduce the number of Americans covered."

This is basically true.

A number of Republican proposals have emerged since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, but few of them have been evaluated by the Congressional Budget Office, the official government scorekeeper for legislative proposals. That means it's hard to compare them head-to-head.

But several of the leading plans have been evaluated by independent experts. And, indeed, they have all led to reductions in insurance coverage when compared with current numbers.

Republicans in the House are currently working on a bill, and the budget office is expected to offer estimates on its effects. So we'll find out more details soon.

— Margot Sanger-Katz

Above is from:  https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/28/us/politics/fact-check-democratic-response-to-trump.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Monday, February 27, 2017

Pro-Trump town riled up after immigration officials arrest popular restaurant manager

IMMIGRATION

Pro-Trump town riled up after immigration officials arrest popular restaurant manager

Published February 27, 2017

Associated Press

Facebook Twitter livefyre Email Print

(AP)

WEST FRANKFORT, Ill. –  A southern Illinois community that solidly backed President Donald Trump has rallied behind a Mexican restaurant manager who doesn't have legal permission to live in the U.S. and has been detained by immigration officials.

Letters of support for Juan Carlos Hernandez Pacheco have poured in from West Frankfort's mayor, police chief, high school athletic director and the county prosecutor. They describe Hernandez as a role model and praise his robust civil involvement, including funding school scholarships, benefit dinners for families in need and hosting a law enforcement appreciation event.

Hernandez, 38, came to the U.S. in the 1990s but didn't obtain legal status, according to friends. He has been the manager of La Fiesta Mexican Restaurant for a decade in the community with coal mining roots, about 100 miles southeast of St. Louis.

He was arrested at his home earlier this month and remains in custody at a U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement facility outside St. Louis. ICE officials did not explain why Pacheco was arrested, but noted his drunken-driving convictions from 2007.

Some residents in the community of roughly 8,000 didn't know Hernandez lacked legal status in the U.S. until word spread of his arrest.

Though the community largely backed Trump — who has made an aggressive stance on immigration central to his agenda and has promised to deport millions of immigrants who have no permission to live here — many residents of West Frankfort said Hernandez' case has complicated their views on immigration policy.

"I think people need to do things the right way, follow the rules and obey the laws, and I firmly believe in that," Lori Barron, the owner of a beauty salon, told The New York Times. "But in the case of Carlos, I think he may have done more for the people here than this place has ever given him. I think it's absolutely terrible that he could be taken away."

Hernandez' attorney is pushing for him to be freed on bond until his case can be heard.

His wife, Elizabeth Hernandez, and three children are U.S. citizens. She told The (Carbondale) Southern Illinoisan that she hopes her husband can come home and "continue his efforts on becoming an American citizen, something that he has wished for a very long time."

Above is from:  http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/27/pro-trump-town-riled-up-after-immigration-officials-arrest-popular-restaurant-manager.html

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Law professors file misconduct complaint against Kellyanne Conway

 

The Washington Post logoWashington Post - Washington Post

The Washington Post

Sari Horwitz1 day ago

 

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway speaks Thursday during the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland’s National Harbor.© Joshua Roberts/Reuters White House counselor Kellyanne Conway speaks Thursday during the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland’s National Harbor.

A group of law professors from around the country has filed a professional misconduct complaint against White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, a graduate of George Washington University Law School who was admitted to the D.C. Bar in 1995.

The letter, filed with the office that handles misconduct by members of the D.C. Bar, said Conway should be sanctioned for violating government ethics rules and “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation,” the letter says.

The 15 professors, who specialize in legal ethics, cite several incidents, including a television interview in which Conway made the “false statement that President Barack Obama had ‘banned’ Iraqi refugees from coming into the United States for six months following the ‘Bowling Green Massacre,’ ” and the use of her position to endorse Ivanka Trump products.

“We do not file this complaint lightly,” the professors said in their filing. “We believe that, at one time, Ms. Conway, understood her ethical responsibilities as a lawyer and abided by them. But she is currently acting in a way that brings shame upon the legal profession.”

The professors teach at law schools such as Georgetown University Law Center, Yale Law School, Fordham University and Duke University.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The letter was sent to the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the chief prosecutor for disciplinary matters that involve active or inactive attorneys who are members of the D.C. Bar. Conway is listed as a D.C. Bar member under her maiden name, Kellyanne E. Fitzpatrick, but is a suspended member for not paying her dues, according to the disciplinary filing.

D.C. Disciplinary Counsel Wallace “Gene” Shipp Jr. said that his office receives about 1,500 complaints a year but investigates only between 400 to 500 of them. The actions that can be taken range from dismissal of the complaint to the prosecution of charges and possible disbarment, he said.

Since she has been serving as counselor to President Trump, Conway has been caught up in several controversies. Last month, during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” she said the White House had put forth “alternative facts” regarding the size of Trump’s inauguration crowd.

“ ‘Alternative facts’ are not facts at all; they are lies,” the professors said in their filing.

Conway was also criticized for using her position during a Feb. 9 interview on Fox News to endorse Ivanka Trump’s fashion products.

“Federal rules on conflicts of interest specifically prohibit using public office ‘for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,’” the complaint said.

Abbe Smith, a Georgetown Law Center professor and director of the Criminal Defense and Prisoner Advocacy Clinic, said she has never filed such a complaint before and generally does not believe that lawyers should routinely face discipline under the broad rule they cited, which includes conduct outside the practice of law.

“But Ms. Conway’s conduct was so outside the norm for a member of the legal profession,” Smith said. “What prompted our complaint was a combination of the specific conduct that Ms. Conway engaged in plus the fact that she holds such a high public office.”

Above is from:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/law-professors-file-misconduct-complaint-against-kellyanne-conway/ar-AAnh6qH?ocid=spartandhp

Trump rejects DHS intelligence report on travel ban

 

FOX News logoFOX News

FOX News

Edmund DeMarche

4 hrs ago

 

Officials in President Trump’s administration Friday downplayed an intelligence report by the Homeland Security Department that contradicts the White House’s main argument for implementing a travel ban on seven predominantly Muslim countries.

The report, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal and Associated Press, determined that the "country of citizenship is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of potential terrorist activity."

The Trump administration has taken the position that immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries should be blocked from the U.S. due to their terror risk. Trump used terrorism a primary justification when he announced the now court-blocked travel ban in late January.

The intelligence report found that in the past six years, foreign-born individuals who were “inspired” to strike in the U.S. came from 26 different countries.

Senior White House Policy Adviser Stephen Miller told Fox News' "First 100 Days" Tuesday that a revised version of the travel ban would "have the same basic policy outcome."

A senior administration official told The Wall Street Journal that the DHS report’s assessment overlooked key information and the finished product that the White House requested has not been completed. The White House called the report politically motivated. Officials said it overlooked some information that supported the ban.

“The president asked for an intelligence assessment,” the official said. “This is not the intelligence assessment the president asked for.”

The draft report determined that few people from the countries Trump listed in his travel ban have carried out attacks or been involved in terrorism-related activities in the U.S. since Syria's civil war started in 2011.

Gillian Christensen, a DHS spokeswoman, does not dispute the report's authenticity, but says it was not a final comprehensive review of the government's intelligence.

“It is clear on its face that it is an incomplete product that fails to find evidence of terrorism by simply refusing to look at all the available evidence,” she said, according to The Journal. “Any suggestion by opponents of the president’s policies that senior (homeland security) intelligence officials would politicize this process or a report’s final conclusions is absurd and not factually accurate. The dispute with this product was over sources and quality, not politics.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Above is from:  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-rejects-dhs-intelligence-report-on-travel-ban/ar-AAnkWi8?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Friday, February 24, 2017

WREX’s Update on GLB RR

 

image

Posted: Feb 23, 2017 11:00 PM CST

ROCHELLE (WREX) -

By next week, the developers behind the multi-billion dollar Great Lakes Basin Railroad are expected to update the federal government on the project. 
They called for a time out in December to refile their application.  

All indications are this plan is moving forward.  While there are those fighting to keep this railroad from ever happening, there are those at least interested in hearing more.
John and Bonnie Murphy own a Winnebago County farm.  This February warm up has kept them busy.

"Father's grandfather's father started the farm in about 1840 and we've been here ever since," said John.  He said they farm "corn, beans and dairy cows." 

There's a lot of action down at the Rochelle rail yard, too.  Workers packing hundreds of rail cars onto city tracks to make way for even more.

There is a deep sense of tradition steeped in the farming and the railroad industries in Northern Illinois.  These two economic engines at a crossroads now with the idea of a 270-plus mile railroad. The Great Lakes Basin Railroad would run from Wisconsin through Illinois into Indiana cutting through farms along the way including the Murphys.

"They're gonna come and take a few acres of my land, and it'd be like I opening a restaurant in Rockford and taking a homeowners 20 feet of their property," said John.  "It doesn't make you feel good."

Their concerns echoed when the federal agency reviewing Great Lakes Basin's potential environmental impact held meetings across local counties the rail could cut through.  Those concerns, very real.  Some say, so is the potential for growing the Stateline's economy.
To see what this new investment could mean for towns along the railroad's path, we travel to Rochelle.  Where more than 20 years ago, the city formed its own railroad system to capitalize on an opportunity.

Rochelle's economic development director, Jason Anderson, said the city's dual access rail line connects to two major Class 1 railroads: the Union Pacific and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe.

"We've added $1.5 billion in capital investment in land, equipment and buildings in the last 10 years," said Anderson.

Since building an industrial park to serve the railroad. 15 businesses have come to ogle county.   What you see here, could become the norm in Winnebago, Lee and other counties up and down the Great Lakes Basin Railroad.  The purpose: to bypass Chicago.

"It takes about 2 days to get a product from southern California or Seattle, Tacoma to Rochelle.  But because of the congestion in Chicago it can take almost 2 days to go that last 75 miles," said Anderson.

So what's in it for the communities that relieve the bottleneck?  Rochelle's economy lends the best insight:
Take the city's tax base:  Rochelle's more than doubled its value since focusing on rail.

"It took us 100 years to get to $100 million tax base. It took us an additional 13 years to get $225 million, most of that was driven by access to rail," said Anderson.  "That means your city, your park district, your school districts your library districts all receive a larger revenue stream from that tax base."

In that same time, the city's created 2,200 new jobs.  The third benefit, he said, Rochelle was in a good position to leverage assets it already had, like access to major highways.

"If we start to work together on how we can leverage those things that already exist, we'll be unstoppable from an economic development standpoint," said Anderson.

You'd think Anderson is all for the Great Lakes Basin Railroad.  But he isn't, nor is he against it.  He's cautiously optimistic:

"I know this is a concern locally.  By tying all these communities all together, Rochelle loses its uniqueness as being a community that has multiple rail service because all the communities along the great lakes basin railroad will have access to those 6 class 1 railroads," said Anderson.

So we've told you why some people don't want the rail and what communities have seen a positive impact of having a hub.  But what if there was another way? 

There's already a railroad that runs from Rochelle to Rockford, but Anderson and others say it's not utilized to its potential. So whether it's the Great Lakes Basin Railroad or something else, they say it's time to leverage that rail.

"Why doesn't a new railroad take advantage of some of the existing rail right-of-way," said Mike Dunn, Jr., the executive director of the Rockford Metropolitan Agency for Planning. 
The lines already in existence between Rochelle and Rockford are called the Illinois RailNet.  It stretches from Winnebago to Ogle County.  Right now the short lines are in private hands and would need to be purchased.   Then upgraded to handle Class 1 railroads, but that's not on the proposed route for the Great Lakes line.

"The RMAP policy board has supported the concept of the Great Lakes Basin Railroad, but it has not supported a specific route," said Dunn.

It's why Great Lakes basin or not, RMAPs long term plan is for a railroad to better serve Rockford's airport to compliment the global trade park north of RFD and the industrial park earmarked for development south of the airport along Interstate 39.

Meanwhile we all wait to hear from the Great Lakes Basin on its next proposal.  Like the Murphys who look at this land and see their future in farming. That same land a railroad company could have a future on as it charts its course through the Stateline.

The earliest the government could make its decision about the project is 2019.  Eminent domain wouldn't be sorted out until then either.  We contacted Great Lakes Basin Railroad to be part of our story, but they declined multiple times.  So this update next week could be everything from them asking for an extension, or revealing a 3rd proposed route.  13 News will keep you posted.

See the GLBT proposed route map (updated September 2016). See the old route map that would have cut through Boone County

Above is from:  http://www.wrex.com/story/34591509/2017/02/24/digging-deeper-what-the-statelines-rail-economy-could-be-with-or-without-the-great-lakes-basin-railroad