Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Blackhawk Bank acquired by downstate bank





Beloit-Based Blackhawk Bank Acquired By First Mid Bank & Trust

March 21, 2023 at 2:50 pm Kevin Haas


  • Blackhawk Bank, which has 10 locations including this one at 3101 11th St. in Rockford, was acquired by First Mid Bank & Trust on Tuesday, March 21, 2023. (Photo by Kevin Haas/Rock River Current)

    By Kevin Haas
    Rock River Current
    Get our mobile app

    BELOIT, Wis. — Blackhawk Bank, which has served the region for more than 140 years, has been acquired by Matoon, Illinois-based First Mid Bank & Trust.

    The companies announced the agreement to merge on Tuesday, saying First Mid will acquire the Beloit-based bank with a 100% stock transaction. First Mid will pay $90.3 million, which is based on the per-share price of $27.13 at market close on Monday, for the acquisition. Blackhawk shareholders will receive 1.15 shares of FMBH common stock for each share of BHWB.

    Blackhawk, which was established in 1881 in Beloit and expanded into northern Illinois in 1996, has 10 locations in southern Wisconsin and Illinois.

    “Blackhawk has a long history of providing excellent service with a community-minded focus that aligns very well with First Mid’s philosophy,” Joe Dively, chairman and CEO of First Mid, said in a news release.

    More business: Rockford brothers’ company Phateez breaks the mold for sunglasses

    Blackhawk has the fifth largest share among banks in the Rockford market, capturing about 9% of the market, according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation data. It has approximately $1.32 billion in total assets, $782 million in loans and $1.19 billion in deposits.

    Dively said that recent volatility for banks, which came to a head with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank earlier this month, didn’t play a role in the merger. Discussions between First Mid and Blackhawk have been ongoing for years.

    “We have partnered with Blackhawk on many projects over the last several years and could not be more confident in the cultural and strategic alignment,” Dively said. “The combined company will be an approximately $8.1 billion financial institution with significant wealth management and insurance services. We look forward to welcoming Blackhawk’s shareholders, employees and customers to the First Mid team.”

    More business: Camera Craft, Rockford’s last locally owned camera store, will close in April

    The merger has been unanimously approved by each company’s board of directors and is expected to close in the second half of 2023, subject to regulatory approvals, the green light from Blackhawk’s stockholders and other closing considerations.

    “This has been a very long process culminating in today’s announcement, which has reinforced our belief in the strength of these two organizations and the opportunities it will provide once combined,” Todd James, chairman, president and CEO of Blackhawk, said in a news release.

    James said customers, employees and shareholders will benefit from access to First Mid’s larger banking organization. He said it will offer larger loan limits and a broader array of services, including wealth management, trust, insurance and agricultural services.

    “We are excited to join forces with First Mid, a like-minded partner that shares our commitment to supporting the communities we serve and building strong long-term relationships with customers,” James said.


    This article is by Kevin Haas. Email him at khaas@rockrivercurrent.com or follow him on Twitter at @KevinMHaas .

    Above is from:  Beloit-based Blackhawk Bank acquired by First Mid Bank & Trust | Rock River Current

    Thursday, March 23, 2023

    March 23, 2022: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Situation Report

    COVID-19 Situation Report

    Weekly updates on COVID-19 epidemiology, science, policy, and other news you can use.

    Click to Subscribe

    Announcements

    CALL FOR PAPERS Early detection of biological threats, whether naturally occurring or manmade, is critical. Threat agnostic approaches, which do not rely on determining the identity of the agent or pathogen, show early promise. In 2023, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security journal, Health Security, will issue a special feature that considers threat agnostic approaches to biodefense and public health. We encourage submissions of original research articles, case studies, and commentaries that explore policy gaps, data and data analysis, and implementation, among potential topics. The deadline is March 31, 2023. For more information, visit: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/journal/call-for-papers/call-for-papers.html

    In this issue

    > New analysis appears to link SARS-CoV-2 origin to raccoon dogs in Wuhan market, raises questions about completeness of data shared by China; US law requires declassification of intelligence information

    > End of US public health emergency to impact various healthcare programs, rules; US House Republicans eye canceling unspent COVID-19 aid to help rein in federal spending

    > US Senate HELP Committee hears testimony from Moderna CEO about expected commercial market price increase for vaccine

    > US FDA expected to soon decide on authorization of additional bivalent booster dose; Canada, UK move forward with shots for some individuals

    > What we're reading

    > Epi update

    New analysis appears to link SARS-CoV-2 origin to raccoon dogs in Wuhan market, raises questions about completeness of data shared by China; US law requires declassification of intelligence information

    More than 3 years into the COVID-19 pandemic, the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus remains a hotly contested topic. In the absence of a “smoking gun,” it is unclear exactly how the virus first infected humans, and it may never be definitively determined whether the virus evolved naturally among animals or escaped a laboratory setting. Investigations into the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 have been hindered by insufficient access to facilities, personnel, specimens, and data in China, and intense political divisions—in the US and elsewhere—have made public debate over the available evidence difficult.

    Recent revelations regarding early genetic data from specimens collected at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, in early 2020 provide additional support for theories that the pandemic emerged as a result of natural zoonotic transmission. Dr. Florence Débarre, a researcher from France, recently identified a previously undisclosed trove of genetic data published on the GISAID platform. Among the viral genetic data, she identified DNA from multiple mammal species, including raccoon dogs, which are known to be susceptible to coronaviruses. The presence of raccoon dog DNA among the viral sequences indicates that these animals were present at the market and may have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Notably, the Chinese government previously asserted that these types of animals were not present at the market. Reportedly, after Dr. Débarre reached out to Dr. George Gao, former Director of the China CDC, to collaborate on further research, the data were removed from GISAID “at the request of the submitter.” Following a briefing by Dr. Débarre’s team last week, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus chastised China for withholding the data and called on the Chinese government to share all of the available data immediately. The researchers published their findings (preprint) on March 20. While the new data still do not provide definitive proof, they demonstrate that the Chinese government has more data available than what it has shared.

    Following unanimous approvals in both houses of the US Congress, President Joe Biden signed a bill requiring US intelligence agencies to declassify all information related to investigations on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. To date, various public reports from the US intelligence community indicate that agencies have reached different conclusions regarding the likely origin of the pandemic. Following the release of its report that concluded—albeit with “low confidence”—that a laboratory incident was the most likely origin, the US Department of Energy briefed the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on March 16 about classified information underpinning that analysis.

    End of US public health emergency to impact various healthcare programs, rules; US House Republicans eye canceling unspent COVID-19 aid to help rein in federal spending

    The WHO said this week that its experts are confident that the public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) declaration for COVID-19 will be able to be declared over by the end of this year. Similarly, the Biden administration previously announced an end to the US public health emergency for COVID-19 in May, and this week said it will disband its White House COVID-19 Response Team at the same time. The end of the public health emergency will bring with it changes to healthcare access and benefits for many residents nationwide. Millions will lose healthcare coverage with the end of continuous Medicaid enrollment, a change likely to disproportionately impact Black and Hispanic adults, according to a recent Commonwealth Fund report. Additionally, training rules for nursing home staff will become stricter; rollbacks of broader access to certain controlled substances threaten treatment for people recovering from addiction; hospitals and other care facilities will have to comply with stricter capacity and staffing rules; and federal COVID-19 surveillance reporting requirements for states will end.

    Additionally, Republicans in the US House are targeting unspent COVID-19 relief money in a plan to cut federal spending. Though a small amount—less than US$80 billion unspent as of January out of the total US$5.2 trillion relief aid allocated—canceling the funds would have huge repercussions for union pension funds, healthcare for veterans, COVID-19 research efforts, and aid for small businesses and transportation systems.

    US Senate HELP Committee hears testimony from Moderna CEO about expected commercial market price increase for vaccine

    In early 2023, reports emerged publicly that Moderna planned to increase the price of its SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, quadrupling it from between US$15–$26.36 to US$110–$130 per dose, when it shifts its sales to the commercial market later this year. The end of the COVID-19 public health emergency in May will shift the burden of purchasing vaccines to the private sector. Moderna earned about US$40 billion from sales of its COVID-19 vaccines alone over the past 2 years. On March 22, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel testified regarding those plans before the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP Committee). Mr. Bancel argued that, while Moderna received considerable funding from the federal government—on the order of US$12 billion for research, development, and procurement—the company will need to implement new production and logistics as the pandemic enters an endemic phase. The combination of new manufacturing processes, storage, wastage, and significantly lower demand necessitates higher costs per dose, he said. Some Senators on the committee argued in favor of Moderna, noting that the success of Moderna’s vaccine illustrates the benefits of capitalism. While the purchase cost of the vaccine is expected to increase, Moderna has committed to ensuring the vaccines remain fully covered by health insurance. Patient assistance programs also will help uninsured or underinsured individuals access the vaccines, but some Senators noted that the paperwork for these programs can be difficult to navigate. Pfizer and BioNTech also plan to increase the cost of their SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to US$110–$130 per dose, but the companies did not use US government funding in developing the shot.

    US FDA expected to soon decide on authorization of additional bivalent booster dose; Canada, UK move forward with shots for some individuals

    The US FDA is discussing the possibility of authorizing a second round of vaccine boosters targeting the Omicron variant for certain people at high risk of severe COVID-19 illness. The agency is expected to decide within a few weeks, according to people familiar with the deliberations. The bivalent booster is currently recommended for anyone aged 6 months and older after completion of any FDA-approved or FDA-authorized primary series or previously received monovalent booster dose(s), with an exception for the youngest children who received the bivalent vaccine as the last dose in their 3-dose primary series.

    While only 16.4% of the total US population has received the updated booster, a small percentage of people are anxiously wondering when they can get another shot. People aged 65 and older are contributing a larger proportion of COVID-19-related deaths over time, particularly those who have underlying health conditions. Additionally, though people who are immunocompromised make up about 3% of the US population, they account for 25% of people hospitalized with COVID-19. For both of these populations, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization and symptomatic infection begins to drop significantly 2–4 months following their last booster. Canada and the United Kingdom are offering the bivalent booster to older adults, residents of care homes and other senior living settings, and certain people who are immunocompromised. We should know soon whether the US will authorize boosters for similar groups.

    What we’re reading

    CHILDREN & FAMILIES The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on the lives of children and their families in the United States, and greater focus and investment are needed to address the critical social, emotional, behavioral, educational, mental, physical, and economic health and well-being challenges that the pandemic caused or exacerbated, especially among families identifying as Black, Latino, and Native American, and those with low incomes, that have disproportionately borne the stress of these negative effects, according to a report published March 16 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The report makes several recommendations for federal- and state-level legislatures and agencies to address the short- and long-term effects on children and families and to prepare for the next pandemic. 

    PAXLOVID A panel of expert advisors to the US FDA voted 16-1 last week to endorse the antiviral Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) as a treatment for adults with COVID-19 who are at high risk for progression to severe illness. Notably, the committee highlighted potentially harmful drug interactions. Experts later said there is not enough data to determine exactly who would benefit most from the drug and a poor understanding of the treatment among the medical community, hindering its prescription. According to a recently released analysis, Paxlovid use could “lead to 1,500 lives saved and 13,000 hospitalizations averted each week in the United States,” based on COVID-19 data from January 2023. Another study, published March 17 in JAMA Health Forum, modeled population-level impacts of a Paxlovid rollout during a surge like the 2022 winter Omicron wave. The panel’s endorsement likely will lead to full approval of the drug by FDA, although the agency is not required to follow the advice of its advisory committees. A final decision is expected in May. In related news, a study by the Yale School of Medicine is testing whether a 15-day course of Paxlovid can improve the health of people with long COVID.

    PANDEMIC-RELATED STATE LAWS, LEGISLATION & REGULATIONS On March 17, KHN published 2 articles examining various state-level legislative actions or laws with pandemic-related roots. One article discusses legislation and proposed regulations in more than a dozen states aimed at controlling healthcare staffing agency wage rates for temporary workers during health emergencies, as well as steps hospitals and health facilities are taking to retain their workers with the acute challenges of the pandemic now in the past. Another article examines how California’s COVID-19 misinformation law, which is meant to discipline doctors who provide false information about COVID-19 patients, is mired in legal limbo after 2 federal judges issued conflicting rulings in recent lawsuits.

    CHINA China this week authorized a domestically produced mRNA vaccine against COVID-19, after showing reluctance to use similar vaccines produced in the US and European nations. According to CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd., which makes the vaccine, known as SYS6006, a large clinical trial showed the vaccine is safe and effective against several Omicron subvariants. The WHO urged CSPC to share its full data so the health agency can assess the vaccine for use on the international market. China’s other homegrown vaccines, which use more traditional platforms, proved less effective against newer Omicron variants. According to a report from the Associated Press, China’s sudden scrapping of its strict “zero COVID” policy in late 2022 went against the advice of experts and led to hundreds of thousands of COVID-19-related deaths, some of which could have been avoided with better vaccination coverage and more prepared healthcare facilities.

    EQUITABLE VACCINE DISTRIBUTION Equitable worldwide distribution of COVID-19 vaccines would increase global economic benefits by about US$950 billion per year by improving health gains, helping to ease lockdowns, and supporting supply chain recovery, when compared with a scenario focused on vaccinating the entire populations of vaccine-producing countries first then distributing vaccines to other nations, according to an analysis published this week in Nature Communications. The researchers propose a benefit-sharing mechanism that allows all stakeholders to benefit and provides a model to analyze distribution strategies in different infectious and socioeconomic contexts. They note that the need for equitable vaccine distribution is one of the most important lessons to be learned from COVID-19, though global collaboration continues to present a challenge. Notably, wealthy nations already appear to be repeating their COVID-19-era vaccine hoarding tendencies with avian influenza vaccines.

    UN CLIMATE REPORT A report released this week by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned that the world is likely to fail at meeting its most ambitious climate target—limiting warming to 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial temperatures—by the early 2030s. This change could bring about catastrophic damage to the Earth, causing climate disasters and other impacts—such as heat waves, famines, and infectious disease outbreaks—so extreme that humans will have difficulty adapting. The authors said humanity has reached a “critical moment in history” and needs to accelerate actions to achieve its climate goals.

    Epi update

    As of March 21, the WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports:

    • 761 million cumulative COVID-19 cases
    • 6.88 million deaths
    • 734,302 million cases reported week of March 13
    • 18% decrease in global weekly incidence
    • 4,897 deaths reported week of March 13
    • 22% decrease in global weekly mortality

    Over the previous week, incidence declined or remained relatively stable in all WHO regions except the South-East Asia (+57%) and Eastern Mediterranean (+47%) regions.

    UNITED STATES

    The US CDC is reporting:

    • 103.8 million cumulative cases
    • 1.12 million deaths
    • 149,955 cases week of March 15 (down from previous week)
    • 1,706 deaths week of March 15 (down from previous week)
    • This is the lowest weekly mortality since March 2020
    • 7.8% weekly decrease in new hospital admissions
    • 12.1% weekly decrease in current hospitalizations

    The Omicron sublineages XBB.1.5 (90.2%), BQ.1.1 (3.5%), XBB (2.5%), and XBB.1.5.1 (2.2%) currently account for a majority of all new sequenced specimens, with various other Omicron subvariants accounting for the remainder of cases.

    USEFUL GRAPHICS

    Please note, this is the last week we will include this section; bookmark pages for easy future reference.

    The New York Times this week ended its COVID-19 data collection and switched to using official data from the US CDC, which is updated weekly. The dashboard shows information about hospital patients with COVID-19; reported cases and tests; the number of COVID-19 deaths; vaccination coverage and comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations; and a new interactive county map, including COVID-19 community levels that take into account case and hospitalization data.

    Community transmission data, which takes into account case and test positivity data, is available on the US CDC COVID-19 Integrated County View (click on pulldown menu to view COVID-19 Community Transmission, as well as other indicators specific to the US).

    Editor: Alyson Browett, MPH

    Contributors: Erin Fink, MS; Clint Haines, MS; Amanda Kobokovich, MPH; Aishwarya Nagar, MPH; Christina Potter, MSPH; Matthew Shearer, MPH; and Rachel A. Vahey, MHS

    Thursday, March 16, 2023

    March 16, 2022: Johns Hopkins COVID 19 Situations Report

    COVID-19 Situation Report

    Weekly updates on COVID-19 epidemiology, science, policy, and other news you can use.

    Click to Subscribe

    Announcements

    CALL FOR PAPERS Early detection of biological threats, whether naturally occurring or manmade, is critical. Threat agnostic approaches, which do not rely on determining the identity of the agent or pathogen, show early promise. In 2023, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security journal, Health Security, will issue a special feature that considers threat agnostic approaches to biodefense and public health. We encourage submissions of original research articles, case studies, and commentaries that explore policy gaps, data and data analysis, and implementation, among potential topics.   The deadline is March 31, 2023. For more information, visit: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/journal/call-for-papers/call-for-papers.html

    NOTE In this newsletter, we include hyperlinks to original sources as a way of citation and for further information. Several of the sources we link to are accessible only to subscribers. We apologize for any inconvenience.

    In this issue

    > World marks 3rd anniversary of COVID-19 pandemic; news outlets, experts reflect on lessons learned, actions needed to prepare for next health emergency

    > WHO calls COVID-19 origin investigations scientific, moral imperative; US Congress passes bill calling for declassification of intelligence information

    > COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated health workforce shortages, WHO says, calls for health worker migration agreements

    > 4 vaccine doses provide protection against severe COVID-19, restore waning immunity; US FDA authorizes bivalent booster for youngest children but mum on spring boosters for individuals at high-risk

    > US maternal mortality climbed significantly during pandemic, with communities of color more dramatically impacted

    > Studies, articles show pandemic’s negative impacts on health and wellbeing of children, adolescents

    > US FDA briefing document supports Paxlovid use in high-risk COVID-19 patients ahead of expert meeting to discuss full approval

    > What we're reading

    > Epi update

    World marks 3rd anniversary of COVID-19 pandemic; news outlets, experts reflect on lessons learned, actions needed to prepare for next health emergency

    March 11 marked 3 years since the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. While most nations have relaxed their mitigation measures, the virus continues to kill thousands of people each week worldwide and likely will be with us for the foreseeable future. This week, several news outlets—including Bloomberg, Scientific American, US News & World Report, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post—reflected on pandemic responses and lesson learned, while other reporting—from The Atlantic, NPR, and Wall Street Journal—highlighted remaining questions about SARS-CoV-2 and what the future might hold.

    Experts also are reflecting on lessons learned and a path forward, by answering reader questions in a newly launched New York Times limited-run newsletter, titled “The Next Pandemic,” and in related opinion pieces. In a New York Times commentary, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Director Dr. Tom Inglesby outlines 6 critical actions for pandemic preparedness, including quickly developing and vaccinating large numbers of people; facilitating the development and distribution of effective diagnostics; building and managing stronger stockpiles of high-quality protective gear; improving indoor air quality in buildings to diminish the risk of disease transmission; strengthening research oversight and lab safety; and streamlining and reinforcing public health agencies with better authority and funding. Most notably, policymakers must focus their efforts on preparing for the next pandemic by authorizing additional funding, he notes. In a separate New York Times opinion piece, Dr. Atul Gawande, assistant administrator for global health at USAID, says governments worldwide must refocus their health systems toward primary care in order to make a “real recovery from the pandemic—and be prepared for the next one.”

    On March 23, Axios is hosting an event exploring how the US can improve its public health preparedness, with Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense Executive Director Dr. Asha M. George and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Director Dr. Tom Inglesby. Click here to learn more and register.

    WHO calls COVID-19 origin investigations scientific, moral imperative; US Congress passes bill calling for declassification of intelligence information

    Understanding the origin of COVID-19 by exploring all hypotheses constitutes both a scientific and moral imperative, to help prevent future outbreaks and “for the sake of the millions of people who died and those who live with long COVID,” WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said March 11 on Twitter, reiterating that the UN health agency remains committed to finding out how SARS-CoV-2 arose.

    The day before, the US House voted unanimously to declassify all US intelligence information on the origins of the coronavirus, as part of US congressional efforts to investigate the pandemic’s origin. The US Senate passed the bill by unanimous consent on March 1. If signed into law by US President Joe Biden, the measure would require the declassification within 90 days of “any and all information relating to potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the Coronavirus Disease,” including information regarding research and other activities at the lab, such as whether any researchers fell ill. Biden has not indicated whether he will sign the legislation. If he does not, it will mark his first veto as president. In addition to Congress, 8 US government agencies are investigating the origin of COVID-19, but their findings remain divided and uncertain. Evidence from the scientific community largely supports the theory that SARS-CoV-2 arose from zoonotic transmission from an infected animal to a human.

    COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated health workforce shortages, WHO says, calls for health worker migration agreements

    At least 55 countries are facing serious healthcare worker (HCW) shortages, an existing situation exacerbated by workers leaving their home nations to seek better paid opportunities in wealthier nations amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO said this week. The WHO health workforce support and safeguards list 2023 includes 8 additional countries since it was last published in 2020. African nations are the worst-hit, with 37 countries on the continent facing shortages of HCWs, threatening their chances of achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of universal health care by 2030. The WHO list notes that the 55 countries have: 1) a density of doctors, nurses, and midwives below the global median (ie, 49 per 10 000 population), and 2) a universal health coverage service coverage index below a certain threshold. Though the list does not prohibit international HCW recruitment, it does recommend governments establish health worker migration agreements and implement the WHO Global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel (WHO Global Code) to ensure the international movement of health workers is ethically managed, supports those workers’ rights and welfare, and maintains health service delivery objectives.

    4 vaccine doses provide protection against severe COVID-19, restore waning immunity; US FDA authorizes bivalent booster for youngest children but mum on spring boosters for individuals at high-risk

    Four vaccine doses, including a primary 2-dose series and 2 booster shots, were the most effective way to protect against critical Omicron BA.5 infection, according to a large population-based study from South Korea published in JAMA Network Open. A 4-dose booster regimen was associated with higher protection against critical BA.5 infection, irrespective of a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to the study, which highlights the importance of booster shots. Notably, subsequent boosters appear to restore waning immunity. In another study, published in Nature Communications, a fourth dose of monovalent mRNA vaccine restored strong protection against severe outcomes for at least 3 months after vaccination.

    With these and other supportive findings, many countries, including the US, are looking to the future of vaccine schedules. The UK and Canadian governments plan to offer additional booster shots to people at high risk of severe COVID-19 this spring. In the US, the FDA has remained silent on the issue of spring boosters for those most at risk, creating frustration among a small number of people who do not want to wait until the fall to receive their next dose. Notably, only 16.3% of the total US population has received an updated bivalent booster. This week, the FDA amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine to allow for a single booster dose of the vaccine in children aged 6 months through 4 years, to be administered at least 2 months after completion of the primary 3-dose series of the companies’ monovalent vaccine. So far, no US resident has had to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine dose, but that could soon change. Experts are concerned that if people have to pay an expected US$110-$130 per shot, they will forego the jabs that, based on ongoing research, continue to provide significant protection from serious COVID-19 disease.

    US maternal mortality climbed significantly during pandemic, with communities of color more dramatically impacted

    The rate at which people in the US died of medical conditions caused or aggravated by pregnancy increased from 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2020 to 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2021, with the burden of death disproportionately borne by communities of color, according to a report published today by the US CDC National Center for Health Statistics. In 2021, 1,205 women died of maternal causes in the United States compared with 861 in 2020 and 754 in 2019. These numbers represent an overall 40% increase compared to 2020, which itself had a 60% increase compared with 2019. Racial and ethnic disparities were particularly stark, with Black women experiencing 69.9 maternal deaths out of 100,000 births, compared to 26.6 maternal deaths per 100,000 births among White women. The US maternal mortality rate—the highest among high-income nations—increased for the third year in a row and the increases were significant in all race and Hispanic-origin groups and all age groups.

    Though the report does not mention the pandemic, experts highlighted the likely role COVID-19 played in worsening the number of maternal deaths. They said there is a clear need to understand what factors, both social and biological, impacted the health of pregnant women during COVID-19. Additionally, scientists attribute some maternal stressors to the contextual factors of living through a tumultuous worldwide event, such as disrupting income or experiencing grief from deaths. Notably, social determinants of health are already an identified factor in the likelihood of having a preterm birth. Strong and lasting changes are needed to prevent these outcomes in future pandemic and non-pandemic scenarios and must be applied through an equity-focused lens in order to best serve expectant women.

    Studies, articles show pandemic’s negative impacts on health and wellbeing of children, adolescents

    Several new articles and studies highlight the severe, adverse impacts of the pandemic on the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents in the United States and around the world, as well as associated factors:

    • A survey on adolescent mental health and substance use in Iceland documented increased depressive symptoms and worsened mental wellbeing for the first 2 years of the pandemic, as well as a decrease in alcohol intoxication that reversed after the easing of social restrictions. Parental social support and average sleep duration of 8 hours or more were significantly associated with better mental health outcomes and lessened substance use among adolescents.
    • A survey of adolescents in cosmopolitan Singapore examining resilience during the pandemic noted that approximately half of the participants had normal resilience scores, while about one-third had low scores, according to the Brief Resilience Scale (59.6%/32.7%) and Hardy-Gill Resilience Scale (49.0%/29.0%). Chinese ethnicity, low socioeconomic status, and lower coping abilities related to school life, staying home, sports, and friends were associated with lower resilience scores.
    • A Kaiser Health News article highlighted various studies showing how the effects of the pandemic and other recent events have heightened the gun violence crisis affecting children and adolescents. This is further echoed in a JAMA viewpoint published this week describing increases in pediatric all-cause mortality. Between 2019 and 2020, pediatric all-cause mortality increased 10.7% and increased an additional 8.3% between 2020 and 2021, with injuries (particularly from gun violence) and COVID-19 as the major culprits.
    • A JAMA Network Open study noted that family financial disruptions were associated with a 205.2% [95% CI, 52.9%-509.0%] increase in perceived stress, 112.1% [95% CI, 22.2%-268.1%] increase in sadness, 32.9% [95% CI, 3.5%-53.4%] decrease in positive affect, and a 73.9 [95% CI, 13.2-134.7] percentage-point increase in COVID-19–related worry among a sample of 6,030 US children in late 2020. There was no association between in-person schooling disruption and mental health.

    US FDA briefing document supports Paxlovid use in high-risk COVID-19 patients ahead of expert meeting to discuss full approval 

    A US FDA briefing document prepared by the Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee and released this week addresses the question of whether or not Paxlovid is associated with COVID-19 rebound, a phenomenon wherein patients test positive or symptoms recur after initial recovery. The briefing document is meant to inform a panel of experts meeting today to determine whether to recommend Paxlovid for full approval for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in adults at high risk of hospitalization or death. Since it received emergency use authorization (EUA) in 2021, more than 8 million people in the US have taken Paxlovid, which consists of a 5-day course of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir for COVID-19 treatment that has shown to reduce the chances of hospitalization, death, and experiencing long COVID.

    The briefing concluded that Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted by the drug’s manufacturer, Pfizer, support that Paxlovid’s benefits outweigh its risks. The document also acknowledged the COVID-19 rebound phenomena but concluded that rebound is likely a natural course of COVID-19 and likely not significantly associated with Paxlovid treatment. Notably, an ongoing clinical trial may indicate if re-treatment would aid patients who experience COVID-19 rebound, and another ongoing trial is investigating optimal treatment duration in immunocompromised patients. Data indicate that COVID-19 rebound rates range from 10-16% across patients, with no significant difference based on infection with either the Omicron or Delta variant. The FDA’s review of whether or not Paxlovid should receive full approval is expected to be completed in May this year.

    What we’re reading

    CHINA REOPENS BORDERS Following 3 years of border restrictions, China this week reopened its borders to foreigners, allowing nearly all types of visas to be issued as of March 14, including those for tourism. The move comes after the Chinese government last month declared victory over COVID-19 following an abrupt end to its strict mitigation policies in early December 2022. Travelers to China will still be required to take a COVID-19 test 48 hours before departure and note the results on their customs health declaration forms. The US State Department on March 10 urged US citizens to reconsider travel to China due to “arbitrary enforcement of local laws” and to exercise caution if traveling due to the risk of “wrongful detentions.”

    PANDEMIC PROFITEERING In an open letter published March 11 by The People’s Vaccine, nearly 200 current and former presidents and ministers, Nobel laureates, faith leaders, heads of civil society organizations, health experts, business leaders, and celebrities call on governments to reflect on mistakes made in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and “never again” allow “profiteering and nationalism” to hinder an equitable response to a global health crisis. The letter calls on world leaders to take 4 steps, including supporting a pandemic treaty at the WHO that embeds equity and human rights; investing in global common goods; moving to allow intellectual property waivers for vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics for COVID-19, as well as future pandemic diseases, to enhance knowledge and technology sharing; and investing in scientific innovation and manufacturing capacity in low- and middle-income countries. Work on the latter has begun, with the establishment of the mRNA vaccine technology transfer hub, but without sufficient funding, the long-term sustainability of the initiative is in question.

    HEALTH OFFICIALS’ CORRESPOND ON VACCINE SAFETY The heads of the US FDA and US CDC last week responded to a letter regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccine safety sent by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo in February, in which he called for more transparency regarding vaccine-related adverse events and better communication regarding potential risks. In a 4-page response, FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said they wanted to address “associated misinterpretations and misinformation about the data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),” which they said “could be harmful to the American public.”

    POOR SLEEP Less than 6 hours of sleep in the nights surrounding anti-viral vaccination is associated with a reduction in subsequent immune system response, similar to the waning of COVID-19 vaccine antibodies over 2 months, according to a meta-analysis published in Current Biology. Notably, the impact of poor sleep on immune response to a vaccine appears to be more robust among men than women, although more research is needed to better understand the sex disparity. Nevertheless, the researchers say the analysis shows there is evidence to suggest that insufficient sleep hinders the immune system’s capacity to produce protective antibodies following vaccinations.

    Epi update

    As of March 16, the WHO COVID-19 Dashboard reports:

    • 760 million cumulative COVID-19 cases
    • 6.87 million deaths
    • 812,255 million cases reported week of March 6
    • 4% decrease in global weekly incidence
    • 5,048 deaths reported week of March 6
    • 27% decrease in global weekly mortality

    Over the previous week, incidence declined or remained relatively stable in all WHO regions except the South-East Asia (+33%) and Eastern Mediterranean (+34%) regions.

    UNITED STATES

    The US CDC is reporting:

    • 103.7 million cumulative cases
    • 1.1 million deaths
    • 170,576 cases week of March 8 (down from previous week)
    • 1,862 deaths week of March 8 (down from previous week)
    • 10.3% weekly decrease in new hospital admissions
    • 10.5% weekly decrease in current hospitalizations

    The Omicron sublineages XBB.1.5 (90%), BQ.1.1 (5%), and XBB (2%) currently account for a majority of all new sequenced specimens, with various other Omicron subvariants accounting for the remainder of cases.

    USEFUL GRAPHICS

    The following websites provide up-to-date epidemiological information down to the US county level:

    New York Times Coronavirus in the US: Latest Map and Case Count (US data portrayed in tables, maps, and graphs)

    US CDC COVID-19 Integrated County View (click on pulldown menu to view either COVID-19 Community Levels or Community Transmission, as well as other indicators specific to the US)