Monday, November 16, 2020

Illinois Budgeting

Large deficits, bill backlog expected over next five years without solutions

November 16, 2020 6:37 pmMike MiletichILLINOIS CAPITOL BUREAU, TOP STORIES

<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" />1

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – The Pritzker administration is facing a stark reality with the state’s budget due to the ongoing pandemic and failed graduated income tax proposal.

New estimates from the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget (GOMB) show a $3.9 billion deficit for this fiscal year. However, the picture could get worse over the next five years. The office is projecting deficits ranging from $4.8 billion in Fiscal Year 2022 to $4.2 billion by Fiscal Year 2026. Reporters asked Gov. JB Pritzker about the office’s concerning report Monday afternoon.

“There are not solutions to the budget problem that are built into that,” Pritzker said. “That was a definition of what the budget problem is if we go without any solutions.”

State lawmakers relied on borrowing $5 billion to fill holes in the current budget, but the administration says the deficits for the next three fiscal years would grow larger if Illinois borrowed that money. Pritzker notes every state is suffering from a severe lack of revenue because of COVID-19.

“The federal government is really the only resource that we all have to turn to. They’ve helped big corporations along the way,” Pritzker explained. “I think we all believe that we want to save both jobs and the services that we’re all providing for the public.”

Data provided by the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget

Time for the tough decisions

In the meantime, Pritzker is looking into spending cuts and adjusting revenue. GOMB’s report says the administration asked state agency directors to include a potential 10% cut from their FY21 appropriations for the next budget. Still, the office wrote cuts to spending can’t solve these issues alone.

“The Governor believes that support for quality education, access to healthcare, and sufficient social services for when people need a helping hand to get on their feet are all part of the essential functions of state government. However, along with servicing our debt and meeting our pension obligations, these costs make up over 75% of the budget,” the office wrote. “Across-the-board cuts to state government spending means these areas will not go untouched.”

Pritzker continues to note everything is on the table, but cuts will come first. “I think those cuts will be somewhat painful. And then, we’ll consider all the other options about what we need to do in order to get to balance for FY21 and moving forward.”

GOMB suggested Pritzker will work with lawmakers to identify corporate and business tax loopholes along with tax adjustments. However, the governor didn’t specifically address the tax adjustments Monday.

The office says Illinois’ backlog of bills could also significantly grow in the five-year span. They project over $33 billion in unpaid bills in Fiscal Year 2026. That’s nearly double the backlog Illinois saw during the budget impasse under former governor Bruce Rauner.

Author Profile Photo

Mike Miletich

Above is from:  https://wrex.com/2020/11/16/large-deficits-bill-backlog-expected-over-next-five-years-without-solutions/

Congresswoman Cheri Bustos tests positive for COVID-19

Congresswoman Cheri Bustos tests positive for COVID-19

November 16, 2020 3:32 pmAndrew CarriganCORONAVIRUS, ILLINOIS NEWS, TOP STORIES

<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" />

Cheri Bustos

(WREX) — A U.S. Congresswoman representing Illinois has tested positive for COVID-19.
Congresswoman Cheri Bustos (D), of the 17th Congressional District, said on Twitter she has tested positive for the virus.

"I have tested positive for the COVID virus. I am experiencing mild symptoms, but still feel well. I have been in contact with my medical provider and, per CDC guidance, am self-isolating," said the congresswoman.
Rep. Bustos says she'll work remotely from home until she's cleared by a physician.

Above is from: 

November 16: 11,632 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois

Public Health Officials Announce 11,632 New Cases of Coronavirus Disease

16th Nov, 2020

SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) today reported 11,632 new confirmed and probable cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Illinois, including 37 additional deaths.

  • Clinton County: 1 male 50s
  • Cook County: 1 female 50s, 1 male 50s, 1 female 60s, 3 males 60s, 2 females 70s, 3 males 70s, 1 female 80s, 2 males 80s, 3 females 90s, 2 males 90s
  • DuPage County: 1 female 90s
  • Edwards County: 1 male 80s
  • Iroquois County: 1 female 60s
  • Kane County: 1 male 50s
  • Lake County: 1 female 50s
  • LaSalle County: 1 male 60s, 1 male 70s, 3 males 90s
  • Madison County; 1 male 80s
  • McDonough County: 1 female 70s
  • Peoria County: 1 female 80s
  • Pike County: 1 female 80s, 1 male 80s
  • Wayne County: 1 male 80s
  • Will County: 1 female 90s

Currently, IDPH is reporting a total of 585,248 cases, including 10,779 deaths, in 102 counties in Illinois. The age of cases ranges from younger than one to older than 100 years.  Within the past 24 hours, laboratories have reported 90,612 specimens for a total 9,161,453.  As of last night, 5,581 in Illinois were reported to be in the hospital with COVID-19.  Of those, 1,144 patients were in the ICU and 514 patients with COVID-19 were on ventilators.

The preliminary seven-day statewide positivity for cases as a percent of total test from November 9 – November 15, 2020 is 12.5%.  The preliminary seven-day statewide test positivity from November 9 – November 15, 2020 is 14.7%.

*All data are provisional and will change. In order to rapidly report COVID-19 information to the public, data are being reported in real-time. Information is constantly being entered into an electronic system and the number of cases and deaths can change as additional information is gathered.  For health questions about COVID-19, call the hotline at 1-800-889-3931 or email dph.sick@illinois.gov.

November 16: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Report

COVID-19

Updates on the COVID-19 pandemic from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Additional resources are available on our website.

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also produces US Travel Industry and Retail Supply Chain Updates that provide a summary of major issues and events impacting the US travel industry and retail supply chain. You can access them here.

REVERSING CURRENT TRENDS As the US looks ahead to the coming holiday season and winter months, the rapid escalation of the COVID-19 epidemic poses considerable health risk. On November 19 (12-12:30pm EST), the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health will host a webinar to discuss what individuals, health officials, and elected leadership can and should do to mitigate COVID-19 risk in the coming months. The panelists will include experts from across the school: Dr. Josh Sharfstein, Vice Dean for Public Health Practice and Community Engagement; Dr. Amber D’Souza and Dr. David Dowdy, professors in the Department of Epidemiology; and the Center for Health Security’s own Dr. Caitlin Rivers.

Advance registration is not required, but you can submit a question in advance via the event website, where you can watch the webcast live.

EPI UPDATE The WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports 54.30 million cases and 1.31 million deaths as of 9am EST on November 16. The WHO reported a new record high for weekly COVID-19 incidence for the ninth consecutive week—3.98 million new cases, a 6.5% increase over the previous week. The WHO also reported a new record high for weekly mortality for the second consecutive week—59,860 deaths, an 11% increase over the previous week.

Total Daily Incidence (change in average incidence; change in rank, if applicable)

1. USA: 152,201 new cases per day (+43,017)

2. India: 41,639 (-4,696; ↑ 1)

3. Italy: 34,775 (+2,522; ↑ 1)

4. France: 27,786 (-25,558; ↓ 2)

5. Brazil: 26,406 (9,491; new)

6. United Kingdom: 25,329 (+2,887)

7. Poland: 23,792 (+3; ↓ 2)

8. Russia: 21,642 (+1,991)

9. Spain: 18,537* (-1,537; ↓ 2)

10. Germany: 18,494 (+374; ↑ 1)

Per Capita Daily Incidence (change in average incidence; change in rank, if applicable)

1. Montenegro: 994 daily cases per million population (+64; ↑ 3)

2. Luxembourg: 927 (+83; ↑ 4)

3. Andorra: 904 (-128; ↓ 2)

4. San Marino: 884 (+400; new)

5. Austria: 809 (+152; ↑ 4)

6. Georgia: 793 (+145; new)

7. Switzerland: 743 (-205; ↓ 4)

8. Liechtenstein**: 738 (-150; ↓ 3)

9. Slovenia: 679 (+25; new)

10. Poland: 629 (no change; new)

*Spain’s average daily incidence is not reported for today; these values correspond to the most recent data available.

**Liechtenstein is a member of the UN, but not the WHO; Liechtenstein’s COVID-19 data is reported by Switzerland.

The Czech Republic fell out of the top 10 in terms of total daily incidence, and it was replaced by Brazil, which jumped all the way to #5. France’s daily incidence decreased by nearly 50% compared to the previous week. Conversely, the daily incidence increased by nearly 40% in the US and 56% in Brazil. The US is reporting more than 3.5 times the incidence as every other country. Armenia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, and France fell out of the top 10 in terms of per capita daily incidence, and they were replaced by Georgia, Poland, San Marino, and Slovenia. San Marino’s COVID-19 incidence increased by 83%, and it jumped all the way to #4.

UNITED STATES

The US CDC reported 10.85 million total cases and 244,810 deaths. The US is averaging 148,280 new cases per day, the highest since May 24. The US is averaging 1,180 deaths per day, and it could reach 250,000 cumulative deaths by the end of the week.

The US reported a new single-day record for daily incidence on Friday, with 194,610 new cases. This is 36% more cases than the previous record, which was reported on the previous day. The US has reported more than 100,000 new cases on 10 of the 11 days since becoming the first country to do so on November 4, including the past 3 days with more than 150,000 new cases. Since that time, the average daily incidence has increased by 65%, and it appears to still be increasing exponentially. Notably, the US reported more than 1 million cases over the past 7 days.

Two-thirds of all US states have reported more than 150,000 cumulative cases, and 20 have reported more than 200,000 cases:

>1 million: California, Texas

>800,000: Florida

>500,000: Illinois, New York

>400,000: Georgia

>300,000: North Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin

>200,000: Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia

On a per capita basis, more than half of all US states are reporting higher cumulative incidence than New York City, the country’s biggest hotspot early in the epidemic, including North and South Dakota, which are reporting more than twice the per capita cumulative incidence as New York City. In terms of mortality, the parts of the country that were affected most severely in the US this spring—eg, New York City, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Louisiana—continue to report the highest per capita cumulative mortality; however, over the last 7 days, only Hawai’i, Oregon, and Vermont have reported lower per capita mortality than New York City (0.1 deaths per 100,000 population). On the other end of the spectrum, 4 states have reported 1 or more deaths per 100,000 population—Wyoming (1), Georgia (1), South Dakota (1.6), and North Dakota (1.8)—at least 10 times the current rate in New York City.

The Johns Hopkins CSSE dashboard reported 11.05 million US cases and 246,255 deaths as of 11:30am EST on November 16.

MODERNA VACCINE Moderna Therapeutics issued a series of press releases over the past several days regarding the progress for the Phase 3 clinical trials for its candidate SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Last week, Moderna announced that it identified enough cases among study participants—ie, at least 53—to conduct the first interim analysis on the vaccine’s efficacy. The study completed enrollment of 30,000 participants in late October, and the primary metric is preventing symptomatic COVID-19 disease, with secondary aims of preventing severe disease and preventing infection. Last Friday, Moderna announced that Swiss regulatory officials began reviewing the trial’s safety and efficacy data to evaluate the possibility of authorizing its use in Switzerland. The review will occur on a rolling basis, as new data become available, as opposed to waiting until all data are collected, in hopes of accelerating the review process compared to traditional timelines.

The most noteworthy news, however, was today’s announcement that interim analysis of the data indicates that the candidate vaccine could be nearly 95% effective. Like Pfizer’s announcement last week, this update was provided in a press release, and the actual data still need to be published and reviewed; however, the news is promising that multiple highly efficacious vaccines could be available in 2021. The Moderna interim analysis involved 95 participants with confirmed COVID-19 (90 of which were in the placebo group). Notably, 11 severe COVID-19 cases were reported among trial participants, and all were among the placebo group. Among the 95 cases, 15 are aged 65 years or older and 20 are racial or ethnic minorities—12 Hispanic or LatinX, 4 Black or African American, 3 Asian, and 1 multiracial. Moderna estimates the vaccine to be 94.5% efficacious based on the preliminary data, which would be comparable to the Pfizer vaccine. The vaccine also appears to have an acceptable safety profile, with no serious adverse events reported thus far.

Moderna also announced that the vaccine has demonstrated longer shelf life and greater stability at refrigeration temperatures than initially anticipated. According to the press release, “remains stable at 2° to 8°C (36° to 46°F)...for 30 days” and “at -20° C (-4°F) for up to six months.” The Moderna vaccine could be stored temporarily in standard refrigerators or freezers. Additionally, the Moderna vaccine can remain at room temperature for up to 12 hours and does not require onsite dilution or additional handling at the vaccination site, which could reduce the logistical burden required for mass vaccination.

Both Pfizer and Moderna are expected to file for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) with the US FDA, and regulatory authorities in other countries, including the European Medicines Agency, have also announced they will review the Moderna candidate. The news about both vaccine candidates has been received positively and with relief, especially as initial expectations about the efficacy of mRNA vaccines were somewhat low. Neither company has released the full interim analysis or the data analyzed in a journal, however, and the long-term safety and efficacy of these candidates remains to be assessed.

HEALTHCARE WORKER BURNOUT US COVID-19 incidence is surging to unprecedented levels, nearly reaching 200,000 new cases on November 12. While this surge is commonly described as a “third wave,” the reality, especially for frontline healthcare workers, is that this is just the ever-growing peak of a single, continuous wave since March. The US never successfully contained its “first wave,” so many US healthcare workers never got a reprieve between the second and third surges. The Atlantic published a detailed report on the current state of the US healthcare workforce, as emergency rooms across the country are reaching capacity with COVID-19 patients and medical staff are being pushed to the limit, sometimes working 36-hour shifts. The strain is particularly difficult in rural areas in the Midwest and West regions, where hospitals and health systems are running out of bed space and healthcare personnel to care for new patients. The seemingly endless surge in cases across many states has led to concerns of impending and continuing burnout from doctors and nurses, especially as many personnel are required to remain in quarantine or isolation due to their continual contact with COVID-19 patients. In some locations, such as North Dakota, the lack of available doctors and nurses has policies allowing healthcare workers who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 to keep working, as long as they remain asymptomatic.

The previous 2 surges in the spring and summer provided valuable experience and insight regarding how to best treat COVID-19 patients, and the development and availability of new therapies have helped to an extent. But with holidays rapidly approaching in the US, many are concerned about an impending surge in cases as people may congregate. US healthcare workers, like those in many countries are physically, mentally, and emotionally exhausted, and the third surge is the biggest to date, with no sign of slowing. Increased incidence inevitably brings increased hospitalizations and mortality, but if hospitals and health systems are unable to cope with the surge, including if healthcare workers are too exhausted to operate effectively, the US could risk mortality more like that reported early in the epidemic, when New York City was overwhelmed, except on a national scale.

SLOVAKIA As COVID-19 transmission continues to surge in Europe and many countries move to strengthen social distancing restrictions to mitigate transmission risk, Slovakia took a slightly different approach that initially appears to be paying dividends. As we covered previously, Slovakia implemented a plan to test every adult in the country, in addition to enhanced social distancing policies. In the first week of testing, Slovakia tested more than 3.6 million people—approximately two-thirds of the country—and a week later, it retested more than 2 million individuals in high-risk areas. The tests used for this effort are rapid antigen tests, which are slightly less reliable than traditional PCR-based diagnostic tests, but they can provide results in as little as 15-30 minutes. Individuals who tested positive during the nationwide effort were placed in quarantine or isolation to mitigate the risk of further transmission, and contact tracers conducted investigations to identify other at-risk individuals.

In the weeks since testing began, Slovakia has reported a significant decrease in COVID-19 incidence. Slovakia’s daily COVID-19 incidence fell dramatically from a peak of 2,547 new cases per day on November 4 to 1,610 on November 16, a 33% decrease. Slovakian Prime Minister Igor Matovič attributed the decreased incidence to the testing program and associated quarantine requirements. While Slovakia had a number of other social distancing measures in place—including prohibitions on large gatherings, curfew, and many business closures—some of these measures were tied to testing results to encourage participation. For example, the curfew, in place from 11pm to 5am, required those with exceptions for work, health care, or other essential activities to carry documentation of a negative PCR or antigen test.

These restrictive social distancing measures have been in place since early October, so it is not easy to distinguish the impact of the testing program, but the downward trend in incidence following the mass testing is certainly promising. Prime Minister Matovič announced that the next round of testing will be conducted the weekend of November 21-22 and will be much more limited in scope than the nationwide effort, focusing cities where the previous round of testing identified SARS-CoV-2 prevalence greater than 1 percent. In the announcement, he noted that continued widespread testing could enable Slovakia to "indulge in a little freedom," as opposed to facing highly restrictive “lockdown” through the winter months. He suggested that if the testing data continue to provide evidence that the country’s COVID-19 epidemic is moving in the right direction, Slovakia could ease some existing social distancing measures. While Slovakia elected to extend its state of emergency for another 45 days, Prime Minister Matovič later announced that Slovakia’s Pandemic Commission approved measures to reopen “cinemas, theaters and churches” at 50% capacity as well as gyms and swimming pools with limited capacity, indicating that the government is confident that the testing program is meeting its aims. While the curfew will remain in place, individuals who are eligible for the noted exceptions will no longer be required to provide documentation of a recent test. As many other countries, particularly in Europe and North America, struggle to combat their respective COVID-19 surges, Slovakia’s experience provides some evidence that widespread testing, in combination with contract tracing and quarantine/isolation, can help contain transmission and enable the relaxation of some social distancing measures.

WHITE HOUSE TRANSMISSION Last week, multiple news media reports indicated that more than 130 secret service officers, assigned to protect US President Donald Trump and other senior White House officials, have been ordered to quarantine or isolate as a result of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 or an exposure to a known case, representing approximately 10% of the Secret Service’s core team. Much of that total comes from just the past several weeks, as an outbreak has spread among White House and other administration officials, including President Trump, Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson.

PUERTO RICO Like many other areas in the US, Puerto Rico is experiencing a surge in COVID-19 incidence that has necessitated the addition of new protective restrictions. The US territory is currently reporting more than 600 cases per day, with projections reaching 1,200 cases per day by mid-December. The Puerto Rican government is taking several approaches to curb the rise in cases. Gyms, churches, restaurants, casinos, and other businesses will be limited to 30% capacity. Beaches will also be closed, with the exception of those using them for exercise. Free rapid testing, likely rapid antigen testing, will be available at toll booth locations during the weekends, providing results back in as little as 15 minutes. Mask use will remain mandatory in public spaces. Finally, Governor Wanda Velazquez activated the National Guard to help with the enforcement of an island-wide curfew from 10pm to 5am. These restrictions came into force on November 16 and are currently scheduled to remain in place until December 11. Governor Velazquez cautioned Puerto Ricans to reduce holiday travel and, instead, participate in virtual family get-togethers where possible.

Sunday, November 15, 2020

November 15: 10,631 New COVID 19 Cases in Illinois



Illinois’ fall COVID-19 surge continues as state announces 10,631 new cases, another 72 deaths

The state’s seven-day statewide positivity rate — a figure experts use to understand how rapidly the virus is spreading — reached 12.8% Sunday, up from 8% at the start of the month.

By Madeline Kenney Nov 15, 2020, 3:55pm CST

Share this story

Illinois surpassed 10,000 coronavirus cases for the 10th consecutive day on Sunday as state health officials announced 10,631 new coronavirus infections and an additional 72 people have died.Illinois surpassed 10,000 coronavirus cases for the 10th consecutive day Sunday as state health officials announced 10,631 new coronavirus infections and an additional 72 people have died. Scott Olson/Getty

Illinois surpassed 10,000 coronavirus cases for the 10th consecutive day Sunday as state health officials announced 10,631 new coronavirus infections and an additional 72 fatalities.

Sunday’s new cases accounted for roughly 12.5% of the more than 84,800 tests reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health in the last 24 hours.

The state’s seven-day statewide positivity rate — a figure experts use to understand how rapidly the virus is spreading — reached 12.8% Sunday, up from 8% at the start of the month, the state public health department reported.

The surge in cases has led to Illinois hospitals treating the most COVID-19 patients they’ve ever had. As of Saturday night, 5,474 beds were taken up by COVID-19 patients in Illinois hospitals, with 1,045 of those patients in intensive-care units and 490 on ventilators, officials said.

Cook County accounted for 21 of Sunday’s 72 fatalities. Only 16 of those deaths reported statewide were among people under the age of 70, and only six were under 60.

Illinois logged 546 coronavirus-related deaths in the last week, which is about 5% of the state’s pandemic death toll of 10,742.

The state has administered more than 9 million coronavirus tests since March, with 573,616 people confirmed to have the respiratory virus, which is about 4.5% of the state’s population.

The recovery rate for Illinois coronavirus patients is 97%. Most people who contract it show mild or no symptoms.

With holidays around the corner and the fall COVID-19 surge showing no signs of letting up, several local officials have issued stay-at-home advisories to limit the spread of the virus, including leaders in suburban Cook County and Mayor Lori Lightfoot.

The Cook County and Chicago stay-home advisories take effect 6 a.m. Monday.

Over the next 30 days, those who live in the Chicagoland area are urged to go out only when necessary, which includes leaving for work, school, medical appointments, groceries, take-out food and pharmaceuticals. In an attempt to contain this second outbreak, there’s also a mandatory 10-person cap on social gatherings.

Above is from:  https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/11/15/21561588/illinois-fall-covid-19-surge-continues-as-state-announces-10631-new-cases-another-72-deaths

Do Republicans Still Believe in Democracy?


Very insightful and interesting radio interview.


The crisis isn’t Trump. It’s the Republican Party.

Anne Applebaum wrote the book on why people choose to collaborate with authoritarian regimes. So what does she think of the GOP?

By Ezra Klein@ezraklein Nov 13, 2020, 8:20am EST



US President Donald Trump stands alongside US Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) during a Keep America Great campaign rally in North Charleston, South Carolina, on February 28, 2020. Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

The most alarming aspect of the past week is not Donald Trump’s anti-democratic efforts. He is doing exactly what he has always done, exactly what he said he would do. It’s the speed at which Republican elites have consolidated support around him. Without the Republican Party’s support, Trump is just the loser of an election, ranting ineffectually about theft as a way to rationalize defeat. With the Republican Party’s support, he’s a danger to the country.

Some Republicans, like Lindsey Graham, have wholeheartedly endorsed Trump’s claims. On Monday, the South Carolina senator said that Trump should not concede the election and that “Republicans win because of our ideas and we lose elections because [Democrats] cheat.” Others — including Vice President Mike Pence and Sens. Marco Rubio and Josh Hawley — have signaled solidarity with the president, while not quite endorsing his conspiracy theories. The message is clear: When faced with the choice of loyalty to Trump and the legitimacy of the democratic process, Republicans are more than willing to throw democracy under the bus.

Anne Applebaum is a staff writer for the Atlantic, a senior fellow of international affairs at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, and most recently the author of Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. In it, Applebaum, once comfortable in center-right elite circles, grapples with why so many of her contemporaries across the globe — including right here in America — have abandoned liberal democracy in favor of strongman cults and autocratic regimes.

We discuss why most politicians under increasingly autocratic regimes choose to collaborate with the regime, how Graham went from outspoken Trump critic to one of Trump’s most vocal supporters in the US Senate, why the Republican Party ultimately took the path of Sarah Palin, what we can expect to happen if and when a much more capable demagogue emerges, and much more.

A lightly edited excerpt from our conversation follows. The full conversation can be heard on The Ezra Klein Show.

Subscribe to The Ezra Klein Show wherever you listen to podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher.


Ezra Klein

How do you think we would cover what Trump and the Republican Party are doing and saying right now if it were happening in another country?

Anne Applebaum

If this were happening in another country, we would be talking about a populist authoritarian seeking to create disillusion with democracy in his country in order to have a base of supporters who will help him return to power. But I don’t think we have to talk about it as if it were another country. I’m very happy to use the same language that I would use if this were happening in Brazil or Argentina or anywhere else.

Ezra Klein

I think that Americans — and I would include myself in this — have had an implicit exceptionalism in the way we understood our country’s immunity to some of the political trends and dangers that afflict other countries. As if authoritarianism can’t happen here, as if our parties can’t turn against democracy here. That just no longer seems true.

Is it time for Americans to be disabused of the idea that there is any special protection to our system, our political culture?

Anne Applebaum

This is a conclusion that I came to several years ago through the agonizing personal experience of living in Poland and watching one of the political parties here become a populist authoritarian party. Watching it try to undermine democracy, undermine the courts, undermine the media once it came to power. And then, glancing over at the United States and realizing that I was seeing many of the same things.

I think you’re absolutely right. I think it’s partly American exceptionalism. It’s also partly our incredible luck over the past six or seven decades. We had a stable democracy, we had an expansion of prosperity, we were the leading country in the world, and others were following us. And we somehow came to assume that it was always going to be like that — just because it had been like that for 60 or 70 years, it would go on indefinitely.

We forget that even in our own history, we had previous moments when democracy was in doubt. We had a civil war. And even if you look at our own Constitution, it was written by people who also had doubts about democracy and also wondered whether it would succeed. One of the reasons we have some of the odd institutions that we do is that the Founding Fathers were people who had doubts about human nature, who wanted checks and balances, who wanted some control over the president, who were reading Greek and Roman history where there were lots of stories of democracy going wrong. All of that was coded into the system from the very beginning.

I think that the last several decades have blinded us to our own history and our own origins.


Ezra Klein

I want to put my cards on the table for a moment: I don’t find Donald Trump very interesting in this story. I think what he is is known. He’s a very familiar type historically.

What I am interested in is how quickly the Republican Party has fallen to somebody like Trump. The architecture of your book is about watching people you admired and respected — people who fought alongside you against tyrannies and strongmen for liberal democracy — become functionaries in populist-right, authoritarian parties, and often authoritarians themselves.

Why do you think that happens? What separates the people who end up as dissidents in those moments from those who become functionaries in them or accommodate themselves to them?

Anne Applebaum

I’ve tried to stay away from sweeping vast generalizations. But there is one sentiment, I think, that links the people who were once part of the center-right — the anti-communist movement in Poland or Reaganism or Thatcherism — and who began to change in a different direction over the past decade or so: disappointment.

These are very often people who are disappointed, and they are almost always disappointed with their society. Whether it’s the superficiality of modern democracy, the demographic change that they don’t want or like, the decline in morals and values that they see all around them, or, in the case of Britain, England’s loss of its voice in the world. It’s a feeling of loss or disappointment, and sometimes it’s quite an extreme form of disappointment — a kind of despair. “My society has ended.”

I think anybody who has that view of the contemporary world — that it’s over, it’s finished, my civilization is dead and gone, my society is decayed — leads you almost inevitably into a kind of radicalism. If you have that feeling that it’s over, then why wouldn’t you try to smash everything?


Ezra Klein

As a very quick typology of the Republican Party, I think you could cut people into three groups. There are the people who liked Donald Trump from the beginning, or bought into an apocalyptic understanding of America that Donald Trump seemed to share. A good example is Patrick Buchanan. Then there are people who don’t have unbelievably strong feelings about Donald Trump, but they really hate the left. They’re the anti-anti-Trumpers. And their dislike for the left is enough to make them make peace with him. I would probably put Mitch McConnell in this category.

But the people I’m most interested in are the people who saw exactly what Donald Trump is and loathed it and then also accommodated it. Somebody I want to use here as a case study, because you’ve written about him and I’ve spent some time reporting about him, is Lindsey Graham. He ran against Donald Trump in 2016 and called him “a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot.” And he said, “if we nominate Trump, we’ll get destroyed, and we’ll deserve it.”

Now, he’s out there telling Trump not to concede the election. He’s saying that if Republicans concede, they’ll never win again. He’s telling Sean Hannity that Democrats only win elections when they cheat. What do you think happened to Lindsey Graham?

Anne Applebaum

Lindsey Graham is particularly difficult to explain when you look at his background. If you were to look at him as a type, you would imagine him to be the most loyal American patriot and admirer of the Constitution. He has a very strong affiliation to the military. He got through college on a military scholarship. His parents died when he was young, so he had a hard-knock story and was saved by the American military. And he’s said that many times. If you were to imagine a type of person who would never betray American ideals, it would be Lindsey Graham.

But this is where you have to get into questions of personality and personal weakness. Graham is clearly someone who needs to be around a leader. For many, many years, he was John McCain’s sidekick. And in those years, he was a McCain Republican. I saw him at conferences in Europe where he talked about America’s role in the world, America promoting democracy. And then when McCain died, he seemed to need another role and he attached himself to Trump.

He appears to like the role of a power broker. When he runs into journalists in Washington, he likes recounting how he was just on the phone with the president. So the feeling of being close to power, of being next to someone important, this seems like a role that he is psychologically attached to playing. It’s a recognizable personality type.

If you look at the story of other nations that have been occupied by others or where people are part of political systems that they don’t admire, you will always find people like Lindsey Graham who give up their ideas, who move close to power, and who then seek to play some kind of role in the new system benefiting them.

Ezra Klein

My understanding of Graham — and I spent a bit of time with him over the years — is that in the middle of the Trump era, as he began to make this transition, his explanation was if he flattered Trump enough, he could direct Trump in important ways on things that are important to him, particularly foreign policy. This ends up failing. The abandonment of the Kurds, for instance, was a huge blow to Graham. But he does try to become this adviser to Trump, and from what I understand, there was a certain level of realpolitik about that.

And then slowly it became something other than that. He began to look at things through new eyes. He was very radicalized by the Kavanaugh [Supreme Court] hearings. He’s out there telling people that the thing about the left is they hate us. All the smart people out there, they hate us.

Something that you emphasize in the book is the way that cooperating with a regime like this often is a product not of one big decision to change sides, but of a series of small decisions, a series of small accommodations. And eventually you wake up and you’re on the other side. Can you talk a little bit about that process?

Anne Applebaum

There’s actually social science studies of this and usually it’s done in the form of examining corruption inside companies. How do people end up going along with corruption if their company is carrying out some kind of scam?

The studies show that it’s always a step-by-step process. You accept one aspect of it: “Well, everybody else is keeping double books, so I can, too. That’s just what people do in this company, and it’s normal.” And then the next step is: “I’ll do this transaction in cash and I’ll keep it in the drawer. And I’m still a good person; I’m still a good worker. I’m doing this to help my company stay out of trouble or keep its head above water.” As each step becomes normalized, as people get used to the situation, then they can take the next step.

This is very similar to what happens in occupied countries. I’m not saying that the United States is Vichy France or occupied East Germany. But these are useful parallels to look at because they show you what human psychology is like when someone is working inside a system whose ideology they previously disagreed with or disliked. You see the same kinds of patterns.

Something like that also happened inside the Republican Party: People who thought of themselves as patriots, as good people — as politicians working in the interest of the United States — made small decisions over time, each time reminding themselves of why what they were doing was for the good of the country.

For Lindsey Graham, it was: I’m here to guide Donald Trump in the right direction. And then, at each stage, the situation becomes normalized. Eventually Lindsey Graham came to see his opponents as anti-American radical leftist socialists who he had to fight against. He still probably thinks he’s playing the same role — that he’s a good person fighting for American values — even though what he’s doing is almost precisely the opposite of what he said he would do or the kind of person that he was four years ago.

Ezra Klein

I want to talk about one of those decision trees that I think is happening right now, which has to do with the stolen election narrative that is taking hold among the Republican base.

Donald Trump is simply saying outright, in all caps, that he won the election and that the election has been stolen. There are some Republicans, like Graham, who are siding with him explicitly on that. But many of the others are doing something that I would describe as signaling emotional solidarity with Trump’s claims while not quite buying into them but not disputing them either. On Saturday, Marco Rubio tweeted, “The media can project an election winner, but they don’t get to decide if claims of broken election laws & irregularities are true. That is decided by the courts and on the basis of clear evidence and the law.”

I agree with everything in that tweet. But the point of that tweet is to signal solidarity with a president saying something quite different. I think there is a belief among many elected Republicans right now that their base needs to grieve the election, that Donald Trump needs to grieve the election, and so it’s best to indulge the idea that it might have been stolen. Let them process the law slowly, let the courts shut that down, and then you can move on in a less emotionally traumatic way for your base. I just don’t think they’re going to be able to control it in that way. I think this is going to overtake them just like all the other conspiracies have overtaken them.

But I’m curious, do you have sympathy for that view? Is there something to be said for that strategy?

Anne Applebaum

I’m afraid that I think it’s a little bit more sinister than that. I think that — certainly on Trump’s part, and other Republicans are probably coming to see this the same way as well — this is an attempt to create a new kind of base: an enraged receiving base, which will always think that the election was stolen and which will always assume that something went wrong and will always feel that they were deprived of something. And this base will then have uses in the future.

I don’t believe it will be all of the Republican Party. I can’t tell you right now how many of them it will be. But it will be a significant number of people. And in some congressional districts and some states, it could even be a majority. And this will be a base that is usable. This will be a base that not only dislikes the Democratic Party or disagrees with them, it will think that the Democratic Party is evil and anti-democratic — that they have stolen the election.

Think about what that means. That means that they aren’t even a legitimate political party. It means that there is a base of people who will be not just skeptical of mainstream media — whatever you think mainstream media is, which may even include Fox now. They will be not just skeptical of Fox, CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Philadelphia Inquirer. They will think all of those institutions are part of a deliberately constructed conspiracy to steal the presidency. And that kind of feeling — that conviction that the other side isn’t just wrong, it’s evil and traitorous — that’s then a useful group of people who can be motivated politically and maybe in other ways in the future.

Above is from:  https://www.vox.com/21562116/anne-applebaum-twilight-of-democracy-gop-trump-election-fraud-2020-biden-the-ezra-klein-show

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Illinois Secretary of State shuts driver services facilities until Dec. 7th

Illinois Secretary of State shuts driver services facilities until Dec. 7th

LOCAL NEWS

by: WTVO

Posted: Nov 13, 2020 / 03:12 PM CST / Updated: Nov 13, 2020 / 05:11 PM CST

<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" NS = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" />

SPRINGFIED, Ill. (WTVO) — Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White announced Friday that all driver services facilities statewide will be shut down between November 17th and December 7th due to the worsening COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition, White announced that expiration dates for driver’s licenses and ID cards will be extended until June 1, 2021. This June 1, 2021 extension also includes those who have February, March, April and May 2021 expiration dates. As a result, expired driver’s licenses and ID cards will remain valid until June 1, 2021. CDL (Commercial Driver License) holders and commercial permit holders are excluded from this extension due to federal requirements.

“After careful consideration, we have decided to close all Driver Services facilities until December 7, 2020, due to the worsening COVID-19 pandemic,” said White. “The health and safety of employees and the public remains paramount and face-to-face transactions potentially increase the further spread of the virus. We have extended expiration dates to assist people during this difficult time. I am also encouraging customers to consider using online services which are available for many office transactions.”

Above is from:  https://www.mystateline.com/news/local-news/secretary-of-state-shuts-driver-services-facilities-until-dec-7th/